Ottawa bw

 

SPECIAL OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL

19 NOVEMBER 2010

ANDREW S. HAYDON HALL

10:00 a.m.

 

AGENDA 99

 

 

Special Meeting Called by His Worship Mayor O’Brien to deal with matters related to the Stage 1 Site Plan for the Lansdowne Park Implementation Plan; Motion No. 98/9 regarding the South March Highlands (deferred by Council at their meeting of 6 October 2010) and the corresponding staff report; any other urgent matter arising from Standing Committees requiring Council approval; by-laws authorized by reports being presented or previously adopted reports; and by‑laws authorized by the Delegation of Authority By-law.

(If required, the Special Meeting will continue on Monday, November 22, 2010.)

 

1.       Prayer

 

 

2.       Roll Call

 

 

3.       Declarations of interest including those originally arising from prior meetings

 

 

4.       Communications

 

 

5.        Regrets

 

Councillors P. Feltmate (City Business) and S. Desroches (City Business) have advised they will be absent from the Council meeting of 19 November 2010.

 


 

6.       Motion to Introduce Reports

(Councillors R. Bloess. and M. McRae)

 

 

7.                 Resolving Into Committee of the Whole

(Councillors R. Bloess and M. McRae)

 

November 19th - Hearing of Public Delegations on matters related to the Stage 1 Site Plan for the Lansdowne Park Implementation Plan

 

 

DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES AND COMMUNITY SUSTAINABILITY’S REPORT

 

 

1.             SITE PLAN CONTROL – iNTEGRATED SITE PLAN – lANSDOWNE PARTNERSHIP PLAN

 

                VÉRIFICATION DU PLAN D’IMPLANTATION - PLAN CADRE d’IMPLANTATION intégré – PLAN DE PARTENARIAT DE lANSDOWNE

 

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS

 

That City Council sitting as Committee of the Whole:

 

1.                  Approve the Integrated Site Plan for the Revitalization of Lansdowne Park, as described in the Lansdowne Partnership Plan (LPP) Implementation report (ACS2010-CMO-REP-2034),  approved by Council on June 28, 2010, and as detailed in Documents 3, 4, 5 and subject to the Standard and Special Conditions set out in Document 6 of this report:

 

Including:

 

a.      Lansdowne Park Integrated Site Plan, DWG No. A0-01, prepared jointly by BBB Architects, Barry J. Hobin Architects, Cannon Design and Philips Farevaag Smallenberg Landscape Architects (PFS) dated November 4, 2010 and dated as received November 5, 2010 (Document 3);

b.      Lansdowne Park Integrated Landscaping Plan prepared jointly by Philips Farevaag Smallenberg Landscape Architects (PFS), Corush Sunderland Wright Landscape Architects (CSW), BBB Architects, B.J. Hobin Architects, and Cannon Design dated November 11, 2010 and dated as received November 8, 2010 (Document 4);

c.       Integrated Engineering Plans as follows (Document 5):

 

                                                              i.      Existing Conditions Plan, Lansdowne Park, Drawing No. EX-1, prepared by David Schaeffer Engineering Ltd. (DSEL), dated November 2010, and dated as received November 8, 2010 (Document 5A)

                                                            ii.      Integrated Servicing Plan, Lansdowne Park, Drawing No. SSP-1, prepared jointly by David Schaeffer Engineering Ltd. (DSEL),  Stantec Engineering and Philips Farevaag Smallenberg Landscape Architects (PFS) dated November 2010, and dated as received November 8, 2010 (Document 5B)

                                                          iii.      Integrated Grading Plan, Lansdowne Park, Drawing No. GP-1, prepared jointly by David Schaeffer Engineering Ltd. (DSEL),  Stantec Engineering, Philips Farevaag Smallenberg Landscape Architects (PFS) and Corush Sunderland Wright Landscape Architects (CSW), dated November 2010, and dated as received November 8, 2010 (Document 5C)

                                                          iv.      Integrated Stormwater Management Plan, Lansdowne Park, Drawing No. STM-1, prepared jointly by David Schaeffer Engineering Ltd. (DSEL),  Stantec Engineering, and Philips Farevaag Smallenberg Landscape Architects (PFS), dated November 2010, and dated as received November 8, 2010 (Document 5D); and

 

d.      The conditions set out in Document 6, specifically those conditions related to finalizing the site plan approval and for executing the required site plan agreement.

