4. CARP AIRPORT -
BUSINESS PLAN Aéroport de Carp - plan d’activités |
Committee Recommendations
That Council:
1. Not
approve the Business Plan for the Carp Airport, as submitted by West Capital
Developments (WCD) on 31 October 2003, for the reasons set out in this report,
and instead, direct staff to finalize negotiations with West Capital
Developments with respect to an Option Agreement to purchase the Carp Airport
property based on modifications, as necessary, to the Business Plan and on conditions
that will:
a. ensure
the proposed development will be compatible with the City’s planning policies,
and compatible with the Community Plans for the Carp Village and Carp Road
Corridor;
b. require
WCD to fully fund all approval and development costs associated with
implementing the modified Business Plan;
c. eliminate
any financial risk for the City; and
d. ensure
that the existing airport operations and tenancies will not be adversely
affected should the WCD Business Plan not be fully implemented for whatever
reason.
2. Direct
staff to bring forward a report with recommendations regarding an Option
Agreement with WCD for consideration by the Corporate Services and Economic
Development Committee and Council in April 2004;
3. Direct
staff to bring forward a report with respect to the long and short-term
arrangements with the Carp Airport Authority for operating and managing the
airport, should the Option Agreement with WCD not proceed or should the WCD
Business Plan not be fully implemented for whatever reason, for consideration
by the Corporate Services and Economic Development Committee and Council in
April 2004.
Recommandations du comité
Que le Conseil municipal :
1. n’approuve
pas le plan d’activités de l’aéroport de Carp, tel que présenté par West
Capital Developments (WCD), le 31 octobre 2003, pour les raisons
indiquées dans le présent rapport, mais, à la place, demande au personnel de
conclure les négociations avec WCD quant à une convention d’option d’achat de
la propriété de l’aéroport de Carp, en fonction de modifications apportées au
besoin au plan d’activités et des conditions suivantes :
a. s’assurer
que le développement proposé est compatible avec les politiques de
planification de la Ville, ainsi qu’avec les plans pour le village de Carp et
le corridor du chemin Carp;
b. exiger
de WCD qu’elle assume la totalité des coûts d’approbation et de mise en valeur
liés à la mise en œuvre du plan d’activités révisé;
c. éliminer
tout risque financier pour la Ville;
d. s’assurer
que les activités et locations actuelles de l’aéroport ne seront pas touchées
dans l’éventualité d’une mise en œuvre incomplète, pour quelque raison que ce
soit, du plan d’activités de WCD;
2. demande
au personnel de produire un rapport comprenant des recommandations au Comité
des services organisationnels et du développement économique et au Conseil
municipal pour l’examen d’une convention d’option avec WCD, en avril 2004;
3. demande
au personnel de produire un rapport faisant état des dispositions à court et à
long termes prises avec l’administration de l’aéroport de Carp pour
l’exploitation et la gestion de l’aéroport dans l’éventualité du refus de la
convention d’option avec WCD ou d’une mise en œuvre incomplète, pour quelque
raison que ce soit, du plan d’activités de WCD, afin que le Comité des services
organisationnels et du développement économique ainsi que le Conseil municipal
l’examinent en avril 2004.
Documentation
1. Corporate
Services Department General Manager's report dated 12 February 2004 (ACS2004-CRS-RPR-0020).
2. Copy of written submission from B.
Doyle on behalf of Long Hangar Owners and Long Term Tenancies, previously
distributed to all members of Council and held on file with the City Clerk.
3. Extract of Draft Minutes, 17
February 2004.
