OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL

25 MAY 2011

ANDREW S. HAYDON HALL

10:00 a.m.

MINUTES 13

The Council of the City of Ottawa met at Andrew S. Haydon Hall, 110 Laurier Avenue West, Ottawa, on 25 May 2011 beginning at 10:00 a.m.

The Mayor, Jim Watson, presided and Chief Howard Bernard of the Algonquins of Ontario led Council in prayer.

The National Anthem was performed by students from l’École secondaire catholique Béatrice-Deslogues.

Announcements/Ceremonial Activities

RECOGNITION – CITY BUILDER AWARD

Mayor Watson presented the Mayor’s City Builder Award to Mrs. Linda Graupner who is a dedicated volunteer with the Big Brothers and Big Sisters organization of Ottawa. The presentation of the Mayor’s City Builder Award to Mrs. Graupner coincided with the Bring a Little to Council program. This initiative pairs each member of Council with a “Little” from the Big Brothers and Sisters program.

PRESENTATION – CITY MANAGER’S AWARDS FOR EXCELLENCE

Mayor Watson and Mr. Kirkpatrick, City Manager, recognized City staff with the presentation of the 2011 City Manager’s Awards for Excellence. Mr. Kirkpatrick recognized the Elections Team in the “Making People a Priority” category for their efforts in making voting and polling facilities more accessible. The awards were presented to Catherine Bergeron, Jean-Denis Hurtubise, Paul Richard, Tyler Cox, Sophie Gaegea, Stephanie Lanoue, Raynor Boutet, Ameer Deen, Wendy Power, Nadya Laskey, Geoffrey Mackay, Amanda Moule, Curtis Reilly, Milan Stevanovic, Jennifer Butcher, Jennifer Vila, Amy Favereau, Rob Wilkinson, Melissa Durnion, Lori Reilly, Hélène Manninen, and Kathy Fisher.

In the “Turning Ideas into Results” category, the Mayor and Mr. Kirkpatrick recognized Ottawa Fire Services for their mentorship program for young women called “CAMP FFIT – Female Firefighters in Training Team. The awards were presented to Bruce Montone, Dave Cranidge, Louise Hine-Schmidt, Sue E. Jones and Carissa Campbell Darmody.

Mayor Watson and Mr. Kirkpatick then recognized Susan Jones, General Manager of Emergency and Protective Services, in the “Demonstrating Leadership” category, noting her vision, expertise and unwavering support in mentoring employees.

Roll Call

ALL MEMBERS WERE PRESENT EXCEPT COUNCILLORS J. HARDER AND
D. THOMPSON.

Confirmation of Minutes

The regular Minutes of the meeting of 11 May 2011 were confirmed.

Declarations of interest including those originally arising from prior meetings

No declarations were received.

Communications

The following communications were received:

Responses to Inquiries:

· 03-11 – Kanata Recreation Centre

· Verbal update from Dixon Weir, General Manager, Environmental Services, with respect to the timeline for the risk assessment of the City's drinking Water distribution system and the financial impact of undertaking this risk assessment.

· Petition containing 1,817 signatures asking Council to rescind its decision regarding the renaming of Robertson Road and to defer its decision regarding the renaming of Richmond Road from Moodie to the Village of Richmond.

Regrets

Councillors J. Harder and D. Thompson advised they would be absent from the Council meeting of 25 May 2011, due to City business.

Motion to Introduce Reports

MOTION NO. 13/1

Moved by Councillor M. McRae

Seconded by Councillor D. Chernushenko

That the Report from Hydro Ottawa Holding Inc. entitled “Hydro Ottawa Holding Inc. – 2010 Annual Report”, Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee Report 6, Environment Committee Report 7, Finance and Economic Development Committee Report 7, Ottawa Board of Health Report 1, Planning Committee Report 8B and Transportation Committee Report 6A be received and considered.

And That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to receive and consider Community and Protective Services Report 5 and Planning Committee Report 10 because of the urgency of the items contained in the reports (specific reasons set out below).

(Waiver of the Rules is being requested for Item 1 of Community and Protective Services Report 5 due to the urgency of the item contained in the report.)

(Waiver of the Rules is being requested for Item 1 of Planning Committee Report 10 as the zoning needs to be approved in order to ensure that a site plan agreement can be reached by July 29, 2011 and so that the Community benefit can be realized.)

(Waiver of the Rules is being requested for Item 2 of Planning Committee Report 10 because work in the area of Greenbank and Cambrian is currently underway and this would facilitate the construction of a roundabout at this intersection.)

CARRIED

Reports

HYDRO OTTAWA HOLDING INC.

1. HYDRO OTTAWA HOLDING INC. – 2010 ANNUAL REPORT

RAPPORT ANNUEL DE 2010 DE L’ACTIONNAIRE DE LA SOCIÉTÉ DE PORTEFEUILLE D’HYDRO OTTAWA INC

REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS

That Council:

1. Receive the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of Hydro Ottawa Holding Inc. for the Year 2010 as set out in the Annual Report at Document 1 (issued separately and held on file with the City Clerk);

Appoint Ernst & Young LLP as the auditor of Hydro Ottawa Holding Inc. for the Year 2011;

Approve the recommendation of the Chair of the Board and the Governance and Management Resources Committee of the Board of Directors of Hydro Ottawa Holding Inc., specifically, that Council re-appoint the persons identified at Document 2 to serve as members of the Boards of Hydro Ottawa Holding Inc. and Hydro Ottawa Limited for the corresponding terms as specified; and

Authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign a written resolution on behalf of the City of Ottawa as shareholder of Hydro Ottawa Holding Inc. setting out the resolutions approved by the City Council.

MOTION NO. 13/2

Moved by Councillor P. Hume

Seconded by Mayor J. Watson

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Document 2, as referenced in Recommendation 3 of the Hydro Ottawa Holding Inc. – 2010 Annual Report, be amended such that the renewal term be one year.

CARRIED

MOTION NO. 13/3

Moved by Councillor P. Hume

Seconded by Mayor J. Watson

WHEREAS the Chair of the Board of Directors for Hydro Ottawa Holding Inc. and Hydro Ottawa Limited has indicated that Hydro Ottawa is in the process of updating its five year business strategy as set out in the 2008-2012 Strategic Direction and Financial Outlook; and

WHEREAS this update is anticipated to be completed before the end of this year;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Manager review the business plan once it has been adopted by the Board of Hydro Ottawa Holding Inc.

