1. COMMUNITY GARDEN ACTION PLAN EVALUATION EVALUATION DU PLAN
D’ACTION DES JARDINS COMMUNAUTAIRES |
Committee RecommendationS
That Council:
1.
Approve as a policy
statement, that community gardening is a valuable community activity that can
contribute to community development, civic participation, neighbourhood
revitalization, environmental awareness and a healthier lifestyle; and
2.
Approve the
continued development of community gardens by approving the revised Community
Garden Action Plan (2009) attached to this report as Document 1.
RecommandationS du Comité
Que le Conseil :
1.
approuve comme énoncé de principes
le fait que le jardinage communautaire constitue une activité communautaire
très positive qui peut contribuer au développement de la collectivité, à la
participation communautaire, à la revitalisation des quartiers, à la
sensibilisation à l’environnement et à l’adoption d’un mode de vie plus sain;
et
2.
approuve le développement continu
des jardins communautaires en approuvant la version révisée du Plan d’action
pour les jardins communautaires (2009), que vous trouverez en pièce jointe du
présent rapport (document 1).
Documentation
1.
Deputy
City Manager's report, City Operations dated 24 February 2009
(ACS2009-COS-RCS-0005).
Report to/Rapport au:
Community and
Protective Services Committee
Comité des services communautaires et de protection
and Council/et au Conseil
24 February 2009 / 24 février 2009
Submitted by/Soumis par: Steve
Kanellakos, Deputy City Manager, City Operations / Directeur municipal adjoint,
Opérations municipales
Contact Person/Personne ressource: Aaron Burry, General Manager /
Directeur général
Recreation and Community Services / Services récréatifs et communautaires
(613) 580-2424
x23666, Aaron.Burry@ottawa.ca
City-wide/ À l’échelle de la ville
ACS2009-COS-RCS-0005 |
SUBJECT: |
|
OBJET : |
REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS
That the Community and Protective Services Committee recommend that
Council:
1.
Approve as a policy
statement, that community gardening is a valuable community activity that can
contribute to community development, civic participation, neighbourhood
revitalization, environmental awareness and a healthier lifestyle; and
2.
Approve the
continued development of community gardens by approving the revised Community
Garden Action Plan (2009) attached to this report as Document 1.
RECOMMENDATIONS DU
RAPPORT
Que le Comité des
services communautaires et de protection recommande au Conseil :
1.
d'approuver comme énoncé de
principes le fait que le jardinage communautaire constitue une activité
communautaire très positive qui peut contribuer au développement de la
collectivité, à la participation communautaire, à la revitalisation des
quartiers, à la sensibilisation à l’environnement et à l’adoption d’un mode de
vie plus sain;
2.
d’approuver le développement continu
des jardins communautaires en approuvant la version révisée du Plan d’action
pour les jardins communautaires (2009), que vous trouverez en pièce jointe du
présent rapport (document 1).
The City of Ottawa has had a Community Garden Action Plan since October 2004, when City Council approved the report Model to Support Community Gardening in Ottawa. The initial request for the development of a Community Garden Action Plan came from the Community Garden Network in a report A Strategy to Support Community Gardens in the City of Ottawa, to the Health Recreation and Social Services Committee (HRSS), March 3, 2003. In response to this request, a joint community steering committee, including the Community Garden Network (CGN) and a staff-working group, collaborated on and contributed to the Model to Support Community Gardening in Ottawa.
Council approved the Community Garden Action Plan on October 27, 2004. The recommendations in the action plan called for:
1. Identification and access to community garden space
2. Support for capacity development, including the provision of a liaison function to coordinate the Community Garden Action Plan
3. Operational support, including a Community Garden Start-Up Fund of $5,000
4. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the proposed model
Further to the recommendations set out above, this report includes an evaluation of the first three recommendations of the Community Garden Action Plan (based on consultation with City staff, City Councillors, the Community Garden Network, Advisory Committees, community stakeholders, community garden representatives and a review of other municipal community garden policies and practices) and requests endorsement of the community gardens policy statement and recommends approval of the 2009 action plan.
