6.       mer bleue community design plan

plan de conception mer bleue

 

 

Committee recommendation

 

That Council approve the Mer bleue Community Design Plan as detailed in Document 7 (under separate cover).

 

 

Recommandation du Comité

 

Que le Conseil approuve le Plan de conception communautaire pour Mer bleue, tel que le montre en détail le document 7 (disponible séparément).

 

 

 

 

 

Documentation

 

1.         Deputy City Manager's report (Planning and Growth Management) dated
28 April 2006 (ACS2006-PGM-APR-0115).

 

2.         Extract of Draft Minute, 9 May 2006.

 



Report to/Rapport au :

 

Planning and Environment Committee

Comité de l'urbanisme et de l'environnement

 

and Council / et au Conseil

 

28 April 2006 / 28 avril 2006

 

Submitted by/Soumis par : Ned Lathrop, Deputy City Manager/

Directeur municipal adjointe,

Planning and Growth Management / Urbansime et Gestion de la croissance

 

Contact Person/Personne ressource : Karen Currie, Manager / Gestionnaire

Development Approvals / Approbation des demandes d'aménagement

(613) 580-2424 x28310, Karen.Currie@ottawa.ca

 

Cumberland (19)

Ref N°: ACS2006-PGM-APR-0115

 

 

SUBJECT:

Mer bleue community design plan

 

 

OBJET :

Plan de conception communautaire Mer bleue

 

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATION

 

That the Planning and Environment Committee recommend that Council approve the Mer Bleue Community Design Plan as detailed in Document 7 (under separate cover).

 

RECOMMANDATION DU RAPPORT

 

Que le Comité de l'urbanisme et de l'environnement recommande que le Conseil approuve le Plan de conception communautaire Mer Bleue, tel que détaillé dans le document 7 (disponible séparément).

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

On September 14, 2005, Council adopted Official Plan Amendment 35, which redesignated lands in the south-east portion of Orléans from Employment Area to General Urban Area and Mixed Use Centre. As a condition of approval, Council required City staff to work with the landowners to prepare a Community Design Plan (CDP) for the area east of Mer Bleue Road, west of Tenth Line Road, south of the Hydro corridor and north of urban boundary in order to establish a land use framework that reflects the principles, objectives and policies of the Official Plan and guide development applications within these lands.  This future development area is approximately 160 hectares in size.

 

The Community Design Plan document was prepared by planning consultants acting on behalf of the landowners in consultation with engineering consultants, various City Departments, school boards, adjacent landowners, local community groups, the South Nation River Conservation Authority and other technical agencies.

 

The CDP establishes the arrangement of the public road network, the location of residential, commercial and institutional uses, as well as the location of parks and open spaces for the study area.  It also serves as a community development guideline document for the preparation and review of development applications within these lands.  The CDP proposes an estimated 3000 residential units and a range of 4000-5000 jobs.

 

The purpose of this report is to present the recommended Mer Bleue Community Design Plan to Committee for recommendation to Council for approval.  Although a demonstration plan has been prepared to show how the Mixed Use Centre can be developed, this area will undergo its own CDP process and Official Plan Amendment as per the policies of the City Council Approved Official Plan.

 

Financial Implications:

 

The development of major servicing infrastructure and parks within the study area will be funded as per the City’s Development Charges By-law.

 

Public Consultation:

 

Two advertised public open house meetings were held in the community. The first open house was held on November 30th, 2005. The purpose of this meeting was to obtain public comment on the proposed study components, timeframes and background materials including base information on the existing conditions for the study area, different land use alternatives, servicing and transportation options and the policies that guided the completion of the plans for the area.

 

The second public open house meeting was held in the community on March 22, 2006. The purpose of this meeting was to display for public review and comment a draft of the preferred CDP alternative, a demonstration plan showing how the community could be developed as well as the various background studies updated and prepared in support of the CDP.

 

In addition to the above-noted meetings, various meetings were held throughout the process with the Conservation Authority, other City Departments, landowners and adjacent residents.

 

RÉSUMÉ

 

Hypothèses et analyse :

 

Le 14 septembre 2005, le Conseil a adopté la modification n° 35 du Plan officiel qui a permis de modifier la désignation de terrains situés dans la partie sud-est d'Orléans, les faisant passer de secteur d'emploi à zone urbaine générale et centre polyvalent. Comme condition nécessaire à l'approbation, le Conseil a demandé à ce que le personnel de la Ville travaille avec les propriétaires fonciers à la préparation d'un Plan de conception communautaire (PCC) pour le secteur situé à l'est du chemin Mer Bleue, à l'ouest du chemin Tenth Line, au sud du couloir de transport de l'électricité et au nord de la limite urbaine afin d'établir un cadre d'utilisation des terrains qui tient compte des principes, des objectifs et des politiques du Plan officiel et qui guide les demandes d'aménagement sur ces terrains. Cette future zone d’aménagement représente une superficie d'environ 160 hectares.

 

Le Plan de conception communautaire a été préparé par des consultants en urbanisme agissant au nom des propriétaires fonciers en collaboration avec des ingénieurs-conseils, différents services de la Ville, des conseils scolaires, des propriétaires adjacents, des groupes communautaires locaux, la Société d'aménagement de la rivière Nation-Sud et d'autres agences techniques.

 

Le PCC établit la configuration du réseau public routier, l'emplacement des utilisations résidentielles, commerciales et institutionnelles ainsi que l'emplacement des parcs et des aires ouvertes pour le secteur à l'étude. Il sert aussi de lignes directrices en matière d'aménagement communautaire pour la préparation et l'examen des demandes d'aménagement pour ces terrains. Le PCC prévoit environ 3 000 unités d'habitation et entre 4 000 et 5 000 emplois.

 

Ce rapport a pour but de présenter le Plan de conception communautaire Mer Bleue au Comité afin qu'il le recommande au Conseil pour approbation.  Bien qu'un plan de démonstration ait été préparé pour démontrer comment le centre polyvalent peut être aménagé, ce secteur sera soumis à son propre processus PCC et sa modification du Plan officiel en vertu des politiques du Plan officiel approuvé par le Conseil de la Ville.

 

Répercussions financières :

 

L'aménagement d’importantes infrastructures de viabilisation et de parcs dans le secteur à l'étude sera financé en vertu du règlement sur les redevances d'aménagement de la Ville d'Ottawa.

 

Consultation publique :

 

Deux séances portes ouvertes annoncées ont eu lieu dans la communauté. La première séance a eu lieu le 30 novembre 2005. Celle-ci avait pour but d'obtenir des commentaires du public sur les composantes de l'étude proposée, les délais, la documentation y compris l'information de base sur les conditions actuelles du secteur à l'étude, les différents scénarios d'utilisation des terrains, les options de viabilisation et de transport et les politiques qui ont guidé l'achèvement des plans du secteur.

 

La deuxième séance portes ouvertes a eu lieu dans la communauté le 22 mars 2006. Cette séance avait pour but de présenter à la population une version préliminaire de l'alternative du PCC préférée afin qu'elle puisse l’étudier et la commenter, un plan de démonstration présentant les façons dont la communauté pourrait être développée ainsi que les diverses études préliminaires mises à jour et préparées pour appuyer le PCC.

 

En plus des séances précitées, différentes réunions ont été tenues tout au long du processus avec l'office de protection de la nature, d'autres services de la Ville, des propriétaires et des résidents adjacents.

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

On September 14, 2005, Council adopted Official Plan Amendment 35, which redesignated 160 hectares of land in the south part of Orléans.  The lands in question are located south of the Hydro Corridor, east of Mer Bleue Road, west of Tenth Line Road and north of the urban boundary (see Document 1).  The Amendment redesignated the lands from Employment Area to General Urban Area and Mixed Use Centre.  As a condition of approval, Council required City staff to work with the landowners to prepare a Community Design Plan (CDP) to establish a land use framework to guide the future development within this new community. The purpose of the CDP is to provide a comprehensive vision and a conceptual framework which reflects the principles, objectives and policies of the Official Plan that will guide the preparation and review of development applications within these lands. 

