OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL
22
September 2010
ANDREW S. HAYDON HALL
10:00 a.m.
AGENDA 97
1. Prayer
2.
National Anthem (Councillor R. Jellett)
3.
Announcements/Ceremonial Activities
·
Presentation
– Governor General’s Certificate to Mr. Jeron Poirier
·
Recognition
– Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention Month
4. Roll Call
5. Confirmation
of Minutes
Confirmation of the
Minutes of the regular meeting of 8 September 2010.
6. Declarations of interest
including those originally arising from prior meetings
7. Communications
Responses to Inquiries:
·
27-10 - Ontario
Heritage Trust Heritage Easement
Agreement for the Aberdeen Pavilion
·
Correspondence received from the Honourable Tony
Clement, Minister of Industry with respect to the 2011 Census.
8. Regrets
No regrets filed to
date.
9. Motion to Introduce Reports
(Councillors R. Bloess and M.
McRae)
CITY
CLERK AND SOLICITOR
|
STATUS UPDATE
– COUNCIL INQUIRIES AND MOTIONS FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 8 SEPTEMBER 2010 RAPPORT DE SITUATION –
DEMANDES DE RENSEIGNEMENTS ET MOTIONS DU CONSEIL POUR LA PÉRIODE SE TERMINANT
LE 8 septembre 2010 |
REPORT RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive this report for information.
DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES
AND COMMUNITY SUSTAINABILITY’S REPORT
|
PROGRAMME DU FONDS DE STIMULATION INFRASTRUCTURE –
PROJETS SUPPLÉMENTAIRES FINANCÉS PAR LE RÉINVESTISSEMENT DE FONDS
EXCÉDENTAIRES – IDENTIFIÉS PAR LES CONSEILLERS |
REPORT RECOMMENDATION
That
Council, at its meeting of 22 September 2010:
1)
Approve the list of additional Infrastructure
Stimulus Fund (ISF) projects as detailed in Document 1, which can be completed
by 31 March 2011 and will be funded by recycling of surplus funds from delivery
of the ISF projects that were approved by the Federal and Provincial
Governments on 5 June 2009;
2)
Direct staff to finalize the official funding
request for the additional projects as detailed on Document 1, and to initiate
the projects as soon as approval of the funding requests has been received;
3)
Direct the City Treasurer to increase the City’s debt authority by
$447,000 as an interim financing measure and to
report back with the identification of the sources of funding for the City’s
share of the projects for Council approval; and
4)
Receive the list of additional Infrastructure
Stimulus Fund (ISF) projects as detailed in Document 2, and direct staff to
report back to Corporate Services Committee and Council, should an extension of
the ISF completion deadline to 31 December 2011 be approved by the Federal and
Provincial governments.
COMMITTEE
REPORTS
AGRICULTURE AND RURAL AFFAIRS
COMMITTEE REPORT 56A
|
1. comprehensive
zoning by-law 2008-250: anomalies RČGLEMENT DE ZONAGE GÉNÉRAL
2008-250 : ANOMALIES ET |
Committee recommendationS AS AMENDED
(This matter is Subject to Bill 51)
That Council approve the amendments recommended in Column 3 of Document
1 a, to correct anomalies in Zoning By-law 2008-250, as further amended by the
following:
Deleting the text in Column
III of Document 2, regarding the property located at 4497 O’Keefe Court, and
replacing it with,
“ Amend Section 240,
Exception [401r] as follows:
1. Add the following uses
to Column III – Additional Land Uses Permitted:
–artist studio, -bank,
-hotel, -office, -place of assembly limited to a convention facility,
-production studio, -recreational and athletic facility, -research and
development centre, -technology industry
2. Delete the following
uses from Column IV – Land Uses Prohibited:
-bank, -hotel, -office,
-place of assembly limited to a convention facility, -recreational and athletic
facility
3. Add the following
words to Column IV after the words “light industrial use”, “limited to the
manufacturing or assembly of small products”
4. Add the following
provisions to Column V – Provisions, “- any single warehouse use may occupy up
to a maximum of 50% of the gross floor area of a building, - more than one warehouse use is permitted in
a building, - accessory display and sales area:
i) must be within the same building as the use to which it is accessory,
and, ii) may occupy a maximum of 15%, or
in the case of large appliances, 30% of the gross floor area of the
warehouse use to which it is accessory,
-display and sales to the public is only permitted in the display and
sales area”
5. Replace the word
“buffer” with the word “area” in Column V
6. Add the words
“designation of the Secondary Plan of South Nepean Urban Areas 9 & 10”
after the words “Prestige Business Park” in Column V, and;
That there be no further
notice pursuant to Section 34 (17) of the Planning
Act.