 

2.                  Receive the Response Matrix (Document 2) for information, which details how Recommendation 1, responds to the directions provided by Council on June 28, 2010.

 

 

That City Council sitting as Committee of the Whole recommend that Council:

 

3.                  Approve the newly appointed Design Review Panel as the review body to finalize the site plan as set out in Recommendation 4 - on the basis that the Lansdowne Strategic Design Review and Advisory Panel has fulfilled its mandate to provide third party peer design review to Council through its consideration of the LPP.

 

4.                  Delegate to the General Manager, Planning and Growth Management the authority to finalize the Integrated Site Plan Approval in accordance with the conditions set out in this report including but not limited to:


 

a.      Receiving for consideration recommendations from the City’s recently appointed Design Review Panel on the design details to be incorporated into the  Integrated Site Plan as set out in Document 6 prior to final site plan approval;

b.      Advising where appropriate, the Planning and Environment Committee on the fulfillment of the conditions set out in Document 6; and

c.       Bringing forward to the Planning and Environment Committee for its approval any plans that reflect substantial changes from the approval framework outlined in this report.

 

5.                  Approve that the City’s Signs By-law not apply for signage related to the Lansdowne Revitalization Project subject to a comprehensive signage plan being developed as described in Document 6.

 

6.                  Approve the preferred location for the Ottawa Art Gallery (OAG) at Lansdowne Park, as determined through the site evaluation process described in this report including endorsements by the Board of Directors of the Ottawa Art Gallery and the Design Review Panel, should Council determine through its consideration of the Arts Court Project Report (Q1 2011) to locate the Ottawa Art Gallery at Lansdowne.

 

7.                  Direct staff to bring forward an information report for Council consideration during the 2011 Budget process on the costs and requirements associated with the burial of the overhead hydro wires along Bank Street as part of the implementation of the Bank Street Rehabilitation project in the Glebe to facilitate a final decision on this issue prior to the commencement of the reconstruction which is scheduled to proceed in 2011 in accordance with the approved budget allocation.

 

8.                   Receive the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Ottawa Farmers’ Market Board and the City, which will serve as the framework for determining  the design details to be incorporated into the Integrated Site Plan and based on the outcome of these discussions, that the site plan be finalized by staff under delegated authority.

 


REPORT FROM THE OTTAWA BUILT HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE

 

 

1.             Relocation of the Horticulture building, a property designated under part iv of the ontario heritage act (By-law 8-1994)

 

DÉPLACEMENT DU BÂTIMENT DE L'HORTICULTURE, PROPRIÉTÉ DÉSIGNÉE AUX TERMES DE LA PARTIE IV DE LA LOI SUR LE PATRIMOINE DE L'ONTARIO (RÈGLEMENT 8-1994)

 

 

Ottawa Built Heritage Advisory Committee RECOMMENDATION AS AMENDED

 

That Council sitting as Committee of the Whole recommend that Council reject the staff recommendations.

 

 

STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS

 

That the Ottawa Built Heritage Advisory Committee recommend that Council sitting as Committee of the Whole recommend that Council approve:

 

1.                  the relocation of the Horticulture Building according to plans prepared by BBB Architects, Barry J. Hobin Architects and Cannon Design (Document 3);

 

2.                  that, in accordance with the Recommendations contained in the Heritage Impact Assessment Report, the approval be subject to:

 

a.                  A Conservation Strategy to support future public use of the relocated Horticulture Building as determined through the Programming Plan being developed for the Urban Park including Aberdeen Square, the Aberdeen Pavilion and the Horticulture Building;

b.                  A detailed plan for works for the proposed relocation; and

c.                   A and B being prepared to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Planning and Growth Management; and

 

3.         repeal of By-law 8-1994 designating the Horticulture Building under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act and enact a new designation By-law under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act once the building has been relocated and rehabilitated as set out in the Conservation Strategy to be developed for its new use.