 

The study area known to this point as Neighbourhood 5, is bisected by the future extension of the Blackburn Hamlet Bypass and includes stations for the transit line just south of the Hydro corridor at Mer Bleue Road and Tenth Line Road. To the north of the study area is the eastern portion of the Orléans Industrial Park for which a Land Use and Design Study was recently completed.  The area west of Mer Bleue Road is also subject to a Community Design Plan for a residential neighbourhood.  Phase 1 of this plan was completed in June, 2005 and Phase 2 is currently under review. A municipal snow disposal facility is planned north-west of the site along Mer Bleue Road just north of the Hydro Corridor. 

 

The Mer Bleue Community Design Plan was initiated by the City and was developed with the support of consultants retained by the landowners.  The CDP was guided by a project team consisting of landowners, engineering and planning consultants led by City staff and involving input from the public, surrounding landowners, internal City departments, school boards and outside technical agencies.  The study process included detailed geotechnical, servicing and traffic analysis.

 

The plan envisions the development of a mixed-use community with approximately 3000 residential units and a range of 4000-5000 jobs. The density targets associated with the "Developing Community" Official Plan land use designation apply to the lands designated "General Urban".  A range of housing types is provided including a maximum of 60% single detached and semi-detached, at least 10% apartment dwellings and the remainder multiple dwellings other than apartments. 

 

 

DISCUSSION

 

The Mer Bleue CDP indicates how the housing mix, residential density, parks and green space objectives in the new Official Plan (OP) can be met and illustrates the arrangement of all types of land uses, including commercial, open spaces and transportation corridors.  The CDP will serve as a community development guideline document, which incorporates and provides detail on the policy direction for design in the new Official Plan.  The Mixed Use Centre will be subject to an Official Plan Amendment and a more detailed analysis to determine how the plan will be implemented in this area.

 

In addition, the CDP considers the proposed and existing development areas adjacent to the study area, establishes the collector road network and identifies key land use, density and infrastructure assumptions for the lands within the study area.

 

An Existing Conditions Report dated January 18, 2006 was prepared to give general information on the study area.  A summary of its findings form Document 2. 

 

COMMUNITY DESIGN PLAN

 

The Mer Bleue CDP has been guided by the direction and policies in the Official Plan, including Section 2.5.7 "Collaborative Community Building and Community Design Plans" and Section 3.6.4. "Developing Community".  In addition, the proposed plan was influenced by existing and proposed road and transit networks, the future Mixed Use Centre (MUC), the natural environment features, the proposed snow disposal facility and the servicing studies for the area.

 

Neighbourhood 5 is structured with a modified grid road network, proposed commercial blocks, a mixed use centre and new parks.  The homes in the neighbourhood are within a 400 metre radius of neighbourhood and community parks.  On and off-street pedestrian and cycling networks will be provided throughout the development which will create a link to adjacent communities and transit.

 

A minimum employment target of 4000-5000 jobs formed part of the Official Plan Amendment for these lands.  To ensure this target is met, sufficient land will have to be set aside for employment.  It is anticipated that the Mixed Use areas near the transit stations will generate over 2500 jobs, the commercial designations will generate 1200 jobs and the balance is expected in institutional uses, schools and home based businesses throughout the study area.

 

Six land use designations will apply to the lands within the Mer Bleue Community Design Plan: Mixed Density Residential, Mixed Use Areas, Commercial, Schools, Other Institutional Uses and Parks.  Document 3 illustrates the distribution of land uses.

 

Mixed Density Residential

 

This community will provide a variety of housing forms, mixed throughout the community.  The overall residential density will be at least 29 units per net hectare, with higher density residential uses located close to the Mixed Use areas and in areas of constrained soils.  Mixed Density Residential can include singles, semi-detached, townhomes, stacked townhomes and low-rise apartments (maximum of 6 storeys).  In accordance with OP policies for developing communities, the plan will provide a maximum of 60% single detached and semi-detached, at least 10% apartment dwellings and the remainder multiple dwellings other than apartments.

 

 

Mixed Use Areas

 

The Mixed Use areas located at the north-west and north-east corners of the lands in proximity to the transit stations, will accommodate a wide range of office, institutional, and convenience retail uses, with the objective of becoming high-density employment-generating nodes for the area.  The Official Plan policies state that lands within 400 metres of Transit Stations are intended to develop as compact, mixed-use, pedestrian friendly cores.  The plan will direct built form to the proposed transit stations at Mer Bleue Road and Tenth Line Road and encourage pedestrian access to transit.  High density residential uses will be integrated with non-residential uses in the same building.  Approximately 300 high density residential units will be provided.  Non-residential uses can include institutional, commercial and service uses such as professional and medical offices, retail stores, restaurants, service commercial, financial institutions, hotels, entertainment and recreational uses.  These uses should support job creation at a rate of one employee for every 30 square metres of floor area in order to achieve the employment targets of the plan. The two mixed-use areas are expected to generate over 2500 jobs.

 

Commercial

 

Commercial nodes are located along Mer Bleue Road and Tenth Line Road at the intersections with the Blackburn Hamlet Bypass Extension. The intent of this designation is to provide commercial uses such as food services, neighbourhood serving retail, financial services, gymnasiums and child care.

 

Institutional Uses

 

A Public / Institutional block has been reserved along Mer Bleue Road at the intersection of the east-west collector road south of the Blackburn Hamlet Bypass Extension. Public land uses such as libraries, schools, fire stations or municipal servicing facilities are appropriate for this designation.  Institutions such as churches and private schools are also suitable for this area. It is recognized that this block may be re-located in the future, as its specific use is determined.  Inclusion in the plan at this time is important to recognize the possibility of such a use.

 

Parks

 

Two large Community Parks, approximately 3.25 hectares in size, are centrally located along collector roads and are focal points for the north and south sectors of the plan.  They will accommodate sports fields such as soccer as well as a variety of other recreational activities, active and passive.  The two 0.8 hectare Neighbourhood Parks are both located in the south half of the plan and will provide small-scale recreational uses and passive recreation. 

 

The Hydro corridor which is designated in the OP as a Major Recreational Pathway and Cycling Route, will connect the area to the City's pathway and cycling network.

 

The total parkland required based on 2700 residential units provided on the land use plan is approximately 9.0 hectares.  The demonstration plan indicates a total of 8.1 hectares of parkland, plus the public square located in the Mixed Use Centre.  Cash-in-lieu of parkland will also be collected in accordance with Planning Act requirements for commercial uses.

 

Schools

 

Two school sites have been provided on the plan and are centrally located in the southern sector.  The Ottawa-Carleton District School Board have requested that a 2.8 hectare site be reserved for a future Elementary School.  A 8.0 hectare site has been shown at the request of The Ottawa-Carleton Catholic School Board for a future Secondary School.

 

The Elementary School site is located adjacent to a Community Park which provides the opportunity for shared parking and facilities between the City and the school board.

 

These sites will have dual zoning to permit medium density residential uses as an alternative use in the event that the sites are not acquired by the school boards within the prescribed time limit. 

 

Special Study Area

 

The CDP identifies a Special Study Area which corresponds to the limit of the fill and floodplain mapping for McKinnons Creek regulated by the South Nation Conservation Authority at the south-western corner of the lands.  The Provincial Policy Statement allows development and site alteration in hazardous zones other than floodways, provided the hazard can be safely addressed.  Because the construction of buildings and placing of fill in the floodplains may reduce the natural storage area of a stream, a process to amend the floodplain mapping has been undertaken to allow development.  This modification is currently in progress and must be completed to the satisfaction of the South Nation Conservation Authority prior to the approval of any planning applications in this area.  In the interim, the lands will be zoned with a holding provision prohibiting development.

 

Pedestrian Network

 

Sidewalks and pathway connections make up the pedestrian network throughout Neighbourhood 5.  Some of the local roads will have a sidewalk on one side, whereas the collectors and arterials will provide a sidewalk on both sides of the road.  Pathway connections will provide additional links between roads, community facilities, schools, parks and commercial uses.

 

Transportation Plan

 

A Transportation Impact Study has been prepared in support of the Community Design Plan.  The transportation network is composed of a system of interconnected collectors and local roads organized in a modified grid system to permit accessibility and flexibility of movement.  The network provides connectivity to the future transit stations at Mer Bleue and Tenth Line Roads, while concentrating larger volumes of traffic to key intersections, avoiding traffic through the local residential portions of the neighbourhood.

