1. COMPREHENSIVE ZONING BY-LAW 2008-250: rÈGLEMENT DE ZONAGE général 2008-250 : |
pLANNING
AND eNVIRONMENT Committee RecommendationS as amended
That
Council approve the amendments recommended in Column 3 of Document 1, to
correct anomalies in Zoning By-law 2008-250 as amended by the following:
1. That
Document 1, Item 18, Column 3 be amended to read: “maximum driveway width is
3.05 m at the street lot line, and in the case of a semi-circular driveway, the
maximum driveway width, for both accesses combined, must not exceed 6.1
metres.”
2. That
Document 1 be amended to add a new Item 20, as follows:
Item |
Objective of Amendment |
Proposed Amendment |
20. Certain lands
located on Friendly Crescent, Shining Star Circle, Brightside Drive, Hopetown
Steet and Hartsmere Drive Ward 6 |
In the former Goulbourn Zoning By-law, the lands were zoned R1-6,
exception 6 reducing the lot width and area and establishing different
setbacks from the R1 zone. The new R1T zone most closely approximated the lot
width of the former exception zone, and a new exception zone, exception 721,
was created to reflect the other modified performance standards.
Unfortunately, when the new zone was affixed to the zoning map, it became R1D
and the old exception zone number 6 was retained, rather than applying the
“T” subzone and the new exception number 721. Reference to the RID zone in exception 6 should be removed.
Additionally, there was no maximum front yard setback in the former Goulbourn
zoning, so this provision should be deleted. |
Amend the Zoning
Map to rezone the R1D[6]zone to R1T[721] as shown on the attached map. Amend Section 239,
Column II to remove the zone reference R1D[6] in exception 6. Amend Section 239,
Column IV to remove the words “-maximum front yard setback 6 m” in exception
721. |
3. That
a map be added to Document 3, that identifies the lands that are being re-zoned
in Item 20 of Document 1.
4. That
there be no further notice pursuant to Section 34 (17) of the Planning Act.
RecommandationS modifiées du Comité de l’urbanisme et de l’environnement
Que le Conseil approuve les modifications
recommandées dans la colonne 3 du document 1 afin de corriger des anomalies
dans le Règlement de zonage no 2008-250 tel que modifiée par ce
qui suit :
1. Que
la troisième colonne du point 18 du document 1 soit modifiée ainsi :
« la largeur maximale d’une entrée privée est de 3,05 m à la ligne de lot
contiguë à la rue et, dans le cas d’une entrée privée semi-circulaire, la
largeur maximale des deux accès combinés ne doit pas excéder 6,1 mètres. »
2. Que
le document 1 soit modifié par l’ajout du nouveau point 20 suivant :
Point |
Objectif de la modification |
Modification proposée |
20. Certains
terrains situés le long du croissant Friendly, du cercle Shining Star, de la
promenade Brightside, de la rue Hopetown et de la promenade Hartsmere Quartier 6 |
Dans l’ancien
Règlement de zonage de Goulbourn, les terrains se sont vus attribuer un
zonage R1-6, exception 6, qui réduit leur largeur et leur superficie, et qui
établit des retraits différents par rapport à la zone R1. La nouvelle zone
R1T est celle qui s’approche le plus de la largeur de terrain de l’ancienne
zone assortie d’exceptions, et une nouvelle zone d’exception, exception 721,
a été créée pour tenir compte des autres normes de rendement modifiées.
Malheureusement, lorsque la nouvelle zone a été ajoutée au plan de zonage,
elle a été transformée en zone R1D et l’ancien numéro de zone d’exception 6 a
été conservé, au lieu d’appliquer la sous-zone « T » et le nouveau
numéro d’exception 721. La référence à la
zone RID dans l’exception 6 doit être supprimée. De plus, puisqu’aucun
retrait de cour avant maximal n’était prévu dans l’ancien zonage de
Goulbourn, cette disposition doit donc être supprimée. |
Modification du
plan de zonage de manière à faire passer la zone R1D[6] en zone R1T[721], tel
qu’illustré sur le plan ci-joint. Modification de la
section 239, colonne II, de manière à supprimer la référence de zone R1D[6] à
l’exception 6. Modification de la
section 239, colonne IV, de manière à supprimer les mots « retrait de
cour avant maximal de 6 m » à l’exception 721. |
3. Qu’une
carte désignant les terrains faisant l’objet d’un changement de zonage au point
20 du document 1 soit ajoutée au document 3.
4. Qu’aucun
autre avis ne soit émis, conformément à l’article 34 (17) de la Loi sur l’aménagement du territoire.
Agriculture
and Rural Affairs Committee Recommendation
That Council approve the amendments recommended in Column 3 of Document
2, to correct anomalies in Zoning By-law 2008-250.