La Ville d’Ottawa dispose d’un Plan d’action
pour les jardins communautaires depuis le mois d’octobre 2004, moment où
le Conseil municipal avait approuvé le rapport « Modèle pour soutenir le
jardinage communautaire dans la ville d’Ottawa ». La première demande
d’élaboration d’un plan d’action pour les jardins communautaires a été
présentée par le Réseau des jardins communautaires dans son rapport intitulé
« Réseau de jardins communautaires d’Ottawa : Stratégie de
soutien », qui a été présenté au Comité de la santé, des loisirs et des
services sociaux le 3 mars 2003.
En réponse à cette demande, un comité
d’orientation mixte communautaire, composé de membres du Réseau des jardins
communautaires, et un groupe de travail composé de membres du personnel ont participé
à l’établissement du « Modèle pour soutenir le jardinage communautaire
dans la ville d’Ottawa ».
Les membres du Conseil ont approuvé le Plan
d’action pour les jardins communautaires le 27 octobre 2004. Voici
les recommandations formulées dans le plan :
1.
déterminer
des espaces de jardinage communautaire et l’accès à ces espaces;
2.
établir
des mesures d’aide pour améliorer la capacité, ce qui comprend la prestation
d’une fonction de liaison visant à coordonner le Plan d’action pour les jardins
communautaires;
3.
offrir
des mesures de soutien opérationnel, ce qui comprend notamment la création d’un
fonds de démarrage des jardins communautaires d’une valeur de
5 000 $;
4.
évaluer
l’efficacité du modèle proposé.
En plus des recommandations décrites ci‑dessus,
le rapport présente une évaluation des trois premières recommandations
formulées dans le Plan d’action pour les jardins communautaires
(recommandations établies à la lumière des consultations avec les employés de
la Ville, les conseillers municipaux, les membres du Réseau des jardins
communautaires, les membres des comités consultatifs, des intervenants de la
collectivité et des représentants des jardins communautaires, de même qu’à la
lumière de l’examen d’autres politiques et pratiques relatives aux jardins
communautaires). On demande également dans le rapport l’approbation du modèle
sur les jardins communautaires et on recommande l’approbation du plan d’action
de 2009.
The Community Garden Network is a community-based organization that supports the development and sustainability of community gardens by providing community outreach, community development and capacity building. The Community Funding Division (CFD) has provided the Community Garden Network (CGN) with annual funding for core operational costs since 2001. In 2009, this represents $46,549, including the $5,000 Start-Up Fund. In addition, the Community Funding Division (CFD), as per the second recommendation of the Community Garden Action Plan, provides a liaison function, with an existing FTE, to coordinate the Community Garden Action Plan, link the community with the appropriate resources within the City and act in a coordination and liaison role with the community.
Community gardens are different from allotment gardens that are administered by municipalities and lease individual plots to gardeners.
The City of Ottawa operates one municipal allotment garden, the Kilborn Allotment Garden, managed by Recreation and Community Services through the Dempsey Community Centre.
Community gardens are projects that are initiated and led by the community, planned and managed by local residents. Community gardens support the Community Funding Division’s mandate to “improve access to basics for people who face barriers to participation in or access to services and increasing self-sufficiency and including all citizens in community life and active participation”.
Community gardens provide a benefit to the community by increasing opportunities for diverse members of the community to participate in community-led projects that promote civic participation, neighbourhood stabilization, self-sufficiency, food security, environmental awareness and increased opportunities for recreation and a healthier lifestyle. Community gardens are included in the Official Plan, under the Guiding Principle of A Healthy and Active City as an opportunity for a healthy lifestyle.