 

The Transportation Impact Study anticipated the generation of more than 4000 jobs and 2700 residential units of varying densities and examined traffic growth, traffic generated by the community, traffic distribution and traffic impact.  Based on the findings of the study, there is sufficient capacity provided on the road network to accommodate projected internal and external traffic volumes.

 

Transit Service

 

All major collectors within the development area will be designed to accommodate buses.  The internal road system will be connected to the major arterials Mer Bleue Road, Tenth Line Road and the Blackburn Hamlet Bypass in order to facilitate routing of buses throughout the community and connections to the future transit stations which will be located on Mer Bleue Road and Tenth Line Road.  Separation distance between local bus stops along collector roads should be no more than 200 to 250 metres and walking distance to bus stops is not to exceed 400 metres.

 

Servicing Plan

 

The Municipal Servicing Plan for the Mer Bleue CDP has been developed respecting the location of major existing and proposed new infrastructure within and around this community.  The plan protects major servicing corridors for trunk water, wastewater and stormwater infrastructure to allow for a cost effective phased development of the entire neighbourhood.

 

The water distribution system for the CDP area has been studied to include watermain connections in Neighbourhood 5 with internal looping providing a strong overall system which will facilitate staged development over several years.

 

The runoff from Neighbourhood 5 will be controlled in an off-line water quality/quantity stormwater management facility designed as an extended detention hybrid wet pond providing an enhanced level of protection.  The pond will be located south of the study area and east of McKinnons’ Creek.

 

The proposed storm sewer system consists of an east west trunk sewer which runs along the southern boundary of Neighbourhood 5 and intercepts two north south storm trunk sewers which service the entire neighbourhood and conveys the flow to the stormwater management pond just south of the development area.

 

The sanitary sewer system which will service the area is designed in conjunction with the development of the proposed storm sewer system for Neighbourhood 5 but will outlet into the Tenth Line Road Pump Station.  

 

Affordable Housing

 

Affordable Housing will be required in accordance with Section 2.5.2 of the Official Plan.  The Official Plan directs that 25% of all new housing development and redevelopment is to be affordable to households at or below the 30th income percentile for rental and at or below the 40th income percentile for ownership.  Within the CDP area, approximately 675 homes will be within the affordability range as determined at the time of subdivision development approval.  In Neighbourhood 5 approximately 40% of the estimated 2700 housing units will be comprised of multiple-unit structures (10% apartments and 30% townhomes).

 

The development of "social housing" for low and moderate income households by social housing providers, with or without City funding or incentives, will be included within the total 25% of affordable housing in the community.  No specific sites have been identified for this use at this time.

 

Design Guidelines

 

A set of Design Guidelines has been established which will apply to all development within the Mer Bleue CDP area.  The CDP examines how open space, public infrastructure and built form can work together to structure neighbourhoods and contribute to community development.  The community identity will rely solely on the location, architecture and design of new construction as well as landscaping.  Guidelines have been created for gateways and prominent corners, noise attenuation, residential neighbourhoods, parks, schools, transit, commercial uses, institutional uses, mixed-use areas and streets. 

 

Gateways and Prominent Corners

 

Gateways and Prominent street corners will be highlighted by special streetscape treatment such as low decorative masonry walls, distinct lighting and planting as well as building architecture.  On corner lots, buildings will be oriented to face both street fronts.  Such buildings are to be designed with a consistent architectural character to address both streets.  Parking areas will be located away from gateway intersections.  Treed entry boulevards and medians will be created to define the entrances into the neighbourhood.

 

Streets

 

In accordance with the Official Plan, streets within this community have been designed using a modified grid pattern to maximize the number of access and egress points, increase permeability of the network, increase pedestrian and transit accessibility and enhance personal navigation. 

 

Arterial roads are designed to carry large volumes of traffic and should provide a high degree of connectivity between land uses and places along the route.  Some intersections along the arterials have full movement and are signalized, others will be limited to right-in/right-out movements only.  Sidewalks and pedestrian-scale lighting is to be provided at all intersections along arterials and pedestrian crossings must be clearly marked.  On-street cycling lanes will be provided along the arterials in the CDP area.  Street trees will be planted at regular intervals to form a canopy along roadways.

 

Collector roads establish routes in and around the various neighbourhoods and provide connections to transit within the community.  Deciduous trees should be planted in the public right of way, along with a sidewalk inside the boulevard on both sides of the street.  Lighting will be provided to meet pedestrian requirements.

 

Local roads are designed to distribute traffic from arterial and collector roads to individual properties within the neighbourhood.  If appropriate, the local roads will have a sidewalk on one side.  Single loaded streets will be used in areas adjacent to arterials roads to minimize the use of noise attenuation barriers.  Rear laneways can also be used in cases where garages and front driveways are problematic.

 

Noise Attenuation

 

The placement and orientation of the buildings will be done to avoid the need for noise attenuation walls.  Residential dwellings along arterials and collectors will be oriented to face the street.  To avoid the need for noise barriers, single-loaded streets, side-lotting and front-lotting will be used.  When required, noise attenuation walls will be designed with a variety of materials and generous landscaping to be visually pleasing.

 

Residential Neighbourhoods

 

Residential areas will be developed with an integrated mix of housing choices and built form.  Variety of housing form will improve densities and provide more interesting streetscapes.  Buildings will be designed with architectural details such as different façade articulations for each unit, porches, windows, balconies and corner treatments to add interest throughout the neighbourhood.  Housing design will have a strong street presence with consistent, reduced front yards, without dominating garages and paved areas.  Parking areas and common driveways can be located beside or behind the residential units to achieve a strong street edge.

 

Townhouse blocks will be designed with an architectural style to complement the design of single and semi-detached dwellings. Low to mid-rise apartments will be oriented to the public street with entries facing the sidewalk.  Common parking areas and service areas will be located on the side or at the rear of the buildings away from the front of the building.

 

Parks

 

Parks will have frontage on at least two public streets with pedestrian linkages clearly identified with landscape features.  A Community Park is planned adjacent to the Elementary School Site.  Tree planting will be designed to provide shading without restricting visibility into the park.  The Crime Prevention through Environmental Design principles will be applied throughout the site including lighting and plant selection, pedestrian access, location of passive and active areas.  Where necessary, parking areas and buildings will be located on site to minimize the impact created by lights and noise on adjacent residential developments.

 

Schools

 

Schools should be designed with special architectural features to reflect  their public and educational vocation.  The buildings will be located on corners close to the street edges and designed with quality architecture and materials and landscaped to create an interesting streetscape.  Parking areas and play areas should be located on the side or at the rear of the school away from residential neighbourhoods where possible.  Fencing and landscaping will be provided in these areas in proximity to residential developments.  Drop-off areas for buses or cars should be provided at the side or front of the building.  Street lay-bys will be avoided along arterial and collector roads.  The school’s main entrance will be connected to the public sidewalks to facilitate pedestrian access.

 

Transit

 

Bus stops will be located close to intersections and in proximity to pathway connections and building entrances.  All transit stops should have concrete pads and shelters when and where required.  These shelters will be constructed with transparent sides to allow visibility inside and out.  For additional safety, lighting should be coordinated with bus stop locations.

 

Commercial Uses

 

Safe and easy pedestrian access should be provided  from commercial areas to the residential neighbourhood.  Building fronts are to be located close to the public street and oriented towards the street as well with parking behind or beside the building.  The building elevations along the street will be approved with a functional façade and the presence of windows and doors.

 

Service areas for loading and garbage pick-up should be screened with a masonry wall designed to be complimentary with the main building architecture and materials.

 

Mixed Use Areas

 

The Mixed Use Areas are located adjacent to a major transit route and stations and will be areas where the community will gather for commercial activities and services.  They will provide a diversified location for jobs, high density residential and service commercial oriented to the future transit infrastructure.  Built form and site planning within the Mixed Use Areas must reinforce a high quality urban identity through enhanced architecture and landscape design.  Buildings will have articulated façades, lots of glazing, complimentary architectural treatment and building heights of at least two storeys.  A mix of residential and non-residential uses are encouraged within the same building.  Building entrances will be prominent to the street, ground floors will be animated by shops and restaurants and pedestrian friendly outdoor amenities such as seating areas and patios will be provided in the front and at the sides of buildings.