Recommandation
du
Comité de l’agriculture et des affaires
rurales
Que le Conseil approuve les modifications recommandées dans la colonne 3
du document 2 afin de corriger des anomalies dans le Règlement de zonage no 2008-250.
Documentation
1. Deputy City Manager’s report
(Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability) dated 8 March 2010
(ACS2010-ICS-PGM-0066).
Planning and Environment Committee
Comité de l'urbanisme et de l'environnement
and / et
Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee
Comité de l'agriculture et des affaires rurales
and Council / et au Conseil
08 March 2010 / le 08 mars 2010
Submitted by/Soumis par : Nancy
Schepers,
Deputy City Manager / Directrice municipale adjointe
Infrastructure
Services and Community Sustainability
Services d’infrastructure et Viabilité des collectivités
Contact Person/Personne-ressource : Richard Kilstrom,
Manager/Gestionnaire, Policy Development and Urban Design/Élaboration de la politique
et conception urbaine, Planning and Growth Management/Urbanisme et Gestion de
la croissance Élaboration de la politique et conception urbaine
(613)
580-2424 x22653, Richard.Kilstrom@ottawa.ca
1. That
Planning and Environment Committee recommend that Council approve the
amendments recommended in Column 3 of Document 1, to correct anomalies in
Zoning By-law 2008-250; and
2. That
Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee recommend that Council approve the
amendments recommended in Column 3 of Document 2, to correct anomalies in
Zoning By-law 2008-250.
1. Que
le Comité de l’urbanisme et de l’environnement recommande au Conseil
d’approuver les modifications recommandées dans la colonne 3 du document 1 afin
de corriger des anomalies dans le Règlement de zonage no 2008-250;
2. Que
le Comité de l’agriculture et des affaires rurales recommande au Conseil
d’approuver les modifications recommandées dans la colonne 3 du document 2 afin
de corriger des anomalies dans le Règlement de zonage no 2008-250.
On June 25, 2008 City Council adopted the new
Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2008-250 that affects all properties within Ottawa.
By-law 2008-250 replaces the 36 Zoning By-laws of the former municipalities
that were amalgamated in 2001. Since the
adoption of the Zoning By-law, staff has been identifying anomalies that
require correction, and reports to correct the anomalies are being forwarded to
Committee and Council on a regular basis. This report details recommended
amendments to correct a number of the identified anomalies in the urban area of
the City.
Since the adoption of the Zoning By-law
2008-250, staff has monitored the new by-law and has identified certain
anomalies that are being recommended for correction. Document 1 provides staff
recommendations to Planning and Environment Committee on the anomalies, and
includes details of the recommended amendments in the urban area in Column 3 of
Document 1. Document 2 provides staff
recommendations to Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee on the anomalies in
the rural area. Document 3 contains the
maps showing the location of zoning map corrections.
The amendments
are intended to correct mapping and text reference errors in the implementation
of Council-approved changes that were not accurately reflected in the
Comprehensive Zoning By-law.
RURAL
IMPLICATIONS
As noted
above, Document 2 includes recommendations to correct anomalies in the rural
area.
CONSULTATION
Notice of the public meeting to deal with these
anomalies and corrections was provided in The Citizen and Le Droit, with a
listing of the addresses and provisions subject to correction. As well, interested
parties have been notified by individual mail.
COMMENTS BY THE WARD COUNCILLOR(S)
N/A
These changes are of a routine nature to
correct anomalies and do not have any legal/risk management implications.
CITY STRATEGIC PLAN
N/A
TECHNICAL IMPLICATIONS
N/A
N/A
Document 1 List of Anomalies and Modifications to
Zoning By-law 2008-250 for consideration by Planning and Environment Committee
Document 2 List of Anomalies and Modifications to
Zoning By-law 2008-250 for consideration by Agricultural and Rural Affairs
Committee
Document 3 Location
Maps
Planning and Growth Management Department to
prepare the implementing by-law and forward it to Legal Services who will then
forward the by-law to City Council.