 

(Note: The statutory 90-day timeline for consideration of this application under the Ontario Heritage Act will expire on December 29, 2010.)

 

(Note: Approval to Relocate/Demolish this property under the Ontario Heritage Act must not be construed to meet the requirements for the issuance of a building permit.)

 

 

PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE REPORT 76A

 

 

1.                            MOTION – USE OF HORTICULTURE BUILDING AS A YEAR-ROUND FARMERS’ MARKET

 

                MOTION – Que l’ÉDIFICE DE L’HORTICULTURE serve de marché de producteurs AGRICOLES toute l’année durant

 

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

 

That Council sitting as Committee of the Whole recommend Council consider the following motion during its deliberations on the Lansdowne Park Phase 1 Site Plan:

 

“Be it resolved that the horticulture building be used as a year round farmer’s market.”

 

 

8.       Motion to Rise and Report

 

 

9.                 Postponements and Deferrals

 

CITY COUNCIL – 6 OCTOBER 2010

 

Motions of Which Notice has been Given Previously

 

MOTION NO. 98/9

 

Moved by Councillor M. Wilkinson

Seconded by Councillor C. Doucet

 

WHEREAS the South March Highlands is a unique old growth forest landscape identified as a priority ecological protection area by the City’s Greenspace Master Plan ; and

 

WHEREAS lands in the South March Highlands in the vicinity of the lands designated for development north of the Beaver Pond (Phase 9) have been rated as the most environmentally significant in the entire urban area of Ottawa: and

 


WHEREAS permitting the clear cutting of about 74 acres of land followed by blasting would completely destroy the ecological value of these lands; and

 

WHEREAS as a G8 capital city the City of Ottawa should be leading the country in creating an ecological reserve on such sensitive lands; and

 

WHEREAS the NCC will be presenting three scenarios on the future of the Greenbelt to the public in December for comment and at least one of these will include the South March Highlands; and

 

WHEREAS this unique old growth forest, is a wilderness environment that includes many endangered and at risk species, identified after the plan of subdivision was approved, that is located within the boundaries of the urban area and is accessible by public transit providing an excellent opportunity for eco-tourism and environmental education; and

 

WHEREAS there is an opportunity to consider these lands as a key component to a Nature Park which could showcase this venerable old-growth forest, archaeology, wetland complexes, and wildlife of this wilderness area in ways that will draw

visitors to our City; and

 

WHEREAS the community has undertaken to assist with raising funds with donations from the community and environmental groups which can  be used to offset some of the costs of acquiring these lands and has also prepared a Stewardship Plan for managing the lands at no cost to the City; and

 

WHEREAS the educational and research opportunities for the area have support from a wide number of groups from all parts of the City as well as from within the local community; and

 

WHEREAS additional time is needed to solicit contributions from individuals, foundations and governments; and

 

WHEREAS an amendment to the conditions of draft approval are appropriate to provide this additional time to ensure that the old growth forest is preserved; and

 

WHEREAS the South March Highlands has two ANSI designations (Provincially Significant Area of Natural or Scientific Interest) putting it in the same designation as Algonquin Park and ahead of any other protected landscape in Ottawa;

 

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Ottawa seek to obtain these lands as an ecological reserve in the City through a negotiated purchase and/or land exchange, in partnership with the community, charitable foundations and government agencies, and

 


BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the approval of an agreement of purchase and sale by the City requires further authorization by City Council, and

 

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT any funds obtained now or in the future from other sources for the purpose of acquiring the Beaver Pond lands be used to eliminate or reduce any potential cost to the City of Ottawa; and

 

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the delegated authority with respect to the KNL Plan of Subdivision be removed and a new condition inserted so that no destruction or removal of trees be permitted prior to Council’s final approval of the 2011 budget.

