SECTION 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
|
||
Project Name: |
Coordinated Access |
|
Task Force Chair: |
Glenn Barnes |
|
Project Lead: |
Diane Blouin Bain |
|
SECTION 1 PROJECT OBJECTIVE (S) / ANTICIPATED RESULTS
|
||
Describe key project objective(s To
develop consistent and effective service access, ideally across the continuum
as we know it; To
develop a coordinated system for both addiction and concurrent disorder*
clients, which works in collaboration with mental health and service
providers, and recognizes the needs of the Francophone population, as well as
other linguistic, cultural, and gender needs. This Coordinated System will include: -
centralized
information regarding treatment information in Ottawa ** -
coordinated screening processes and protocols for the
Champlain region -
coordinated
assessment processes and protocols in Ottawa -
treatment planning
and referrals in Ottawa -To enhance and formalize the working relationships between
addiction agencies, mental health agencies and other allied services. The desired results are to
reduce consumer confusion and frustration; improve access, reduce wait times
for appropriate service, improve client matching for service and ultimately
improve clinical outcomes.
** Aiming in the long-term to establish a
Coordinated System Champlain-wide |
||
SECTION 2 – PROJECT SCOPE |
||
Project Description
- Goal & Scope: |
Essentially
the project will:
|
|
SECTION 3 PROJECT ASSUMPTIONS
|
||
Identify project
assumptions: -
Access to service is
difficult -
Additional capacity
is not in place to meet the demand created by an improved coordinated system -
Counselling capacity
is priority number 1 -
Key goal of
coordinated access in the system is to look at primary care, early
intervention and support. Start identifying where the client is placed on the
spectrum (from early experimentation to acute
chronic cases) in an attempt to determine the most appropriate treatment plan
for that patient/client. |
||
SECTION 4 PROJECT
RISKS
|
||
Identify project risks:
-Careful not to create a large front loaded
service to the detriment of the end service i.e. concern of diversion from
treatment to coordination -
Implosion of service -
Cynicism and fatigue toward s planning processes such as these. Need to
acknowledge this and situate this initiative within a change management
framework. (Le Guichet has however sparked some hope) |
||
Key Success Factors
(project level) The critical
success factors will be to:
Success will
be measured along the spectrum ( from early experimentation to acute chronic
cases) by:
|
||
SECTION 5 PROJECT
INTEGRATION – Associated Projects
|
||
Identify other
project(s)/initiatives that are linked to this project: Keep in mind integration opportunities -Central access/screening in
Eastern Counties -Shared waiting list -Link with DART, Guichet
Francophone, 211, and Eastern
Counties |
||
|
||
SECTION 6 PROJECT
PLANNING RESOURCES
|
||
Identify project
resources required to carry out the planning of the project: |
||
Team members: |
Glenn Barnes Jane Fjeld And others from the
Treatment Taskforce |
|
Other: (Research,
meeting rooms etc) |
|
|
|
||
Identify solutions
that can be achieved to demonstrate success and execution: Short Term (less
than 6 months)
- Stages: start with information and referral - Interface with other sectors can also be integrated - Develop broader discussion paper on Broader Integrated System need Medium Term (6-18
months) - followed by screening, assessment - Start where the “bigger bang for our buck is” and in segments
i.e. Employers, GPs, the military,
hospitals. Long Term (more
than 18 months) -followed by client matching -Public forum where early intervention is addressed and issues
discussed i.e. employers’ costs for low productivity, short-term
disabilities, absenteeism etc. |
||
|
||