DOCUMENT 1 as
amended
LIST OF ANOMALIES AND
MODIFICATIONS TO ZONING
BY-LAW 2008-250 FOR
CONSIDERATION BY PLANNING AND
ENVIRONMENT
COMMITTEE
Item |
Objective of Amendment |
Proposed Amendment |
Typograhical
Corrections |
||
1. Subection 109 (4) |
Subsection
109 (3) immediately above Subsection 109 (4) indicates that the regulation
affects parking requirements for lots in R1 through R5 Zones which is
correct. Subsection
(4) is also intended to apply only to R1 through R5 Zoned lots but the
drafting fails to identify the applicability of the rule and should be
drafted as per Subsection (3). |
Amend Subsection 109(4) so that its applicability only to
lots in the R1 to R5 Zones is captured |
2. Section 239,
Exception [1463] 6371 Hazeldean Rd. Ward 6 |
The
minimum required interior side yard setback is unclear due to the drafting of
the second condition; when the numbering of the condition is removed (2.),
the requirement is 0 m on the common side, which is the standard correct
“non-requirement” when two units are attached on one common side |
Amend Section 239, Exception [1463] to replace the numbered
conditions affecting the requirement for the minimum interior side yard, so
that the correct conditions are easily understood to mean 1.5 m on either
side of the main building and 0 m on the common side |
3. Section 239, Column II and V, Exceptions
[9], [134, [242], [964] and [1046] |
Column II in the Exceptions sections
references the zones to which the exception applies. There are a number of
incorrect references in this column that should be removed, added or
modified. |
Amend Section 239, Column II
to: -
removed
zone references I1A[9] H(9) zone in exception 9 -
modify
zone reference by changing the Schedule reference to S89 rather than S94 in
exception 242 -
add
reference to R3XX[1046] in exception 1046 Amend Section 239, Column V
to: -
replace
reference O1[367] to L1[367] in exception 134 and 964 |
4. R4O Zone |
The lot
width and lot area applicable to planned unit developments are erroneous, and
should be the same in this subzone as in other comparable R4 Zones. The purpose of a planned unit development
is to permit a number of dwellings on a single lot, rather than just one
dwelling, and therefore must not need to conform to the lot sizes affecting
each dwelling type. |
Amend Section 162,
Table 162A, Subzone O, Columns IV (minimum lot width) and V (minimum lot
area) to delete the phrase “as per dwelling type” and replace with “na” in
Column IV, and with “1,400” in Column V. |
Zoning Map
Corrections |
||
5. Area to the north
of Meadowbrook Road; bounded by Eugene
Street to the north, to the back of the lots on the east side of Aurele
Street, to the west, to the back of the lots fronting on the west side of
Maxime Street. Area zoned to the siouth side of Meadowbrook Road, the
zoning narrows to cover only those lots on the west side of Maxime Street,
south to Ridgebrook Drive. Ward 11 |
There are
approximately 24 dwelling units on Maxime and Aurele streets that have been
made legal non-conforming by the rezoning from former Gloucester Zoning
By-law to the new by-law. The old Rd1
zone permitted semi-detached dwellings while the new R1N zone does not. The Rd1 of Gloucester
was supposed to be R2N ... it appears that a "1" was placed on the
map instead of a "2" in the zone category. |
Amend the Zoning Map to rezone the lands from R1N to R2N. |
6. 713 Tweedsmuir
Avenue Ward 15 |
The boundary between the commercial and residential zoning
was incorrectly transferred on the new Zoning Map which means a detached
dwelling is now zoned commercial
instead of residential. |
Amend the Zoning Map, to rezone the subject lands, as shown
on Document 3, from AM5[21] S114 to R4B. |
7. 297-301 Savard
and 306 Cyr Avenues Ward 12 |
The zoning map placed an exception [9] on the lands when it
should have been exception [8]. |
Amend the Zoning Map, to rezone the subject lands, as shown
on Document 3, from I1A[9] H(9) to I1A[8] H(9). |
8. 116 Beech Street
and 287 Loretta Avenue South Ward 15 |
The 2007 draft version of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law,
reflected a maximum height limit of 18 m in the R5B zone in the text of the
by-law. For the final by-law, the height limits for the R5 zone were taken
out of the text and placed instead on the Zoning Map. The intent of the zoning strategy for the
mid-high rise residential, R5 zone, was to apply an 18 metre height limit
where the previous zoning either did not have a height limit, or where
existing buildings were 18 metres or less in height. For the property at 116 Beech Street, no height limit is
showing on the Zoning Map, where an H(18) should have been added to the
zoning designation. For the small property at 287 Loretta Avenue S., the
existing building is lower than 18 metres, and the 42 metre height limit of
the adjoing property was incorrectly also applied to these lands. |
Amend the Zoning Map, to rezone the subject lands, as shown
on Document 3, from R5B to R5B H(18) and R5B H(42) to R5B H(18). |
9. 320 McLeod Street Ward 14 |
Zoning for site incorrectly identifies Schedule 244 as
applicable to the property when it should be Schedule 224. |
Amend the Zoning Map, to rezone the subject lands, as shown
on Document 3, from R5B[1169] H(28) S244 to R5B[1169] H(28) S224. |
10. 710 Carson’s Road (part of) Ward 13 |
By-law 2004-400 was incorrectly transferred for the the
north part of the site; it should be zoned R4N[985]S226 rather than I1A. |
Amend the Zoning Map, to rezone the subject lands, as shown
on Document 3, from I1A to R4N[985]S226. |
Zoning Map and
Text Corrections |
||
11. 80 Aberdeen Ward 14 |
Amend Section 239, Exception
[963] by: - adding the following words
to column III: -
research