 

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the staff be directed to bring forward a report to Council to amend the City of Ottawa official plan and zoning by-law so as to designate and zone these lands for Environmental Protection lands;

 

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT City Staff re-evaluate lands that could have been designated as urban natural features but were not considered due to planning decisions on those lands and report back through the Planning and Environment Committee to ensure that no other situation similar to that with the Beaver Pond lands occurs in the future.

 

 

MOTION NO. 98/10

 

Moved by Councillor D. Thompson

Seconded by Councillor P. Hume

 

1.      That Motion No. 98/9 be deferred to the November Special Council Meeting and at that meeting staff present a report that outlines a strategy to acquire the 72.9 acres of the Phase 9 development of the KNL lands by the following measures:

 

a)      Re-alignment of present and future development phases;

b)     Land exchange, including the Kanata Town Centre lands

 

2.      That Staff present the cost of acquiring any residual lands via a financial transaction;

 

3.      That the report include servicing plans for future phases based on the potential acquisitions; and

 

4.      That Council request that the owner agree to allow the land to remain in its current condition so that Council can consider the Staff report at its November Special Meeting.

 

                                                                                                       DEFERRAL CARRIED

 

 

 


DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES AND COMMUNITY SUSTAINABILITY’S REPORT

 

 

1.             Staff Response to Council Motion on Acquisition of Phase 9 KNL Lands

 

                réponse du personnel à la motion du conseil concernant l’acquisition de terrains de KNL developments Ltd visés par L’étape 9 d’aménagement

 

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS

 

That Council receive this report for information.

 

 

COMMITTEE REPORTS

 

COMMUNITY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT 60

 

 

1.         CRIME PREVENTION OTTAWA –ACTION REPORT 2009-2010

 

PRÉVENTION DU CRIME OTTAWA – RAPPORT D’ACTION 2009-2010

 

 

 

Committee Recommendation

 

That Council receive this report for information.

 

 

 

2.             SUPPORT FOR A NATIONAL INDIGENOUS CENTRE ON VICTORIA ISLAND

 

SOUTIEN EN VUE D’UN CENTRE AUTOCHTONE NATIONAL SUR L’ÎLE VICTORIA

 

 

 

Committee Recommendation

 

That Council support a National Indigenous Centre in the Nation's Capital, and to encourage the Federal Government to work with stakeholders (First Nations, Province of Ontario, etc.) to establish a National Indigenous Centre on Victoria Island.

 

 


PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE REPORT 79

 

 

 

1.             APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO DEMOLISH A ONE-STOREY SERVICE CENTRE AND TO CONSTRUCT AN APARTMENT BUILDING IN THE CENTRETOWN HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT AT 435 GLADSTONE AVENUE

 

DEMANDE DE PERMISSION DE DÉMOLIR UN CENTRE DE SERVICES D’UN ÉTAGE ET DE CONSTRUIRE UN IMMEUBLE RÉSIDENTIEL AU 435, AVENUE GLADSTONE, DANS LE DISCTRICT DE CONSERVATION DU PATRIMOINE DU CENTRE-VILLE

 

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

 

That Council:

 

1.         Approve the application for new construction at 435 Gladstone Avenue in accordance with the plans by M. David Blakley, submitted by Stantec Consulting Ltd., received on October 4, 2010.

 

2.         Issue the Heritage Permit with a two-year expiry date from the date of issuance.

 

3.         Delegate authority for minor design changes to the General Manager of the Planning and Growth Management Department.

 

(Note: Approval to Alter this property under the Ontario Heritage Act must not be construed to meet the requirements for the issuance of a building permit.)