CARRIED

Item 1 of the Hydro Ottawa Holding Inc. Report, as amended by motion Nos.13/2 and 13/3, was then put to Council and is set out in full below:

That Council:

2. Appoint Ernst & Young LLP as the auditor of Hydro Ottawa Holding Inc. for the Year 2011;

3. Approve the recommendation of the Chair of the Board and the Governance and Management Resources Committee of the Board of Directors of Hydro Ottawa Holding Inc., specifically, that Council re-appoint the persons identified at Document 2 to serve as members of the Boards of Hydro Ottawa Holding Inc. and Hydro Ottawa Limited and amended such that the renewal term be one year; and

4. That the City Manager review the business plan once it has been adopted by the Board of Hydro Ottawa Holding Inc.

5. Authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign a written resolution on behalf of the City of Ottawa as shareholder of Hydro Ottawa Holding Inc. setting out the resolutions approved by the City Council.

CARRIED

Direction

Mayor Watson agreed to take as direction, that he begin discussions with the Province with respect to the issue of the purchase of Hydro One customers within the City of Ottawa boundaries.

Postponements and Deferrals

MULTI-USE PATHWAY CONNECTION – COVENTRY ROAD

CITY COUNCIL – 8 MARCH 2011

CITY TREASURER’S REPORT

1. 2011 DRAFT OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGETS - TAX SUPPORTED PROGRAMS

BUDGETS PRÉLIMINAIRES DE FONCTIONNEMENT ET D’IMMOBILISATIONS DE 2011 - PROGRAMMES FINANCÉS

MOTION NO. 8/10

Moved by Councillor J. Harder

Seconded by Councillor E. El-Chantiry

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that approval of the multi-use pathway from Coventry Road to the Train Station be subject to the disposition of the item at Council on March 10, 2011.

CARRIED

CITY COUNCIL – 10 MARCH 2011

TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT 4

2. Multi-Use Pathway Connection – Coventry Road To Train Station: Environmental Assessment Study

Sentier polyvalent – du chemin coventry à la station d’O-Train : Étude d’évaluation environnementale

Committee recommendation

That Council approve the finalization of the Environmental Study Report for the multi-use pathway connection between Coventry Road and the Train Station and posting of the Notice of Study Completion.

MOTION NO. 9/6

Moved by Councillor M. Wilkinson

Seconded by Councillor J. Harder

WHEREAS a report on the proposed redevelopment for the Ottawa Stadium will be before Finance and Economic development Committee in the spring of 2011; and

WHEREAS consideration of this report will provide Council with additional information for the approval of the capital authority for project 903271; and

WHEREAS Council directed that approval of the multi-use pathway from Coventry Road to the Train Station be subject to the disposition of the item at Council on March 10, 2011;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Council consider the Multi-use Pathway Connection – Coventry Road to Train Station: Environmental Assessment; and

FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that Council defer the approval of the Capital Budget authority for capital project 903271 Coventry Overpass to Train Station until the redevelopment report is before Council for consideration.

CARRIED

Item 2 of the Transportation Committee Report 4 was then put to Council and CARRIED as amended by Motion No. 9/6.

CITY COUNCIL – 11 MAY 2011

MOTION NO. 12/4

Moved by Councillor P. Clark

Seconded by Councillor R. Bloess

That the Rules of Procedure be waived, due to the Province indicating that a commitment from the City on proceeding with joint design work on the Coventry footbridge is required no later than the end of May, to consider the following:

WHEREAS Council considered the Multi-Use Pathway Connection – Coventry Road to Train Station: Environmental Assessment Study on March 10, 2011; and

WHEREAS, at that meeting, Council authorized the posting of the Notice of Study Completion for the Environmental Assessment Study but deferred consideration of the project’s budget authority until the redevelopment report for the Ottawa Stadium is before Council; and

WHEREAS the Multi-Use Pathway Connection – Coventry Road to Train Station: Environmental Assessment Study indicated that there were significant cost savings, efficiencies and synergies from the City co-ordinating the design work for the footbridge with the Ministry of Transportation for Ontario (MTO)’s widening of the Queensway; and

WHEREAS, subsequent to Council’s consideration of that report, Ontario’s Ministry of Transportation has indicated that it requires a commitment from the City of Ottawa for its participation in the detailed design work that is now underway no later than the end of May, or the opportunity for a shared design and the associated benefits will be lost; and

WHEREAS the Finance and Economic Development Committee at its meeting of May 12, 2011 is scheduled to consider the redevelopment report for the Ottawa Stadium but the Ward Councillor is not able to be present on May 12, 2011 and has requested that the Ottawa Stadium report be deferred; and

WHEREAS deferral of the Ottawa Stadium report would result in Council consideration of the capital budget item for the Multi-Use Pathway Connection – Coventry Road to Train Station taking place after the provincial deadline for joint design work;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT Council consideration of the redevelopment report for the Ottawa Stadium by Finance and Economic Development Committee be deferred to a future meeting of the Committee and that the public be advised of this deferral immediately upon adoption by Council; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT Council, with a ¾ vote as this revisits a previous decision of this Council, consider the matter of the capital budget authority for the Multi-Use Pathway Connection – Coventry Road to Train Station at the Council Meeting of May 25, 2011, regardless of the date for Council consideration of the Ottawa Stadium report.

CARRIED

CITY COUNCIL – 25 MAY 2011

MOTION NO. 13/4

Moved by Councillor P. Clark

Seconded by Councillor E. El-Chantiry

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Council approve the Capital Budget authority for capital project 903271 Coventry Overpass to Train Station.