and development centre -
office - modifying the following
provision in column V so as to delete the words “including parking for a
non-conforming use” and inserting the words “for research and development
centre and office uses,” after the words “accessory parking”. - adding the following
provisions in column V: -
the uses
of research and development centre and office are only permitted at 80
Aberdeen Avenue; -
the
minimum parking requirement for research and development centre and office
use is 1.3 spaces for every 100m2 of gross floor area; -
the
maximum permitted height for a research and development centre and office is
13.2 metres. Amend the Zoning Map to
rezone the lands, as shown in Document 3, from R4S[963] to R4S[963]
S214. |
|
12. 940 Belfast Road Ward 18 |
Amend Section 239, Exception [446] by adding the following
provisions in column V: - outside
storage is allowed on the west side of the property that abuts the IG zone,
on the lands known as Part 2, Plan 5R-50 and including the triangle formed
from a right angle at the east limit of Part 2 to the CNR right of way. |
|
13. Parts of
Hazeldean Road, from Eagleson Road and the Carp River Ward 23 |
Amend the Zoning Map to rezone the lands, as shown in
Document 3, from AM2 H(20) to AM2[xxx] H(20) to permit the following
additional uses: -
recreational and athletic facility -
cinema -
theatre |
|
14. 3249 Conroy Road Ward 10 |
Amend the Zoning Map to
rezone the lands, as shown in Document 3, from IL to GM[xxx] H(13.5) to: 1. prohibit all uses, except for: -animal
hospital -apartment
dwelling, low rise -artist
studio -bank
machine -bank -bed and breakfast -community centre -community health and resource centre -convenience store -converted dwelling -day care -detached dwelling -diplomatic mission -duplex dwelling -dwelling unit -group home -instructional facility -linked detached dwelling -medical facility -multiple attached dwelling -office -personal service business -planned unit development -post office -retail food store -retail store -retirement home -retirement home, converted -rooming house -rooming house, converted -semi-detached dwelling -shelter -stacked dwelling -three unit dwelling -training centre 2. apply the following provisions: -no minimum lot area or lot width -minimum front yard of 6 m along Johnston Road -no minimum side yard setback along Conroy Road -minimum interior side yard setback of 7.5 m along the east
property line -minimum rear yard of 7.5 m -maximum floor space index of 2.0 -minimum required width of 3 m of landscaped area where a
yard is required along Johnston Road, the south and east prperty line; that
landscaped area may be reduced to 0.6 m where a minimum 1.4 m high opaque
screen is provided -all non-residentail uses, except a day care are limited to
no more than 50% of the floor space index. A bed and breafast and diplomatic
mission are also limited to no more than 50% of the floor space index -storage must be completely enclosed within a building |
General Provisions
|
||
15. Section 54 – new
definitions |
The terms “mixed use building” and “non-residential building” are
often used in the various zones to denote separate regulations based on the
type of land use category. These terms have not been defined, and have caused some interpretation
questions. Staff recommend that these two terms be defined. In addition, these terms should be added to Part 16 - Appendix A –
List of Land Uses specifically Mentioned or Defined |
Amend Section 54 to add the following new definitions: ““mixed use building” means a form of development in which
a building contains both residential and non-residential uses, and mixed use
development has the same corresponding meaning” ““non-residential building means a form of development in
which a building contains any type or combination of permitted
non-residential uses, and non-residential development has the same
corresponding meaning” Amend Part 16, Appendix A to add “mixed use building” and
“non-residential building” to the list of land uses specifically mentioned or
defined |
16. R5 Zone
Provision 163 (6) |
The Subsection establishes what set of zoning provisions will apply in
the case of “…other non-residential uses” based on the uses’ heights. This clause should also make reference to
mixed-use buildings, so as to capture both the principal uses as well as
permitted ancillary uses within a building also developed with dwelling
units. |
Amend Subsection 163 (6) to insert a comma as well as the
term“mixed use building” immediately following the term “rooming house”,
wherever the term “rooming house” appears. |
17. Section 132 –
Rooming Units in Private Dwellings |
The Section is intended to permit a limited number of rental rooms to
assist homeowners, and is not intended to result in the creation of a rooming
house, converted. Prior permission, under former Ottawa Zoning By-Law 93-98, was that
rooming units were permitted within each principal dwelling unit, and not
within the whole of the dwelling. Once a fourth rooming unit is created, the use becomes a rooming house
converted as per the zoning definition, subject to its own set of
regulations. The former regulations,
then, would have permitted up to 6 rooming units in the whole of a
semi-detached dwelling, which by definition, would become a rooming house. The new Zoning By-law did not reflect this intent, by restricting up
to two or three rooming units in the whole of a residential use
building. While this attempts to
prohibit the creation of a fourth or more unit resulting in an illegal
rooming house (if not listed as a permitted use), it can result in “first
come first served” zoning which is not authorized under the Planning Act. Recommend that Section 132 be revised to indicate that up to two or
