6.         Reducing The Impact Of The Barricades At The Us Embassy On Sussex Drive

 

Réduction De L’incidence Des Barricades À L’ambassade Des États-Unis De La Promenade Sussex

 

 

 

Committee Recommendation As Amended

 

That Council direct staff to continue discussions with all responsible parties to eliminate or reduce the negative impact of the security barricades on Sussex Drive with the objective of re-establishing some traffic on the west lane, and specifically to:

a.         Confirm specifics related to the works that would be required to replace the barriers with bollards.

b.         Determine the costs associated with these additional works.

c.         Determine funding sources and/or cost sharing to undertake the additional works and,

d.         Report back to Transportation Committee as soon as these determinations are made to allow Transportation Committee to give consideration to the incorporation of the replacement of the barriers with bollards as part of the Sussex Drive reconstruction project.

 

 

Recommandations Modifiées du comité

 

Que le Conseil charge le personnel de poursuivre des discussions avec les parties responsables en vue de supprimer ou de limiter les effets négatifs des barricades de sécurité installées sur la promenade Sussex, de manière à ramener une part de la circulation sur la voie gauche et, plus particulièrement :

a.         de confirmer les détails relatifs aux travaux à entreprendre pour remplacer les barricades par des bornes de protection;

b.         d’établir les coûts liés à ces travaux supplémentaires;

c.         de déterminer les sources de financement ou les modalités d’une entente de partage des coûts en vue de ces travaux supplémentaires;

d.         de rendre compte des éléments précédents au Comité des transports dès que possible pour permettre à celui-ci de considérer le remplacement des barricades par des bornes de protection dans le cadre du projet de reconstruction de la promenade Sussex.

 

 

Documentation

 

1.         Transportation Committee report dated 15 October 2009 (ACS2009-CCS-TRC-0019).

 

2.         General Manager, Planning and Growth Management Department Memo dated 1 December 2009.

 

3.         Extract of Draft Minute, 2 December 2009.

 


Report to / Rapport au :

 

Transportation Committee

Comité des transports

 

And Council / et au Conseil

 

15 October 2009 / le 15 octobre 2009

 

Submitted by / Soumis par : Georges Bédard, Councillor / Conseiller

 

Contact / Personne-ressource : Councillor G. Bédard
613-580-2482, Georges.Bédard@ottawa.ca

 

Rideau-Vanier (12)

Ref N° / No de référence : ACS2009-CCS-TRC-0019

 

 

SUBJECT:

REducing the impact oF THE BARRICADES AT THE US EMBASSY ON SUSSEX DRIVE

 

 

OBJET :

rÉDUCTION DE L’INCIDENCE DES BARRICADES À L’AMBASSADE DES ÉTATS-UNIS DE LA PROMENADE SUSSEX

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATION

 

That the Transportation Committee recommend that Council direct staff to pursue discussions with responsible parties to eliminate or reduce the negative impact of the security barricades on Sussex Drive so as to have a remedy at the end of this reconstruction, and to report back to the Transportation Committee and Council on new measures that will be taken before the end of reconstruction.

 

 

RECOMMANDATION DU RAPPORT

 

Que le Comité des transports recommande au Conseil de charger le personnel de poursuivre des discussions avec les parties responsables en vue de supprimer ou de limiter les effets négatifs des barricades de sécurité installées sur la promenade Sussex, de manière à obtenir une solution à la fin de ce projet de remise en état, et de charger le personnel de rendre compte au Comité des transports et au Conseil des nouvelles mesures qui seront adoptées avant la fin des travaux.

 

BACKGROUND

 

On 7 October 2009, the aforementioned Notice of Motion was put forward for consideration at a subsequent meeting.

 

CONTEXTE

 

Le 7 octobre 2009, l’avis de motion mentionné ci-dessus a été présenté aux fins d’examen à une réunion ultérieure.