AGRICULTURE AND RURAL AFFAIRS
COMMITTEE REPORT 57
|
1. UPPER FLOWING CREEK MUNICIPAL
DRAIN INSTALLATIONS
MUNICIPALES DE DRAINAGE UPPER FLOWING CREEK |
Committee meeting information
Note: Committee has met four times on this matter:
·
27
May (original meeting; decision deferred to allow for additional discussion
with affected residents to try to achieve workable solution);
·
08
July (further deferred as time was insufficient);
·
26
August (again deferred to ‘Special’ meeting of ARAC); and
·
7
September, 2010 (potential resolution).
Delegations: Approx. 20-25 delegation spoke to this item (on
different occasions throughout four meetings, some on more than one occasion),
mostly opposed to having to pay fees that, to 25 May had already risen to $1.2M
(residents’ portion of proposed drainage works); originally told cost would be
in the range of $250k.
Debate: Overall, 2-3 hours’ worth of
discussion/debate by Committee, not including presentations by Drainage
Engineer and presentations by members of public. Overall meeting time over four meetings;
approx 7-8 hours (including debate).
Vote: The final decision was “Carried”
unanimously, by Committee at its meeting of 7 September 2010.
Position
of Ward Councillor: Councillor Brooks (21 – Rideau-Goulbourn) in
support of the solution presented to allow applicants to withdraw and not be
liable for $381,000.00 expense, with acknowledgement that costs escalated
beyond what residents were led to expect at outset of process.
Committee Recommendation AS AMENDED
WHEREAS, the majority
of the original petitioners who signed the original petition for the Upper
Flowing Creek Municipal Drain have signed a letter requesting the City to
cancel the drainage works project described in the Engineer’s Report dated
March 2010,
AND WHEREAS, the
expenses in connection with the petition and the Engineer’s Report to date are
approximately $381,000;
AND WHEREAS, the cost
of the drainage works, as described in the Engineer’s Report, is $1,640,000 of
which $1,200,000 is to be assessed to the landowners within the watershed and
$440,000 to the City;
THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED THAT Council settle the petitioners’ liability under the Drainage Act for the sum of $0.00, on
the condition that the petition does not, at the end of the Council meeting to
consider the Engineer’s Report, contain a sufficient number of names to comply
with Section 4 of the Drainage Act.
COMMUNITY AND PROTECTIVE
SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT 59
|
1. School Travel Planning Program - Demande de
soutien et de financement auprčs de la province |
Committee RecommendationS
That Council:
1. Approve that the City of Ottawa request that the Province
of Ontario make this initiative a priority for the school children of the Province
and commit for providing support and funding for a Provincial School Travel
Planning Program, and;
2. Recommend that the Ontario Government adopt the
recommendation contained in the Green Communities Canada’s “Saving Time and
Money with Active School Travel” report.
|
2. FEDERAL BILL
C-304 - AN ACT TO ENSURE SECURE, ADEQUATE, PROJET DE LOI
FÉDÉRAL C-304 - LOI VISANT Ŕ ASSURER AUX |
Committee RecommendationS as amended
That City Council
support, in principle, Bill C-304, and notify the Federal Government,
Opposition House Leaders and Local Area MPPs of this support, to include the
following:
·
have at its core a commitment to ongoing,
sustainable funding for adequate, safe, secure affordable housing for Canadians
of all income levels;
·
include funding for a wide range of supports for
people with complex needs to obtain and maintain their housing, and;
·
be integrated with a strategy to end homelessness.
|
6. FAMILY
HEALTH TEAMS ÉQUIPES
SANTÉ FAMILIALE |
Committee Recommendation
That Council call on the Provincial Government to
establish one of its 30 new Family Health Teams at Algonquin College.