three are permitted in each principal dwelling unit, and add a proviso that
the total number of rooming units within all attached principal dwelling
units, must not result in the creation of a rooming house, converted. This approach will strengthen the
prohibition of a rooming house, converted as that use is not to be permitted
in an indirect way by adding up all rented rooms in the attached dwellings. |
Amend Section 132 to add a new subsection (3) and to renumber
the subsequent subsection, to modify the wording of clauses 1) and 2) shown
in bold print below, so that the subsections (1), (2), and (3) would read as
follows: “(1) In
the case of the R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5 zones, up to three rooming units are
permitted in a detached dwelling, and a linked-detached dwelling;
and in each principal dwelling unit of a semi-detached dwelling, of a
duplex dwelling, and of a multiple attached dwelling. (2) In
the case of the VM, V1, V2, V3, RU and RR zones, up to two rooming units are
permitted in a detached dwelling, and a linked-detached dwelling;
and in each principal dwelling unit of a semi-detached dwelling and a
duplex dwelling. (3) In no
case, may the cumulative total of rooming units within the whole of one of
the residential use buildings, listed in subsections (1) and (2) above,
result in the creation of a rooming house, or rooming house, converted.” |
18. Maximum Width of
Driveways Rockcliffe Park Ward 13 |
In the former Rockcliffe Zoning By-law, a maximum driveway
width of 6.1 metres was in effect, the intent of which was to reduce the
number and width of driveways, with landscaping made more significant than
the driveway or parking areas. Zoning By-law 2008-250 establishes the maximum driveway
width of a residential lot as a maximum of 50% of the area of the front yard,
or the minimum width of one parking space (i.e. 2.6 m). As the lot gets wider and larger, so too
may a driveway be wider. Rockcliffe Park consists mostly of large detached dwelling
lots. Without a firm maximum standard,
a substantial amount of a front or corner side yard could be turned into a driveway, thus
reducing the landscaping of the front yards. In addition, it is recommended that the minimum landscaped
strip between the driveway and the interior side lot line be brought forward,
as it aids in maintaining soft landscaping between residential lots |
Amend the following site-and area-specific exceptions: R1A[1256], R1A[1257], R1B[1259], R1BB [1258], R1C [1260],
R1I [1261], R3B [907], and R4N[1321] H(12.5), and rezone the R1I and R4N to the same exception [xxxx] by
adding the following text:
-
maximum
driveway width is 3.05 m at the street lot line, and in the case of a
semi-circular driveway, the maximum driveway width, for both accesses
combined, must not exceed 6.1 metres -
minimum landscaped strip of 1.5 m, developed with
soft landscaping, is required between the driveway and the interior side lot
line. Amend the Zoning Map to rezone the R1I and R4N subzones in
Rockliffe Park, as shown in Document 3, from R1I to R1I [xxxx] and R4N to
R4N[xxxx]. |
19. Section 55 –
Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures as affects the RM Zone - Mobile Home
Parks |
[Note that this item is also included in Document 3 as item
2 – for ARAC’s consideration because
there are a number of mobile home parks located throughout the rural area.] A review of Section
55 indicates that the requirements affecting whole mobile home parks were not
considered in the creation of this Section. Column II has the RM – Mobile Home Park Zone in the same
category as residential dwellings, where the rule is intended to apply to one
building per lot. The Section fails to
consider accessory uses, buildings and structures needed and used by the mobile
home park itself. Subsections 55 (7) and 55 (8) limit the total cumulative
amount of all accessory structures and buildings at 55 m2, with a
maximum of two buildings or structures permitted per lot. Since mobile home parks are developed on
one lot, the maximum number of accessory buildings is two for the entire
site. These provisions were created based on one residential
building per lot, which falls short of the actual need for multiple accessory
buildings serving the mobile home park itself. Further, in many existing mobile home parks, each mobile
home site has an accessory building, which when added in with all other ones,
would also exceed the cumulative total of 55 m2 gross floor area. It is recommended that the requirements for both mobile
home sites, as well as for mobile home parks, be amended to create standards
that reflect more clearly the needs of mobile home park operators as well as
park residents. |
1. Amend
Table 55 to remove reference to the RM Zone from Column II, and to
add the same RM Zone reference under Column III immediately following the RI
zone reference. 2.Amend
Table 55 (7) to add a new clause (b), and to rename the current clause (b) to
clause (c): "(b) In an RM zone, (i)
a maximum of 10 m2 is permitted for a maximum of
one accessory building associated with a mobile home site; and (ii) a
maximum cumulative total gross floor area of 300 m2 may be used
for accessory buildings or structures whose sole purpose is to provide space
for tools, equipment, materials and similar items, or for accessory uses
needed to maintain the mobile home park; and must not be used for storage for
individual mobile home sites, nor for commercial storage." |
20. Certain lands
located on Friendly Crescent, Shining Star Circle, Brightside Drive, Hopetown
Steet and Hartsmere Drive Ward 6 |
In the former
Goulbourn Zoning By-law, the lands were zoned R1-6, exception 6 reducing the
