3.         JOINT national capital commission and cITY of Ottawa Cycling infrastructure - proposed Multi-use pathway facilities

 

Entente conjointe entre la Commission de la Capitale NationalE et la Ville d’Ottawa sur l’infrastructure cyclable – installations de sentiers polyvalents proposés

 

 

Committee RecommendationS

 

That Council:

 

1.         Direct the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability to seek a cost-sharing agreement with the National Capital Commission for the proposed multi-use pathway projects as identified in this report; and

 

2.         Direct staff to include the list of proposed multi-use pathway projects in the City’s 2011 draft capital budget.

 

 

RecommandationS DU Comité

 

Que le Conseil :

 

1.         de demander à la directrice municipale adjointe, Services d’infrastructure et Viabilité des collectivités, d’établir une entente de partage des coûts avec la Commission de la capitale nationale dans le cadre des projets de sentiers polyvalents proposés, comme l’explique le présent rapport;

 

2.         de demander au personnel d’inclure la liste des projets de sentiers polyvalents proposés dans le budget préliminaire des immobilisations de 2011 de la Ville.

 

 

Documentation

 

1.         Deputy City Manager’s report dated 12 August 2010 (ACS2010-ICS-PGM-0150).

2.         Extract of draft Minute, 23 August immediately follows the report


Report to/Rapport au :

 

Transportation Committee

Comité des transports

 

And Council / et au conseil

 

12 August 2010 / le 12 août 2010

 

Submitted by/Soumis par : Nancy Schepers, Deputy City Manager/Directrice municipale adjointe, Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability/Services d 'infrastructure et Viabilité des collectivités

 

Contact Person/Personne ressource : John L. Moser, General Manager

Planning and Growth Management/Urbanisme et Gestion de la croissance

(613) 580-2424 x, john.moser@ottawa.ca

 

City Wide/à l'échelle de la Ville

Ref N°: ACS2010-ICS-PGM-0150

 

 

SUBJECT:

JOINT national capital commission and cITY of Ottawa Cycling infrastructure - proposed Multi-use pathway facilities

 

 

OBJET :

Entente conjointe entre la Commission de la Capitale NationalE et la Ville d’Ottawa sur l’infrastructure cyclable – installations de sentiers polyvalents proposés

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS

 

That the Transportation Committee recommend that Council:

 

1.         Direct the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability to seek a cost-sharing agreement with the National Capital Commission for the proposed multi-use pathway projects as identified in this report; and

 

2.         Direct staff to include the list of proposed multi-use pathway projects in the City’s 2011 draft capital budget.

 

RECOMMANDATIONS DU RAPPORT

 

Que le Comité des transports recommande au Conseil :

 

1.                  de demander à la directrice municipale adjointe, Services d’infrastructure et Viabilité des collectivités, d’établir une entente de partage des coûts avec la Commission de la capitale nationale dans le cadre des projets de sentiers polyvalents proposés, comme l’explique le présent rapport;

 

2.                  de demander au personnel d’inclure la liste des projets de sentiers polyvalents proposés dans le budget préliminaire des immobilisations de 2011 de la Ville.

 

 

BACKGROUND

The Official Plan (OP) and accompanying Transportation Master Plan (TMP) place importance on strengthening existing communities while developing new smart growth communities that are environmentally sustainable, providing community-friendly transportation facilities and integrate employment centres.  As directed by the City’s Strategic Plan, in 2008 City Council approved the Ottawa Cycling Plan (OCP).  The OCP identifies the need to improve existing off-road multi-use pathways and on-road cycling facilities and to complete missing links in the City’s cycling network and provide connections to the National Capital Commission (NCC) pathway network.  The OCP network calls for 1,200 new kilometres of bike lanes, multi-use pathways and paved shoulders. 

The City, through its current plans, policies, guidelines and implementation programs, has ensured that pedestrian and cycling facilities are included in all new and reconstructed roads.  It is estimated that between years 2000 and 2009 approximately 160 kilometres of new bike lanes, paved shoulders and multi-use pathways have been added to the City’s transportation infrastructure, excluding new pathway construction by the NCC.  Furthermore, in 2010, the City has made significant investments in its cycling and pedestrian network to close the gap between planned and built pedestrian and cycling infrastructure and to provide for multi-use pathways.