An additional benefit noted by other municipalities is that the presence of community gardens in a neighbourhood has been shown to decrease vandalism and crime and lead to more positive, community use of public spaces. Both Vancouver and Toronto publicly note this benefit to the community at large. “The presence of community gardens discourages criminal behaviour and vandalism. A green and groomed community garden shows that residents care about the property and each other.” (City of Vancouver Administrative Report, April 24, 2006: Community Garden Pilot Project). “Community gardens have been shown to revitalize areas where vandalism and illegal activities degraded places intended for community programs and celebration. There are measurable outcomes that document the success of this effort. At a number of park sites, crime graffiti, and negative park use have declined considerably.” (City of Toronto Community Garden’s Program Toolkit. 2008)
Currently, Ottawa has 19 community gardens (Document 2) in 13 wards across the City, including the Kilborn Allotment Garden (run by the City). Approximately 4,100 residents from diverse cultural and socio-economic backgrounds benefit directly from these community-run gardens. The gardens operate on property owned by school boards, churches, universities, private landowners, Ottawa Community Housing, Community Health and Resource Centres as well as City land and City parkland. The size of the gardens varies from six plots to 225 plots, in total representing approximately 1,356 plots. Plots in the urban core average 100 square feet while plots in a suburban garden average 300 square feet. In addition, five new gardens were started in 2008 and will be ready for gardening in 2009.
Each year, interest in and demand for community gardens increase, influenced by rising food costs and gas prices, concerns about food security, interest in growing and eating locally-produced food, urban greening projects and urban agriculture. In Ottawa, the demand for new gardens has increased substantially: from one request in 2005 to 15 requests in 2008. The number of new gardens started in Ottawa has reflected this heightened interest; with five new gardens started in 2008, compared to two new gardens in 2006. The need for additional garden space is also evidenced by the waiting lists for plots in existing community gardens. Eighty percent of existing gardens have waiting lists for plots; waiting time can be up to two years.
“Gardening is Canada’s second most popular physical activity, after
walking.” (Canadian Health Network: Health Canada, May 1, 2004). For older adults, gardening is an excellent
physical activity; as the senior’s population is expected to expand significantly, it will add
to the demand for community gardens.
The
continued intensification of the urban core and decreased access to individual
garden space has added to and will continue to put additional pressure on the
need for more community garden space.
Entire families engage in the community garden work and the diversity is
seen not just in the gardeners’ country of origin or language, but also in age,
family status and occupation. If there are other activities taking place in the
surrounding area, such as in a City park, participants can go from one activity
to another, thereby increasing the level of physical activity, recreation and
community interaction.
Green
Partnership Pilot Program
In
April 2006, Public Works and Services launched a pilot project, the Green
Partnership Pilot Program (GPP). The
objectives of the GPP were to provide funding for sustainable, community-based
cleaning and greening initiatives. Community gardens supported the objectives of and met the requirements of the
GPP. GPP served as an additional and
complementary resource to the Community Garden Start-Up Fund. A total of eight
gardens were supported by the GPP in 2006 and 2007. In 2008, the Community Garden Network (CGN) submitted a proposal
for nine gardens to the GPP as part of a Hallmark project. Six gardens received
approval for a funding allocation of $49,000.
Council did not approve the GPP funding budget for 2009. However, as
part of their approval of the 2009 budget, Council did approve the PWS
recommendation (September 24, 2008) that $75,000 of the GPP fund be redirected
to the Community Garden Action Plan, to support the development of new
community gardens and the enhancement or expansion of existing community
gardens. This funding is to be administered by the Community Funding Division
in conjunction with the Community Garden Network.
The recommendations contained in the 2004 Community Garden Action Plan included:
The evaluation addressed each recommendation to highlight what the Community Garden Action plan has implemented to date. The evaluation results informed the development of the 2009 Action Plan (Document 1).
The 2009 Community Garden Action Plan builds on and enhances the progress made on the priorities established in the 2004 Action Plan.
A consultation process was undertaken in order to complete this evaluation. The results of the consultation are detailed in Document 3 and many elements of the feedback received are included in the discussion.