CARRIED

*******************

CITY COUNCIL – 27 APRIL 2011

TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT 5A

6. OTTAWA ROAD 174 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

ÉVALUATION ENVIRONNEMENTALE DE LA ROUTE 174 D’OTTAWA

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

That Council approve:

1. That the Provincial offer of $5M to complete an Environmental Assessment of the widening of OR 174/Prescott Russell Road 17 be utilized under the following conditions:

a. That the widening of Highway 417 to fix the split westerly to Nicholas Street is fully funded with a commitment to implement by 2015;

b. All costs related to the City of Ottawa’s planned Environmental Assessment from 417/174 split easterly to Jeanne D’Arc be drawn from the Provincial offer of $5M;

c. The remaining funds be used to complete the Environmental Assessment of OR 174 / Prescott-Russell Road 17 from Jeanne D’Arc easterly and that the study be borne by the Province or the United Counties of Prescott and Russell with the City providing input on the scope of the study prior to the call for proposals;

d. That the Environmental Assessment from Jeanne D’Arc easterly look at the downstream effect on the City’s infrastructure, and that the study include a cost benefit analysis and a full exploration of all alternatives; and,

e. That the Environmental Assessment from Jeanne D’Arc easterly requires final approval by City of Ottawa Council.

2. That the results of the Environmental Study for the widening of OR 174 from Jeanne D’Arc easterly be considered and incorporated into the City’s updated Transportation Master Plan.

MOTION NO. 11/7

Moved by Councillor S. Blais

Seconded by Councillor B. Monette

WHEREAS Ottawa Road 174 (OR 174) is a fundamental transportation link and critical to future growth in Orléans and continuing east; and

WHEREAS more time is needed to acquire information related to the Committee recommendation;

THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that consideration of Transportation Committee Report 5A, Item 6, Ottawa Road 174 Environmental Assessment be deferred to the May 25, 2011 meeting of Council.

DEFERRAL CARRIED

CITY COUNCIL – 25 MAY 2011

MOTION NO. 13/5

Moved by Councillor S. Blais

Seconded by Councillor B. Monette

WHEREAS, subsequent to Committee’s consideration of this item, staff identified a requirement to amend the funding assumptions; and

WHEREAS staff have worked with the United Counties of Prescott-Russell to address this requirement; and;

WHEREAS the United Counties of Prescott-Russell have accepted a Provincial offer of $4 million and signed an agreement to take the lead on an Environmental Assessment within their boundaries, which will focus on 8.4 kilometers of County Road 17 East of Canaan Road; and

WHEREAS the United Counties of Prescott-Russell and the Province have agreed that the existing $4 million in funding is sufficient to extend their study to Trim Road and the Province has confirmed an additional $1 million is still available to further extend the proposed Environmental Assessment within the City’s boundaries from Trim Road to the 417/174 split; and

WHEREAS the United Counties of Prescott-Russell have agreed to lead an integrated, cross-boundary EA study from the 417/174 split to County Road 17 East of Canaan Road;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the integrated Environmental Assessment (EA) of the widening of OR 174/Prescott Russell Road 17 be authorized within the City of Ottawa’s boundary under the following conditions:

a) That the widening of Highway 417 to fix the split westerly to Nicholas Street is fully funded with a commitment to implement by 2015;

b) That the additional $1 million is delivered by the Province for the integrated study;

c) That costs related to the Environmental Assessment from 417/174 split easterly to Trim Road be drawn from the Provincial offer of $1 million;

d) That the City provide input on the scope of the study and that the United Counties of Prescott-Russell present a report on the study scope for the approval of the City’s Transportation Committee prior to the call for proposals;

e) That the City oversee the Environmental Assessment process within its boundary, including but not limited to having staff representatives on the study team;

f) That the Environmental Assessment from Jeanne D’Arc easterly look at the downstream effect on the City’s infrastructure, and that the study include a cost benefit analysis and a full exploration of all alternatives;

g) That a legal agreement with respect to the EA study and including these conditions be prepared and that Council delegate the City Manager or designate the authority to finalize and execute the agreement on the City’s behalf; and

h) That the results of the Environmental Assessment within the City boundary requires final approval by City of Ottawa Council; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the results of the Environmental Study for the widening of the OR 174 from Jeanne D’Arc easterly be considered and incorporated into the City’s updated Transportation Master Plan.

CARRIED

Transportation Committee Report 5A, Item 6, Development Ottawa Road 174 Environmental Assessment was put to Council and CARRIED as amended by Motion No. 13/5.

Committee Reports

AGRICULTURE AND RURAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE REPORT 6

1. Comprehensive zoning by-law 2008-250: anomalies and minor corrections – first quarter 2011 – 2980, chemin conley

rÈglement gÉnÉral de zonage 2008-250 : anomalies et corrections mineures – premier trimestre de 2011 – 2980 conley road

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

That Council amend Section 240 of Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2008-250, Exception [460r], by adding the following to Column IV - Land Uses Prohibited:

(all uses except for)

- a campground

And add to Column V - Provisions:

- a campground is a seasonal use only.

CARRIED

2. ZONING – 6622 Rideau Valley Drive

ZONAGE – 6622, promenade rideau valley

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

That Council approve an amendment to the Zoning By-law 2008-250 to change the zoning of 6622 Rideau Valley Drive from Development Reserve Subzone 1 (DR1) to Village Residential First Density Subzone P (V1P) as shown in Document 1.

CARRIED

3. ZONING – 3131 RIVER ROAD

ZONAGE - 3131, CHEMIN RIVER

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

That Council approve an amendment to the Zoning By-law 2008-250 to:

1. Change the zoning for part of 3131 River Road from Agricultural Subzone 2 (AG2) to Agricultural Subzone 6 (AG6) as shown on Document 1; and

2. Amend the AG2 [Agricultural Subzone 2] Zone for part of 3131 River Road, as shown on Document 1 and detailed in Document 2.

CARRIED

4. ZONING – 6080 McVagh ROAD

ZONAGE - 6080, CHEMIN mcvagh

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

That Council approve an amendment to the Zoning By-law 2008-250 to change the zoning for part of 6080 McVagh Road from Agricultural Subzone 2 (AG2) to Agricultural Subzone 6 (AG6) as shown in Document 1.