Report
to/Rapport au :
Corporate Services and Economic Development Committee
Comité des services organisationnels et du
développement économique
12 February 2004 / le 12 février 2004
Submitted by/Soumis par : Kent Kirkpatrick, General Manager/Directeur
général,
Corporate Services/Services généraux
Contact Person/Personne
ressource : Douglas McCaslin, Manager, Real Estate Services
Real Property Asset Management/Gestion des actifs
et des biens immobiliers
(613) 580-2424 x 22595, douglas.mccaslin@ottawa.ca
SUBJECT: |
|
|
|
OBJET : |
REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS
That the Corporate
Services and Economic Development Committee recommend Council:
1. Not approve the Business
Plan for the Carp Airport, as submitted by West Capital Developments (WCD) on
31 October 2003, for the reasons set out in this report, and instead, direct
staff to finalize negotiations with West Capital Developments with respect to
an Option Agreement to purchase the Carp Airport property based on
modifications, as necessary, to the Business Plan and on conditions that will:
a. ensure
the proposed development will be compatible with the City’s planning policies,
and compatible with the Community Plans for the Carp Village and Carp Road
Corridor;
b. require
WCD to fully fund all approval and development costs associated with
implementing the modified Business Plan;
c. eliminate
any financial risk for the City; and
d. ensure
that the existing airport operations and tenancies will not be adversely
affected should the WCD Business Plan not be fully implemented for whatever
reason.
2. Direct staff to bring
forward a report with recommendations regarding an Option Agreement with WCD
for consideration by the Corporate Services and Economic Development Committee
and Council in April 2004;
3. Direct staff to bring forward a report with respect to the long and short-term arrangements with the Carp Airport Authority for operating and managing the airport, should the Option Agreement with WCD not proceed or should the WCD Business Plan not be fully implemented for whatever reason, for consideration by the Corporate Services and Economic Development Committee and Council in April 2004.
Que le Comité des
services organisationnels et du développement économique recommande au Conseil
municipal :
1. de ne pas approuver le
plan d’activités de l’aéroport de Carp, tel que présenté par West Capital
Developments (WCD), le 31 octobre 2003, pour les raisons indiquées
dans le présent rapport, mais, à la place, de demander au personnel de conclure
les négociations avec WCD quant à une convention d’option d’achat de la propriété
de l’aéroport de Carp, en fonction de modifications apportées au besoin au plan
d’activités et des conditions suivantes :
a. s’assurer
que le développement proposé est compatible avec les politiques de
planification de la Ville, ainsi qu’avec les plans pour le village de Carp et
le corridor du chemin Carp;
b. exiger
de WCD qu’elle assume la totalité des coûts d’approbation et de mise en valeur
liés à la mise en œuvre du plan d’activités révisé;
c. éliminer
tout risque financier pour la Ville;
d. s’assurer
que les activités et locations actuelles de l’aéroport ne seront pas touchées
dans l’éventualité d’une mise en œuvre incomplète, pour quelque raison que ce
soit, du plan d’activités de WCD;
2. de demander au personnel
de produire un rapport comprenant des recommandations au Comité des services
organisationnels et du développement économique et au Conseil municipal pour
l’examen d’une convention d’option avec WCD, en avril 2004;
3. de demander au personnel
de produire un rapport faisant état des dispositions à court et à long termes
prises avec l’administration de l’aéroport de Carp pour l’exploitation et la
gestion de l’aéroport dans l’éventualité du refus de la convention d’option
avec WCD ou d’une mise en œuvre incomplète, pour quelque raison que ce soit, du
plan d’activités de WCD, afin que le Comité des services organisationnels et du
développement économique ainsi que le Conseil municipal l’examinent en avril
2004.
BACKGROUND
The Carp Airport Authority (a non-profit
Corporation) has operated the airport based on annual leases from the City of
Ottawa. The last annual lease expired on 31 December 2003 and the Airport
Authority’s tenancy is now on a month-to-month basis.
A Board of Directors, consisting of seven
members (all volunteers), is responsible for the operation of the airport.
Following amalgamation, the new City of Ottawa now appoints four members of the
Board, with the remaining members elected or appointed by users, residents and
local businesses. A General Manager (now a contract employee of the City of
Ottawa) is responsible for the day-to-day operations of the airport.
The Airport Authority has a number of
subtenants who have built facilities on land leased from the Authority. These
subtenants pay rent based on a formula related to the area of land leased and
an annual cost adjustment is applied. They also pay an annual Airport
Maintenance Charge, which is also shared amongst the subtenants based on
pro-rated areas. However, only 75% of the maintenance costs have traditionally
been recovered under a formula that was established during the era that
Transport Canada owned and operated the airport.