 

An urban courtyard and public space will be the focal point of the Mixed Use Centre at Mer Bleue Road where pedestrian links to the transit station and the rest of the community will be provided.

 

Implementation

 

The Official Plan requires that Community Design Plans indicate how policies and guidelines will be implemented at the community level. The CDP describes how the Plan is to be interpreted, provides a sector plan to track development densities, provides guidelines for reviewing  development applications, shows how affordable housing targets will be met and explains the process for making changes to the Plan in the future.   Zoning By-law amendments will be undertaken at the time of development approval and will implement the land use and community design directions set out in the CDP.  The design guidelines will be applied through the implementing zoning, site plan and subdivision review process.

 

 

CONSULTATION

 

Two advertised public open house meetings were held in the community at key stages in the study. The first open house was held on November 30th, 2005.  The purpose of this meeting was to obtain public comment on the proposed study components, timeframes and background materials. The public viewed display materials including base information on the existing conditions for the study area, different land use alternatives, servicing and transportation options and the policies that guided the completion of the plans for the area. Approximately 80 people attended the open house meeting. The proposed CDP study was generally well accepted by the public.

 

The second public open house meeting was held in the community on March 22, 2006. Approximately 50 people attended the open house meeting. The purpose of this meeting was to display for public review and comment a draft of the preferred CDP alternative, a demonstration plan showing how the community could be developed as well as the various background studies updated and prepared in support of the CDP. The public response to the proposed CDP was generally positive. A general concern for increased traffic and vehicular movements were expressed as well as the timing for the transit corridor to be operational.  Although it is recognized that a separate Environmental Assessment is being conducted for the widening of Mer Bleue Road and Tenth Line Road, the public is concerned with the potential congestion which will occur at key intersections at both north/south arterial roads as well as the Blackburn Hamlet Bypass Extension. A summary of comments received from the public is set out in Document 5.

 

 

TECHNICAL REVIEW

 

The Community Design Plan document was prepared by planning consultants acting on behalf of the landowners in consultation with engineering consultants, various City Departments, the school boards, adjacent landowners, local community groups, the South Nation River Conservation Authority and other technical agencies.

 

The comments received throughout the process have been considered in the preparation of the Mer Bleue Community Design Plan.

 

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

The development of major servicing infrastructure and parks within the study area will be funded as per the City’s Development Charges By-law.

 

 

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

 

Document 1      Location Plan

Document 2      Existing Conditions Report Summary

Document 3      Land Use Plan and Land Use Summary Table

Document 4      Demonstration Plan

Document 5      Record of Public Consultation

Document 6      List of Supporting Studies

Document 7      Mer Bleue Community Design Plan dated 9 May 2006 (on file with the City Clerk)

 

 

DISPOSITION

 

Corporate Services Department, City Clerk's Branch to notify the owners (Minto Developments Inc., 300-427 Laurier Avenue West, Ottawa, ON K1R 7Y2 and Taggart/Tamarack, 225 Metcalfe Street, Ottawa, ON  K2P 1P9), and Ghislain Lamarche, Program Manager, Assessment, Financial Services Branch (Mail Code: 26-76) of City Council's decision.

 


DOCUMENT 1

 

LOCATION PLAN                                                                                                                           

 



DOCUMENT 2

 


EXISTING CONDITIONS

 

The Existing Conditions Report dated January 18, 2006 identified existing and planned infrastructure throughout the surrounding area as well as natural features. Although the study area itself does not have parks or recreational facilities, there are significant natural features and major recreational facilities in the existing surrounding communities. 

 

The study area is bound by major transportation features.  Mer Bleue Road to the west of the lands and Tenth Line Road to the east are two-lane urban arterials with rural cross-sections which are currently subject to a road widening Environmental Assessment.  Innes Road north of the subject properties has recently been widened to a four-lane arterial and provides an east-west connection between Mer Bleue Road and Tenth Line Road.  The transit corridor immediately north of the study area is not yet operational, however transit services are currently provided on Tenth Line Road and on Innes Road to service the existing Avalon Community east of this future neighbourhood.

 

Water service to Neighbourhood 5 will initially be provided by existing 406 and 152 mm watermains along Tenth Line Road on the east side.  The water distribution system provides large fire flows and maintains water pressure to these lands.

 

The wastewater outlet for this development is the future Tenth Line Road Pump Station located in the south-east corner of the CDP lands and the proposed gravity sewer, which will be installed in Tenth Line Road from the Bilberry Creek Industrial Park to the proposed pumping station. This pump station is under construction at this time.

 

The study area generally slopes from north to south. Stormwater runoff from the CDP area flows south through agricultural drains into McKinnons Creek, which flows along the south-west corner of the site. The Master Drainage Plan requires a storm water management pond to treat post development runoff from Neighbourhood 5 which will outlet to McKinnons Creek.

 

A preliminary Geotechnical Investigation (January 18, 2006) was prepared for the CDP area. It revealed that the soil profile in the area consists of a layer of topsoil overlying a layer of silty clay varying in thickness from 9 m to 26 m.  Below the silty clay is the limestone and shale bedrock.  The subject land will be subjected to grade raise restrictions if standard shallow footing foundations are used.  The most constrained areas are located in the southern central portion of the study area.  If higher grade raises are required, pile foundations, preloading, light weight fill and/or other measures should be investigated to reduce the risks of unacceptable long term post construction settlements.

 

There are no significant natural heritage designations within the CDP area including provincially significant wetlands, Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest and significant wildlife habitat.  No woodlands or other features have been identified through the recent Urban Natural Area study completed by the City in 2005.

 

 


DOCUMENT 3

 

LAND USE PLAN                                                                                                                            



DOCUMENT 4

 

DEMONSTRATION PLAN                                                                                                            

 


DOCUMENT 5

 

RECORD OF PUBLIC CONSULTATION                                                                                    

 

 

Comments from Public Open House Meeting #1 - November 30, 2005

 

Comment - The Ottawa Carleton District School Board indicated a requirement for a 7 acres elementary school site in this CDP area.  The school site should be adjacent to a city park and have a rectangular configuration.  Dual street frontage is preferable with one street having a minimum frontage of 125 metres.

Response - A 2.8 hectare (7 acre) parcel has been secured on the Demonstration Plan for a future elementary school.  It meets the preferred lot configuration, has two street frontages and is adjacent to a park.

 

Comment - The Ottawa-Carleton Catholic School Board indicated a requirement for a future intermediate/high school.

Response - A 8.0 hectare (20 acre) parcel has been secured on the Demonstration Plan for a future intermediate/high school as requested.

 

Comment - Richcraft commented on the alignment of the Blackburn Bypass Extension as presented as it may create a land locked parcel on their land.

Response - It was explained that the one shown was the preferred alignment in accordance with the approved Environmental Assessment.

 

Comment - The Innes Re-Zoning and Development Group commented they liked all three concept plans presented but preferred Concept #1 because there are two north-south streets in this plan which better subdivides the residential areas, allowing better distribution of the traffic flow.  This plan also has two east-west traffic venues: the Blackburn Hamlet Bypass Extension and the collector road to the south.  They liked the idea of having a centre greenspace and creating a "Town Centre" focal point.  They preferred the option which provided four parks well distributed within the community with one adjacent to the Elementary School.

Response - All the elements mentioned have been incorporated in the preferred alternative included in the CDP.

 

Comment - All three concepts seem to lack a neighbourhood focus.  The commercial buildings should either be built in the centre of the community for pedestrian accessibility or be concentrated in one area where residents could walk along and have a choice in shops, restaurants and bars similar to the By Ward Market, Elgin Street, Bank Street in the Glebe or Westboro.

 

We are in favour of the greenspace shown in the middle of the mixed use areas and think this focal point should be adorned by a statue to instill civic pride within the community.  Unlike the Cumberland Town Centre, parking should be out of sight as much as possible.

Response - On the preferred concept plan, the commercial developments have been shown along major arterial roads and in the mixed use areas.  Pedestrian connections have been provided throughout the community for easy access to these commercial centres.  Their locations will facilitate driving to the sites as well.  The mixed use centres will be designed to encourage pedestrian access and a town centre atmosphere is what is envisioned.  Parking structures will be built behind main buildings in order to concentrate vehicle parking away from the street.

