DOCUMENT 1
Prototype Quarterly Performance Report to Council
City of Ottawa
Corporate Planning and Performance
Reporting Office
Prototype
Quarterly Performance Report to Council
February 8, 2006
Quarterly Performance ReportIntroductionOne of the
components of the Performance Measurement and Reporting Framework being
proposed is a quarterly Performance Report to Council. This quarterly report
is intended to establish and communicate performance in relation to key
targets and/or benchmarked performance indicators that are of interest to
Council. This
document presents a prototype for the quarterly report. 2004 OMBI Efficiency MeasuresAs shown
in Figure 1: Ottawa OMBI Results
Versus Other OMBI Municipalities (Efficiency Measures), Ottawa performed at or better
than other participating municipalities for 76% of efficiency measures. More
specifically,
·
Ottawa
costs are significantly greater than (20%+) the OMBI average for 14% of
measures Service ProfilesThe list to the right presents
service indicators provided by the following service areas:
·
General
and Administrative |
|
|
Quarterly Performance Report – 2004 OMBI Efficiency Measures
Figure 1: Ottawa OMBI Results Versus Other OMBI Municipalities (Efficiency Measures)
Areas where Ottawa indicators are below or
significantly below OMBI averages have been or are being followed up by
the relevant branch. In some of these instances, one factor that
contributes to these differences is the accounting for the full cost of
the service provided under Ottawa’s Centre of Expertise (COE) service
delivery model.
Quarterly Performance Report – Service Profile - Transit Figure 2: On Time Service Performance at Time Points (2005) |
Figure 3: Percentage of Planned Service Trips Operated (2005) |
Figure 4: Conventional Transit Ridership – Average Monthly |
Figure 5: Passenger Trips per Capita (2004) |
Figure 6: Costs per Service Hour (2004) |
Figure 7: Cost per Passenger Trip (2004) |
Definitions
On
Time Service Performance at Time Points: the percentage of service “never
leaving a time point early or more than 3 minutes late.” Percentage of Planned Service Trips Operated:
Of all the planned scheduled service trips in a day, the percentage that are
operated. Cost per Service Hour: All
direct expenses required to operate a bus for one hour. Over 80% of all service was operated on time. The summer period saw the best performance with a rating of 81.6%. The target of operating 99.5% of all planned service was met in the summer period and fell just slightly short of the target in the other periods. Average monthly ridership showed gains in each quarter in 2005 compared to 2004 except for Q1. Ridership fell in Q1 due to service cutbacks implemented in 2004 that carried over into Q1 of 2005. Ottawa’s passenger trips per capita figure of 118 is well above all other Canadian cities of comparable size. Calgary is next closest at 85 trips per capita. The cost per service hour for Ottawa is in line with other like-sized cities. The cost per passenger trip for Ottawa is among the lowest with only Winnipeg and Toronto operations being less expensive. |
|||
|
Quarterly Performance Report – Service Profile - Police Figure 8: Priority 1 Response Performance (2004) |
Figure 9: Number of Criminal Code Offences Handled per Police Officer (OMBI) |
|
|
Figure 10: In-Service Time – mobile response calls only (2004) |
Figure 11:Number of Calls For Service – all priorities (2004) |
|
Priority 1 Response Performance
is defined as “Citizen-initiated calls, with mobile response to crimes in
progress and/or life threatening situation.” The Benchmark is within 15
minutes for 90% of calls. The Ottawa Police agrees in principle with inclusion of the above
indicators in the prototype of the Council Performance Report, recognizing
that: ·
the
Police Performance Measurement Advisory Committee has not yet completed its
work; ·
the
Ottawa Police will continue to participate on the Ontario Chief's of Police
OMBI Expert Panel which may table additional perspectives; and, ·
the
Ottawa Police has developed and continues to refine its own Performance Monitoring
Framework, Data Warehouse, and Dashboard |
Quarterly Performance Report – Service Profile – Paramedic Services Figure 12: % of Code Calls Where an Advanced Care Paramedic Responded |
Figure 13: Annual Call Volume |
Figure 14: 90th Percentile Response Times (minutes) for High and Low Density Areas |
Quarterly Performance Report – Service Profile -Fire
Performance indicators for Ottawa Fire Services will
be available using the measures endorsed by the Ontario Municipal
Benchmarking Initiatives (OMBI) Group, represented by the Chief
Administrative Officers of the 15 largest municipalities in Ontario, of which
Ottawa is an active member. Some examples of these measures are Service Level
indicators such as Total Fire Operating Costs Per Capita (Urban and Rural);
Number of In-Service Vehicle Hours Per Capita (Urban); Total Number of
Incidents Responded to per 1,000 population (urban). There are also Efficiency measures such as
Cost per Incident (Urban) and Community Impact Measures such as Residential
Fire Related Fatalities per 100,000 Population. OMBI is considering using up to 36 measures in
all. Ottawa Fire will be providing
some of the measures that are contained in that group when we are requested
to do so, however the final measures to be utilized has yet to be determined. |
Quarterly Performance Report –
Service Profile – Library Figure 15: Total Number of Library Uses per Capita (OMBI) |
Figure 16: Number of Electronic Visits per Capita (OMBI) |
Figure 17: Annual $ Amount Spent on Library Materials per Capita (OMBI) |
Figure 18: Number of Circulation Uses per Capita (OMBI) |
Libraries participating in OMBI range from Toronto
Public Library (the largest library in Canada) through mid-size libraries
such as Hamilton and London down to smaller library systems such as Thunder
Bay and Waterloo. Averaging the OMBI results suppresses the wide variance
among the participating libraries and may not result in good comparator data. |
|
||
|
Quarterly Performance Report – Service Profile – General and Administrative Figure 19: # of FTE’s/100,000 population Source
– Population Data: Year End City Estimates Source – Staff Data: FTE figures from the Human Resources Plan. Figures do not include Elected Representatives. |
Figure 20: Facility Cost per Square Foot of Administrative Facilities Managed (OMBI) |
|