As a result, the airport has operated with
annual operating deficits that have required the City to subsidize the
operations since the acquisition from Transport Canada with a direct grant each
year. While the grant amount has been reduced $20,000 in recent years, the City
still provides a significant amount of in-kind services including, the supply
of vehicles, repairs to equipment, etc. and also covers the cost of the airport
manager position.
In 2003 the cost to the City in support of the
Carp Airport operations totaled approximately $100,000. The City also spent
approximately another $50,000 in capital improvements. Based on the Airport
Authority’s draft budget for 2004, the total cost to the City with respect to
the airport's operations will be at least $75,000, not including an allowance
for major maintenance/minor capital items.
Since the Airport Manager is a contract
employee of the City; the City appoints the majority of the members to the
Airport Authority's Board; and the City has been underwriting the cost of
operating and maintaining the airport, the Carp Airport Authority is operating
more as an agent of the City rather than as a tenant.
In order to move the airport towards
independency and self-sufficiency, the City issued a Request for Expressions of
Interest in 2002 with respect to the future planning, development, operation
and ownership of the airport. This resulted in four (4) responses but only two
(2) comprehensive responses were received, those being from the Carp Airport
Authority (CAA) and West Capital Developments (WCD).
The proposal from the CAA was based on the City
continuing to own the airport and to support any operating losses and provide
services in-kind until such time that the airport becomes self-sufficient. The
proposal also called for the City to fund the development of the Airport Master
Plan and then for the City to make a long-term commitment to the Authority in order
for them to embark on the self-sufficiency plan.
WCD provided the only response that set out a
comprehensive project to own, manage and develop the Carp Airport as a private
sector corporation. The WCD indicated
they would undertake all the necessary planning studies
technical/investigations at its expense to develop a Master Plan, Servicing
Plan, Marketing Plan and Investment Plan.
WCD indicated a willingness to make a large
capital investment to improve and expand the existing infrastructure including
extending the runway, provision of water and waste water treatment for the
project area and adding additional roads.
Specific areas of operation and development the
Expressions Of Interest (EOI) from WCD included:
At the time the EOI’s were submitted, the City
had also received a request by First Air to have its lease extended for a
10-year term with a further 10-year option. First Air was prepared to accept a
condition, that the Carp Airport might not be operated as an airport after 14
March 2007, provided that, if it is not operated as an airport after 14 March
2007, they are permitted to terminate the lease on a period of two (2) months
notice.
First Air also understood that they would be
required to reach agreement with the head lessee of the airport as to the
contribution to be made by First Air towards the operating costs of Carp
Airport and for paying a market rent for the extended term.
It was also considered equitable to extend the
same opportunity for a 10 year lease under the same terms to all other existing
sub-tenants at the airport whose tenancies were in good standings under the
terms of their specific leases.
In addition, the Airport Authority had
requested approval from the City to construct a 20 bay T-Hangar. In order to
allow the Airport Authority to keep moving forward to self sufficiency, while
waiting to see if WCD would be able to develop a viable business plan that
meets the City’s requirements, it was agreed to permit the construction of the
20 bay hangar and provide a loan guarantee. This approval/guarantee was to be
subject to the confirmation that at least 15 bays would be sold or rented and
the loan guarantee would be no greater than $200,000 for a loan with an
amortization period no greater than 20 years.
On 14 May 2003, City Council approved
recommendations in a report regarding the results of the EOI process as
follows:
Essentially the above approvals allowed WCD to
proceed with developing its Business Plan while still allowing the Airport
Authority to move towards independency and self-sufficiency should the City not
proceed to approve the WCD Business Plan.
A Business Plan Agreement, dated August 2003,
was executed based on the Council authority of 14 May 2003 and the specific
conditions approved by Council were attached as Schedule 'C' to the agreement
and are attached as Annex 'A' to this report. WCD completed its Business Plan
and delivered it, under confidential cover, to the City on 31 October 2003.
Staff from Corporate Services, Development Services, and Transportation
Utilities and Public Works have subsequently reviewed the plan.