The majority of the consultation feedback was obtained through the Community Garden Action Plan Evaluation Template that was sent to City staff, City Councillors and community stakeholders. Respondents were asked to provide feedback (including impact, challenges and recommendations for improvement) on each of the first three recommendations contained in the 2004 Community Garden Action Plan. Twenty-four Evaluation Templates were emailed, 18 (75%) were completed and returned. The Health and Social Services Advisory Committee, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee and the Poverty Initiatives Advisory Committee were also consulted. Consultation was also carried out with individual community garden members and community stakeholders to assess the impact of community gardens on individuals directly involved and on the wider community.
Results:
Under the Community Garden Action
Plan there is an established process to identify surplus City land for
community garden development and community gardens are included in the
evaluation of priority use of City surplus land. Community gardens are included
in the City’s Zoning Bylaw and are a permitted use in all urban area and rural
zones with the
exception of EP - Environmental Protection Zone, Urban and Rural Industrial Zones,
Rural Zones that permit Agriculture and the Transportation Facility Zone. They are also a permitted use in VM -
Village Mixed Use Zone, DR - Development Reserve Zone and OI - Parks and Open
Space Zone. A standardized license of
occupation has been developed for community gardens and has been completed for
all gardens approved on City land.
In the more suburban areas of the City, the process to identify surplus City land for community garden space has worked well. For example, the process to identify surplus land was followed in response to a request from a group of interested residents in Orléans.
Several sites were identified,
the most appropriate was chosen, a licence of occupation completed and the site
was developed into the Jardin Communautaire Orléans Community Garden and opened
in 2007.
2. Supporting Capacity Development
The capacity of a community garden group to develop and sustain a community garden is key from both a community and a City perspective. This recommendation included providing liaison functions for Community Gardens, communicating process to community groups and assisting community gardens through the Community Garden Network in accessing other supports.
Results:
Under the Community Garden Action Plan a liaison function was assigned, with an existing FTE in the Community Funding Division. Approximately 50% of the FTE is dedicated to the Community Garden Program Liaison function. The City liaison has collaborated with the Community Garden Network to increase the capacity of community gardens and has worked to facilitate access to other City Departments and Branches critical in the implementation of the Community Garden Action Plan.
In addition, Community Funding allocates an annual amount of $46,549 to the Community Garden Network. This amount goes towards core operational costs and includes the $5,000 for start-up funds for new gardens. The Service Agreement between the City of Ottawa and the Community Garden Network identifies the role of the CGN as providing community outreach, capacity building, community development and education to its members.
The Community Garden Action Plan touches on a broad spectrum of services and calls for multi-departmental involvement and collaboration. This support is particularly important when community gardens are on or are requesting to be on City land. Relevant departments and branches are noted in the original Action Plan, in relation to the responsibility attached to each clause. City staff from various Departments and Branches have collaborated to facilitate City services necessary to support the Community Garden Action plan, including identification of City surplus land, providing Historical Land Use Inventory data, processing Community Group Liability Insurance, issuing license of occupation, providing assistance and support related to the provision of water services and assessing the suitability of community gardens in specific parks.
3. Provision of Operational Support
Operational support is critical for successful garden start-up, ongoing development and sustainability. The needs of individual gardens will vary by location, size, and how much community support they have. For groups with access to a favourable site and a broad range of support, the need for additional operational support may be minimal. For groups with less capacity that have been unable to access resources and/or have a less favourable site, the need for operational support could be more significant. The recommendation included an annual amount of $5,000 for community garden start-up costs as well as allowing water access and use where City of Ottawa infrastructure exists. The recommendation also included permitting community garden groups to be included in the City’s community association group liability coverage program.
