9.         RESTORING GLENDALE AVENUE TO A DEAD END - MOTION

 

RÉTABLISSEMENT DE L’AVENUE GLENDALE EN CUL-DE-SAC - MOTION

 

 

Committee Recommendation

 

That Council direct staff to provide a recommendation from an Area Traffic Management point of view of restoring Glendale Avenue to a dead end so that the two segments of the park on either side of the closed segment could be joined.

 

 

Recommandation DU Comité

 

Que le Conseil de demander au personnel de formuler une recommandation du point de vue de la Gestion de la circulation locale en vue du rétablissement de l’avenue Glendale en cul-de-sac afin de que les deux parties du parc situées de chaque côté du tronçon fermé puissent être joints.

 

Documentation

 

1.         Councillor’s report dated 3 June 2010 (ACS2010-CCS-TRC-0018).

 


Report to / Rapport au:

 

Transportation Committee

Comité des transports

 

and Council / et au Conseil

 

3 June 2010 / le 3 juin 2010

 

Submitted by / Soumis par:  Conseiller / Councillor Clive Doucet

 

Contact / Personne-ressource : Councillor C. Doucet

(613) 580-2487, Clive.Doucet@ottawa.ca

 

Capital / capitale (17)

 

File. No. ACS2010-CCS-TRC-0018

 

 

SUBJECT:    RESTORING GLENDALE AVENUE TO A DEAD END - MOTION

 

OBJET:          RÉTABLISSEMENT DE L’AVENUE GLENDALE EN CUL-DE-SAC - MOTION

 

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATION

 

That the Transportation Committee recommend that Council direct staff to provide a recommendation from an Area Traffic Management point of view of restoring Glendale Avenue to a dead end so that the two segments of the park on either side of the closed segment could be joined.

 

 

RECOMMANDATION DU RAPPORT

 

Que le Comité des transports recommande au Conseil de demander au personnel de formuler une recommandation du point de vue de la Gestion de la circulation locale en vue du rétablissement de l’avenue Glendale en cul-de-sac afin de que les deux parties du parc situées de chaque côté du tronçon fermé puissent être joints.

 

 


BACKGROUND

 

On 2 June 2010, the Transportation Committee received the aforementioned Notice of Motion with respect to the above.  A full copy of the Motion is attached as Document 1 to this report.

 

 

DISCUSSION

 

The original configuration of Glendale Avenue east of Percy was a dead end.  The former City of Ottawa vacated the City yards at the east end of Glendale and a road segment was added linking Chamberlain and Glendale.

 

A majority of Glendale residents have submitted a petition requesting that Glendale be restored to a dead end and that two segments of the park on either side of the closed segment be joined.

 

Glendale Avenue will be reconstructed this summer as a result of watermain works that need to be undertaken and this will provide an opportunity to reconfigure the street.

 

 

CONSULTATION

 

Planning and Growth Management Comments

 

Background

 

Residents of Glendale Avenue submitted a petition to the City, in November of 2007, requesting the City “reduce the number of vehicles that cut through Glendale Avenue from Chamberlain Avenue to enter the Glebe.”  The request was considered as a potential Area Traffic Management Study, utilizing the procedures for prioritizing and initiating new studies as per the City’s Council approved Area Traffic Management Guidelines.  A letter indicating that Glendale ranked relatively low when compared to other study requests, and that the request could not be carried forward in the foreseeable future, was provided to the applicants in August 2008.  Glendale is currently ranked 41st of 45 study requests.

 

The main concern of residents, as indicated in their petition, was that southbound Percy Street traffic, travelling under Highway 417, is not permitted to continue southbound across Chamberlain Avenue “…therefore, to enter the Glebe, many… turn left onto Chamberlain Avenue and right onto Glendale Avenue, and continue through Glendale Avenue to Percy Street.”

 

Traffic Conditions along Glendale Avenue

 

Traffic Volumes          - 400 veh/day (AM Pk Hr - 17 veh/hr, PM Pk Hr - 70 veh/hr)

Traffic Speeds             - Average speed – 35 km/h, 85th percentile speed - 41 km/h

Collisions                    - No reported collisions between Jan 2004 and Jan 2007

 

A resident conducted survey, from Oct 22 to Nov 10, 2007, found “…an average of 126 cars turned onto Glendale from Chamberlain during the 3:30 to 6:00 PM timeframe each workday.  Of these cars, only 3-6 are Glendale residents.”

 

Staff Comments Regarding Street Closure

 

Street closures represent the most extreme technique for addressing traffic concerns, and often result in the creation of new concerns/issues or simply the relocation of concerns from one street to another.  Typical impacts of street closures include:

 

Other techniques could be considered for Glendale Avenue, such as right turn prohibitions along Chamberlain at Glendale, covering either the entire day, or portions of the day.  Before proceeding with a solution, however, it is generally advisable to consult not only residents living along the street of concern, but also those who could potentially be affected by the changes, as well as those who currently use this street.  This broader consultation is primarily what would occur through the undertaking of an Area Traffic Management Study.

 

While the larger Glebe community may be using Glendale Avenue as an access road, volumes along Glendale are still well within the expected range for local residential streets.