CARRIED

5. Flewellyn special study area environmental policies proposed modifications to OPA 76

AIRE D’ÉTUDE SPÉCIALE DE FLEWELLYN POLITIQUES

ENVIRONNEMENTALES - CHANGEMENTS PROPOSÉS À LA MPO 76

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AS AMENDED

That Council endorse the modifications to Official Plan Amendment No. 76 set forth in Documents 1 and 2 to this report, as amended by the following:

1. That the row corresponding to Item 269 in Document 1 be replaced with Item 269 in Document 3;

2. That the City Clerk and Solicitor be directed to seek a modification to Section 4.7.3, Policy 3 such that it will read as follows:

“3. The setback provided for in policies 1 and 2 will be implemented through the zoning by-law and any change in the setback will require a zoning by-law amendment or variance that is consistent with the policies in this section of the Plan.”;

3. That the City Clerk and Solicitor be directed to seek a modification to Section 3.2.5 such that it will read as follows:

“3.2.5 – Flewellyn Special Study Area

Land in the vicinity of Flewellyn Road and Conley Road have been identified and designated on Schedule A as the “Flewellyn Special Study Area”. The purpose of this overlay designation is to restrict development until such time as the City has completed a cumulative effects study. The study will identify the changes to the drainage in the area resulting from, but not limited to, the effects of road construction, private drain works, municipal drain maintenance and discharge of water from quarries. The City will follow the cumulative effects study with a re-evaluation of the area in 2016 using the Ontario Wetland Evaluation System. Once the study and re-evaluation have been completed, the City will amend this Plan to remove the Flewellyn Special Study Area overlay designation and confirm the appropriate land use designations and policies for the area.

In addition to the Flewellyn Special Study Area policies, the Study Area remains subject to the Drainage By-law No. 2007 – 398 and former Township of Goulbourn Removal of Topsoil By-law No. 45 - 86.

Policies

1. Notwithstanding the underlying designations on Schedule A of this Plan, no new development, as defined in Section 4.7.8, will be permitted until the Flewellyn Special Study Area overlay is removed.

2. Uses that lawfully exist on the date that this provision comes into force are recognized and may continue. [Mod. 33.]”;

CARRIED

6. former Cumberland interim control study and zoning by-law amendment – waste processing and transfer facilities

ÉTUDE SUR LA RESTRICTION PROVISOIRE DANS L’ANCIEN SECTEUR DE cUMBERLAND ET MODIFICATION AU RÈGLEMENT DE ZONAGE – Installations de traitement et de transfert des déchets

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AS AMENDED

That Council approve that a Zoning By-law Amendment be adopted that creates a set of General Provisions applicable to waste processing and transfer facilities, and that these regulations have general applicability throughout the Rural Area of the City, as amended by the following:

1. That Clause 1 of Document 3 – Details of Recommended Zoning be deferred and brought forward to Committee at a later date.

2. That Document 3 – Details of Recommended Zoning, Clause 2 be modified as follows:

A) Amend Part III, Specific Use Provisions, to add a new Section 95: Waste Processing and Transfer Facilities and to add the following:

Section 95 - Waste Processing and Transfer Facilities in the Rural Area

(1) The following applies to Waste Processing and Transfer Facilities in the area shown on Schedule xxx:

(a) waste processing and transfer facility (putrescible) is only permitted in RH Zones,

(b) minimum lot area for waste processing and transfer facility (putrescible): 2 ha,

(c) minimum separation distance of 300 metres is required between a building containing a waste processing and transfer facility (putrescible) and a principal building on a lot zoned Rural Residential (RR), Rural Countryside (RU), Village Residential (V1, V2, V3), Village Mixed Use (VM), Rural Minor Institutional (RI1) and Rural Major Institutional (RI2);

(d) minimum separation distance of 300 metres is required between a building containing a waste processing and transfer facility (putrescible) and a principal building on a residentially-zoned or institutionally-zoned lot located within Area C of Schedule 1,

(e) New development in proximity to existing waste processing and transfer facilities (putrescible) must also comply with the minimum separation distance;

(f) despite the required minimum separation distance, no waste processing and transfer facility (putrescible) is deemed to be non-complying by the subsequent erection of a residential use or institutional use building on another lot,

(g) waste processing and transfer facilities, (putrescible) and waste processing and transfer facilities, (non-putrescible), are restricted to having either direct access to a designated truck route or access through an RG- or RH-zoned industrial subdivision leading directly to a designated truck route,

(h) the development of a waste processing transfer facility, (putrescible) or a waste processing transfer facility (non-putrescible) must not result in truck traffic that necessitates travel through a Village, and

(i) the development of a waste processing transfer facility, (putrescible) or a waste processing transfer facility (non-putrescible) must not be developed without the approval of the Ministry of Environment.

(j) In Rural Heavy Industrial (RH) Zones in the area as shown on Schedule xxx the following terms and definitions replace the term ‘waste processing and transfer facility:

Waste processing and transfer facility (non-putresible) means a facility where non-putresible waste is sorted, processed and temporarily stored prior to transfer off site and may include a recycling operation.

Waste processing and transfer facility (putrescible) means a facility where putrescible and non-putrescible waste is sorted, processed or temporarily stored prior to transfer off site and may include a source separated organics and biosolids processing and storage facility.

(k) On lands zoned RG in the area shown on Schedule xxx this section applies to ‘waste processing and transfer facility (non-putrescible).

(l) On lands zoned RH in the area shown on Schedule xxx this section applies to ‘waste processing and transfer facility (non-putrescible)’ and ‘waste processing and transfer facility (putrescible)’

(m) On lands zoned Rural Heavy Industrial (RH) Zone a minimum lot area of 2 ha is required in the case of a waste processing and transfer facility (putrescible).

(n) waste processing and transfer facility (putrescible) and waste processing and transfer facility (non-putrescible) must not be used as a solid waste disposal facility; and

(o) outdoor storage of putrescible waste is prohibited.”

B) Amend the Zoning Map to delete the exceptions [27r] and [29r] from the lands known as 5001 Herbert Drive.

C) Amend Section 17 - Schedules of By-law No. 2008-250 to add a new schedule that shows the rural areas of old Cumberland that where subject to the original Interim Control By-law, to be noted as Schedule xxx;

3. That Committee direct staff to come back to Committee with this item again with requisite public notice for the balance of the rural area;

4. That wherever reference is made, in the Report and Documents attached thereto, to the lands identified as “307 Entrepreneur Crescent”, such address is incorrect and should be changed to “336 Entrepreneur Crescent”; and,

That no further notice be provided pursuant to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act.

CARRIED

7. RURAL REVIEW - ESTABLISHMENT OF PROJECT WORKING GROUPS

L’examen rural - Établissement de Groupes de travail

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

That Council approve:

1. That a selection committee of Councillors be established to select the members of Project Working Groups; and,

2. That individuals interested in participating in a Working Group be asked to submit a Letter of Interest indicating their background and expertise relating to the subject matter of the particular project.