The Carp Airport Authority has sold 17 units
and leased 3 in the 20 bay T-Hangar. The hangar is now constructed and fully
occupied.
Negotiations for the First Air Lease extension
have been completed and the agreement is ready for execution by the parties to
it. Draft agreements have been prepared for the other subtenants using the
First Air lease as model and taking into account the specifics of each
individual tenancy.
DISCUSSION
The West Capital Developments Business Plan, as
submitted on 31 October 2003, is more ambitious than the concept plan submitted
with it EOI and, as a result, will require amendments to the City's Official
Plan and Zoning By-law to implement.
Zoning/OP amendments are not consistent with
the conditions approved by City Council on 14 May 2003 as set out in Schedule
'C' of the Business Plan Agreement between the City & WCD. WCD is aware
that its Business Plan does not fully comply but have indicated, in writing,
that the Land Use and Airport Master Plans cannot be modified to comply without
jeopardizing the financial viability of the project.
At the same time, the City's review of WCD's
Business Plan indicates that the WCD vision for a fully contained aviation
community would appear to have significant economic development potential and
benefit for the City, Carp Village, the Carp Road Corridor, and the General
Aviation Community. As a result, staff and WCD representatives have been
negotiating the possibility of an Option Agreement that would allow WCD to go
ahead with the development provided that the conditions of the agreement will:
a)
ensure
the proposed development will be compatible with the City's planning policies,
and compatible with the Community Plans for the Carp Village and Carp Road
Corridor;
b)
require
WCD to fully fund all approval and development costs associated with
implementing the modified Business Plan;
c)
eliminate
any financial risk for the City; and
d)
ensure
that the existing airport operations and tenancies will not be adversely
affected should the modified WCD Business Plan not be fully implemented for
whatever reason.
The negotiations are now to the point that WCD
has indicated its acceptance of 23 specific conditions for an option agreement,
as set out in Appendix 'B' to this report, that would satisfy the intent of the
above conditions (a) to (d).
Before finalizing the negotiations with WCD,
there needs to be significant further consultation between WCD and the City’s
Development Services Department to identify the specific extent of
modifications to the WCD Business Plan and also the extent of any environmental
assessment, servicing and planning approvals required to implement the modified
plan. This will then provide the basis for any necessary changes to the project
schedule and funding requirements in order to allow WCD to verify, and amend if
necessary, its financial proforma for the development before entering into an
option agreement. Both the City & WCD need to be satisfied as to the
financial viability of the proposed development before action is taken to
implement a modified Business Plan.
If Council approves Recommendations # 2 & 3
of this report, and subsequently approves the terms of an option agreement in
April 2004, WCD has agreed that it will provide the City, at the time of
executing the Option Agreement, with a certified cheque for $50,000 and a Letter of Credit for an
additional $100,000 to underwrite any operating deficit of the Airport during
the first third of 2004, as well as the option term, as compensation for the
option being granted by the City.
WCD believes this action, coupled with the
significant financial investment in the business plan to date, clearly
indicates WCD’s willingness to proceed with a modified Business Plan and assist
the City in the operation and maintenance of the airport as contemplated in
conditions 22 & 23 of the proposed option agreement as set out in Annex 'B'
of this report.
As was the case during the Business Plan stage,
staff is also working towards implementing arrangements that will still provide
for operational changes and development at the Airport to allow the airport
operations to move towards independency and self-sufficiency if for any reason
the WCD Business Plan does not proceed or is not fully implemented. Therefore,
staff is also discussing these arrangements with the Carp Airport Authority
concurrently with the negotiations with WCD for a modified Business Plan and
Option Agreement.
These arrangements call for the City to have
more direct control of the day-to-day operations of the airport in the
short-term until Council decides the final direction for the long-term. This
will allow the City to take advantage of WCD's agreement to underwrite the
operating and maintenance costs for the airport during the option period if
Council ultimately approves executing an option agreement with WCD.
In the meantime, the Business Plan Agreement
with WCD requires that City Council consider the WCD Business Plan by no later
than the end of February 2004. Recommendation # 1 deals with this technical
requirement and, therefore, eliminates any financial obligation to WCD with
respect to the preparation of the Business Plan while still allowing a modified
Business Plan to be negotiated based on an option agreement process.