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT
COMMITTEE REPORT 76
|
4. OFFICIAL
PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONING - 100 CHAMPAGNE AVENUE SOUTH MODIFICATION DU PLAN
OFFICIEL ET ZONAGE - 100, AVENUE CHAMPAGNE SUD |
Committee meeting
information
Delegations: Two
delegations spoke to this item, one in support, one in opposition.
Debate: Approximately one hour was spent in
discussion and debate on this item.
Vote: The item was carried on a vote of
7 to 1
Position of
Ward Councillor: Councillor Leadman did
not support the report recommendations.
Committee recommendationS
(This matter is Subject to Bill 51)
That
Council:
1.
Approve and adopt an amendment to the Official
Plan Volume 2A: Secondary Plans for the Preston-Champagne Secondary Plan to re-designate
100 Champagne Avenue South from “Residential Low Profile” to “Residential High
Profile”, as detailed in Document 2; and
2.
Approve an amendment to
Zoning By-law 2008-250 to change the zoning of 100 Champagne Avenue South from R4M (Residential Fourth Density Subzone M)
to R5P Sxxx (Residential Fifth Density Subzone P, Schedule xxx) zone as detailed in Document 3, and shown in Document 4.
|
5. Zoning – LansdownE Park (Lansdowne
Partnership Plan) ZONAGE – PARC LANSDOWNE (PLAN DE PARTENARIAT POUR LE PARC LANSDOWNE) |
Committee meeting
information
Delegations: 22
delegations spoke to this item, in opposition to the report recommendations.
Debate: Approximately five hours were spent
in discussion and debate on this item.
Vote: The item was carried, as amended,
on a vote of 5 to 4
Position of
Ward Councillor: Councillor Doucet did
not support the report recommendations.
Committee recommendationS as amended
(This matter is Subject to Bill 51)
That Council approve:
1.
An amendment to the Zoning By-law 2008-250 to
establish a new L2, Major Leisure Facility Subzone to be known as “L2C Subzone
– Lansdowne” and to change the zoning for Lansdowne Park shown as Area A
on Document 1, from L2[338]F(1.5), Major Leisure Facility
exception zone to L2C[338]SXXX-h, Major Leisure Facility Subzone exception zone
with a Schedule and holding symbol, to accommodate the Lansdowne Partnership
Plan as detailed in Document 2, subject to the following amendment:
a.
That the maximum height permitted for the Horticulture
Building, once relocated, should be identical to its current height and that it
be a requirement that the historic overlay also move with the building.
2.
An amendment to the Zoning By-law 2008-250 to change
the zoning of the Lansdowne Community Park shown as Area B on Document 1
from L2[338] F(1.5) to L2 F(1.5), subject to the following amendments:
a. That the portion of area B identified as the
Lansdowne Community Park be rezoned from L2(338) F(1.5) to L1
b. That the maximum
permitted building heights in the Urban Park be limited to 2 stories (6m).