 

(Note: The statutory 90-day timeline for consideration of this application under the Ontario Heritage Act will expire on January 2, 2011.)

 

 


 

11.          24 JULY, 2009 west end flooding action plan – status update

 

                PLAN D’ACTION POUR LES INONDATIONS DU 24 JUILLET 2009 DANS LA PARTIE OUEST DE LA VILLE – RAPPORT DE SITUATION

 

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

 

That Council receive this report for information, and approve:

 

1.      That Environmental Services staff be instructed to:

a)      Prepare a policy on debris in creeks, drainage ditches and other drainage courses to balance water quality and water flow concerns; and

b)     Co-ordinate efforts of staff in other departments and branches, as well as external agencies, to keep creeks, drainage ditches and other drainage courses free of unnecessary debris; and

c)      Report back to Planning and Environment Committee on what has been put in place.

 

2.      That Environmental Services launch a public awareness campaign on drainage issues including the role that surface accumulation of water during heavy rainfall events, the need to not remove manhole covers when water accumulates on the surface and what level of debris is acceptable or even helpful.

 

 

PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE REPORT 79A

 

 

1.             ZONING - 90 RICHMOND ROAD, 114 RICHMOND ROAD AND 380 LEIGHTON TERRACE

 

ZONAGE – LE 90 ET LE 114 DU CHEMIN RICHMOND AINSI QUE LE 380 DE LA TERRASSE LEIGHTON

 

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS, AS AMENDED

 

That Council approve an amendment to  Zoning By-law No. 2008-250 to change the zoning of 90 Richmond Road, 114 Richmond Road and 380 Leighton Terrace from Minor Institutional (I1A), Traditional Mainstreet (TM[83] H(15)) and  Residential First Density (R1MM[762]), to a Traditional Mainstreet Exception zone with a Schedule and holding symbol (TM[1763] S256-h), and a Residential Fifth Density Subzone B Exception zone with a Schedule and holding symbol (R5B[1763] S256-h), to permit a Mixed Use and Residential Development, as shown in Document 1 and Detailed in Documents 2 and 3, as amended by the following:

 

1.                  That the zoning be amended to provide the following conditions to the holding zone:

a.            No development shall be permitted on the lands outlined in black on Document 1 (Map A), until Council has considered a report to impose a special rate to permit the acquisition of such land, less land taken as parkland under the Planning Act, section 42;

b.            If Council has not approved the acquisition of the lands outlined in black , less lands to be acquired under section 42, and a special rate to permit the acquisition by 31 March 2011 this provision will be deemed to be void and of no effect

c.             If Council has approved the acquisition of the lands outlined in black, less lands to be acquired under section 42,  and the special rate by 31 March 2011, this provision shall remain in effect until 31 March 2014;

 

2.                  The determination of the special rate take into account the possibility of using funds from amounts contributed in Kitchissippi Ward to cash-in-lieu of Parkland, other than funds directed towards City Wide purposes.

 

3.                  The City take Parkland, and not cash-in-lieu of parkland, in respect of this development and that such parkland be adjacent to the Byron Linear Strip.

 

4.                  That the Report Recommendation be amended by inserting after the text “(TM[1763] S256-h)” the text “Parks and Open Space Exception Zone with a Schedule and holding symbol (O1[1763]; and

 

5.                  That Document 1 be replaced with the attached Location Map (Map B); and

 

6.                  That Document 3 be amended by replacing the first two sentences after the heading “Proposed Changes to the Comprehensive Zoning By-law” with the text:

 

“The subject properties are to be rezoned from I1A, TM[83] H(15) and R1MM[762] to TM[1763] S256-h, O1[1763] S256-h and a R5B[1763] S256-h as shown on Document 1.