 

Comment - Because the Mer Bleue Road and Tenth Line Road EA Study and the transit infrastructure has not been completed, it is difficult to predict their implications. There is no other way to travel east/west in this area other than Innes Road and the Blackburn Hamlet Bypass.

 

The proposed servicing and stormwater management pond is inappropriate given that it will lower the underground water level affecting the marine sensitive clay soils and will risk causing stress on foundations.  The plan does not give consideration to existing environmental conditions. 

ResponseThe impact of Tenth Line Road, Mer Bleue Road and transit infrastructure

has been assessed within the transportation modelling component of the City's Official Plan and Transportation Master Plan (TMP). Based on this process, traffic projections for the above arterial roads have been prepared for the study horizon year of 2020 and assessments of the

required road configurations (i.e. number of lanes and intersection configurations ) determined. The TMP process is the recognized transportation industry practice for assessment of future road needs and combined with appropriate periodic updates recognizing land use updates is considered to be the most reliable method of planning road and transit needs.

 

The City of Ottawa has identified major transportation screenlines for the purpose of monitoring and determining future transportation needs, including future east-west needs. Of relevance to the Mer Bleue development, the Bilberry Creek Screenline is located on a north-south

axis within the proposed development and east of Mer Bleue Road. Based on the information in the CCL Transportation Overview (2004) and the Delcan report for Eden Park (2003), the modal split to transit at the Bilberry Creek Screenline is 27% in the morning peak hour and 22% in

the afternoon peak hour. This compares favourably to the City-wide average of 17% in the afternoon peak hour. The estimates of future roadway needs at the Bilberry Creek Screenline

can be accommodated adequately by constructing the following facilities by 2021:

 

           Blackburn Hamlet by-pass Extension; two-lanes initially, four lanes ultimately, to Trim Road

           Innes Road/Walkley Road link, two lane road initially, four lanes ultimately

           Innes Road; widening to four lanes between Orleans Boulevard and Tenth Line Road (construction reaching finalization)

           Highway 174; widening to six lanes from Highway 417 to Place D’Orleans

           Widening of Mer Bleue Road and Tenth Line Road (Environmental Assessments currently underway)

 

As well, the following roads will be constructed by 2021, which, although not directly providing increased capacity for east – west across the Bilberry Creek screenline, will significantly improve the road network east of the study area:

 

           Trim Road Widening, Innes Road to Highway 174

           Frank Kenny Extension, north of Innes Road to highway 174

           Portobello Boulevard, Trim Road north of Innes Road to Blackburn Hamlet By-pass Extension.

 

The City’s analysis also indicates that the projected 2021 transit share at the Bilberry Creek Screenline is 35%. These projected transit shares will be attained by the construction of the following transit facilities:

 

           Highway 174 bus lanes to Place D’ Orleans (completed)

           Highway 174 Transitway to Trim Road

           Cumberland Transitway to Trim Road

           Navan Road Park-and-Ride lot

           Trim Road Park-and-Ride lot

           Highway 417/Innes Road Park-and-Ride lot

 

The Rapid Transit Extension Study (RTES) has endorsed the extension of the existing east transitway in the Highway 174 corridor to Trim Road as a bus way and recommended implementation of the Cumberland Transitway, south of Innes Road, as a future corridor for light rail rapid transit or bus transit.

 

We note that the groundwater issues associated with the storm water management pond were discussed in our preliminary geotechnical investigation report and are as follows:

 

"It is our understanding that the proposed storm water management pond (SWMP) will be located in an area of silty clay soils extending beyond the full depth of the pond. The surface elevation of the proposed SWMP will range from 86.6 to 86.8 m and will be excavated to an elevation of approximately 81.4 m. The permanent water level within the proposed SWMP will be at an elevation of 83.3 m.

 

From a geotechnical perspective, the long term groundwater level was evaluated at a depth of 2 m below the existing grade. A further 0.5 m of groundwater lowering was added to the long term water level to account for the development of the subject site. The construction of the proposed SWMP will lower the long term groundwater table at the pond location to depths of approximately 3.3 to 3.5 m below the existing grade. This localized groundwater lowering will be approximately 0.8 to 1 m below the groundwater lowering accounted for the developed areas. Since the underlying soils are all relatively impervious (silty clay), the groundwater drawdown zone of influence along the perimeter of the SWMP from the edge of the permanent water level will be less than 10H:1V. Therefore, a no construction zone buffer between 8 to 10 m from the edge of the permanent water level within the pond should be implemented for this site."

 

Consideration has been given to existing environmental conditions in that Niblett Environmental Associates Inc. has completed a natural heritage evaluation of fish, fish habitat, vegetation and wildlife. The only concern identified was the potential to adversely affect fish habitat in the drain that forms the headwater of McKinnon’s Creek. The landowners are in negotiations with the South Nation Conservation Authority and the Department of Fisheries and Oceans to address this matter. It is our present understanding that the proposal to dredge this portion of the creek is acceptable in principle to these agencies, however, they will require both mitigation and compensation prior to authorizing any works in this watercourse.

 

It should also be noted that an Existing Conditions Report was prepared in support of the Mer Bleue CDP and made final on January 18, 2006 following internal City review and review by the SNRCA.  The report includes a summary of findings from a bio-physical inventory completed by Niblett Environmental Associates and a Preliminary Soils Investigation prepared by the Paterson Group.  The findings from these reports were used as a basis for the concept planning stage of the CDP.

 

Comments from Public Open House Meeting #2 - March 22, 2006

 

Comment - What is the difference between the water table observed in November, 2005 and in March, 2006?  What effect does the change in the water table have on infrastructure, on existing buildings and on new buildings? 

Response - Most of the water levels are due to a perched groundwater condition.  The long term water level for design purposes was taken at approximately 2.0 m.  A further 0.5 m of groundwater drawdown was used when determining preliminary grade raise restrictions. The water levels have remained close to the same between October of 2005 and March of 2006 (when not frozen). With the proposed clay dykes and depth of servicing, it is not expected that groundwater lowering below the assumed 2.5 m will take place at this site especially with the uniform silty clay subsoil conditions.

 

Comment - There are more arterial roads north-south east of the N.C.C. lands (eg. Tenth Line Road, Mer Bleue Road, Frank Kenny Road, Belcourt Boulevard, Portobello Boulevard than there are arterials with east-west movements (eg. St. Joseph Boulevard, Highway 174, Innes Road, Blackburn Hamlet Bypass and Navan Road).  Highway 174 carries a total of 2006 vehicles per hour with existing traffic and the Blackburn Bypass carries a total of 2006 vehicles per hour.  What solutions are proposed to deal with the increase in vehicular traffic on these roads?

Response -  The City of Ottawa has identified major transportation screenlines for the purpose of monitoring and determining future transportation needs.  Of relevance to the Mer Bleue development, the Bilberry Creek Screenline is located on a north-south axis within the proposed development and east of Mer Bleue Road.  Based on the information in the CCL Transportation Overview (2004) and the Delcan report for Eden Park (2003), the modal split to transit at the Bilberry Creek Screenline is 27% in the morning peak hour and 22% in the afternoon peak hour.  This compares favourably to the City-wide average of 17% in the afternoon peak hour.

The estimates of future roadway needs at the Bilberry Creek Screenline can be accommodated adequately by constructing the following facilities by 2021:  Blackburn Hamlet by-pass extension (two lanes initially, four lanes ultimately) to Trim; Innes Road/Walkley Road link (two lane initially, four lanes ultimately); Innes Road (widening to four lanes between Orléans Boulevard and Trim Road being finalized); Highway 174 (widening to six lanes from Highway 417 to Place d’Orléans) and widening of Mer Bleue Road and Tenth Line Road (Environmental Assessment currently underway).

 

The following roads will be constructed by 2021, which, although not directly providing increased capacity for east-west across the Bilberry Creek screenline, will significantly improve the road network east of the study area:  Trim Road widening from Innes Road to Highway 174; Frank Kenny Extension north of Innes to Highway 174; Portobello Boulevard from Trim Road north of Innes Road to the Blackburn Hamlet By-pass Extension.