|
6. ZONING
– 100, 300 and 645 Longfields drive zonage – 100, 300 et 645, promenade
longfields |
Committee recommendationS as amended
(This matter is Subject to Bill 51)
That
Council approve an amendment to the
Zoning By-law 2008-250 to change the zoning of 100, 300 and 645 Longfields
Drive, as shown on Document 2 and as detailed in Document 4, as amended by adding the following provisions to Item 1
of Document 4:
Section 239, Exception 1650 amended as follows:
In Column V Provisions, insert the following:
The provisions for detached dwellings are:
- minimum lot width: 12m
- minimum lot area: 300 m2
- minimum front yard setback: 3m
- minimum interior side yard setback: 0.6m
- minimum corner side yard setback: 3m
- maximum lot coverage: 60%
- minimum rear yard setback: 6 m
- maximum building height: 11 m
- minimum front yard – attached single car garage: 6m from main
elevation of dwelling
- minimum front yard – attached two car garage: 3m from main elevation
of dwelling for first garage, and 6m from main elevation for second garage
- unenclosed covered porch may project 2 m into front yard as long as
the steps attached come no closer than .5 m to the property line
The provisions for semi-detached dwellings are:
- minimum lot width: 9m
- minimum lot area: 270m2
- maximum lot coverage: 60%
- minimum front yard setback: 3m
- minimum interior side yard setback: 0.6m
- minimum corner side yard setback: 3m
- minimum rear yard setback: 6m
- maximum building height: 11m
- minimum front yard – attached single car garage: 6m from main
elevation of dwelling
- unenclosed covered porch may project 2m into front yard as long as the
steps attached come no closer than 0.5m to the property line
That pursuant to the Planning
Act, subsection 34(17) no further notice be given.
|
8. comprehensive
zoning by-law 2008-250: anomalies and minor corrections – third quarter 2010,
urban area (REVISED) RČGLEMENT DE ZONAGE GÉNÉRAL
2008-250 : ANOMALIES ET CORRECTIONS MINEURES – troisiČme TRIMESTRE 2010,
SECTEUR URBAIN (RÉVISÉ) |
Committee recommendationS as amended
(This matter is Subject to Bill 51)
That Council approve the amendments
recommended in Column 3 of Documents 1 and 2, to correct anomalies in Zoning
By-law 2008-250, as amended by:
1.
adding
the following item to Document 1, regarding the property located at 429-435
(odd numbers only) Haileybury Street, 681-695 (odd numbers only) Paul Metivier
Drive, part of 125 Bren Maur Road,
|
Item |
Objective of Amendment |
Proposed Amendment |
|
Zoning Map Corrections |
||
|
Lands located at 429-435
(odd numbers only) Haileybury Street; 681-695 (odd numbers only) Paul
Metivier Drive; part of 125 Bren Maur Road Ward 22 |
By-law 2007-171 amended the former Nepean Zoning By-law 100-2000 to
permit the development of a residential subdivision. The subdivision plan
received draft approval and was registered after the zoning amendment was
approved. The zoning in the former
Nepean Zoning By-law 100-2000 and By-law 2008-250 does not reflect the
approved land uses as shown in the registered Plan of Subdivision. |
Amend the Zoning Map, to rezone the
subject lands, as shown in Document 4, from O1 to R3Z. |
2.
Adding
the attached zoning/location map to Document 4.
That pursuant to the Planning
Act, subsection 34(17) no further notice be given.
10. Bulk Consent Agenda
That Council approve the
Bulk Consent Agenda attached as Document
1.
11. Disposition of Items Approved by Standing Committees
Under Delegated Authority
That Council
receive the list of items approved by its Standing Committees under Delegated Authority,
attached as Document
2.
12. Motion
to Adopt Reports
(Councillors R. Bloess and M. McRae)
13. Motions
of Which Notice has been Given Previously
MOTION
Moved by Councillor R. Chiarelli
Seconded by Councillor A. Cullen
WHEREAS the Ottawa West Golden Knights Junior
B hockey team has been operating out of the Bob Rosebrook Team Room and
associated offices of the Barbara Ann Scott Arena at the Pinecrest Recreation
Complex for over 30 years; and
WHEREAS the Ottawa West Golden Knights Junior
B hockey team has engaged in a number of important community programs and contributed
financially to significant improvements to the Barbara Ann Scott Arena including
the purchase of new television sets;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that from this point going forward the Ottawa West Golden Knights Junior B hockey team receive a commitment from the City Council that they may continue to use the Bob Rosebrook Team Room and associated offices on game nights, including play offs, and sell alcohol on regular game nights and during the play off season from 7:00 pm to 11:30 pm given that they post in plain site a copy of the special occasions and alcohol permit;
AND
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicable hourly rental fee for the Bob
Rosebrook Team Room be waived for the Ottawa West Golden Knights for each of
the regular season and playoff game nights.