lot width and area and establishing different setbacks from the R1 zone. The
new R1T zone most closely approximated the lot width of the former exception
zone, and a new exception zone, exception 721, was created to reflect the
other modified performance standards. Unfortunately, when the new zone was
affixed to the zoning map, it became R1D and the old exception zone number 6
was retained, rather than applying the “T” subzone and the new exception
number 721. Reference to the
RID zone in exception 6 should be removed. Additionally, there was no maximum
front yard setback in the former Goulbourn zoning, so this provision should
be deleted. |
Amend the Zoning Map to rezone the
R1D[6]zone to R1T[721] as shown on the attached map. Amend Section 239, Column II to
remove the zone reference R1D[6] in exception 6. Amend Section 239, Column IV to
remove the words “-maximum front yard setback 6 m” in exception 721. |
DOCUMENT 2
LIST OF ANOMALIES AND
MODIFICATIONS TO ZONING
BY-LAW 2008-250 FOR
CONSIDERATION BY
AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL AFFAIRS
COMMITTEE
Item |
Objective of Amendment |
Proposed Amendment |
Zoning Map and
Text Corrections |
||
1. Mobile Home Parks 5401 Bank Street 7481 Mitch Owens 1000 Vista Barrett Private Ward 20 |
Three mobile home parks were originally zoned to permit
detached dwellings in addition to mobile homes. These parks contain a number of detached
dwellings, including premanufactured houses.
Further, former Gloucester Zoning By-law 333 of 1999 permitted the
use. In the case of the Albion Sun Vista Mobile Home Park (1000
Vista Barrett Private) in former Osgoode, the site-specific zoning extended
the definition of mobile home to include premanufactured housing, which is a
detached dwelling land use under Zoning By-law 2008-250. . Because a detached dwelling is both permitted and exists on
each of these three sites, it is recommended that the following mobile home
parks be rezoned to permit detached dwellings: 5401 Bank 7481 Mitch Owens 1000 Vista Barrett Private |
Amend the Zoning Map to rezone 5401 Bank Street and 7481
Mitch Owens from RM2 to RM2 [xxxr], and rezone 1000 Vista Barrett Private
from RM3 to RM3 with the same [xxxr] exception as the other two properties
noted herein. Amend Section 240 – Rural Exceptions, to create a new
exception that will add “detached dwelling” as an additional permitted use in
Column III. Amend Section 240 – Rural Exceptions to add the references
to the affected zoning, “RM2 [xxxr]” and RM3[xxxr] in Column II. Amend Section 240, rural Exception RM2 [188r]-h to add
“detached dwelling” as an additional permitted use in Column III. |
2. Section 55 –
Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures as affects the RM Zone - Mobile Home
Parks |
[Note that this item is also included in Document 2 as item
19 – for PEC consideration as there
are mobile home parks located in the urban area.] A review of Section
55 indicates that the requirements affecting whole mobile home parks were not
considered in the creation of this Section. Column II has the RM – Mobile Home Park Zone in the same
category as residential dwellings, where the rule is intended to apply to one
building per lot. The Section fails to
consider accessory uses, buildings and structures needed and used by the
mobile home park itself. Subsections 55 (7) and 55 (8) limit the total cumulative
amount of all accessory structures and buildings at 55 m2, with a
maximum of two buildings or structures permitted per lot. Since mobile home parks are developed on
one lot, the maximum number of accessory buildings is two for the entire
site. These provisions were created based on one residential
building per lot, which falls short of the actual need for multiple accessory
buildings serving the mobile home park itself. Further, in many existing mobile home parks, each mobile
home site has an accessory building, which when added in with all other ones,
would also exceed the cumulative total of 55 m2 gross floor area. It is recommended that the requirements for both mobile
home sites, as well as for mobile home parks, be amended to create standards
that reflect more clearly the needs of mobile home park operators as well as
park residents. |
1. Amend
Table 55 to remove reference to the RM Zone from Column II, and to
add the same RM Zone reference under Column III immediately following the RI
zone reference. 2.Amend
Table 55 (7) to add a new clause (b), and to rename the current clause (b) to
clause (c): "(b) In an RM zone, (i)
a maximum of 10 m2 is permitted for a maximum of
one accessory building associated with a mobile home site; and (ii) a
maximum cumulative total gross floor area of 300 m2 may be used
for accessory buildings or structures whose sole purpose is to provide space
for tools, equipment, materials and similar items, or for accessory uses
needed to maintain the mobile home park; and must not be used for storage for
individual mobile home sites, nor for commercial storage." |
3. 3690 Carling
Avenue Ward 7 |
Amend the Zoning Map from RC4[263r] to RC4[xxxr] Amend Section 240, Rural Exceptions, to create a new
exception for the property such that under Column IV, Land Uses Prohibited it says “all uses
prohibited except for: -
a golf course limited to a driving range, -
amusement park limited to a miniature golf facility and the following ancillary
uses: -
retail store limited to the sale of golf clubs -
golf club repair -
snack bar” |
|
4. Selected RR4,
RR5, RR14, RR15 zones in West Carleton (former West Carleton RR-2 zones) Ward 5 |
The former West Carleton Zoning By-law permitted the
construction of buildings and structures on lots having frontage on a private
road within the former RR-2 subzone.