The NCC has had a strong interest in the development of pathways, originally for greening the capital and for recreational purposes.  However, with the development of the NCC’s Pathway Network for Canada’s Capital Region – 2006 Strategic Pathway Plan, there has been recognition of the role NCC pathways play in utilitarian cycling.  The NCC, along with its partners (chiefly the cities of Gatineau and Ottawa) proposed a framework for the planning and development of the Capital Pathway Network for the next 10 years.  This plan was built on the need to ensure the pathway network will be multi-purpose, accessible and safe, connect to other transportation networks to encourage sustainable transportation and promote recognition of the National Capital Region (NCR) in the greater international context. 

The NCC pathway plan, which was endorsed by City Council when presented in October 2006, includes considerable intertwining of pathways with the OCP’s on- and off-road cycling routes.  In 2009, the NCC has convened two committees (tripartite and regional) with representatives from the various jurisdictions comprising the NCR in order to better coordinate and move forward with the implementation of the 2006 Strategic Pathway Plan. 

 

According to the 2006 Census, Ottawa-Gatineau was ranked first in Canada as having the highest bicycle commuter mode share of large cities at 2.1 per cent, followed by Vancouver and Montreal at 1.7 per cent and 1.6 per cent, respectively.  However, Ottawa-Gatineau is in danger of losing this status as both Montreal and Vancouver have been making proportionately larger investments in cycling infrastructure in recent years and both have introduced a variety of new cycling facility types not yet introduced in Ottawa-Gatineau.

Since the City’s and the NCC’s cycling facilities have been developed at different paces over time, they consequently created gaps in the cycling network.  The target for priority cycling projects for 2011 is to close as many of these gaps as possible.   Therefore, this report proposes a list of multi-use pathways for inclusion in the 2011 draft capital budget that will extend and increase access to the existing NCR cycling network.  Residents and visitors will benefit from increases in sustainable transportation alternatives that create positive social and environmental impacts, improving our quality of life, improving health outcomes, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

 

 

DISCUSSION

 

The proposed multi-use pathways below are recommended for inclusion in the 2011 Draft Capital Budget as priority projects subject to a cost-sharing agreement with the NCC:

1.                  Champagne/O-Train Corridor Pathway (parallels the O-Train corridor between Ottawa River and Dow’s Lake);

2.                  Rideau River Western Pathway (Belmont Street to Ottawa University’s  Lees Campus);

3.                  Sawmill Creek/LRT Corridor Pathway (Brookfield Pathway to Walkley Road);

4.                  Hampton Park Pathway (Sebring Avenue to Island Park/Merivale Intersection);

5.                  Aviation Pathway (Innes Road to Prescott-Russell Pathway).

The above projects are shown on Document 1.  The map indicates project subcomponents should there be a need to split up more complex projects for implementation and/or funding purposes.

The pathway candidates are all designated future off-road cycling facilities in the Ottawa Cycling Plan (OCP) either approved by Council as part of the plan in July 2008 or appended to the plan at Transportation Committee on 2 December 2009.  All of these proposed pathway projects except the Hampton Park Pathway are also identified on the NCC’s “Pathway Network for Canada’s Capital Region – 2006 Strategic Plan” as future pathway projects to be constructed within either the short term (0 to five years) or medium term (five to 10 years).  The Hampton Park Pathway has already been agreed to in principle by NCC staff.

 

These projects are recommended for the following reasons:

 

The following section provides a description of each of the proposed projects:

 

1.      Champagne/O-Train Corridor Pathway

 

The proposed multi-use pathway (identified in the NCC pathway plan as the Champagne Corridor Pathway) follows the O-Train corridor on its east side from the Ottawa River Capital Pathway to Prince of Wales Drive at Preston Street where it links to the Rideau Canal West Capital Pathway.  This project would link the Ottawa River with Dow’s Lake and associated pathways and would create a continuous off-road circuit of the entire downtown area that would not only increase sustainable transportation, it would also encourage bicycle tourism and meet other City and NCC objectives.  Various linkages to existing rapid transit stations and the surrounding residential community on local streets will guarantee this pathway will be well-used.  The estimated cost of this project is about $3.2 million.