Results:
An annual start-up fund of $5,000, for new garden development, has been allocated each year since 2005. However, as demand increases each year for more gardens, the $5,000 is inadequate to meet all the actual costs of garden start-up. New gardens started since 2005 have been included in the community association group liability coverage and a link to the CGN has been included on the City web page. Water access for some new gardens has been provided. This $5,000 Start-Up Fund was helpful as a starting point for new gardens. In 2006, it provided two small gardens with the basics for the first growing season. Community gardens are developed and managed by community volunteers. The resources needed to start a community garden include: clearing and tilling the site, soil testing, top soil, compost, plant material, seeds, tools and equipment, composters and if required and approved for the site, rain barrels, fencing, and tool sheds.
Current costs for community garden start-up are approximately $8,000 - $10,000; if a water source is not readily available and/or the site needs considerable soil enhancement it could range from $10,000 to $25,000. Community Gardens, in collaboration with the Community Garden Network, have also obtained other sources of support towards the start-up of their garden, be it in-kind (donations of relevant materials from local businesses) or through fundraising.
On
September 24, 2008, Council approved a motion to redirect $75,000 of funding
from the Green Partnership Pilot Program to the Community Garden Action Plan
for the development of new community gardens and the enhancement of existing
community gardens; to be administered by Community Funding in conjunction with
the Community
Garden Network, subject to 2009 Budget Council Approval. Council approved the $75,000 in the 2009
budget on December 8, 2008.
The
$75,000 will provide new community gardens with start-up funds that reflect the
actual costs of starting a community garden.
In
addition, assistance for existing gardens may be provided in situations where
it is necessary to ensure the sustainability of the garden or to expand the
garden to accommodate additional demand that is beyond the normal operation of
the garden.
Water
is an obvious and essential element for the success and sustainability of
community gardens. The Community
Garden Action Plan includes a recommendation to, Allow water access and use
where City of Ottawa infrastructure exists and ensure maintenance of existing
systems. This is especially important in situations where a water source or
water infrastructure exists on site, but is not readily accessible. The process to coordinate water services and
access to water is technical and skills-specific and involves many City
operations. Relevant Departments and Branches will work collaboratively to enhance
coordination of city services. A
liaison person in Public Works will be identified to work with the Community
Funding liaison in all matters related to their services, while another liaison
will be established in Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability for
support in matters related to access to water.
The Community Funding liaison function will continue. This will allow residents to have access to
one contact person.
Other Municipal Policy Frameworks for Community
Gardens
As part
of this evaluation, staff also consulted with various municipalities on their
Community Garden Program and policies.
In the case of Vancouver, Toronto and Montreal, their community garden
programs are anchored in an overarching city policy where the intent behind the
policy and commitment to community gardening are clearly stated.
Toronto
Toronto’s policy notes “community gardens
grow food, beautify the city, strengthen communities, and contribute to the
self-reliance of the people who work in them, and improve the environment.” The policy commits to working to increase the
area of the City devoted to community gardening and the number of participants
in community gardening. To this end,
the objective is to develop community gardens in each ward of the city. The policy is linked to multiple city
objectives including: lifelong health and wellness for all, child and youth
development, environmental stewardship, recreation, community development and
food security.
http://www.toronto.ca/parks/programs/community.htm
Vancouver
Vancouver’s policy regarding community gardens
on parkland recognizes “community gardening as a valuable recreation
activity that can contribute to community development, environmental awareness,
positive social interaction and community education.” To meet the increased demand for more
community gardens, in May 2006, Vancouver Council unanimously passed a motion
calling for the creation of 2010 new garden plots in the City by January 1,
2010, as an Olympic Legacy.
The 2010 Challenge recognizes community gardens
as “important neighborhood gathering places that promote sustainability,
neighborhood livability, urban greening, community building, intergenerational
activity, social interaction, crime reduction, exercise and food production.”
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/socialplanning/initiatives/foodpolicy/projects/2010gardens.htm
Montreal
Montreal’s municipal community garden program
began in 1975; in 1989, Montreal city council approved a policy to manage the
community garden program. The policy
outlines the specific objectives for developing the community gardens network,
maintenance and improving the quality of service.