 

Glendale Avenue is scheduled for full reconstruction in 2010, and Infrastructure Services indicate that the closure of the north/south section of Glendale Avenue could be accommodated as part of this project, at essentially no additional cost, if a final decision on this closure were made before the beginning of September.  The process for formal closure of a public street typically takes approximately 17 weeks to complete. 

 

Fire Services Branch

 

The proposed street closure on its own would not have significant negative impacts on response times for Fire Services.

 

However, the new street design would require the construction of a turn-around area at the proposed blockage with sufficient radius to allow fire apparatus to safely turn and exit from Glendale Avenue back onto Percy Street.  Fire route signage and enforcement would then pose a challenge for this cul-de-sac.

 

This street would appear to be a low priority for snow removal from recent past history.  Once the through traffic is removed the priority would probably become even lower.  In past, this street has been reduced to one lane for significant time periods after heavy snowfalls and rendered almost impassable. 

 

Also of concern in this area is the lack of fire hydrants.  There is currently only one hydrant located on the north side of the street across from 32 Glendale Ave.  The current dead end portion located west of Percy Street does not have any hydrants in the dead end portion and the closest hydrant to service this area is located on the east side of Percy Street at the corner of Renfrew Avenue.

 

According to our information from the City GIS mapping software, both of the water mains supplying water to these hydrants are of iron construction and have been in use since 1911.  The age and the accumulation of scaling in the pipe will have greatly reduced the available water flow required for fire suppression operations.  Should one of these two available hydrants break, freeze or be obstructed from view by snow during the winter months the lack of additional available water supply could become disastrous.

 

The Glendale Avenue hydrant is currently obscured from view when looking east from Percy Street by a mature tree and a hydro pole.

 

Of further concern is the unknown impacts of the demolition and re-construction of the Bronson Avenue eastbound off ramp.  The current proposal would see the demolition of the School Board building at the corner of Bronson and Imperial.  The closure of the Glendale/Chamberlain intersection would require responding apparatus to use Bronson Avenue as their response route and would eliminate the alternate route of Percy Street to Chamberlain and then onto Glendale Ave.  There is currently no through traffic allowed on Percy Street at Chamberlain Ave., and fire apparatus, due to their size, are not able to manoeuvre through the channelization that is currently in place to preclude the through movement. 

 

This may just be an issue of timing where the Bronson interchange future design and realignment would need to be completed before the Glendale closure in order to maintain an acceptable response time into this neighbourhood.

 

Our recommendations with regard to fire protection for this area would be:

·       To ensure that an additional hydrant is installed in the dead end portion of Glendale Avenue west of Percy Street.

·       To develop streetscape plans that include a cul-de-sac of sufficient radius to allow fire apparatus turn and exit back onto Percy Street.

·       To explore the opportunity to install additional hydrants along Percy Street to enhance the water supply for this area as well as Percy St., Powell Ave., Clemow Ave., and Glebe Avenue. 

 

The simpler solution to the through traffic issue might be to try the restricted right turn signage from Chamberlain Avenue onto Glendale and measure the effects before physically blocking off access to this neighbourhood. 

 

Once a permanent blockage is in place the area becomes critically dependent and affected by events happening on streets remote from their area, which could leave the residents isolated from emergency service and protection.  In this instance, the Bronson at Imperial intersection will become extremely important as a primary conduit into this area and this left turn movement is already affected by overcrowding and long periods of congestion.

 

 

LEGAL/RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS

 

There are no legal or risk management implications in relation to the implementation of the report’s recommendations.

 

 

RURAL IMPLICATIONS

 

There are no rural implications.

 

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

Glendale Avenue is scheduled for full reconstruction in 2010, Infrastructure Services indicate that the closure of the north/south section of Glendale Avenue could be accommodated as part of this project, at essentially no additional cost, if a final decision on this closure were made before the beginning of September.

 

The development application cost for a local street closure paid for by the applicant is $4,556.90.  If the closure is a motion of Council these fees could be waived. 

 

 

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

 

Document 1 – Councillor Doucet’s Notice of Motion

Document 2 – Location Map

 

 

DISPOSITION

 

If approved by Council, staff will take the appropriate action as directed.

 


 

Document 1

 

City Council and Standing Committee

Notice of Motion

 

Conseil et comités permanents

Avis de motion

 

 

 

 

Moved by/ Motion de:

Councillor Doucet

 

 

 

 

RE:

Closure of Glendale Avenue at Chamberlain

 

Whereas the original configuration of Glendale Avenue east of Percy was a dead end;

 

Whereas when the old City of Ottawa vacated the city yards at the east end of Glendale a road segment was added linking Chamberlain and Glendale;

 

Whereas the vast majority residents of Glendale have submitted a petition requesting that Glendale be restored to a dead end and that two segments of park on either side of the closed segment could be joined;

 

Whereas water works are forcing the reconstruction of Glendale in the summer of 2010 and this provides an opportunity to reconfigure the street;

 

Therefore be it resolved that staff be directed to provide a recommendation from an Area Traffic Management point of view on this requested closure.