 

2.      Rideau River Western Pathway

 

The proposed Rideau River Western Pathway will fill in a substantial gap between existing multi-use pathways.  It will connect the already built pathway from Bank Street to Belmont Street in Windsor Park to the new campus of University of Ottawa on Lees Avenue.  University of Ottawa is agreeable to provide full access for pathway users along the entire riverfront of its Lees campus leading to both a pedestrian/cyclist bridge across the river and under the Queensway to a pathway leading northwards into Strathcona Park.  The proposed pathway will mirror the existing NCC eastern bank pathway along the Rideau River and provide a cycling alternative to the busy streets of Main and Lees.  It will tie together communities on either side of the river such as Overbrook, Sandy Hill and Old Ottawa East, provide access to institutions such as St. Paul University and University of Ottawa’s Lees Campus as well as strengthen connectivity to existing multi-use pathways along both sides of the river and rapid transit facilities at Lees and Hurdman Stations.  The estimate cost of this project is $1.5 million.

3.      Sawmill Creek/LRT Corridor Pathway

 

The proposed Sawmill Creek/LRT Corridor Pathway parallels Sawmill Creek, the O-Train/future North-South LRT, the Southeast Transitway, and Airport Parkway.  It will close the gap between two currently under construction pathways that are being funded through the Stimulus Funding Program: the Sawmill Creek pathway between Walkley and Hunt Club Roads and the pathway from Brookfield to Confederation Heights O-Train Station and Heron Road bus station.  With the construction of this final ‘gap’ segment, a continuous multi-use pathway along a natural green corridor will exist between Hunt Club Road and Heron Road.  It will provide accessibility for sustainable transportation to a wide range of destinations and facilities in coordination with the proposed multi-use pathway to be constructed over the Airport Parkway.  The Sawmill Creek/LRT Corridor Pathway and associated links will provide entirely new access to existing rapid transit stations at South Keys, Walkley Road and Confederation Heights as well as tying together the Hunt Club residential community, Confederation Heights' employment centre, residential communities abutting Brookfield East and West, South Keys shopping centre and other land uses.  Cyclists will also be able to connect to the NCC multi-use pathways at Hogs Back/Mooney’s Bay by riding along Walkley Road to the pathway constructed in 2009 at Riverside Drive.  The estimated cost of this project is $1.2 million.

4.      Hampton Park Pathway

 

The proposed Hampton Park pathway will provide a cycling-friendly east-west route as an alternative to busy Carling Avenue.  It will pass through parklands owned by both the City and the NCC.  The pathway will provide access to quiet local streets in an older residential neighbourhood, recreation facilities in Hampton Park, and retail facilities at Hampton Court Shopping Centre.  It will also connect the designated community cycling route along Dovercourt to existing bike lanes on Island Park Drive and soon-to-be constructed bike lanes on Merivale Road.  The estimated cost of this project is $400,000.

 

5.      Aviation Pathway

 

The proposed pathway will follow Hydro Ottawa corridor connecting  Prescott-Russell Pathway, a Stimulus-funded project being constructed in 2010, with the existing segment of the Aviation Pathway on the north side of Innes Road that is being extended further to the north by the NCC this year (between Montreal Road and Ogilvie Road). Estimated cost of this pathway, which will include a bridge over Green’s Creek, is in the order of $1.4 million. 

 

 

RURAL IMPLICATIONS

 

The proposed Aviation Pathway segment above would allow a direct link from rural areas of Ottawa via the Prescott-Russell Pathway into the urban cycling network.

 

 

CONSULTATION

 

Extensive public consultation occurred during the development of the OCP and the NCC pathway plans.

 

 

COMMENTS BY THE WARD COUNCILLOR(S)

 

Ward 17 – Councillor Doucet (re: Rideau River Western Pathway)

Councillor Doucet is very supportive of multiuse pathway projects moving forward, and welcomes the opportunity to complete these important missing links.