The goals of Montreal’s community garden
program are:
POLICY STATEMENT
The feedback from
the consultation was very clear that while there has been concrete results from
the 2004 Action Plan, there remains a need to have this program entrenched in
City policy, approved by Council. The Action Plan can and will continue, with
some revisions, but the need for a policy statement is important from the
community’s perspective.
Staff recommends that the City of Ottawa Council endorse, as a policy statement, that community gardening is a valuable community activity that can contribute to community development, civic participation, neighbourhood revitalization, environmental awareness and a healthier lifestyle. Staff recommends that Committee and Council support the continued development of community gardens by approving the revised Community Garden Action Plan (2009) included in this report as Document 1.
N/A
N/A
CONSULTATION
A Community Garden Action Plan Evaluation Template was
sent to City staff, City Councillors, Advisory Committees (Parks and
Recreation, Health and Social Services and Poverty Issues Advisory Committee)
and community stakeholders; including the Community Garden Network, community
stakeholders, such as Community Health and Resource Centres, community
gardeners etc. Individual interviews
were also held with some of the groups identified above.
There are
no financial implications.
LEGAL/RISK
IMPLICATIONS
There are
no legal/risk implications associated with this report.
SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTATION
Document
1: 2009 Community Garden Action Plan
Document
2: List of Community Gardens in Ottawa
Document
3: Results of Consultation
DISPOSITION
The City
Operations Departments will action any direction received as part of
consideration of this report.
Document 1
1. |
Identification and Access to Community Garden Space |
||
|
Action |
Responsibility |
Timelines |
1. a) |
2006 Done
|
||
1. b) |
On-going |
||
1. c) |
Establish a process to
identify City-owned land appropriate for community gardens: i) Identify City-owned
land that has minimal development potential ii) Include community
gardens in the evaluation of priority use of City surplus land iii) Community gardens
would be subject to the same priority review process that other properties
undergo
|
January 2005 Done and on-going Starting Spring 2009 |
|
1. d) |
Implement a standardised
licence of occupation used for community gardens on City land. These licences
will contain a 180-day cancellation clause, initiated at the Deputy City
Manager level, if required. |
January 2005 Done and on-going |
2. |
Supporting Capacity Development |
||
|
Action |
Responsibility |
Timelines |
2. a) |
Provide liaison function,
within an existing staff position, for community garden development and with
the Community Garden Network (CGN) |
October 2004 Done and on-going
|
|
2. b) |
Assist community garden
groups, in collaboration with the CGN, to access partnership sponsors and
alternate funding sources
|
October 2004 On-going
|
|
2. c) |
Community and Protective
Services (Cultural Services and Community Funding) |
On-going |
|
2. d) |
CGN |
Fall 2004 On-going
|
3. |
Provision of Operational
Support |
||
|
Action |
Responsibility |
Timelines |
3. a) |
January 2005 Done and on-going
|
||
3. b) |
Corporate Services |
On-going On-going
On-going
|
|
3. c) |
January 2005 Done and on-going
|
||
3. d) |
Not Applicable
|
||
3. e) |
Fall 2004 Done and on-going
Starting Spring 2009 |
||
3. f) |
4. |
Monitoring and Evaluation of the Proposed Model |
||
|
Action |
Responsibility |
Timelines |
4. a) |
On-going December 2007 Done |
||
4. b) |
Spring 2013 |
Document 2
COMMUNITY GARDENS IN OTTAWA
2009
(Gardens developed since 2005
indicated in bold)
NO. |
GARDEN |
LOCATION |
WARD |
PLOTS |
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT |
1. |
Bethany Church Community Garden |
382 Centrepointe Drive |
Ward 8 |
25 plots |
Linked to Bethany Church; provides Green Thumb Club for children 9-10 to learn about growing food. Garden draws together diverse members of the community. |
2. |
Carlington Community Garden |
900 Merivale Rd. Behind the Carlington CHRC. |
Ward 16 |
155 plots |
Linked to the Carlington Community Health and Resource Centre; designated food bank plots that donate food to the Caldwell Centre. The garden has calculated that each plot produces 250 lbs of vegetables each season. |
3. |
Chateau Donald Community Garden |
251 Donald St. |
Ward 13 |
12 plots |
Donate produce to local food bank. Provides a healthy recreational activity for Ottawa Community Housing residents. |
4. |
Debra Dynes Community Garden |
Debra Avenue Back yard of Debra Dynes Family House |
Ward 16 |
1 communal plot |
Provides space for Debra Dynes’ residents to grow their own food. |
5. |
Friendship Community Garden |
1240/1244 Donald (and St. Laurent) |
Ward 11 |
12 plots |
Supported by Eastern Ottawa Resource Centre; workshops provided on how to prepare fresh produce. |
6. |
Glebe Organic Vegetable Garden (GO-VEG) |
Corpus Christie School 185 Fifth Ave.