 

A new Exception, TM[1763] S256-h, O1[1763] S256-h and R5B[1763] S256-h, is added to Section 239 and will include in effect, the following:

 

7.                  That Document 3 be amended by deleting from the ninth provision under the heading “Provisions of Column V” the words “all uses” and replace with the words “all retirement homes” so that the provision would read:

 

“The maximum permitted total cumulative number of parking spaces, including required visitor parking, for all retirement homes located within the R5B[1763] S256 zone, is 65.”

 

8.                  That access for development not be permitted across the Byron Linear Strip and adjacent Parkland.

 

9.                  That there be no further notice pursuant to Section 34 (17) of the Planning Act.

 

And that Council:

 

10.              Endorse the Revised Statement of Cultural Heritage Value attached as Document 1;

 

11.              Should Document 1 also be endorsed by the Conservation Review Board, authorize the enactment of a by-law to designate the property at 114 Richmond on the basis of Document 1.

 

 

 

 

2.             SIDEWALK REQUIREMENT DELETION - APPLECROSS CRESCENT

 

SUPPRESSION DE L’OBLIGATION D’AMÉNAGER UN TROTTOIR SUR LE CROISSANT APPLECROSS

 

 

Committee recommendation

 

That Council approve the deletion of the requirement for a sidewalk to be constructed by Tenth Line Developments Inc. on the North side of Applecross Crescent within the Briar Ridge Phase 2 Subdivision Plan.

 

 

 

TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT 43

 

 

 

1.         REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY OUTDOOR PATIO ENCROACHMENT - 180 MACLAREN STREET

 

             demande d’empiètement temporaire pour une terrasse extérieure – 180, rue MacLaren

 

 

Committee meeting information

 

Delegations:    five Delegations

Debate:            Committee spent two hours debating this issue.

Vote:   CARRIED, as amended

Position of Ward Councillor:  Councillor Holmes opposed the staff recommendation

 

Committee Recommendation

 

That Council approve waiver of the residential encroachment provisions of By-law-446 to allow for an outdoor patio at 180 MacLaren Street as outlined in this report, as amended to ensure that the patio close at 11:00 p.m. and that there be no outdoor sound amplification.

 

 

 

2.         LEITRIM ROAD REALIGNMENT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - RECOMMENDED PLAN

 

             ÉVALUATION ENVIRONNEMENTALE DE LA MODIFICATION DU TRACÉ DU CHEMIN LEITRIM - PLAN RECOMMANDÉ

 

 

Committee RecommendationS

 

That Council:

 

1.                  Concur in the filing of an Environmental Assessment for the southerly realignment of Leitrim Road between approximately Bank Street and Hawthorne Road;

 

2.                  Direct staff to prepare a land exchange agreement, subject to the completion of the Environmental Assessment process, the outcome of such agreement to be submitted to Committee and Council for approval.

 

 

 

4.         FORMER LRT CORRIDOR IN BARRHAVEN AND INTERSECTING ROAD NETWORK - MOTION

 

ANCIEN COULOIR DE TLR À BARRHAVEN ET RÉSEAU ROUTIER TRANSVERSAL - MOTION

 

 

Committee RecommendationS

 

That Council approve:

 

1.         That staff report back to Transportation Committee with the following:

 

-           options for introducing effective traffic controls at the problematic intersections;

-           the legal risks to the City of Ottawa for cancelling traffic lights at these intersections and allowing the intersections to operate without traffic controls;

-           revised plans for the future and yet-to-be built intersections in the area;

-           options for maintaining the median and potential opportunities for tree planters while the median corridor is un-used; and

-           options for financing the work.

 

2.         That staff consult with the principal builder for the area on transportation and median maintenance options and partnership opportunities.

 

 

 

10.     Bulk Consent Agenda

 

That Council approve the Bulk Consent Agenda attached as Document 1.