 

DISCUSSION

 

On 6 November 2001, temporary barricades were installed on Sussex Drive and MacKenzie Avenue surrounding the U.S. Embassy.  The barricades are unsightly and cause major disruption in Ottawa’s number one tourist area.

 

The City intends to completely reconstruct Sussex Drive between George Street and St. Patrick Street starting in November 2009 and this is an opportune time to transform the Embassy’s protective perimeter in a way that maintains or enhances the Embassy’s security requirements, contributes to the City’s urban design goals, and is integrated into the National Capital Commission’s design of Confederation Boulevard.  It is understood that the design of the new perimeter is to be temporary as well and subject to removal should the security requirements of the U.S. Embassy change in the future.  The National Capital Commission has been supportive of this approach.

 

DISCUSSION

 

Le 6 novembre 2001, des barricades temporaires ont été installées sur la promenade Sussex et l’avenue MacKenzie autour de l’ambassade des États-Unis. Les barricades sont inesthétiques et causent une perturbation dans la principale zone touristique d'Ottawa.

 

La Ville a l’intention de reconstruire entièrement la promenade Sussex entre la rue George et la rue St-Patrick à compter de novembre 2009; il semble que ce soit l’occasion de transformer le périmètre de protection de l’ambassade de façon à ce qu’il continue à répondre aux exigences de sécurité de l’Ambassade ou les surpasse, qu’il contribue aux objectifs d'aménagement urbain de la Ville et qu’il s’intègre à la conception du boulevard de la Confédération de la Commission de la capitale nationale (CCN). Il est entendu que la conception du nouveau périmètre sera aussi temporaire et devra être révisée en cas de changement, dans le futur, des exigences de sécurité de l'ambassade des États-Unis. La Commission de la capitale nationale appuie cette démarche.

 

 

CONSULTATION

 

The Planning and Growth Management Department has held initial discussions with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and the United States Embassy, and this discussion has established a positive working relationship that is focused on finding a suitable alternative to the jersey barriers that will fulfill everyone’s goals and objectives.

 


Public Works Department

 

In regards to traffic flow, the loss of the northbound westside curb lane on Sussex Drive causes a loss in lane capacity on Sussex Drive.  This significantly affects the ability to process traffic through both the Rideau-Sussex intersection and the Sussex-St Patrick intersection.

 

Rideau Street is also a major east-west transit route (both OC and STO) and removing the lane on Sussex has had an adverse effect on transit operations through this corridor.  Should the City reclaim the lane or a part of the lane for northbound traffic this will significantly improve operations in the area.

 

Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability

 

The Planning and Growth Management Department have had a keen interest in this file and have led discussions internally with other City departments and externally with stakeholders that include the National Capital Commission, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and the United States Embassy, to discuss possible approaches to the Embassy’s perimeter.  The Department has been encouraged by the initial direction of these discussions and would request Council support to pursue them.

 

 

CONSULTATION

 

Le Service de l’urbanisme et de la gestion de la croissance a tenu des discussions préliminaires avec la Gendarmerie royale du Canada (GRC) et l’ambassade des États-Unis et cette discussion a permis d’établir une relation de travail positive axée sur la détermination d’une solution de rechange convenable aux murets qui satisfera aux buts et aux objectifs de chacun.

 

Service des travaux publics

 

Pour ce qui est de la circulation, la perte de la voie ouest en direction nord sur la promenade Sussex engendre une perte de la capacité des voies de la promenade Sussex et a par conséquent des répercussions sur la circulation à l’intersection de la rue Rideau et de la promenade Sussex et à celle de la promenade Sussex et de la rue St-Patrick.

 

La rue Rideau est également un circuit important de transport en commun est-ouest pour OC Transpo et pour la Société de transport de l’Outaouais (STO) et la perte de la voie de la promenade Sussex a un effet défavorable sur les opérations du transport en commun dans ce corridor. Si la Ville récupère la voie ou une partie de la voie pour la circulation en direction nord, les opérations seront grandement améliorées dans la zone en question.