|
Ward 17 |
2 teaching plots |
Partnered with the Canadian Organic Growers & Glebe Neighbourhood Activities Group. Functions as a teaching garden and hands-on-learning centre for neighbourhood schools and community centres. |
7. |
Gloucester Allotment Garden Association (GAGA) |
2 sites 1) Anderson Rd 2) Blackburn Hamlet |
Ward 2 |
225 plots in total |
Donate fresh produce to the Gloucester Emergency Food Cupboard. Estimate they donated $2,000 worth of produce in 2007. |
8. |
Jardin Communautaire Orleans Community Garden |
3350 St. Joseph Boulevard |
Ward 1 |
80 plots |
Linked with Orleans Cumberland Community Resource Centre. Donate produce to local food bank. |
9. |
Kilborn Allotment Garden (City operated allotment garden) |
Kilborn Ave., between Pleasant Park and Featherstone |
Ward 18 |
355 |
The Hope Garden operates out of the Kilborn Allotment Garden and donates fresh produce to the Shepherds of Good Hope. |
10. |
Children’s Garden, Legget Park |
Main and Clegg St |
Ward 17 |
6 teaching plots |
Children’s Garden is a project of SLOE (Sustainable Living for Ottawa East) a committee of Ottawa East Community Assoc. Partners are Sandy Hill Community Health Centre, Ottawa East Community Activities Group, Lady Evelyn School, Canadian Organic Growers and Carleton University, (Community Service Learning Program). Functions as a teaching garden and hands on learning centre for children. |
11. |
Lindsay Street
Garden
|
355 Acton St., near Church of La Nativité de Notre-Seigneur Jesus Christ |
Ward 18 |
10 |
Unable to contact coordinator. |
12. |
Lowertown/Basseville Community Garden |
40 Coburg St. |
Ward 12 |
6 |
Supported by Lowertown Community Resource Centre. |
13 |
Michele Heights Community Garden |
2955 Michele Dr |
Ward 7 |
19 |
Supported by the Pinecrest Queensway Community Health Centre and the Michele Heights Community House. |
14. |
Nanny Goat Hill Community Garden |
NE corner of Bronson and Laurier |
Ward 14 |
107 |
Partnered with Centretown Community Health Centre, provides composting program for the neighbourhood, donates produce to local food bank. |
15. |
Nepean Allotment Garden Association (NAGA) |
Viewmount between Merivale and Fisher |
Ward 9 |
250 |
Local community association rents plot for collective gardening. |
16. |
Ottawa East Community Garden |
St. Paul’s University |
Ward 17 |
45 |
Partnered with the Sandy Hill Community Health Centre, Sustainable Living for Ottawa East (SLOE). |
17. |
Somali Garden
|
(Within the Kilborn Allotment Garden) |
Ward 18 |
6 |
Links with the neighbourhood Somali community. |
18. |
Strathacona Heights Community Garden |
Wiggin’s Private |
Ward 12 |
40 |
In partnership with the Strathacona Heights Tenant’s Association and OCHC. |
19. |
Sweet Willow Community Garden |
31 Rochester |
Ward 14 |
|
Serves the residents in neighbouring CCOC housing and Alex Laidlaw Co-op. |
COMMUNITY GARDENS DEVELOPED IN 2008, READY FOR
PLANTING IN 2009
|
|||||
NO. |
GARDEN |
LOCATION |
WARD |
PLOTS |
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT |
1. |
Rochester Heights
Children’s Garden |
299 Rochester St. Rochester Heights Social Housing Complex |
Ward 14 |
2 communal children’s teaching plots |
Partnered with and supported by the Somerset West Community Health Centre and Rochester Heights Community Centre. Provides hands on learning experience and activities for children in Rochester Heights community. |
2. |
Van Lang Community Garden |
Roy Duncan Park 295 Churchill Ave |
Ward 15 |
1 communal plot |
Partnered with Van Lang and Taiga Housing Co-ops. |
3. |