Recommendations # 2 & 3 reflect the
intended outcome of the negotiations with WCD and the concurrent discussions
with the Carp Airport Authority.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS
The development planning for the Carp Airport
property will evaluate and address all environmental related issues associated
with developing the Carp Airport lands.
RURAL IMPLICATIONS
The recommendations in this report are based on
ensuring that any proposed development supports the relevant Official Plan
policies for the rural area and the objectives of the rural community including
protecting and adding to the employment base in this location.
CONSULTATION
The recommendations in this report are based on
a review of the WCD Business Plan by staff of the Corporate Services,
Development Services and Transportation, Utilities and Public Works Departments
and the resulting negotiations with WCD and discussions with the Carp Airport
Authority. The Ward Councillor has been briefed on the status of these
negotiations and discussions.
WCD has confirmed in writing that the proposed
conditions for an Option Agreement as set out in Annex ‘B’ are acceptable to
WCD. WCD has also notified the City, in writing, as follows:
“In
regards to the three points you asked me to confirm in writing, here is
our response:
1)
The City may
now release any or all information contained in the Business Plan Summary
document.
2) At this time, WCD cannot amend its submitted Business Plan to eliminate the need to provide facilities for the airport property development on the adjacent agricultural resource lands nor reduce the extent of the residential fly-in community portion to conform to existing provisions in the City's Zoning By-law. In the case of the adjacent agricultural lands, the small incursion onto these lands is required to facilitate the runway extension to 6000 feet. This allows capturing the broadest possible slice of the General Aviation business, which in turn services expected demand and reduces costs for everyone on the airport.
In the case of the density requirement, our experience and research has revealed a strong demand for this type of housing and a critical mass is needed to guarantee an aviation community is formed where people can live work and play. There is only one airport in the region capable of supporting this unique community and hence demand must be properly addressed. The scope of the residential development also provides adequate funds to cover infrastructure improvements that have risen substantially from initial rough estimates in our EOI.
3) WCD acknowledges that the City continues to provide the existing tenants with lease extension agreements as approved by Council on May 14, 2003 and WCD agrees that the lease extensions for Helicopter Transport and First Air can include expansion from the apron to the access road of these properties. The proposed MCFA area for the Airport will include this expansion area.”
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Approval of the recommendations in this report will allow staff to finalize negotiations with WCD with respect to an option agreement that, if approved by Council in April 2004, would result in WCD underwriting any operating deficit for the airport in 2004 and the first third of 2005 to a total amount of $150,000. Should WCD subsequently be successful in meeting the terms and conditions of the option agreement and complete the purchase, they will then invest over $52M in upgrades to the airport and servicing for the property over a 10 year period.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
Annex 'A' - Schedule 'C' of Business Plan
Agreement.
Annex 'B' - The Proposed Conditions of Option Agreement with WCD
DISPOSITION
Corporate Services and Development Services Departments will carry out further negotiations with WCD with respect to the extent of modifications to the Business Plan, approval requirements, and the terms and conditions of the option agreement and report back to CSEDC and Council in April 2004.
ANNEX A
Schedule 'C' of Business Plan Agreement with
West Capital Developments
Council Approved Objectives, Requirements,
Conditions
It is acknowledged by both parties that the
Council of the City of Ottawa has a main objective, in agreeing to the creation
and implementation of a Business Plan for the Carp Airport, which is to
increase the economic activity and employment base at this location.
Submission of a Business Plan by West Capital
Developments shall also be subject to further objectives, requirements, and
conditions as follows:
ANNEX B
PROPOSED OPTION AGREEMENT CONDITIONS
CARP
AIRPORT - BUSINESS PLAN
Aéroport de Carp - plan d’activités
ACS2004-CRS-RPR-0020
As the staff report was issued separately from the Agenda, the Committee approved the following motion.
Moved by Councillor M. McRae
That the Corporate Services and
Economic Development Committee approve that Item 5 of Agenda 4, be considered
by the Committee at today’s meeting, pursuant to section 81(3) of the procedure
by-law (being By-law No. 2003-589).