CARRIED

COMMUNITY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES REPORT 5

1. $75,000 LOAN GUARANTEE TO THE OTTAWA SCHOOL OF SPEECH AND DRAMA

GARANTIE DE PRÊT DE 75 000 $ À L’OTTAWA SCHOOL OF SPEECH AND DRAMA

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

That Council receive this report for information.

RECEIVED

ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE REPORT 7

1. SOLID WASTE SERVICES-COLLECTION CONTRACTS: IN-HOUSE BID AUTHORITY-MANAGED COMPETITION

SERVICES DE GESTION DES DÉCHETS SOLIDES : CONTRATS DE COLLECTE-CONCOURS GÉRÉ À L’INTERNE

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

That Council approve that the Environmental Services Department establish an “In-house bid team” to prepare and submit a “City bid” for the curb side residential waste collection services, through a managed competition process, in all contract areas.

MOTION NO. 13/6

Moved by Councillor M. McRae

Seconded by Councillor S. Moffatt

WHEREAS, at its meeting of April 13, 2011, City Council directed staff to extend the existing Solid Waste Collection contracts by five (5) additional months such that the existing collection contracts and solid waste collection service levels would expire on October 31, 2012; and

WHEREAS staff have advised that the extensions have occurred; and

WHEREAS the staff report for the In-House Bid still indicates that the current contracts and service levels will end on May 31, 2012; and

WHEREAS discussions related to this Bid are still ongoing with CUPE Local 503;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the staff report be amended to reflect Council’s decision with respect to the end date for the existing collection contracts and solid waste collection service levels, being October 31, 2012; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this item be deferred for one month to allow for the continuation of the dialogue with CUPE Local 503.

CARRIED

Item 1 of the Environment Committee Report 7 was then put to Council and CARRIED and DEFERRED as amended by Motion No.13/6.

2. SOLID WASTE SERVICES AT CITY FACILITIES

Services de gestion des DÉCHETS SOLIDES POUR LES installations

de la ville

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AS AMENDED

That Council:

1. Approve residential curb side collection, diversion, and disposal services at City of Ottawa facilities that generate residential quantities of waste;

2. Approve recycling cart and Green Bin services under the current apartment collection contract for City facilities that generate commercial volumes of waste, where feasible;

3. Direct staff to investigate the feasibility of providing full collection, diversion and disposal services to City facilities that generate commercial volumes of waste prior to the tendering of the 2013 Multi-Residential collection contract; and

4. Approve disposal of City facility only residual waste at the Trail Road Waste Facility, and waiver of the fee provisions of subsection 58(i) of Solid Waste By-law No. 2009-396 from applying to these wastes.

5. Direct staff to prepare a progress report on the City of Ottawa’s Corporate Diversion Strategy to be reported to the Environment Committee on an annual basis.

CARRIED

3. 2010 WATER LOSS CONTROL SUMMARY REPORT

OBJET : STRATÉGIE DE CONTRÔLE DES PERTES EN EAU EN 2010

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

That Council receive this report for information.

RECEIVED

4. Municipal Drinking Water Systems – 2010 Summary reports

Réseaux municipaux d’alimentation en eau potable – rapports sommaires de 2010

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

That Council receive the Municipal Drinking Water Systems – 2010 Summary Reports.

RECEIVED

5. July 24, 2009 West-end Flooding Investigation ACTION PLAN

PLAN D’ACTION DE L’ENQUÊTE SUR L’INONDATION DU 24 JUILLET 2009 DANS LE SECTEUR OUEST DE LA VILLE

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

That Council approve the Action Plan as outlined in Document 1.

CARRIED

FINANCE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT 7

1. CORPorate PLANNING FRAMEWORK

cadre de PLANIFICATION MUNICIPALE

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AS AMENDED

That Council approve the Corporate Planning Framework as outlined in this report and as amended by the motions below, including directing the City Manager to work with the Mayor, and the Standing Committee and Transit Commission Chairs and Vice-Chairs to develop draft strategic priorities for the 2011 – 2014 term of Council for Committee and Council consideration in June 2011;

a. That City Council inform the Ottawa Police Services Board, the Ottawa Public Library Board, the Ottawa Community Housing Board of Directors and the Ottawa Board of Health about City Council’s Corporate Planning Framework and its strategic priorities for the 2011 – 2014 Term of Council; and

b. That City Council request the Ottawa Police Services Board, the Ottawa Public Library Board, the Ottawa Community Housing Board of Directors and the Ottawa Board of Health undertake a similar exercise to develop their strategic priorities for the 2011 – 2014 Term of Council and report back to City Council on any actions taken as a result of this request.

CARRIED

2. OTTAWA’S LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (OLRT) PROJECT SCHEDULE ACCELERATION AND PROCUREMENT OPTION SELECTION

Accélération de la mise en œuvre du projet de train léger sur rail d’OTTAWA (TLRO) et choix des options d’approvisionnement

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

That Council:

1. Direct staff to accelerate the implementation of Ottawa’s Light Rail Transit (OLRT) project as outlined in this report;

2. Direct staff to advance the procurement of the OLRT project as a Design Build Maintain (DBM) project as outlined in this report;

3. Delegate authority to the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability, to advance the engineering assessment on the utility work required for the commencement of the Hwy 417 widening and to report to Council on the scope and financial impact of the work when determined; and

4. Direct staff to accelerate the acquisition of properties for the OLRT project by:

Beginning the expropriation process, where required, to accelerate the construction of the OLRT project pursuant to Section 4 of the Expropriations Act; and

Increasing the property acquisition delegated authority limit as outlined in Table 1 in this report.

CARRIED

OTTAWA BOARD OF HEALTH REPORT 1

1. Ottawa Public Health – 2010 Annual REport

RAPPORT ANNUEL DE 2010 DE SANTÉ PUBLIQUE OTTAWA

BOARD OF HEALTH FOR THE CITY OF OTTAWA HEALTH UNIT RECOMMENDATION

That Council receive the Ottawa Public Health – 2010 Annual Report for information, in accordance with the City of Ottawa Act, 1999.