These rights were not carried forward for these lands in By-law
2008-250. |
Amend the Zoning Map to rezone the lands by applying
exception [19r] to the RR4, RR5, RR14, RR15 zones, as shown in Document 3. |
5. Part of the lands between Bank
Street and Sale Barn Road, south of Parkway Road, Greely Village Ward 20 |
OMB orders relating to
PL060527 for part of the lands between Bank Street and Sale Barn Road
south of Parkway Road, as shown in Document 3, were not completely implemented. |
Rezone Area A from O1 to O1 [365r], as shown in Document 3. Rezone Area B from RU to O1 [365r], as shown in Document 3. Rezone Area C from RU to V1I [316r], as shown in Document
3. |
6. 3487 Panmure
Road, Stonewalk Subdivision Ward 5 |
By-law 2008-250 did not properly recognize the lot widths
for a draft approved plan of subdivision. |
Rezone the property from RR3 to RR3 [xxxr], as shown in
Document 3, with exception [xxxr] to read, -minimum lot width 40 metres, except for lots 24 and 25 on
the 2010 Draft Plan of Subdivision which will have a minimum lot width of 22
metres. |
7. 2384 Craig’s Side
Road Ward 5 |
The current zoning, Rural General Industrial (RG), does not
recognize heavy industrial uses that
have existed since 1988 and were permitted under the former
zoning. The property owner has
requested that these heavy industrial uses be reinstated as a permitted
use. |
Rezone the subject lands from RG1 to RG1 [xxxr], as shown
in Document 3. Amend Section 240 – Rural Exceptions, to create a new
exception that will add, “-heavy industrial use” as an additional permitted
use in Column III. |
DOCUMENT 3
AS AMENDED*
LIST OF SITE-SPECIFIC LOCATION MAPS
Location
Maps (attached) |
The R1N
zone in the Maxime and Aurele Street area |
713 Tweedsmuir Avenue |
297-301 Savard and 306 Cyr Avenues |
116 Beech Street and 287 Loretta Avenue South |
320 McLeod Street |
710 Carson’s Road |
80 Aberdeen |
AM2 subzone along Hazeldean Road, Eagleson Road and the
Carp River |
R1I and R4N subzones in former Rockliffe Park |
3249 Conroy Road |
5401 Bank
Street |
7481
Mitch Owens Drive |
1000
Vista Barrett |
3690
Carling Avenue |
Selected
RR4, RR5, RR14, RR15 zones in West Carleton |
Part of
the lands between Bank Street and Sale Barn Road, south of Parkway Road |
2384
Craig’s Side Road |
Certain Lands
located on Friendly Crescent, Shining Star Circle, Brightside Drive, Hopetown
Steet and Hartsmere Drive, Ward 6 (*as amended by PEC, 23 March 2010) |
MAP ADDED AS PER MOTION BY S. QADRI, PEC MEETING OF 23
MARCH 2010
COMPREHENSIVE
ZONING BY-LAW 2008-250: ANOMALIES
AND MINOR CORRECTIONS - FIRST QUARTER 2010
rÈGLEMENT DE ZONAGE général
2008-250 : ANOMALIES
ET CORRECTIONS MINEURES - premiEr trimestre 2010
ACS2010-ICS-PGM-0066 City-wide / À l'échelle de la Ville
At the Planning and Environment Committee meeting of 23 March 2010, the Committee Chair noted that there were two amendments being brought forward, with the support of staff, one in Councillor Legendre’s ward and the other in Councillor Qadri’s ward.