 

The City’s analysis also indicates that the projected 2021 transit share at the Bilberry Creek Screenline is 35%.  These projected transit shares will be attained by the construction of the following transit facilities:  Highway 174 bus lanes to Place d’Orléans (completed); Highway 174 Transitway to Trim Road; Cumberland Transitway to Trim Road; Navan Road Park-and-Ride lot; Trim Road Park-and-Ride lot and Highway 174/Innes Road Park-and-Ride lot.

 

Comments on the Community Design Plan Document

 

Comment – The Ottawa Roads and Cycling Advisory Committee had the following comments:

 

Bike lanes along Tenth Line, Mer Bleue, Innes, and the Blackburn Bypass are important features to aid commuters and other cyclists going places. However there is only one illustration with bicycles inside the report, on p. 44.  One other photograph on p.56 shows a bike lane with a big "No Parking" sign, which should be "No Stopping" in Ottawa and a car parked in the bike lane.... Please show some photographs and designs which encourage cycling.

 

There should be mention of the multi-use pathway along the LRT which would help commuters

going to a station or along the LRT, though the off-road path along the Hydro right of

way would be nearby. The 2003 Transportation Master Plan specifies that there should

be a pathway alongside the LRT. It should ease access by local residents to

LRT stations by being accessible to nearby residents.

 

Section 5.16 specifies a pedestrian network "connecting schools and parks", almost all

on sidewalks. While sidewalks are good, it would make sense to provide easy ways to reach the LRT stations by foot or bike? EG, a pathway alongside the LRT with connections to the internal streets? There seems to be a couple of paths indicated in the demonstration plan on p. 50 providing shorter ped/bike paths to the LRT stations, but no path is shown along the LRT, nor connections to it.

 

Also, two main E/W roads are shown crossing the area. Around them is a warren of

streets with offset meetings. Consider having them meet directly so that cyclists can choose them for more traffic-free cycling and so that cars and pedestrians and cyclists have safer sight lines. Perhaps they should be oriented to provide alternate ways to reach the LRT stations by foot or bike.

 

There are no sections on bicycle parking. This must be considered for apartment and

commercial buildings.  Ideally, apartments should have accessible single-bike opaque

lockers to deter theft and encourage cycling. Shopping areas and institutions like

schools need visible bicycle stands. Offices need showers and supervised parking.

These should be specified in the CDP.

 

How can we encourage cycling and walking by mostly ignoring these healthy activities?

They are both recreational and utilitarian activities. Please build them into the CDP.

 

Response – The photo on page 56 has been changed to one which is more appropriate.

 

There is a pathway/connection shown from the centre of each mixed use areas to the proposed stations and a collector linking both which will have sidewalks and cycle lanes. In addition, the hydro corridor, north of the LRT, is designated as a major recreational pathway in the OP and will provide connectivity as well.

 

The demonstration plan illustrates one way to develop the CDP area in keeping with the proposed policies which shows the road network as a modified grid.  Modifications during the subdivision approval process will be possible.

 

The collector road system has 4-way intersections. However, it is common practice and  proven safer to avoid 4-way intersections between local streets and collectors.

 

Design guidelines with regards to bicycle parking have been added to sections 6.2.7, 6.2.9 and 6.2.10.

 

Policies encouraging cycling and walking and promoting healthy activities have been built in to the CDP document.

 

Comment – OCTranspo had the following comments:

 

While this CDP emphasizes the importance of transit in community development, the focus seems to be primarily placed on the mixed use centres.  The absence of specific transit related guidelines for local routes will require that we fall back to City Policies, in other documents, as mentioned on page 42.  More discussion would have helped demonstrate how other transit issues could maintain and strengthen the high modal share in Orleans.

 

Given that the EA is not complete for the East-West Corridor, we suggest that a similar statement that was made on page 59 regarding possible required changes, which may result due to the recommendations of the study, be introduced earlier in the document.  We suggest on page 26,  4.2 Concept Plan Assumptions in the discussion on the East-West Corridor Light Rail Project and/or on page 42, 5.2.1 Transit, in the discussion of Rapid Transit.

 

In addition there are four technical changes:

 

1. Pg 13 - Starting September 2006, a new Route 94 will be implemented, which will provide direct-to-downtown service along Innes Road.  Service will no longer be provided on Innes Road on Routes 21 and 33.  Route 94 will be a prelude to service which will operate in the future Rapid Transit corridor. 

 

2.  Pg 29 - the label on the Figure of the three concept plans should be renamed from Future Light Rail Transitline/Transitway to Rapid Transit Corridor.

 

3. Pg 41 - The Transportation Plan is mis-numbered.  I believe it should be Figure 12 or the text on page 40 is incorrect.

 

4. Pg 76 - The phasing plan is not consistent with the phasing plan on the subdivision proposal we just received for the same area.

 

Response – The suggested wording and changes recommended by OCTranspo have been incorporated in the CDP document.

 

Comment - The Ottawa-Carleton Catholic School Board (OCCSB) have commented that they are pleased that a site to serve their intermediate/secondary school population has now been incorporated into the design plan for the Mer Bleue area.  The development of the Mer Bleue lands will provide the Board a unique opportunity to provide a high school facility in the heart of the East Urban Community.

 

The OCCSB is satisfied with the size (8.1 ha) and configuration of the high school site.  They have no objection to frontage on three streets as shown in the demonstration plan, however, they would like to discuss any possible implications regarding the school’s location on a designated gateway/prominent corner as well as possible restrictions accessing the site from the Blackburn By-Pass Extension (e.g. right-in/right out movements only). 

 

Regarding the Design Guidelines for Schools outlined in Section 6, the following should be noted:

 

·The Board’s site is not currently abutting any parkland and therefore Section 6.2.6.3 regarding the coordinated design of school and park blocks does not apply.

·The Board has encountered design concerns, traffic problems and pedestrian safety issues with school sites that are located with limited setbacks from area streets.  Design guidelines and site plan approval conditions must respect the challenges associated with the design and construction of school sites and the reality of transporting over 1000 students on a daily basis.

·They support the concept of a street lay-by for busses and cars.

·The Board also accepts the concept of dual-zoning to permit flexibility should our school site requirements change.

 

As noted in the Community Design Plan, the preliminary geotechnical assessment of the area has revealed challenges for the development of certain areas and as such they would like to receive a copy of the Existing Conditions Report, dated January 18, 2006 (Paterson Group, Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, dated January 18, 2006).

 

Response – As requested by the OCCDSB, Section 6.2.6.3 is revised to state that the coordinated design of school and park blocks applies to the elementary school. Sufficient flexibility will be built in the Implementation section of the plan to allow the possibility for the school block to move.  This will be addressed during the subdivision process.

 

Comment - The Ottawa Carleton District School Board's concerns with the draft is the proximity of the elementary site to the optional OCCSB secondary school site and more specifically in terms of transportation issues with both schools having access from the same streets.  

As a result, they would like to switch the elementary site with the adjacent Block currently shown as "Multiples".  Another possibility is moving the elementary site to the north side of the bypass adjacent to the park block "L".

 

ResponseSufficient flexibility will be built in the Implementation section of the plan to allow the possibility for the school block to move based on whether or not the secondary school is constructed in its designated location.

 

Comment – The Ottawa Forests and Greenspace Advisory Committee had the following comments:

 

Natural Significance of the site.

The site consists of hayfields, meadows and some young poplar thickets.   It is an old field ecosystem and its development, while representing a loss of more rural meadows in the Orleans area, is less harmful than development on more naturally diverse lands such as a forest. 

 

According to page 21 of the report the most direct effect upon wildlife from the development of this site will be the reduction of habitat for the short-eared owl whose population is in decline in the Ottawa area and this is regrettable.  The CDP notes that it may be possible for this owl to find habitat to the south in rural lands, but no specific areas of habitat are mentioned or if this habitat will be protected from development.

 

Indirectly, stormwater outflows from this new neighbourhood as well as neighbourhood 4 to the east will affect McKinnons creek and its fish habitat.  The site is near the internationally recognized Mer Bleue wetland and the use of exotic species in landscaping in the development may threaten the native species growing in Mer Bleue.

 

Stormwater Management: plans are required for the proposed pond.