 

Ward 15 – Councillor Leadman (re: Hampton Park and Champagne Corridor Pathways)

“Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this report. I would like to congratulate staff on their efforts with the NCC and the City of Gatineau in developing a strategic cycling plan that closes existing gaps which will provide better and safer cycling facilities for residents. It is a good first step and look further to a much more aggressive approach over the coming years in improving the cycling network throughout the city.”

 

Ward 14 – Councillor Holmes (re: Champagne Corridor Pathway)

Councillor Holmes supports the initiative to include Champagne/O-Train Corridor multi-use pathway in the 2011 Draft Capital Budget. Completing the link from Dow's Lake to the Ottawa River is an essential component of the Carling-Bayview Community Design Plan, and our Pedestrian and Cycling Master Plans.

 

Ward 16 – Councillor McRae (re: Sawmill Creek/LRT Corridor Pathway)

Councillor McRae is aware of this report and supports the construction of Sawmill Creek/LRT Corridor Pathway to close the final gap in a continuous multi-use pathway between Hunt Club Road and Heron Road.

 

Ward 2 – Councillor Bloess (re: Aviation Pathway)

The Councillor is aware of this report.  Further clarification is required about the $1.4M being set aside for the construction of the bridge over the Green’s Creek.

 

LEGAL/RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS

 

There are no legal/risk management impediments to implementing the recommendations contained in this Report.

 

 

CITY STRATEGIC PLAN

 

A1.  Improve the City’s transportation network to afford ease of mobility, keep pace with growth, reduce congestion and work towards modal split targets.

 

A2.  Ensure current federal and provincial commitments for transportation programs are maintained, and seek enhanced support for existing and new potential programs.

 

E6.  Require walking, transit and cycling oriented communities and employment centres.

 

 

TECHNICAL IMPLICATIONS

 

N/A

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

The cost estimates for the recommended projects are very preliminary and have been developed without the benefit of engineering investigations and design. The combined estimated high-level cost of the above works is $7.7 M of which a cost-sharing arrangement with the NCC would be developed.

 

These works will be included in the City’s Long Range Financial Plan. Funds will be requested as part of the 2011 Capital Budget process cycle to be approved by Council; cost-sharing revenue estimates will be included.

 

 

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

 

Document 1    Joint City and NCC Cycling Infrastructure Projects Map

 

 

DISPOSITION

 

Upon Committee and Council approval, the Deputy City Manager (ISCS) will seek a cost-sharing agreement with the NCC; and staff will include the cycling projects listed in this report in the 2011 Draft Capital Budget.

 


JOINT CITY AND NCC CYCLING INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS MAP   DOCUMENT 1


 

            JOINT national capital commission and cITY of Ottawa Cycling infrastructure – proposed Multi-use pathway facilities

Entente conjointe entre la Commission de la Capitale Nationale et la Ville d’Ottawa sur l’infrastructure cyclable – installations de sentiers polyvalents proposés

ACS2010-ICS-PGM-0150                                         City Wide / À L'échelle De La Ville               

 

            The Committee received the following public delegations :

 

            John Dance, Ottawa East Community Association and Sustainable Living Ottawa East spoke briefly in support of the report, particularly with regards to the Rideau River Pathway Project.  He recognized this would fill a missing link for pedestrians and cyclists alike and will be a great investment.

 

            George Darouze, Osgoode Snowmobile Club elected not to speak to this item.

 

            Paul Webber, Bell Baker expressed concern that this item is being discussed whereas an item dealing with a multi-use pathway (Item C of Information Previously Distributed) is not open for discussion.  The Chair clarified that the Committee is not dealing with motorized vehicles on pathways.

 

            On a point of order, Councillor Thompson stated that the delegation was asking questions about an item that is not open for discussion.  The Chair confirmed for the delegation that the IPD dealing with the Osgoode Multi-use Pathway was ‘ received’ by the Committee and is therefore not to be discussed.  She indicated she would rule out of order anyone who raised the same issue.