MOTION
Moved by Councillor G. Brooks
Seconded by Councillor D. Thompson
Whereas in 1992 the former Township of
Rideau established a trust fund for the management of the bequest of the late
Elizabeth Jane Georgina Falls, the Georgina Falls Memorial Trust Fund, pursuant
to By-law No. 85-92 (the “Trust Fund”);
And Whereas the Trust Fund is to be
used for the operation of the Rideau Township Arena including improvements to
Centennial Park;
And Whereas the Council of the former
Township of Rideau was to decide on the actual expenditures
And Whereas pursuant to the City of
Ottawa Act, 1999, the Township amalgamated with other area municipalities
and the former Region to form the City of Ottawa in 2001;
And Whereas City Council in 2003
approved the establishment of an advisory committee to develop further requests
for funding;
And Whereas this Committee was to be
comprised of the legal counsel of the Trust Fund and one representative of the
Manotick Community Association and the Kiwanis, Kinsmen, Lions Club;
And Whereas the two organizations no longer
exist in their original form and the legal counsel is no longer managing the
Trust Fund;
And Whereas there has been a request by
the Parks and Pathways Committee of the Manotick Village and Community
Association to allocate $7,500 from the Trust Fund to the Centennial Park
Pathway Project;
And Whereas the current balance of the
Trust Fund is $80,935;
And Whereas this request will comply
with the stipulation in By-law No. 85-92 that the value of the Trust Fund not
be reduced below the original bequest of $65,628.00;
Now Therefore be it resolved
that Council approve a grant to the Manotick Village and Community
Association of $7,500.00 for the Centennial Park Pathways Project.
MOTION
Moved by Councillor G. Brooks
Seconded by Councillor D. Thompson
WHEREAS
the standard City protocol with respect to the deferral of development charges
is, in respect of any building, to permit the deferral to the earlier of 12
months from the issuance of the building permit or the sale of the property;
AND
WHEREAS with a standard residential dwelling when a closing occurs, the full
value of the land and building is received by the Vendor, thereby enabling the
payment of the deferred development charges;
AND
WHEREAS Hyde Park Residences is a seniors development whose tenure for
residents is based upon a life-lease format;
AND
WHEREAS therefore as each life-lease is entered into, only a small portion of
the value of the building and land is received;
AND WHEREAS
it is therefore appropriate, in encouraging this form of development, to permit
a longer period for the deferral of development charges;
THEREFORE
BE IT RESOLVED THAT Hyde Park Residences be permitted to defer its development
charges to a maximum of twenty-four months from the issuance of a building
permit, subject to entering into a deferral agreement in a form satisfactory to
the City Clerk and Solicitor.