 

 

11.     Motion to Adopt Reports

 

 

12.     Motion to Introduce By-laws                                                     Three Readings

(Councillors R. Bloess and M. McRae)

 

a)                  A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2003-499 respecting fire routes. (Nautica Private)

 

b)                  A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2003-499 respecting fire routes. (Brockington Crescent)

 

c)                  A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2003-499 respecting fire routes. (Madeleine Meilleur Private)

 

d)                 A by-law of the City of Ottawa to establish certain lands as common and public highway and assume it for public use (Cyd Street).

 

e)                  A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2003-499 respecting fire routes (March Road).

 

f)                   A by-law of the City of Ottawa to change the name of portions of Harthill Way, a municipal highway in the City of Ottawa, to Broxburn Crescent, Kippen Place and Fraser Fields Way.

 

g)                  A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to change the zoning of lands known municipally as 125 Hickory Street.

 

h)                  A by-law of the City of Ottawa to designate certain lands at 928, 942 and 954 Klondike Road as being exempt from Part Lot Control.

 

i)                    A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to change the zoning of lands known municipally as 1200 St. Laurent Blvd, 500, 525 and 532 Coventry Road.

 

j)                    A by-law to dedicate a portion of the Longfields Drive extension.

 

k)                  A by-law of the City of Ottawa to establish certain lands as common and public highway and assume it for public use (Canadian Shield Avenue, Cordillera Street).

 

l)                    A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to change the zoning of lands known municipally as 1375 Johnston Road.

 

m)                A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to change the zoning of part of the lands known municipally as 2484 Trim Road.

 

n)                  A by-law of the City of Ottawa to designate certain lands at 100, 102, 104, 106, 108, 118, 128 and132 Spartina Street as being exempt from Part Lot Control.

 

o)                  A by-law of the City of Ottawa to designate certain lands at 540, 555, 578, 608, 613 Pepperville Crescent and 800 and 801 Tabaret Street as being exempt from Part Lot Control.

 

p)                  A by-law of the City of Ottawa to designate certain lands at 632, 644 and 649 Pepperville Crescent as being exempt from Part Lot Control.

 

q)                  A by-law of the City of Ottawa to designate certain lands at 761 to 845 Percifor Way as being exempt from Part Lot Control.

 

r)                   A by-law of the City of Ottawa to designate certain lands at 768, 770, 772 and 774 Cedar Creek Drive as being exempt from Part Lot Control.

 

s)                   A by-law of the City of Ottawa to designate certain lands at 200 to 218 (even), 201 to 219 (uneven), 328 to 354 (even), 329 to 357 (uneven), 356 to 368 (even), 359 to 381 (uneven) and 383 to 405 (uneven) Rolling Meadow Crescent as being exempt from Part Lot Control.

 

t)                   A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to change the zoning of part of the lands known municipally as 2411 Page Road.

 

u)                  A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to change the zoning of lands known municipally as 5370 Canotek Road.

 

v)                  A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to change the zoning of part of the lands known municipally as 6060 Renaud Road.

 

w)                A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to change the zoning of lands known municipally as 154 O’Connor Street.

 

x)                  A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to change the zoning of part of the lands known municipally as 164 Jeanne Mance Street.

 

y)                  A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to change the zoning of lands known municipally as 90 and 114 Richmond Road and 380 Leighton Terrace.

 

z)                  A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to amend technical anomalies and make minor corrections.

 

aa)               A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to amend technical anomalies and make minor corrections.

 

 

13.     Confirmation By-law (Councillors R. Bloess and M. McRae)

 

 

14.     Inquiries

 

 

15.     Adjournment (Councillors R. Bloess and M. McRae)

 

 

 

 

Simultaneous interpretation of these proceedings is available.  Please speak to the attendant at reception.

 

NOTICE

 

In Camera Items are not subject to public discussion or audience.  Any person has a right to request an independent investigation of the propriety of dealing with matters in a closed session.    A form requesting such a review may be obtained, without charge, from the City’s website or in person from the Chair of this meeting.   Requests are kept confidential pending any report by the Meetings Investigator and are conducted without charge to the Requestor.