RECEIVED

PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT 8B

1. designation of 7 hinton avenue under part iv of the ontario heritage act

DÉSIGNATION DU 7, AVENUE HINTON EN VERTU DE LA PARTIE IV DE LA LOI SUR LE PATRIMOINE DE L'ONTARIO

Committee recommendation

That Council approve the designation of the former Capital Wire Cloth Company Factory, at 7 Hinton Avenue under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act as per the Statement of Cultural Heritage Value included as Document 3.

CARRIED

2. WELLINGTON STREET WEST COMMUNITY DESIGN PLAN, OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT, ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT

PLAN DE CONCEPTION COMMUNAUTAIRE DE LA RUE WELLINGTON OUEST, MODIFICATION AU PLAN OFFICIEL, MODIFICATION AU RÈGLEMENT DE ZONAGE

Committee recommendationS

That Council:

1. a) Approve the Wellington Street West Community Design Plan (distributed separately and on file with the City Clerk and shown as Document 2) as Council's direction on the future development of the area;

b) Approve and adopt an amendment to the Official Plan of the City of Ottawa, Volume 2A, to incorporate Part B of this amendment as a Secondary Plan, as detailed in Document 3;

c) Approve an amendment to Zoning By-law 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa as detailed by the table and locations maps in Document 4.

2. Direct the Planning and Growth Management Department, Heritage Services Unit to:

a) Submit the list of buildings to be added to the Heritage Register, as noted in Appendix 1 of the Wellington Street West Community Design Plan, for review and approval to OBHAC; and to present that approved list to City Council for adoption;

b) Conduct a heritage assessment of 1137 Wellington Street (the present Senior Support Services Centre).

3. Direct the Real Estate Partnership and Development Office to undertake an asset rationalization process to determine the long-term viability of 1137 Wellington Street (the present Senior Support Services Centre).

MOTION NO. 13/7

Moved by Councillor K. Hobbs

Seconded by Councillor P. Hume

WHEREAS Report ACS2011-ICS-PGM-0086, Recommendation 3 proposes:

That Planning Committee direct the Real Estate Partnership and Development Office to undertake an asset rationalization process to determine the long-term viability of 1137 Wellington Street (the present Senior Support Services Centre); and

WHEREAS, subsequent to the Planning Committee meeting, staff has identified a more appropriate direction to determine the long term viability of 1137 Wellington Street; and

WHEREAS there is a need to amend Recommendation 3 to clarify that direction;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT Recommendation 3 of the Report ACS2011-ICS-PGM-0086 amended to read as follows:

Direct Planning and Growth Management to pursue the review of the long-term viability of 1137 Wellington Street (the present Ottawa West Community Support Services) with the affected City departments, including Community and Social Services (City Operations), Infrastructure Services (Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability) and Real Estate Partnership and Development Office (City Manager’s Office); and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT pursuant to the Planning Act, subsection 34(17) no further notice be given.

CARRIED

MOTION NO. 13/8

Moved by Councillor K. Hobbs

Seconded by Councillor P. Hume

WHEREAS Report ACS2011-ICS-PGM-0086 recommends approval and adoption of an amendment to the Official Plan of the City of Ottawa Volume 2A to incorporate Part B of the amendment as a Secondary Plan; and

WHEREAS Planning Committee directed staff to review submissions by the Hintonburg Community Association regarding requested changes to clarify certain wording of Part B of the amendment of the Secondary Plan; and

WHEREAS staff have reviewed the requests and are therefore recommending amendments to Sections 11.3.1.2, 11.3.3.11 and 11.3.4.4;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT Council approve the following:

i. That Sections 11.3.1.2 of Document 3 of Report ACS2011-ICS-PGM-0086 be amended to read as follows:

The maximum building height for all new buildings within the Traditional Mainstreet will be six (6) storeys or 20 metres, except where identified by the specific area policies below. In those cases, the City may consider a zoning by-law amendment to those properties to increase the maximum building height to a maximum of nine (9) storeys pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act where community benefits, including but not limited to those identified in the Community Design Plan, are secured through agreement with the City and will be provided at the time of development.

ii. That Sections 11.3.3.11 of Document 3 of Report ACS2011-ICS-PGM-0086 be moved to create a new Section 11.3.1.6 Shared Parking, and be amended to read as follows:

This Plan encourages and permits shared parking in the Traditional Mainstreet and Mixed- Use Centre designated areas to make better use of underutilized land. This will ensure adequate, convenient parking for the variety of uses in the area, throughout the day.

iii. That Sections 11.3.4.4 of Document 3 of Report ACS2011-ICS-PGM-0086 be amended to read as follows:

This plan recognizes the importance of protecting and enhancing the unique green streetscape character created by the existing front yards of the Grace Manor and Bethany Hope Centre (1134 and 1140 Wellington Street) and St. George’s Home (1153 Wellington Street). Retention and improvements to the green space, including provisions to allow public access and use to these privately owned lands, may be considered a Section 37 Community Benefit; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT pursuant to the Planning Act, subsection 34(17), no further notice be given.

CARRIED

MOTION NO. 13/9

Moved by Councillor K. Hobbs

Seconded by Councillor P. Hume

WHEREAS Report ACS2011-ICS-PGM-0086 recommends approval and adoption of amendments to City of Ottawa Zoning By-law 2008-250; and

WHEREAS Planning Committee directed Planning staff to review submissions by Metcalfe Realty to revise to the wording of specific amendments; and

WHEREAS staff have reviewed the wording and recommend amending the relevant items in Document 4, List of Zoning By-law Changes and Location Maps to reflect Committee’s intent;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT Council approve the following:

i. That Item 23, Column IV, of Document 4 of Report ACS2011-ICS-PGM-0086 be amended to read as follows:

7 Hinton Avenue, Maximum FSI: 6.4
281 Armstrong Street, Maximum FSI: 5.3

Areas A and B on Schedule XX are the only areas on Schedule XX on which new development is permitted. The permitted FSI at 7 Hinton Avenue is calculated including Area A and C and any development potential, based on the FSI, of Area C may be transferred to Area A to the full extent of the permitted FSI despite any maximum building height. If the maximum floor area permitted by the FSI for the combined Areas A and C is not developed or proposed for development on Area A, the unused maximum floor area for the combined Areas A and C may be transferred to Area B on Schedule XX, permitting additional density at 281 Armstrong until the FSI of 7 Hinton has been fully exercised on either property, again, despite any maximum building height; and

ii. That Item 24, Column IV, of Document 4 of Report ACS2011-ICS-PGM-0086 be amended to read as follows:

Minimum ground floor setback from façade facing a public street: 2m
Minimum building stepback, above the 3rd storey, when building height is over 4 storeys: 2m

Rear yard setback minimum:

3m, for storeys 1 to 3

7.5m, for storeys 4 to 8

For through lots, the lot lines abutting the street are considered a front lot line; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT pursuant to the Planning Act, subsection 34(17) no further notice be given.