In general, it is the area of stormwater management that is the largest area of concern with this CDP.  We have not been able to evaluate the plans for the proposed stormwater management ponds or see what steps will be taken to mitigate the effects of stormwater flows on McKinnons creek.  We recommend that stormwater management ponds and ditches be constructed in a manner to guard against soil erosion and take into account the nature of the silty clay soil of the area.  This type of soil is observed to be susceptible to erosion as well as developing deep crevices if allowed to dry out when it forms part of an inadequately vegetated embankment.  We recommend that the design of the stormwater management ponds and ditches incorporate the use of native riparian species in order to reduce erosion, anchor soil, create potential wildlife habitat and make the ponds an attractive naturalized feature of the landscape.  The use of extensive green roofs on the flat surfaces of buildings in the commercial and mixed use areas offers the ability to reduce peak stormwater flows.  Green roofed buildings could be an attractive and an environmentally friendly aspect of this new community.

 

Development on the floodplain in the southern part of the community.

We note with the statement on page 27 "the development of lands within the floodplain will require further investigation and discussions with the South Nation Conservation Authority."  Changes in the grade level of the present floodplain will obviously have effects on nearby lands and potentially cause adverse changes in flooding patterns.  The CDP should not be forwarded for approval until the South Nation Conservation Authority has completed its review and approved the plans to develop on the floodplain.

 

 

Use of native plants in the community's landscape.

The community could positively exhibit its relationship to the Mer Bleue wetland through the promotion of the use of native plant and tree species for landscaping.  The nearby Mer Bleue wetland also must be protected from the introduction of exotic species due to landscaping in the community.  The use of attractive native species will help protect the Mer Bleue wetland from competition from exotic species as well as create a community landscape that is in harmony with its surroundings.

 

 

Greenspace plans for the hydro Corridor (page 35)

In this CDP part of the width of the present hydro corridor will be used for the future LRT and extension of the Blackburn Hamlet Bypass.  Although the corridor itself is outside of the CDP area, could part of the corridor be used as community gardening space for Mer Bleue residents?  There will be a number of residents in the Mer Bleue community living in high or medium density housing as well as others who will be living in residences with small yards.  Making land such as that which is under the present hydro towers available as plots for community gardening would create personalized green areas accessible to residents who would otherwise have limited or no access to gardening.  Community gardens add greatly to the fabric of the community and an excellent example of this is just a few kilometers west at the Gloucester Allotment gardens (just to the north of the Blackburn hamlet bypass.)   Community garden plots would be a strong attraction for some potential residents.

 

Recommendations

 

Response – The proposed Stormwater Management Pond is located outside the boundary of the CDP area however general statements will be added to the Servicing Section of the plan document to ensure the pond is designed to the satisfaction of the City.

 

Servicing Studies are being completed to address the floodplain issue.  The City is satisfied that in the event that SNRCA do not allow the fill and floodplain mapping to be amended that the lands identified as a Special Study Area will simply not be developed.

 

Servicing Studies are being completed to address stormwater management.  There is an approved Master Drainage Plan for the area and the City is satisfied that development can “conform” to its recommendations.

 

A guideline has been added to Section 6 that use of native trees and species will be encouraged.

 

There is a pathway connection shown from the centre of each mixed use areas to the proposed transit stations and a collector road linking both which will have sidewalks and cycle lanes.  In addition, the hydro corridor north of the transit corridor is designated as a major recreational pathway in the Official Plan and will provide connectivity as well.

 

Comment – Bell Canada recognizes that early involvement in the planning process ensures its network is planned in an orderly and coordinated manner.  They have requested that the following wording be added to the CDP document:

 

Section 5 – Community Design Plan

 

That a new subsection, 5.3.5 entitled “Public and Private Utilities” be added.  The suggested wording would read as:

 

Public and private utilities shall be permitted in all land use designations and shall be installed within public road allowances or within appropriate easements, as well as on private property.

 

Prior to approval of development, all interested utilities and telecommunication providers are to confirm if services can be provided to support the proposed development.  Developers should consult with utility and telecommunication providers in the early stages of development to determine appropriate locations for large utility equipment or utility cluster sites.

 

Section 6 – Community Design Guidelines

 

Guideline 6.2.3.6

That the following text be added to the end of this guideline:

 

Street trees will have to be coordinated with the location of utilities and infrastructure that share the right-of-way.

 


That the following two Guidelines be added to subsection “Servicing and Utilities”:

 

1.2.7.35    Encourage, wherever possible, a coordination and location within an initial common trench to avoid unnecessary over digging and disruption of the municipal right-of-way.

1.2.7.36    The City should encourage utility providers to consider innovative methods of containing utility services on or within streetscape features such as lamp posts, transit shelters, etc.

 

They have reservations with the utility wording in Guideline 6.2.5.9 regarding above-ground utilities to be located in front and flanking side yards of singles, semis and towns and that they would be incorporated into the streetscape to ensure visual integration, while respecting the operational requirements for access.  They would like to determine potential future locations for major above-ground utilities (eg. Walk-in cabinet) or clusters of utilities that may be needed to service this new neighbourhood.  These locations could be identified with a symbol on the demonstration plan with associated policy statements and guidelines.  This approach makes it clear for future developers that a major utility installation may be required in the area and encourages a coordinated approach among utility service providers to cluster utility installations, where possible, in targeted locations.

 

There are concerns with the impact of reduced right of ways for local roads would affect their operational requirements.

 

Response – The suggested wording proposed by Bell Canada has been added to the CDP document.  Locations of the future above-ground utilities will be discussed in detail during the subdivision process.

 

Comment – The South Nation Conservation Authority had the following comments:

 

The issues regarding the Development of the Floodplain, HEC-2 Model calculations, DFO Authorization/ Fisheries Compensation, along with the chosen Alternative for SWM are still outstanding and under review at this time. However, we have agreed "In Principle" to the Alternative of dredging McKinnons Creek.

 

Please note - that if the MB CDP is approved with these outstanding issues and not approved by the Conservation Authority, the potential for development within the Floodplain area (Special Study Area) is at risk. Therefore, in terms of Section 4.2 "Concept Plan Alternatives", which does not show the Special Study Area, development in the South-West Quadrant may not occur on any of the Alternatives.

 

Once the submissions meet the satisfaction of the Conservation Authority, the final proposal and revised mapping with geodetic elevations must be presented to our Board of Directors, and the Floodplain Designation removed.

 

The South Nation Conservation Authority feels that the Infrastructure Servicing Study and Stormwater Management issues should be resolved first before approving the Community Design Plan.

 

Response – It is understood that the Servicing Studies are being completed to address the floodplain issue.  The City is satisfied that in the event that SNRCA do not allow the fill and floodplain mapping to be amended that the lands identified as a Special Study Area will simply not be developed.  The Fisheries Compensation will be addressed as part of the Subdivision approval process.

 


DOCUMENT 6

 

LIST OF SUPPORTING STUDIES                                                                                                

 

 

 

  1. Mer Bleue Community Design Plan Infrastructure Servicing Study, March 27, 2006 (Draft), IBI Group.

 

  1. Mer Bleue Community Design Plan Transportation Impact Study, March 27, 2006 (Draft), IBI Group

 

  1. Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Cumberland East Urban Community - Neighbourhood 5 Tenth Line Road and Mer Bleue Road, revised March 20, 2006 (Draft), Patersongroup.


            mer bleue community design plan

plan de conception mer bleue

ACS2006-PGM-APR-0115                                                            CUMBERLAND (19)

 

John Moser, Director, Planning and Infrastructure Approvals (PIA), Planning and Growth Management Department (PGM), introduced Ms. Julie Houle, Planner, who provided an overview of the staff report by means of a PowerPoint slide presentation, held on file with the City Clerk.  Ms. Houle distributed the May 9, 2005 version of the Mer Bleue Community Design Plan (CDP) to all Committee members.  This document is held on file with the City Clerk.

 

Chair Peter Hume alluded to the use of single-loaded roads for the Blackburn Hamlet Bypass and he inquired why these were not being brought to the street.  Ms. Karen Currie, Manager, Development Services East/South, responded by saying that Blackburn is to be a large arterial road and that the streets would not intersect with the bypass.  Chair Hume also wanted to know whether alternative road standards or standard subdivision roadways were being used.  Ms. Currie indicated that the plan was set for 18-metre rights-of-way, but could be re-worked to 16.5 metres.