 

            In response to additional questions posed by the delegation, the Chair explained that the report being considered relates to cost-sharing with the NCC for cycling infrastructure and multi-use pathways and speaks specifically about those linkages.

 

            Councillor Bloess indicated that he wanted to listen to Mr. Webber’s questions and his concerns.  The Chair cautioned the delegation that anything related to snowmobiles on this item would not be entertained.  In response to a question posed by the Chair, Vivi Chi, Manager, Transportation Planning confirmed that the report does deal with multi-use pathways for pedestrians and cyclists and other non-motorized users, because these links are in the urban area.

 

            Councillor Wilkinson noted that under the provincial legislation electric bicycles (E-bikes) can use multi-use pathways and she asked staff to look into the use of these vehicles on such pathways.  Valerie Bietlot, Legal Counsel indicated she would take that direction and would respond by the time this item rises to Council on 25 August.

 

            Eric Darwin, Dalhouse Community Association spoke in support of the Champagne/O-Train Corridor Pathway as this link is vital to cyclists.  He stated that the proposal along the O-Train corridor is widely supported.

 

            In considering the report, Councillor Bloess inquired about costs, noting that some NCC pathways are being completed at a less expensive rate than what the City is paying.  Ms. Chi explained that staff brought forward five pathway proposals and whatever the cost is at the end of the day that is what the City would cost-share with the NCC.  She explained that staff would look to refining the costs later on during design and assured the councillor they were not firm at this stage.

 

            Ms. Abouhenidy gave a detailed presentation, highlighting the five pathways to be pursued with the NCC.  A copy of her presentation is held on file.

 

            Councillor Desroches inquired if costs would be split 50/50 between the City and the NCC and staff advised that they would be.  The councillor referred to the Champagne/O-Train corridor pathway and was seeking assurance that when the City moves to light rail, that this link would not interfere with the LRT.  Ms. Chi confirmed that the pathway would not interfere with the O-Train or future North-South LRT operation.  The councillor also inquired how staff prioritized the missing links reflected in the report and Ms. Chi explained that they looked at projects that would be of interest to the City as well as the NCC and the top five candidates were put forward in this report.  She confirmed that each are in both pathway plans for the City and for the NCC.

 

            Councillor Wilkinson inquired about the cost-sharing arrangement with the NCC and Ms. Chi explained that if the Committee and Council adopts the report recommendations that will endorse staff’s formal request for funding from the NCC.  In response to additional questions posed by the councillor, Ms. Chi indicated that staff would identify the amount of cost-sharing in the 2011 budget.

 

            The councillor further referred to the variety of motorized vehicles in use and suggested the City should make it clear what is and is not permitted on those pathways.  In this regard, an educational component would be very helpful to ensure people are clear what the use of these pathways is for.

 

            Councillor Holmes referred to the Champagne/O-Train Corridor Pathway and indicated that part of the Somerset Street reconstruction includes a tunnel which is considered an essential link for this connection.  She asked if this could be done in pieces or does the City need the funding all at once to complete that project.  Ms. Chi confirmed staff would look at this project as one and would liaise with the NCC to get their support.  She confirmed that the City has the flexibility to build it in sections and because of the Somerset Street reconstruction, would take advantage of that first.

 

            Councillor Legendre noted that the estimates are based on the surface of the pathway being paved, but suggested stonedust is less expensive, works just as well and is quite acceptable to all users.  During negotiations with the NCC, he asked staff if they could be flexible about the surface of the pathway.  Ms. Chi advised that in setting a budget envelope they did anticipate it would be paved because of the high volume of cyclists in the urban area.  If not, the project could be rescoped.  She confirmed that there is no policy that states these pathways must be paved.

 

That the Transportation Committee recommend that Council:

 

1.         Direct the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability to seek a cost-sharing agreement with the National Capital Commission for the proposed multi-use pathway projects as identified in this report; and

 

2.         Direct staff to include the list of proposed multi-use pathway projects in the City’s 2011 draft capital budget.

 

                                                                                                            CARRIED

 

            DIRECTION TO STAFF

 

            That staff provide to Council by 25 August, an explanation of E-bikes (electric bicycles) and how they fit into multi-use pathways.