CARRIED

MOTION NO. 13/10

Moved by Councillor K. Hobbs

Seconded by Councillor P. Hume

WHEREAS Report ACS2011-ICS-PGM-0086 recommends approval and adoption of amendments to City of Ottawa Zoning By-law 2008-250; and

WHEREAS Planning Committee directed staff to review recommendations made by Wellington West Business Improvement Area (WWBIA) at the Planning Committee meeting; and

WHEREAS staff have met with and discussed the objectives of the WWBIA and, as a result, recommend amendments to Item 28 in Document 4, List of Zoning By-law Changes and Location Maps;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT Council approve the following:

1. That Item 28, Column IV of Document 4 of Report ACS2011-ICS-PGM-0086 be amended to read as follows:

The following provisions apply to parking in the MC16 Subzone:

(i) parking spaces required or provided in the MC16 Subzone may be available for parking purposes to any land use located within the MC16 Subzone and the TM zone and the TM11 subzone,

(ii) uses of less than 150 square metres gross floor area that are located on the ground floor are not required to provide parking.

(iii) despite any requirements to the contrary, parking for a use required on one lot, may be located on another lot in the MC16 zone, but must be in the same city block, or on a lot on the opposite side of the public street on which the use requiring the parking is located.

Note: MC16 is proposed zoning encompassing the areas presently zoned MC12, MC and IL8 Zones.

2. That the Proposed MC16 Subzone – Parkdale Park Subzone in Document 4 of Report ACS2011-ICS-PGM-0086 be deleted and replaced with the following:

MC16 Subzone – Parkdale Park Subzone

(16) In the MC16 Subzone:

(a) the following uses are prohibited:

amusement centre

bar

multiple attached dwelling

nightclub

parking garage

parking lot

shelter

sports arena

(b) for any lot that abuts Hinton Avenue the lot line abutting Hinton Avenue is deemed to be the front lot line,

(c) the maximum building height for the blocks bounded by Spencer Street, Armstrong Street, Holland Avenue and Parkdale Avenue is 27 metres or 8 storeys whichever is less, except where a transfer of density occurs in Areas A, B and C on Schedule 128 as permitted in 192(16)(d) below,

(d) Areas A and B on Schedule 128 are the only areas on Schedule 128 on which new development is permitted. The permitted floor space index at 7 Hinton Avenue is calculated including Area A and C and any development potential, based on the floor space index, of Area C may be transferred to Area A to the full extent of the permitted floor space index despite any maximum building height. If the maximum floor area permitted by the floor space index for the combined Areas A and C is not developed or proposed for development on Area A, the unused maximum floor area for the combined Areas A and C may be transferred to Area B on Schedule 128, permitting additional density at 281 Armstrong until the floor space index of 7 Hinton has been fully exercised on either property, again, despite any maximum building height,

(e) minimum ground floor setback from façade facing a public street: 2.0m

(f) minimum building step back above the 3rd storey when building height is over 4 storeys: 2.0m,

(g) minimum rear yard setback is 3.0 metres for storey 1 to 3 of a building and 7.5 metres for storey 4 to 8 of a building,

(h) maximum gross floor area per unit of retail, retail food store, personal service business, restaurant, bar, convenience store, service and repair shop, small batch brewery: 200 m²,

(i) maximum gross floor area per unit of office use on the ground floor only: 200m², no maximum on any other floor,

(j) clauses 192(16) (h) and (i) do not apply to the property known municipally as 7 Hinton Avenue,

(k) The following provisions apply to parking in the MC16 Subzone:

(i) parking spaces required or provided in the MC16 Subzone may be available for parking purposes to any land use located within the MC16 Subzone and the TM11 subzone,

(ii) uses of less than 150 square metres gross floor area that are located on the ground floor are not required to provide parking.

(l) Section 110 (Landscaping Provisions for Parking Lots) and Section 113 (Loading Space Rates and Provisions) do not apply.

(m) For through lots, the lot lines abutting the street are considered a front lot line; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT pursuant to the Planning Act, subsection 34(17) no further notice be given.

CARRIED

MOTION NO. 13/11

Moved by Councillor K. Hobbs

Seconded by Councillor P. Hume

WHEREAS Report ACS2011-ICS-PGM-0086 recommends approval and adoption of the Wellington street West Community Design Plan as Council’s direction on the future development of that study’s area; and

WHEREAS Planning Committee directed staff to review submissions by the Hintonburg Community Association to further clarify the wording in some sections; and

WHEREAS staff has reviewed the wording and recommend the following amendments to Sections 3.3.4. A5A, 3.5.1, and 3.6.4 B1d to add clarity to those sections; and

WHEREAS there is a further requirement to correct minor typographical errors throughout the Community Design Plan; and

WHEREAS Planning Committee also directed staff to review the strategy in the Community Design Plan in cases of where environmental remediation may be required;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT Council approve the following:

i. That Sections 3.3.4. A5b of the Community Design Plan of Report ACS2011-ICS-PGM-0086, on file with the City Clerk, be amended to read as follows:

A5b. A needed and/or desired amenity or public benefit is identified within Section 3.3 to 3.7 and as listed below. However, this list of benefits may be modified through discussions with the local community, including the community association(s), the property owner, the Councillor and City staff:

· a public space, such as a plaza and parkette

· public art

· conservation and adaptive reuse of a heritage resource or funds to research, enhance, restore or conserve heritage resources in the community

· affordable or supportive housing and/or cash contribution for such at another site

· expansion and restoration of the Rosemount Library

· enhanced design of the Parkdale Market

· artist live/work space, artists’ studios, performance spaces, and galleries or other facilities that contribute to the QUAD

