1.             ZONING - 475 TERRY FOX DRIVE

 

ZONAGE - 475, PROMENADE TERRY-FOX

 

 

Committee recommendationS as amended

 

That Council:

 

1.         Approve an amendment to the Zoning By-law 2008-250 to change the zoning of 475 Terry Fox Drive from DR (Development Reserve) and O1 (Parks and Open Space) to LC [xxxx] H(11.0) (Local Commercial – Exception xxxx – Height 11.0 metres), as shown in Document 1 and detailed in Document 2;

 

2.         That “convenient store” be added to Document 1, Column IV, Land Uses Prohibited;

 

3.         That a provision be added to restrict any building to a maximum of two storeys;

 

4.         And that there be no further notice pursuant to Section 34 (17) of the Planning Act.

 

 

RecommandationS MODIFIÉES DU Comité

 

Que le Comité de l’urbanisme et de l’environnement recommande au Conseil :

 

1.                  Approuve une modification au Règlement de zonage no 2008-250 en vue de changer le zonage de la propriété située au 475, promenade Terry-Fox, de DR (Zone d’aménagement futur) et O1 (Zone de parc et d’espace vert) à LC [xxxx] H(11.0) (Zone de commerces locaux – exception xxxx – hauteur de 11.0 mètres), comme le montre le document 1 et l’explique le document 2;

 

2.         Que le mot « dépanneur » soit ajouté à la colonne IV, Utilisations du sol interdites.

 

3.         Que soit ajoutée une disposition visant à limiter à deux étages la hauteur des immeubles;

 

4.         Et qu’aucun autre avis ne soit donné, conformément au paragraphe 34 (17) de la Loi sur l’aménagement du territoire.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Documentation

 

1.                  Deputy City Manager’s report, Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability dated 4 August 2009 (ACS2009-ICS-PGM-0141).

 

2.         Extract of Draft Minutes, 25 August 2009.


Report to/Rapport au :

 

Planning and Environment Committee

Comité de l'urbanisme et de l'environnement

 

and Council / et au Conseil

 

04 August 2009 / le 04 août 2009

 

Submitted by/Soumis par : Nancy Schepers, Deputy City Manager

Directrice municipale adjointe

Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability

Services d’infrastructure et Viabilité des collectivités

 

Contact Person/Personne-ressource : Michael Wildman, Manager/Gestionnaire, Development Review-Suburban Services/Examen des projets d'aménagement-Services suburbains, Planning and Growth Management/Urbanisme et Gestion de la croissance

(613) 580-2424, 27811  Mike.Wildman@ottawa.ca

 

 

Kanata North/Nord (4)

Ref N°: ACS2009-ICS-PGM-0141

 

 

SUBJECT:

ZONING - 475 Terry Fox Drive (FILE NO. D02-02-08-0130)

 

 

OBJET :

ZONAGE - 475, promenade Terry-Fox (Dossier no D02-02-08-0130)

 

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATION

 

That the  recommend Council approve an amendment to the Zoning By-law 2008-250 to change the zoning of 475 Terry Fox Drive from DR (Development Reserve) and O1 (Parks and Open Space) to LC [xxxx] H(11.0) (Local Commercial – Exception xxxx – Height 11.0 metres), as shown in Document 1 and detailed in Document 2.

 

 

RECOMMANDATION DU RAPPORT

 

Que le Comité de l’urbanisme et de l’environnement recommande au Conseil d’approuver une modification au Règlement de zonage no 2008-250 en vue de changer le zonage de la propriété située au 475, promenade Terry-Fox, de DR (Zone d’aménagement futur) et O1 (Zone de parc et d’espace vert) à LC [xxxx] H(11.0) (Zone de commerces locaux – exception xxxx – hauteur de 11.0 mètres), comme le montre le document 1 et l’explique le document 2.

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

The site is located at 475 Terry Fox Drive, which is on the southeast corner of Terry Fox Drive and Kanata Avenue.  The one-hectare site is currently undeveloped and is covered with grass and light vegetation.  It is surrounded to the east by existing low-density residential, to the north by a residential/commercial subdivision under development, and to the south and west by a stormwater management facility and the Carp River.

 

The eastern portion of the site was previously intended to form part of the extension of Terry Fox Drive.  However, after a change to the proposed routing, the lands were no longer required.  The lands were sold by the City to the owner of the remainder of the adjacent lands in 2008.

 

Existing Zoning

 

The current zoning on the site is O1 (Parks and Open Space) and DR (Development Reserve).  The site is designated as General Urban Area on Schedule B of the Official Plan

 

Purpose of Zoning Amendment

 

The applicant wishes to proceed with a commercial development consisting of approximately 2400 square metres in gross floor area on the site.  The existing O1 and DR zones do not permit new commercial development, thus a Zoning By-law amendment application is required in order change the zoning to a zone that permits the proposed use.