 

Services d'infrastructure et Viabilité des collectivités

 

Le Service de l’urbanisme et de la gestion de la croissance a un intérêt marqué pour ce dossier et a mené des discussions avec les autres services de la Ville et à l'externe avec des intervenants, dont la Commission de la capitale nationale, la Gendarmerie royale du Canada et l’ambassade des États-Unis, afin de discuter d’approches possibles en ce qui concerne le périmètre de l’Ambassade. Le Service est encouragé par l’orientation initiale de ces discussions et demanderait le soutien du Conseil en vue de les poursuivre.

 

 

LEGAL/RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS

 

There are no legal/risk management impediments to staff pursuing discussions with the responsible parties with a view to eliminating or reducing the impact of the US Embassy security barricades. However, any "remedies" which will be incorporated into the contract for the reconstruction of Sussex Drive may require design and scope changes for that contract.

 

 

IMPLICATIONS JURIDIQUES ET DE LA GESTION DES RISQUES 

 

Il n'existe aucun obstacle juridique ou lié à la gestion des risques en ce qui concerne la poursuite de discussions avec les parties responsables concernant la suppression ou la limitation des effets négatifs des barricades de sécurité aux abords de l’ambassade des États-Unis. Toutefois, toute mesure qui sera prise et intégrée au contrat de reconstruction de la promenade Sussex pourrait nécessiter des changements à la conception et à la portée de ce contrat.

 

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

This report has no current funding implications.  Any negotiated requirements and funding implications will be subject to a future report.

 

 

RÉPERCUSSIONS FINANCIÈRES

 

Ce rapport n'a pas d'incidences de financement actuellement. Toutes exigences négociées et incidences de financement feront l'objet d'un futur rapport.

 

 

DISPOSITION

 

Staff will undertake the direction of Committee and Council.

 

 

DISPOSITION

 

Le personnel exécutera les directives du Comité et du Conseil.


M E M O   /   N O T E   D E   S E R V I C E

 


 

To / Destinataire

Chair and ToMembers of Transportation Committee

File/N° de fichier:

ACS2009-CCS-TRC-0019 File Number

From / Expéditeur

John L. Moser

General Manager, Planning and Growth Management Department

 

Subject / Objet

SubjectSussex Drive Reconstruction and Replacement of Jersey Barriers in front of the United States of America Embassy

Date:  DateDecember 1, 2009

 

The purpose of this memorandum is to provide Committee with further information regarding the City’s collaboration with representatives of the United States of America Embassy, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, and the National Capital Commission with respect to the removal of the jersey barriers in front of the United States of America Embassy as part of the Sussex Drive reconstruction project.

 

§   There is concurrence from the United States of America Embassy with the proposal by the City of Ottawa and National Capital Commission to replace the existing jersey barriers with bollards as part of the Sussex Drive reconstruction project. The preliminary cost estimate to construct the bollards on Sussex Drive is in the order of $900,000.

 

§   If the replacement of the current barriers with a bollard system is implemented there are impacts to the existing underground infrastructure on Sussex Drive. The watermain alignment would need to shift eastward which would then have subsequent impacts on the sanitary/storm sewers and potentially a gas main. In addition, an existing hydro duct and associated manhole structures would have to be relocated. Costs of the above are currently under review.

 

§   A cost-sharing agreement between all parties for the implementation of bollards and associated streetscaping will be brought to Committee and Council for approval. The National Capital Commission’s Board of Directors has recently approved a funding envelope for the Sussex Drive reconstruction project in which there are committed funds of up to $1.2 million that may be part of any cost-sharing agreement.

 

§   The contract award for the reconstruction of Sussex Drive (George to St. Patrick) is complete and construction is scheduled to begin imminently. Therefore, changes to the scope of work would need to be negotiated with the contractor.

 

§   It should be noted that the reconstruction of Sussex Drive has received Federal/Provincial Infrastructure Stimulus funding, and thus it is subject to the schedule requirements of that program that mandates construction completion by March 31, 2011.