MOTION
Moved by Councillor C. Doucet
Seconded by Councillor J. Legendre
WHEREAS
the Zoning - Lansdowne Park (Lansdowne Partnership Plan) report is
scheduled to be tabled at Planning and Environment Committee (PEC) on Tuesday,
September 14, 2010 and considered by Council on Wednesday, September 22, 2010;
and
WHEREAS a
1994 City of Ottawa policy states that “when Council considers the disposal of
parkland, no parkland shall be disposed except by approval of 2/3 of the full
Council”; and
WHEREAS
Sylvia Holden Park has been approved by City Council for future park dedication
as per the 1994 report cited above which states: “The City of Ottawa currently has an
inventory of approximately 184 parks, 104 of which have been dedicated by
by-law for park or recreational purposes, and 80 parks which have been approved
by City Council for future park dedication…It is the inventory of 184 dedicated
parks and parks which have been approved for dedication that the proposed new
Policy serves to protect”; and
WHEREAS
the rezoning of Lansdowne Park assumes the complete loss of Sylvia Holden Park
(0.46 ha) which was named on December 21, 1994 and is situated at the corner of
Bank Street and Holmwood Avenue with a street address of 945 Bank Street; and
WHEREAS, since
1994, Sylvia Holden Park has been enjoyed as parkland and always referred to as
such by the local community and the City Parks Department, and is listed as a
park in the City of Ottawa Park Inventory Report; and
WHEREAS
the disposal (lease longer than 5 years) of an entire City owned park for
development purposes is extremely unusual and may be unprecedented; and
WHEREAS
PEC and Council should delay the rezoning of Lansdowne Park until this
outstanding policy question is clarified; and
WHEREAS,
it is reasonable to believe that the policy should still apply within the
boundaries of the old City of Ottawa which includes the Glebe;
THEREFORE
BE IT RESOLVED THAT Council be required to receive and consider the opinion of
legal services on this policy and any resulting requirements for a 2/3 weighted
vote of Council, prior to the consideration of the rezoning of Lansdowne Park
at Council on September 22, 2010
MOTION
Moved by Councillor C. Doucet
Seconded by Councillor C. Leadman
WHEREAS the sidewalk encroachment by-laws that
enable patio or vendor use of spaces is a cumbersome, expensive and
unnecessarily prolonged process; and
WHEREAS
simplifying the process would enable a
more efficient approach to the process by small businesses;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that staff be directed to prepare a flat
fee schedule for small businesses that is based on the number of small tables
(café style) and chairs requested, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that staff be directed to prepare a small
business flat fee schedule for vendors wishing to sell produce adjacent to
their storefront from small stalls, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that staff be directed to have a response
to requests for sidewalk encroachment requests within 60 days of the request
from an applicant.
MOTION
Moved by
Councillor J. Harder
Seconded
by Councillor E. El-Chantiry
WHEREAS on June 28, 2010 Council accepted a proposal from
Shenkman Corporation (“Shenkman”) for the design, construction, operation and
financing of an Exposition Hall facility and approved the provisions of a
Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) between the City and Shenkman;
AND WHEREAS the City Manager was also authorized by Council
to negotiate and enter into, on behalf of the City, a Municipal Capital
Facilities agreement with Shenkman for the design, construction, operation and
financing of the Exposition Hall facility as outlined in the staff report and
as set out more specifically in the provisions of the MOU;
AND WHEREAS the MOU between the City and Shenkman specified
that the new Exposition Hall facility should be open for use by no later than
January 1, 2012 so that the Trade and Consumer Show industry would not ‘go
dark’ as a result of the construction planned for Lansdowne Park by Council’s
approval of the Lansdowne Partnership Plan (“LPP”) on June 28, 2010;
AND WHEREAS the Traffic Impact Study for the project has
subsequently been completed and indicates that there would be no significant
traffic issues;
AND WHEREAS in the staff report that was approved by Council
on June 28, 2010 major milestone assumptions were set out so as to achieve the
facility opening of January 1, 2011, one of which was that Site Plan agreement
would be obtained by November 16, 2010 to allow construction to proceed on
November 17, 2010;
AND WHEREAS the 28 calendar day circulation period for site
plan approval will not expire until September 22, 2010, with a further 7
working day period (i.e. October 1, 2010) for the Ward Councillor, in
conjunction with Shenkman and City staff to attempt to finalize it;
AND WHEREAS Shenkman Corporation has advised City staff
within the last week that it is essential for it to complete the preliminary
engineering work (e.g. soil compaction, tree removal, ect.) by mid-October 2010
before the frost hits so the project will not lose the entire winter
construction period;
AND WHEREAS the Memorandum of Understanding for the project
that was approved by Council on June 28, 2010 provided, in part, in Section 9a)
and b) that “... the City’s equity contribution [of] $8.5 million was to be
provided in the form of a grant/loan ...” and that “the City’s equity
contribution would be made on a “drawn down” basis as actual costs are incurred
and invoiced by Shenkman and each “drawn down” amount shall not exceed the amount
being drawn down from Shenkman’s equity contribution of $8.5 million”;
AND WHEREAS Shenkman’s current estimated costs to allow for
completion of design and planning work, as well as site preparation work that
total $1.4 million, are comprised of the following:
-
Architectural - $300,000
-
Planning - $150,000
-
Engineering - $200,000
-
Legal - $200,000
-
Site work - $550,000
AND WHEREAS the MOU as a whole contemplated that the City
would fund 50% of the above costs though there was no specific provision in that
regard and, further, that these costs would be lost by both the City and
Shenkman should the necessary approvals not subsequently be obtained;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
1.