 

Proposed Zoning

 

The proposed zoning for the site is LC [xxxx] H(11.0) (Local Commercial – Exception xxxx – Height 11.0 metres).  The LC zone permits a range of locally-oriented convenience and service uses as well as some residential uses.  An exception is proposed to address site-specific concerns.

 

Concept Plan

 

The applicant provided a concept plan with the application, which is shown in Document 3.  The plan is intended to demonstrate how the site could develop for the purposes of discussion of the proposed zoning.  Details of the plan will be considered during a subsequent Site Plan Control process.

 

 

DISCUSSION

 

Planning Act and Provincial Policy Statement

 

Section 2 of the Planning Act outlines those land use matters that are of provincial interest, for which all City planning decisions shall have regard.  The provincial interests that apply to this site are: provision of a full range of housing and employment opportunities; the appropriate location of growth and development; and the promotion of development that is designed to be sustainable to support public transit and to be oriented to pedestrians.  In addition, the Planning Act requires that all City planning decisions be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), a document that provides further policies on matters of provincial interest related to land use development. PPS policies indicate that there should be an appropriate mix of uses to support strong, liveable, and healthy communities, and densities that efficiently use land and support alternative transport modes.

 

The proposed zoning allows for a mix of residential and locally-oriented commercial uses, which will efficiently use land and contribute to a balanced community. The site is located at the confluence of an arterial road (Terry Fox Drive) and a major collector road (Kanata Avenue), which provide good access and a focus for mixed-use development.  The site is conveniently located near adjacent communities via pathways and transit stops to allow for access by pedestrians and transit.  Staff conclude that the proposal is consistent with the matters of provincial interest as outlined in the Planning Act and PPS.

 

Official Plan

 

Land Use

 

The site is designated as “General Urban Area” on Schedule B of the Official Plan.  The intent of this designation is to provide a range of housing types in combination with conveniently located employment, retail, service, cultural, leisure, entertainment, and institutional uses.  Employment, service, residential, and retail uses are all permitted uses within the General Urban Area.  The proposed zoning will allow for additional convenient services and retail to the surrounding residential community, as well as permit some residential uses that contribute to a diverse community.  The proposed uses are permitted in the General Urban Area, and conform to the policies for this land use designation.

 

Compatibility and Design

 

Sections 2.5.1 and 4.11 of the Official Plan outline the objectives and policies for compatible development.  Among the considerations are building height and massing, pattern of surrounding community, location of loading/service/outdoor storage areas, noise and air quality, lighting, and relationship to supporting community services.  In addition, the Urban Design Guidelines for Greenfield Neighbourhoods includes direction on the form and design of development in new communities.  Specifically, the guidelines promote the use of a landscaped buffer between residential areas and the service areas, and direction of non-residential buildings to locate close to the street edge, with public access from the street.

 

Given that the site directly abuts an existing residential community, thus there is the potential for compatibility issues as a result of the differing uses.  In addition, several comments from the surrounding residential community were received in relation to compatibility concerns.

 

The proposed zoning includes a requirement for a 7.5m landscaped strip along the rear of the site abutting the neighbouring residential development.  Details of the landscaped strip, such as the inclusion of a berm, fence, and plantings, will be determined during the Site Plan Control process.  In addition, the proposed zoning includes a special provision restricting the location of garbage/refuse collection so as to reduce the impacts on the adjacent residential.  The intent of these provisions is to provide a buffer between the proposed development and the existing residential development, thereby reducing the potential for aesthetic, noise, odour, and lighting impacts.

 

The proposed building height will permit a three-storey building, which is consistent with that permitted in the adjacent residential zones.  Given that commercial uses generally require a slightly greater floor-to-ceiling height on the main floor, some minor flexibility has been included within the maximum height.

 

The proposed zoning includes a greater restriction on the total size of the commercial uses than in the parent LC (Local Commercial) zone.  This will encourage smaller uses and thus ensure that the development is more oriented to serve the local community, as well as reducing the potential impacts on surrounding neighbourhoods.

 

Fast-food and take-out restaurants are prohibited by a restrictive covenant on the lands.  It is recommended that only full-service restaurants be permitted, with their location being restricted to 40 metres from the adjacent residential zone in order to reduce the potential for adverse impacts.  The proposed zoning also permits some residential uses, which not only satisfies the General Urban Area policies for a mix of uses, but will also allow for the potential for greater compatibility between the site and surrounding residential uses.