 

When asked by Chair Hume to comment on the absence of community centres/recreational facilities and the like, Ms. Currie said the proposed parks were of such a scale that community facilities could be built thereon.  She added that landowners have been told to protect that part of the land should it be determined there is a real need for such facilities.  Chair Hume said he felt that recreational and cultural staff had “dropped the ball” by not being able to advise the Committee about whether or not a community facility is needed in this area.

 

Vice-Chair P. Feltmate asked about gateway features, specifically the disconnection between the need for these markers and the fact that they are not well maintained.  Mr. Ned Lathrop, Deputy City Manager, Planning and Growth Management said maintenance costs would be reflected as a capital item and the City would have to pay them.  He clarified there are two kinds of gateway features: those that developers build and include as a selling feature, always located on private property, and City gateway features on the city streetscape.  With regard to this project, Mr. Lathrop said the community would have to design the gateways as appropriate and identify both the capital and operating costs of maintaining them.

 

Chair Hume thought it was being naïve to link capital and operating costs in relation to gateway features, as these are often jettisoned when budget pressures come into play.  Mr. Lathrop disagreed, positing Council might find it more difficult to make certain cuts when their direct impacts are visible.  His view was that this should be done on a functional basis, making more difficult for Council to separate them in the future.

 

Vice-Chair Feltmate asked about the number of home-based businesses and whether this number is included in employment calculations.  Ms. Pamela Sweet, FoTenn Consultants, said 10% is a typical calculation across the city so there are opportunities for 5,000 jobs here.  Ms. Currie confirmed for the Councillor that home-based businesses are included in employment calculations.  With regard to Councillor’s question about schools in the community, Ms. Sweet said there would be dual zoning, and, should schools not be built, the lands would revert to community residential use.

 

In reply to a question from Councillor Jan Harder, Ms. Currie indicated that the projected population for the area was approximately 8,000 people.  The Councillor stated that, given that number and the community that surrounds it, Council should examine how to accommodate larger recreational and parkland facilities.  She made reference to the Recreation Master Plan soon to come forward, positing this is the way to go.  The Councillor also sought, and received, assurances from staff, that by accepting the CDP, Council is not eliminating the possibility of a community building in the future.

 

With respect to community service facilities, Ms. Currie said that although there are none in this neighbourhood, residents would be able to access them in the adjoining neighbourhoods.  Chair Hume felt that, if this is what staff intends residents to do, it should be highlighted in the plan.  Ms. Currie pointed out that background studies and analyses on the service aspect were done, and that the CDP moves forward from that point.

 

Councillor Bob Monette expressed the view that proper community facilities need to be properly incorporated into the CDP, and sooner rather than later.

 

Councillor Rob Jellett (Cumberland Ward) expressed his support for Councillor Monette’s comment.  He then asked whether Development Charges were being levied for greenspace development in the Hydro Corridor.  Ms. Currie said that particular component could be drawn out of the citywide charge for parks and recreation facilities.  Councillor Jellett wanted to ensure this link is not forgotten and that fees are being collected to take the entire corridor through south Orléans.

 

The following delegations were then heard:

 

Ted Phillips, Taggart Group, spoke in support of the staff report, and he thanked Julie Houle and Mike Wildman, Program Manager, Infrastructure Approvals (EAST) for their diligence.  Commenting on Councillor Harder’s earlier observation about “cookie cutter” projects, Mr. Phillips said this represents a neo-traditional grid to achieve intensification and this approach is generally viewed as more efficient than it was twenty years ago.  Mr. Phillips’ comments were echoed by Mr. Marcel Dénommé, Minto Construction.

 

Iola Price – Chair, Ottawa Forests and Greenspace Advisory Committee asked that the Committee delay approval of the CDP pending the completion of a number of studies, including:

·        Infrastructure Servicing Study

·        Stormwater Management Plan

·        Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) mitigation plan to compensate for the habitat destruction in McKinnons Creek.

 

Ms. Price pointed out that the South Nation Conservation Authority has yet to review these studies.  She felt the pressure to approve this CDP was too great, and she advised delaying approval until all the studies are done and reviewed.  Ms. Price cited another area of concern as the folly of building on the flood plain.  Approving the CDP will put pressure on authorities to allow development in marginalized areas.  The OFGAC are also concerned with the lack of a proposal for a community forest as part of the plan, and the impact the development will have on the short-eared owl, already endangered, and on meadow habitats for butterflies.

 

Councillor Michel Bellemare asked whether the concept plan should be delayed to allow the completion of the studies.  Ms. Currie said staff are comfortable with the fact that the viability of alternatives has been analysed.  She added that the CDP identifies the southwest corner as being a holding area until the floodplain issue is dealt with; this part may never be developed.

 

Mike Wildman provided additional details about the studies alluded to by Ms. Price, noting that many are completed and others such as the DFO’s, are typically done at the micro-review stage, not at this point.

 

Councillor Alex Cullen asked about the down side of waiting for the studies to be completed.  Ms. Currie replied that approval of this plan was more difficult that approval of the Kanata West plan, since the Mer Bleue is a non-adopted design plan.  Should changes be required, these can be done by amendment to the CDP and not through an Official Plan amendment.  Ms. Currie said deferral would impact on the subdivision and on dealing with the DFO and is an issue of timing.  In reply to Councillor Cullen, Mr. Wildman indicated that the DFO’s work in relation to the deepening of McKinnon’s Creek and the effect on the fish habitat is done typically at the subdivision stage.  The area where the SNCA has jurisdiction has been frozen and the floodplain studies will be completed this year.

 

J.P. Taillefer, Taillefer Estates Inc., are the owners of 4 acres in the Northeast corner.  Mr. Taillefer expressed general support for the CDP, but concerns over access to 10th Line Road, which will be restricted in the future by the elevation of 10th Line for the future Transitway and pedestrian pathways below it.  He asked that it be put on record that Taillefer Estates be advised, at the subdivision level, and that its concerns be satisfied.

 

Marcel Bisson, the owner of Lot 4, Conc. 11, Cumberland, to the south of CDP area, asked what would be the effect of stormwater management on property owners, and would landowners to the south be compensated for the effects of deepening McKinnon’s Creek?  He was advised that he would be approached for permission to deepen the Creek; should his answer be no, the storm sewer would be put through the road allowance and by-pass his property.

 

Mr. Bisson said it seemed to him that the City was pushing everything it doesn’t want in the urban boundary onto arable land and that developers get everything they want.  He stated that developers should be made to carry all the disadvantages of development, not the existing property owners whose lands are being devalued.

 

When asked by Councillor Bédard to elaborate on his objections, Mr. Bisson said he would lose approximately 5 acres of land that is still zoned agricultural.  He was promised that a rezoning would be done as part of the 2003 Official Plan review, but it was not, and staff has now indicated this would be done as part of the 2008 review.  Ms. Currie said it is clear, when looking at this parcel, that Mr. Bisson’s property is surrounded by urban lands to the west and east, and this is becoming a more significant factor.

 

Councillor Jellett called Mr. Bisson’s land “the hole in the development donut”, and he sought assurances from staff that, should he be negatively impacted, he would be subject to compensation by means of expropriation at market rates.  Staff confirmed this was correct.  Mr. Bisson concluded his presentation by requesting there be a new study to definitely determine whether or not there is a floodplain on the east and west sides of 10th Line Road.

 

Committee Discussion

 

Councillor Cullen said he has asked staff to develop a policy to deal with surplus school sites, which the Official Plan makes clear are the fundamental building blocks of every community.  This is being done as part of the CDP, but in older communities, when a school is no longer required, there is still a use for that facility, other than having it developed.  Councillor Cullen felt that, in the CDP, school lands are dual-zoned to allow for change if this is needed.  He did not agree that Council should be preparing to abandon community use of these lands if the school is no longer required. 

 

Councillor Rob Jellett said he was pleased to see the hold on the southwest corner of the site, in order to respond to the legitimate concerns expressed by the OFGAC and the Conservation Authority.  He sought assurance from staff and from the developers, that they would be prepared to move the Public / Institutional space to other areas of the development.  Ms. Sweet said this could be done.

 

The Committee then considered the report recommendation:

 

That the Planning and Environment Committee recommend that Council approve the Mer bleue Community Design Plan as detailed in Document 7 (under separate cover).

                                                                                                            CARRIED