 

 

Original Signed By

 

 

 John L. Moser

General Manager,

Planning and Growth Management Department

 

 

 

cc:    Nancy Schepers, Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability

Wayne Newell, Director, Infrastructure Services

         John Smit, Manager, Development Review, Urban Services

         Ziad Ghadban, Manager, Design and Construction (East), Infrastructure Services

         Alain Miguelez, Program Manager, Development Review

Jo-Anne Moore, Senior Engineer, Infrastructure Projects, Infrastructure Services

        

 


REducing the impact oF THE BARRICADES AT THE US EMBASSY ON SUSSEX DRIVE

rÉDUCTION DE L’INCIDENCE DES BARRICADES À L’AMBASSADE DES ÉTATS-UNIS DE LA PROMENADE SUSSEX

ACS2009-CCS-TRC-0019                                                                     RIDEAU-VANIER (12)

 

            The Committee received a memo (copy held on file) dated 1 December from the General Manager of Planning and Growth Management.  The memo provided further information regarding the City’s collaboration with representatives of the United States of America Embassy, the RCMP and the NCC with respect to the removal of the jersey barriers in front of the Embassy as part of the Sussex Drive reconstruction project.

 

As a result of the information provided in that memo, Councillor Bédard believed there was some agreement between all parties as to the possibility of embellishing the present barricades.  He congratulated staff for moving ahead on the work they have already accomplished and to see what they recommend as a result of their work on this issue.

 

Mr. Moser confirmed that staff in Planning and Growth Management and Public Works have spent a considerable amount of time working on this project.  They have explored the various options related to the bollards in front of the Embassy and there is more work to be done.  Alain Miguelez, Program Manager, Development Review Process (Urban), elaborated further by adding that over the past few months, staff have been meeting with the NCC and representatives of the RCMP and the American Embassy in order to tackle the issue of what to do with the jersey barriers given the reconstruction of Sussex Drive.  All parties are currently discussing the option of replacing those barriers with a series of bollards that will be located in the westerly lane of Sussex Drive.  This solution fulfills the NCC’s urban design goals for Confederation Boulevard, as well as Ottawa’s Downtown Urban Design Strategy while at the same time, retaining the level of security required by the Embassy.  They are now at the stage of estimating the cost of doing this.

 

Councillor Bédard recognized that in order to receive funding for the reconstruction of Sussex Drive, the City has to meet the deadline of March 2011 and therefore the work has to be done quickly.  The councillor noted that it is not exactly known how much it will cost to do what staff are proposing (outlined in the memorandum) so expected they needed to do further research on this.  The councillor indicated he would submit a replacement Motion to that which is currently in the report:

 

That Transportation Committee recommend Council direct staff to continue discussions with all responsible parties to eliminate or reduce the negative impact of the security barricades on Sussex Drive and specifically to:

a.         Confirm specifics related to the works that would be required to replace the barriers with bollards.

b.         Determine the costs associated with these additional works.

c.         Determine funding sources and/or cost sharing to undertake the additional works and,

d.         Report back to Transportation Committee as soon as these determinations are made to allow Transportation Committee to give consideration to the incorporation of the replacement of the barriers with bollards as part of the Sussex Drive reconstruction project.

 

Mr. Moser indicated that this would have to be done in any case and therefore concurred with this new Motion.

 

Councillor Wilkinson inquired what legal requirements there were to allow the US Embassy to continue to use a lane of road for any kind of barrier.  Legal Counsel, Ernest McArthur, advised that while Sussex Drive is a City-owned road, the security of the US Embassy is a matter within federal jurisdiction.  When asked whether it was possible to do the reconstruction without having to place bollards on the road, Mr. Miguelez explained that the indication from the US embassy is that they would require this protective perimeter and are operating under the assumption that the jersey barrier approach would continue if nothing was being done to the road.  He confirmed that staff have not had discussions with the RCMP or the Embassy, as to whether or not the City could get that lane back on Sussex Drive.