 

As a result of the above, the proposed development is considered to be compatible with the surrounding forms of development.

 

Other Issues

 

Other site-related issues such as fencing, landscaping, servicing, site access, and noise attenuation will be addressed during the Site Plan Control process.

 

Summary

 

The proposed zoning allows for a mix of low-rise, locally-oriented commercial uses as well as limited residential uses.  The proposal is consistent with the Planning Act, as well as PPS and Official Plan policies that promote efficient use of land and resources, provision of a mix of uses and housing types, and promotion of alternate transportation modes.  The proposed development and recommended zoning have been demonstrated to be compatible with adjacent and nearby development through the use of specific provisions for buffering, use size, and use location restrictions.  In light of the discussion above, staff recommend approval of this application and the details of zoning as included in Document 2.

 

 

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS

 

The Mississippi Valley Conservation Authority and City staff have indicated that there are no issues from an environmental point of view regarding the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment.  Further review of environment impacts will occur during the Site Plan process.

 

 

CONSULTATION

 

Notice of this application was carried out in accordance with the City's Public Notification and Consultation Policy.  The Ward Councillor is aware of this application and the staff recommendation.

 

 

LEGAL/RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS

 

It is anticipated that a hearing with respect to this matter would require an estimated three days.  If the staff recommendation were not adopted, an outside planner would need to be retained at an approximate cost of $30,000 to $35,000.

 

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

There are no direct financial implications associated with this report.

 

 

APPLICATION PROCESS TIMELINE STATUS

 

The application was not processedby the "On Time Decision Date" established for the processing of Zoning By-law amendments due to the need to resolve issues with adjacent uses and compatibility.

 

 

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

 

Document 1      Proposed Zoning Map

Document 2      Details of Recommended Zoning

Document 3      Concept Plan

Document 4      Consultation Details

 

 

DISPOSITION

 

City Clerk’s Branch, Council and Committee Services to notify the owner, Phoenix Commercial Properties Inc, 18 Bentley Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K2E 6T8, applicant, Bill Holzman, Holzman Consultants Inc, 1076 Castle Hill Crescent, Ottawa, ON K2C 2A8, OttawaScene.com, 174 Colonnade Road, Unit #33, Ottawa, ON  K2E 7J5, Ghislain Lamarche, Program Manager, Assessment, Financial Services Branch (Mail Code:  26-76) of City Council’s decision.

 

Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability Department to prepare the implementing by-law, forward to Legal Services Branch and undertake the statutory notification.

 

Legal Services Branch to forward the implementing by-law to City Council.


PROPOSED ZONING MAP                                                                                   DOCUMENT 1

 


DETAILS OF RECOMMENDED ZONING                                                       DOCUMENT 2

 

Proposed Changes to the Comprehensive Zoning By-law

 

1.      The Zoning Map of City of Ottawa Zoning By-law Number 2008-250 is amended by changing the zoning of the lands known municipally 475 Terry Fox Drive from DR (Development Reserve) and O1 (Parks and Open Space) to LC [xxxx] H(11.0) (Local Commercial – Exception xxxx – Height 11.0 metres) as shown on Document 1;

 

2.      Add a new exception and provisions to Section 239 as follows:

 

·        Column III: Additional land uses permitted:

o       residential care facility

 

·        Column IV: Land uses prohibited:

o       fast-food restaurant

o       take-out restaurant

 

·        Column V: Provisions:

o       For non-residential uses listed in Section 189(1), the total area occupied by all the separate occupancies combined shall not exceed a gross leasable area of 2,400 square metres;

o       a full-service restaurant is not permitted within 40 metres of a residential zone;

o       each retail food store shall not exceed 500 square metres;

o       50% of the length of any building wall within 6m of a public street must consist of windows or doors;

o       Minimum width of landscaped area abutting a residential zone: 7.5m;

o       Refuse collection areas must be:

§         located within a building if within 10 metres of a lot line abutting a residential zone; or

§         fully enclosed if it is 10 metres or further from a lot line abutting a residential zone.


CONCEPT PLAN                                                                                                   DOCUMENT 3


CONSULTATION DETAILS                                                                                DOCUMENT 4

 

NOTIFICATION AND CONSULTATION PROCESS

 

Notification and public consultation was undertaken in accordance with the Public Notification and Public Consultation Policy approved by City Council for Zoning By-law amendments.  No formal public meetings were held, however, the Ward Councillor discussed the application at Ward Council meetings.

 

PUBLIC COMMENTS

 

Comment:

We request, in the strongest possible terms, that the following services be prohibited on the site: convenience stores, restaurants, retail food stores, and residential uses.