Anthony Keith, was present in support of Councillor Qadri’s motion to amend Document 1, Item 18, Column 3 with regards to the maximum driveway width.
Moved by S. Qadri:
That Document 1, Item 18, Column 3 be
amended to read: “maximum driveway width is 3.05 m at the street lot line, and
in the case of a semi-circular driveway, the maximum driveway width, for both
accesses combined, must not exceed 6.1 metres;” and
That there be no further notice pursuant
to Section 34 (17) of the Planning Act.
Moved by S.
Qadri:
That report number
ACS2010-ICS-PGM-0066 be amended by:
1.
Adding a new item 20 in Document 1 as
follows:
Item |
Objective of Amendment |
Proposed Amendment |
20. Certain
lands located on Friendly Crescent, Shining Star Circle, Brightside Drive,
Hopetown Steet and Hartsmere Drive Ward 6 |
In the former Goulbourn Zoning By-law, the lands were zoned R1-6,
exception 6 reducing the lot width and area and establishing different
setbacks from the R1 zone. The new R1T zone most closely approximated the lot
width of the former exception zone, and a new exception zone, exception 721,
was created to reflect the other modified performance standards.
Unfortunately, when the new zone was affixed to the zoning map, it became R1D
and the old exception zone number 6 was retained, rather than applying the
“T” subzone and the new exception number 721. Reference to the RID zone in exception 6 should be removed.
Additionally, there was no maximum front yard setback in the former Goulbourn
zoning, so this provision should be deleted. |
Amend the Zoning
Map to rezone the R1D[6]zone to R1T[721] as shown on the attached map. Amend Section
239, Column II to remove the zone reference R1D[6] in exception 6. Amend Section
239, Column IV to remove the words “-maximum front yard setback 6 m” in
exception 721. |
2. Adding a map to Document 3 that identifies
the lands that are being rezoned in Item 20 of Document 1; and
That there be
no further notice pursuant to Section 34 (17) of the Planning
Act.
Committee then approved the report
recommendations, as amended.
1. That Planning and Environment Committee recommend that Council
approve the amendments recommended in Column 3 of Document 1, to correct
anomalies in Zoning By-law 2008-250 as amended by the following:
2. That Document 1, Item 18, Column 3 be amended to read: “maximum
driveway width is 3.05 m at the street lot line, and in the case of a
semi-circular driveway, the maximum driveway width, for both accesses combined,
must not exceed 6.1 metres.”
3. That Document 1 be amended to add a new Item 20, as follows:
Item |
Objective of Amendment |
Proposed Amendment |
20. Certain
lands located on Friendly Crescent, Shining Star Circle, Brightside Drive,
Hopetown Steet and Hartsmere Drive Ward 6 |
In the former Goulbourn Zoning By-law, the lands were zoned R1-6,
exception 6 reducing the lot width and area and establishing different
setbacks from the R1 zone. The new R1T zone most closely approximated the lot
width of the former exception zone, and a new exception zone, exception 721,
was created to reflect the other modified performance standards.
Unfortunately, when the new zone was affixed to the zoning map, it became R1D
and the old exception zone number 6 was retained, rather than applying the
“T” subzone and the new exception number 721. Reference to the RID zone in exception 6 should be removed.
Additionally, there was no maximum front yard setback in the former Goulbourn
zoning, so this provision should be deleted. |
Amend the Zoning
Map to rezone the R1D[6]zone to R1T[721] as shown on the attached map. Amend Section
239, Column II to remove the zone reference R1D[6] in exception 6. Amend Section
239, Column IV to remove the words “-maximum front yard setback 6 m” in
exception 721. |
4. That a map be added to Document 3, that identifies the lands
that are being re-zoned in Item 20 of Document 1.
5. That there be no further notice pursuant to Section 34 (17) of
the Planning Act.
CARRIED
as amended
COMPREHENSIVE
ZONING BY-LAW 2008-250: ANOMALIES
AND MINOR CORRECTIONS - FIRST QUARTER 2010
rÈGLEMENT DE ZONAGE général
2008-250 : ANOMALIES
ET CORRECTIONS MINEURES - premiEr trimestre 2010
ACS2010-ICS-PGM-0066 City-wide / À l'échelle de la Ville
Subsequent to the Planning and
Environment Committee’s consideration of this report at its meeting of 23 March
2010, the Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee considered this report and
“Carried” its portion of the report recommendations without amendment.
That the Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee recommend Council
approve the amendments recommended in Column 3 of Document 2, to correct anomalies
in Zoning By-law 2008-250.
CARRIED