CARRIED
Steve Finnamore, Director, Real Property Asset Management, and Dave Donaldson, Real Estate Officer, RPAM, appeared before the Committee on this item. Mr. Finnamore provided the Committee with a brief overview of the staff report. Staff then responded to questions from the Committee and the following are some of the points raised.
· The Federal Government divested itself of airports across Canada in the 1990’s, one of which was the Carp Airport. There are a series of agreements between Transport Canada, NAV Canada and the City, obliging the City to run an airport until March 16, 2007;
· The new Official Plan states that general aviation infrastructure (i.e. infrastructure for non-commercial aviation, e.g. recreational fliers, business aircraft, etc.) should be maintained in the City and that the Carp Airport should be maintained as a general aviation facility;
· Existing tenants whose leases have expired are currently on a month-to-month basis. They have been offered a 10-year lease (with an option for renewal for another 10 years, as per the Council approved policy). Once a final agreement has been reached with West Capital Developments (staff to report back to Committee and Council in April), it may be possible to offer longer leases;
· All of the conditions contained in Annex B have been accepted by West Capital Developments. Discussions with Transport Canada (re those conditions that will require their approval) have been very positive.
The Committee then heard from the following public delegations.
Brian Doyle and Wayne Woods, appeared before the Committee and advised they were both long hangar owners (one long hangar, divided into 14 sections and owned individually) at Carp Airport and were representing other long hangar owners. A copy of their presentation was distributed to members of the Committee and is held on file with the City Clerk.
Mr. Doyle apprised the Committee of his aviation experience and spoke of the importance of maintaining the Carp Airport. He noted the long hangar owners have $30,000 or more invested in their hangar. In 1997, the Region of Ottawa-Carleton presented them with draft leases, which offered 20-year terms with options for renewal of two ten year periods. The tenants have been in discussions with City staff since the summer of 2003 and have been offered only 10-year terms (with the option of renewing for another 10 years). Mr. Doyle emphasized that this was not acceptable. He said if the owners are putting money into the airport, they must be provided with long-term leases to recoup their losses. He urged the Committee to support their request for the 20-year lease (with two 10-year options for renewal).
Mr. Woods noted the long hangar owners have invested in their hangars, with faith that the airport would survive. He reiterated the sentiments expressed by Mr. Doyle that the City’s offer of a 10 year lease is too short and asked that the Committee recognize their concerns with this situation and support a 20 year term (with two 10 year options for renewal).
In response to questions posed by Mayor Chiarelli, Mr. Davidson assured the Committee staff would take as a direction, the inclusion in the report coming back in April, the status and recommendations for existing tenants
The Committee then approved the staff recommendation.
That the Corporate Services and Economic
Development Committee recommend Council:
1. Not approve the Business Plan for the Carp Airport, as
submitted by West Capital Developments (WCD) on 31 October 2003, for the
reasons set out in this report, and instead, direct staff to finalize
negotiations with West Capital Developments with respect to an Option Agreement
to purchase the Carp Airport property based on modifications, as necessary, to
the Business Plan and on conditions that will:
a. ensure the proposed development will be compatible with the
City’s planning policies, and compatible with the Community Plans for the Carp
Village and Carp Road Corridor;
b. require WCD to fully fund all approval and development costs
associated with implementing the modified Business Plan;
c. eliminate any financial risk for the City; and
d. ensure that the existing airport operations and tenancies
will not be adversely affected should the WCD Business Plan not be fully
implemented for whatever reason.
2. Direct staff to bring forward a report with recommendations
regarding an Option Agreement with WCD for consideration by the Corporate
Services and Economic Development Committee and Council in April 2004;
3. Direct staff to bring forward a report with respect to the
long and short-term arrangements with the Carp Airport Authority for operating
and managing the airport, should the Option Agreement with WCD not proceed or
should the WCD Business Plan not be fully implemented for whatever reason, for
consideration by the Corporate Services and Economic Development Committee and
Council in April 2004.
CARRIED