 

Staff Response:

The General Urban Area designation allows for all the above uses, and specifically promotes service and retail uses in proximity to residential, and a mix of residential types.

 

Comment:

We request that building(s) permitted on the site not exceed one storey in height, specifically no more than 4 meters.

 

Staff Response:

The proposed building height is in keeping with the maximum allowable heights in the surrounding zones.

 

Comment:

The proposed building area of 30,929 square feet is far too large for the site. We believe that the building area should not exceed a maximum of 20,000 square feet.

 

Staff Response:

The recommended zoning includes a special provision requiring that non-residential uses not exceed 2400 square metres (25824 square feet) of gross leasable area.  This restriction addresses concerns with overdevelopment of the site, yet is consistent with the size limitations in the parent LC zone.

 

Comment:

We are considering the site plan and will want to have full information given to us, and input on, the placement of the buildings - backing onto our properties or abutting Terry Fox - to have the least impact on us from the noise of cars entering and leaving, car doors slamming, air conditioning systems, truck deliveries and other considerations. We will also want to understand the exact grading of the property and its implications for our site lines on the commercial development.

 

 

 

 

Staff Response:

Special zoning provisions have been included which will reduce the potential for negative impacts of commercial site operations on the adjacent residential uses.  Noise, site access, parking and building location, fencing, grading, and other site details will be addressed through a future Site Plan Control application.  The subject site is, on average, two (2) metres lower than the adjacent residential lots.

 

Comment:

We will want a minimum of six meters setback between our properties and the back of the development.

 

Staff Response:

The proposed zoning includes a 7.5 metre setback and landscape strip requirement.

 

Comment:

We will want a berm and significant mature landscaping/a living fence to buffer us from the site. In addition, any development must take into consideration the fact that the soundproofing fence installed by our developer at the back of our properties was not done at the proper grade along many of our properties and thus does not and will not fulfill its function and must be corrected for noise and drainage reasons.

 

Staff Response:

These items will be addressed as part of the Site Plan Control process.

 

Comment:

Seeking to change the zoning of this area feels like a violation of the very principles of zoning in the first place, which was surely to provide peace and quiet, along with natural beauty.  If the owner had intended to develop the area all along, they should have had it zoned accordingly before they sold all the homes.

 

Staff Response:

The portion of the lands that are zoned as O1 (Parks and Open Space) is the former future Terry Fox Drive right-of-way, which is no longer required for the extension of that road.  The lands were never considered to be City parkland.  The remainder of the site always has been privately owned and intended for development.  The intent of the Zoning By-law amendment process is to allow for changes to the Zoning By-law if the proposed change is considered to be appropriate.

 

Comment:

Restaurants and convenience stores will draw young people to hang out, create light pollution, noise, and odours, attract animals, and create a security issue.

 

Staff Response:

Take-out and fast-food restaurants are not permitted in the proposed zoning.  The proposed zoning includes restrictions on location of restaurants and garbage.  Light, noise, and security concerns will be addressed through the Site Plan Control process.

 

 

 

Comment:

Our property was chosen because of the view from our back yards.  Any multi-storey building would greatly diminish our view and privacy.

 

 

Staff Response:

The lands have been within the Urban Boundary and the General Urban Area since 2003, and have been intended for urban development.  Given the Provincial and Official Plan policies for the efficient use of land, staff do not support a restriction on building height of one-storey.

 

COUNCILLOR’S COMMENTS

Councillor Wilkinson indicated her support for the concerns of the adjacent residents, summarized above.

COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION COMMENTS

The Kanata Lakes Community Association Comments:

 

Comment:

What is the rationale for more apartments and retirement homes when we have several of these operating, in the planning stage, or under construction?

 

Staff Response:

The General Urban Area allows for all types and densities of residential development in conjunction with conveniently-located retail and services.

 

Comment:

We will push for a larger than normal buffer between the edge of the site, with trees and vegetation.

 

Staff Response:

The proposed zoning includes the requirement for a 7.5m landscaped strip adjacent residential uses, which is not normally required.

 


 

Zoning - 475 Terry Fox Drive

ZONAGE - 475, PROMENADE TERRY FOX

ACS2009-ICS-PGM-0141                                                  kanata north/nord (4)

 

(This application is subject to Bill 51)

 

Kalle Hakala, Planner II, provided a PowerPoint presentation, which is held on file with the City Clerk.