 

Councillor Wilkinson suggested the Motion be amended so that staff also have discussions on what needs to be done in order to get the west lane of traffic back in use.  She stated that the loss of this lane has had a negative impact on that part of the city i.e., congestion, and the City should do whatever it could to gain back that lane.

 

Councillor Bloess thought the US embassy was responsible for it’s own security and asked if the City had a legal obligation to put the barriers up.  Mr. McArthur advised that the security of the embassy has to be a full effort by all parties, but in the final analysis, the RCMP, in cooperation with the federal government, will determine what is required to properly secure the embassy.  The councillor maintained that security was not the City’s responsibility in this instance and suggested the Motion be amended to state that the barriers be eliminated and other security measures be determined.  He further believed the federal government and the American government should be responsible for the costs associated with the underground infrastructure.  He would not support the Motion.

 

Councillor Legendre referred to the information contained in the IPD on today’s agenda, that spoke to the Downtown Ottawa Urban Design Strategy and the thought of having segregated bicycle lanes in the downtown.  He offered that this may be an option to pursue on Sussex Drive as part of the reconstruction.  Mr. Moser confirmed that staff are aware of the need and the design includes provision of a cycling route in the right-of-way.  He agreed to investigate that option further.

 

Councillor Desroches indicated his support for the Bédard Motion because he did not want the site to become a target as that would threaten the residents and businesses in that part of the city as well.  He believed the City should be heeding the advice of the security experts and should work cooperatively with those agencies to protect the embassy.

 

While he did not like the jersey barriers, Councillor Doucet indicated that as the Capital of Canada, the City of Ottawa has a responsibility to be a good host to the American government, which includes understanding their need for protection.

 

Councillor Legendre recalled that the original purpose of putting up the jersey barriers was to prevent the enemies of the United States gaining access to the Embassy grounds.  He too recognized that any threat to the Embassy would be a threat to the neighbouring community and agreed that if the Embassy can be made less of a target by deterring such attacks, then that threat to the community is reduced.  He also agreed that the security experts know what is required.

 

The Committee received an amended Motion from Councillor Bédard, prepared in consultation with Councillor Wilkinson.  Before accepting the amendment, Councillor Bédard wanted assurances from staff that it was not contrary to the direction he was intending with his new Motion.  Mr. Moser indicated that the amendment provides enough latitude to have a fullsome discussion and with that concurrence, the councillor agreed to accept the amendment.

 

In his closing remarks, the councillor reiterated the fact that the City of Ottawa needs to be willing to compromise, as set out in his Motion, to see if there is a possibility and how far the RCMP and the US Embassy is willing to look at bollards that would improve the look of the area as well as freeing up circulation for pedestrians and cyclists.  He reminded Committee members that the ByWard Market is the number one tourist attraction and area for entertainment in Ottawa, and there is a need to improve Sussex Drive for all users.  He was also cognisant of the City’s responsibility as a Capital City and he encouraged members to accept the Motion, as amended.

 

Chair McRae commented that she had spoken to the US Ambassador and they seemed amenable to working with the City of Ottawa.  She wanted to ensure that the Motion is clear to staff that they are being asked to push as hard as they can to ensure the other parties understand what it is the City wants.

 


Moved by G. Bédard

 

That Transportation Committee recommend Council direct staff to continue discussions with all responsible parties to eliminate or reduce the negative impact of the security barricades on Sussex Drive with the objective of re-establishing some traffic on the west lane, and specifically to:

a.         Confirm specifics related to the works that would be required to replace the barriers with bollards.

b.         Determine the costs associated with these additional works.

c.         Determine funding sources and/or cost sharing to undertake the additional works and,

d.         Report back to Transportation Committee as soon as these determinations are made to allow Transportation Committee to give consideration to the incorporation of the replacement of the barriers with bollards as part of the Sussex Drive reconstruction project.

 

            CARRIED, as amended, with Councillor Bloess dissenting