Authority for
the determination of application for site plan approval for the Exposition Hall
Facility be vested in Council should it not be approved on or before October 1,
2010 pursuant to delegated authority in favour of City staff with the
concurrence of the Ward Councillor;
2.
A report on
the application for site plan approval be submitted to the Planning and
Environment Committee meeting of October 4th, 2010 for the receiving
of delegations, consideration by Committee and recommendation to Council;
3.
The Rules of
Procedure be waived, such that the report will rise to the Council meeting of
October 6th, 2010; and,
4.
That the
City’s 50% contribution of $700,000 to Shenkman Corporation’s current estimated
costs to allow for completion of design and planning works as well as site
preparation works be confirmed.
14. Notices
of Motion (For Consideration at Subsequent Meeting)
15. Motion to Introduce By-laws Three Readings
(Councillors R. Bloess and M. McRae)
a)
A by-law of the City of Ottawa to establish
certain lands as common and public highway and assume it for public use
(Corkery Road).
b)
A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law
No. 2004-60 to appoint Municipal Law Enforcement Officers in accordance with
private property parking enforcement.
c)
A by-law of the City of Ottawa to designate
certain lands at 296 Celtic Ridge Crescent and 400 and 401 Arncliffe Avenue as
being exempt from Part Lot Control.
d)
A by-law of the City of Ottawa to impose
special annual drainage rates upon lands in respect of which money is borrowed
under the Tile Drainage Act.
e)
A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law
No. 58 of 1995 of the old Regional Municipality of Ottawa-Carleton (Appointment
of Municipal By-law Enforcement Officers By-law) for collection, removal and
disposal of waste enforcement.
f)
A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law
No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to amend technical anomalies and make minor
corrections.
g)
A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law
No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to amend technical anomalies and make minor
corrections.
h)
A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law
No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to amend technical anomalies and make minor
corrections.
i)
A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law
No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to amend technical anomalies and make minor
corrections.
j)
A by-law of the City of Ottawa to change the
zoning of lands known municipally as 100 Champagne Avenue South.
k)
A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend the
Official Plan for the City of Ottawa to change the designation of the lands
known municipally as 100 Champagne Avenue South.
l)
A by-law of the City of Ottawa to change the
zoning of lands known municipally as 100, 300 and 645 Longfields Drive.
m)
A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law
No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to change the zoning of part of the lands
known municipally as 940 Old Montreal Road.
n)
A by-law of the City of Ottawa to
amend By-law No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to change the zoning of lands
which are the subject of PEC Agenda 80, Item 5, Report Reference Number acs2010-ICS-PGM-0154.
o)
A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law
No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to remove the holding symbol from the
properties known municipally as 2781, 2791 & 2797 Baseline Road.
16. Confirmation By-law (Councillors R. Bloess and M. McRae)
17. Inquiries
18. Adjournment (Councillors R. Bloess and M. McRae)
|
Simultaneous interpretation of these proceedings is available. Please speak to the attendant at reception. |
|
|
In Camera Items are not subject to public
discussion or audience. Any person has a right to request an independent investigation
of the propriety of dealing with matters in a closed session. A form requesting such a review may be
obtained, without charge, from the City’s website or in person from the
Chair of this meeting. Requests are
kept confidential pending any report by the Meetings Investigator and are
conducted without charge to the Requestor.
NOTICE