 

Dennis Mitchler, a resident of Insmill Crescent, spoke of the concessions made by adjacent residents, who initially did not want to see the site develop in order to preserve unobstructed views.  He noted that residents have worked with all parties to come to a reasonable compromise, which would include prohibiting “convenience store” and “full-service restaurant” uses and limiting the height to two storeys.  He touched on the unwanted noise, light pollution and loitering associated with a 24-hour convenience store.  He also explained that garbage and odour would be concerns related to a restaurant.  He pointed out that the two uses are permitted nearby and therefore not necessary at this location.  With respect to height, he added that a two-storey maximum is not overly restrictive and the current proposal could be built within that limit.  Mr. Mitchler said that staff’s position is that the proposal is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and Official Plan; furthermore, he questioned why consultation with the community took place when its feedback is being ignored.  He opined that the three restrictions requested by adjacent residents are reasonable.

 

In reply to questions from Councillor Wilkinson, Mr. Mitchler confirmed that the land was zoned Open Space at the time of purchase of his home and residents were told that the land would be used for a park.  He reiterated that residents worked with the Ward Councillor to come to a reasonable compromise.  He also confirmed that he represents 10 to 11 abutting residents, who agree with the position he put forward.

 

Councillor Holmes stated that she would not support a reduction in height, referring to numerous occasions when increased building height was granted in her ward.

 

Councillor Wilkinson confirmed that Councillor Qadri would move a motion on her behalf calling for the three restrictions outlined by the delegation.

 

Bill Holzman, on behalf of the applicant, spoke in support of the staff recommendation and provided a written submission, which is held on file with the City Clerk.  He advised that some changes were made as a result of feedback received since the open house.  He recalled that a portion of the site was transferred from the original owner to the City and formed part of the former road allowance of Terry Fox Drive/Kanata Avenue, but was conveyed back in 2008 with certain restrictions.  The listed prohibited uses were automotive uses and a drive-through restaurant.  He added that subject to further negotiation, the width of the landscape buffer was increased by 250 per cent and “take-out restaurant” was removed as a permitted use.  He noted a portion of the land was always slated for development and was zoned Development Reserve.

 

With respect to the restrictions requested by the Ward Councillor and the adjacent resident, Mr. Holzman pointed out that “convenience store” and “full service restaurant” are both standard uses for this type of commercial development that serve the adjacent neighbourhood.  He quoted Section 3.6.1 of the Official Plan, which speaks to allowing a variety of small, locally oriented convenience and service uses.  With respect to height, he opined that the restriction would hinder future intensification potential.

 

In response to questions from Councillor Wilkinson, Mr. Holzman acknowledged that “convenience store” and “full service restaurant” are allowed on the parcel directly across from the subject site.  He reiterated that these uses are permitted in local commercial zones and should not be removed.  He noted that it would be less convenient for residents and park users to cross the intersection to access these services.  With regard to height, he reiterated that the current height limit is three storeys and objected to changing the limit.

 

Replying to further questions from Councillor Holmes, Mr. Holzman advised that pedestrian links are provided on both sides to the site.  Mr. Hakala indicated that public pedestrian access would be examined further through the site plan.

 

Councillor Wilkinson spoke on the motion below introduced by Councillor Qadri.  She touched on the history of the site, partially zoned Open Space. She reiterated that the uses to be removed are permitted on the parcel across the way.  She also commented on the progress made with the adjacent residents, suggesting the requested changes are balanced.

 

Councillor Hume called for a divided vote.

 

1.         That the following items be added to Column IV, Land Uses Prohibited:

 

a.   Full Service Restaurant

 

                                                                                                LOST

 

YEAS (3):        M. Bellemare, G. Hunter, S. Qadri

NAYS (4):       C. Doucet, D. Holmes, P. Feltmate, P. Hume

 

b.    Convenience Store

 

                                                                                                                                CARRIED

 

YEAS (4):        G. Hunter, S. Qadri, P. Feltmate, P. Hume

NAYS (3):       M. Bellemare, C. Doucet, D. Holmes

 

 

 

2.         That a provision be added to restrict any building to a maximum of two storeys.

 

CARRIED with C. Doucet and D. Holmes dissenting.

 

That the Planning and Environment Committee recommend Council:

 

1.         Approve an amendment to the Zoning By-law 2008-250 to change the zoning of 475 Terry Fox Drive from DR (Development Reserve) and O1 (Parks and Open Space) to LC [xxxx] H(11.0) (Local Commercial – Exception xxxx – Height 11.0 metres), as shown in Document 1 and detailed in Document 2;

 

2.         That “convenient store” be added to Document 1, Column IV, Land Uses Prohibited;

 

3.         That a provision be added to restrict any building to a maximum of two storeys;

 

4.         And that there be no further notice pursuant to Section 34 (17) of the Planning Act.

 

                                                                                                                                CARRIED as amended