Sandy Hill Community Garden |
Dutchie’s Hole Park 154 Mann Ave. |
Ward 12 |
12 |
Partnered with Sandy Hill Community Health Centre, Ecology Ottawa and Action Sandy Hill. |
4. |
Bytowne Urban Gardeners (BUGS) |
Glebe Memorial Park, 75 Glendale Ave |
Ward 17 |
12 |
Community plot for Canadian Mental Health Association (CMHA) clients. |
5. |
Operation Go Home Community Garden |
179 Murray St |
Ward 12 |
1 communal plot |
Communal plot for Operation Go Home clients. |
Document
3
2004 COMMUNITY GARDEN ACTION PLAN EVALUATION
RESULTS OF CONSULTATION
5 March 2009
As part of the evaluation of the Community Garden Action Plan approved in 2004, the City’s Community Garden liaison conducted a survey in the spring/summer of 2008. A survey tool was developed and sent to City staff, City Councillors and community stakeholders. Respondents were asked to provide feedback on each of the recommendations contained in the Community Garden Action Plan. Twenty-four Evaluation Templates were e-mailed, 18 (75%) were completed and returned.
The Health and Social Services Advisory Committee, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee and the Poverty Initiatives Advisory Committee were also consulted.
Consultation was also carried out
with individual community garden members and community stakeholders to assess
the impact of community gardens on individuals directly involved and on the
wider community.
Respondents acknowledged that the system can and has worked well to identify garden sites on surplus City land as in the case of the Orleans’s Community Garden. The majority of respondents focussed on the need to have a clear and transparent process for the identification of City Parkland as an option for community garden space. Observation from community organizations was that the process was lengthy, confusing and cumbersome.
1.
That a clear, consistent, well-publicized process be
developed, in collaboration with Parks and Recreation, to identify and assess City parkland for the
development of community garden sites.
2.
That a staff person in Parks and Recreation be
identified to respond to and review requests for community garden development
in parks.
The majority of respondents noted the importance of the liaison position and emphasized that it was essential to understanding City structure, processes and invaluable in making community gardens work in the City. Respondents also commented that in order for the liaison function to facilitate the involvement of relevant departments and branches, there needs to be greater awareness of community gardens across departments.
Recommendation
from Consultation:
1. That departments and branches specifically implicated in the Community Garden Action Plan designate a staff person to act as a contact for the liaison staff. This would enhance the coordination of City services across branches and departments
Provision of Operational
Support:
The majority of respondents noted water access as a major impediment to successful garden development. Many expressed their frustration regarding the length of time it took to get water access and suggested it be a top priority for future planning and that the City go beyond “allowing” to “supporting” water access for community gardens. Recommendations included providing sufficient funding to facilitate water access and identifying a contact person in PWS to coordinate requests.
Recommendation from Consultation:
1. That PWS designate an identified liaison person to respond to and coordinate requests from the Community Garden Liaison for water service for community