· transportation related items – transit supportive infrastructure, car (or bike)sharing facilities, public bicycle parking

· signage (including information panels) to highlight community history and heritage

· new or upgraded facilities for provision of needed services such as health, senior programming, child-care as identified in the Hintonburg and Mechanicsville Neighbourhood Plan

ii. That Sections 3.5.1, Old Industrial and Mixed Use Area, Bullet #3 of the Community Design Plan of Report ACS2011-ICS-PGM-0086, on file with the City Clerk, be amended to read as follows:

Holland Avenue’s east side, between Wellington and Spencer, is typically characterized by 2 to 3 storey, single-detached mixed use buildings, similar to the west side of Holland Avenue. However, book ending Wellington and Spencer Streets at Holland Avenue are taller built forms. Just north of Wellington Street is an 11 storey mixed use building and an 8 storey residential apartment. Just north of Spencer Street is a 9 storey residential apartment.

iii. That Sections 3.6.4 B1d of the Community Design Plan of Report ACS2011-ICS-PGM-0086, on file with the City Clerk, be amended to read as follows:

B1d. The public enjoyment of these green spaces, particularly at 1134 and 1140 Wellington Street, will be maximized by improving their utility and accessibility. This improvement may be through programming the land for public use, for example, with an urban parkette, public walk, pedestrian lighting or benches, or more textured landscape. Design should consider a future link-in with McCormick Park. This will be achieved through collaboration of property owners, the community and the City of Ottawa and/or through land acquisition by the City. Public use(s) must integrate and must not conflict with the programming and security requirements of the Grace Manor. The retention and improvement of the green space may be considered a community benefit, under Section 37 of the Planning Act.

iv. That staff be given the authority to correct to minor typographical errors throughout the document.

v. That Section 3.5.4 A12 be added to the Community Design Plan of Report ACS2011-ICS-PGM-0086, on file with the City Clerk, as follows:

A12 Brownfield Redevelopment Strategy

Since some of this Mixed Use Area was an industrial area many years ago, there are potentially a number of properties with some significant contamination challenges. The City specifically encourages the redevelopment of such properties through the Ottawa Brownfields Community Improvement Plan (BCIP).

The BCIP places the highest priority for brownfield redevelopment in the Central Area, Mixed Use Centres, along Mainstreets and within 600 metres of existing or planned rapid transit stations. Therefore, this block is an excellent candidate to take advantage of the various incentive options the program provides. Other properties within the designated Mixed Use and Traditional Mainstreet areas with potential contamination issues may do the same, if qualified.

The Rehabilitation Grant Program component of the BCIP, for example, can provide funds to a maximum of 50% of eligible cleanup costs through a variety of grant options. More detail about these options is provided at: http://www.ottawa.ca/residents/planning/brownfields/index_en.html

This Community Design Plan encourages the use of the City’s comprehensive Brownfields Program in conjunction with other development incentive mechanisms, such as Section 37 of the Planning Act, to make desirable redevelopment feasible and a reality. Any forthcoming redevelopment applications for contaminated sites will include consultations with local residents and community associations; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT pursuant to the Planning Act, subsection 34(17) no further notice be given.

CARRIED

Item 2 of Planning Committee Report 8B, as amended by Motion Nos. 13/7, 13/8, 13/9, 13/10, and 13/11 and set out in full below, was then put to Council:

That Council:

i. That Sections 3.3.4. A5b of the Community Design Plan of Report ACS2011-ICS-PGM-0086, on file with the City Clerk, be amended to read as follows:

· a public space, such as a plaza and parkette

· public art

· conservation and adaptive reuse of a heritage resource or funds to research, enhance, restore or conserve heritage resources in the community

· affordable or supportive housing and/or cash contribution for such at another site

· expansion and restoration of the Rosemount Library

· enhanced design of the Parkdale Market

· artist live/work space, artists’ studios, performance spaces, and galleries or other facilities that contribute to the QUAD

· transportation related items – transit supportive infrastructure, car (or bike)sharing facilities, public bicycle parking

· signage (including information panels) to highlight community history and heritage

· new or upgraded facilities for provision of needed services such as health, senior programming, child-care as identified in the Hintonburg and Mechanicsville Neighbourhood Plan

iii. That Sections 3.6.4 B1d of the Community Design Plan of Report ACS2011-ICS-PGM-0086, on file with the City Clerk, be amended to read as follows:

iv. That Section 3.5.4 A12 be added to the Community Design Plan of Report ACS2011-ICS-PGM-0086, on file with the City Clerk, as follows:

A12 Brownfield Redevelopment Strategy

b) Approve and adopt an amendment to the Official Plan of the City of Ottawa, Volume 2A, to incorporate Part B of this amendment as a Secondary Plan, as detailed in Document 3, as amended by the following:

i. That Sections 11.3.1.2 of Document 3 of Report ACS2011-ICS-PGM-0086 be amended to read as follows:

ii. That Sections 11.3.3.11 of Document 3 of Report ACS2011-ICS-PGM-0086 be moved to create a new Section 11.3.1.6 Shared Parking, and be amended to read as follows:

iii. That Sections 11.3.4.4 of Document 3 of Report ACS2011-ICS-PGM-0086 be amended to read as follows:

c) Approve an amendment to Zoning By-law 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa as detailed by the table and locations maps in Document 4, as amended by the following:

i. That Item 23, Column IV, of Document 4 of Report ACS2011-ICS-PGM-0086 be amended to read as follows:

7 Hinton Avenue, Maximum FSI: 6.4
281 Armstrong Street, Maximum FSI: 5.3

ii. That Item 24, Column IV, of Document 4 of Report ACS2011-ICS-PGM-0086 be amended to read as follows:

Minimum ground floor setback from façade facing a public street: 2m
Minimum building stepback, above the 3rd storey, when building height is over 4 storeys: 2m

Rear yard setback minimum:

3m, for storeys 1 to 3
7.5m, for storeys 4 to 8

For through lots, the lot lines abutting the street are considered a front lot line; and

iii. That Item 28, Column IV of Document 4 of Report ACS2011-ICS-PGM-0086 be amended to read as follows:

The following provisions apply to parking in the MC16 Subzone:

(i) parking spaces required or provided in the MC16 Subzone may be available for parking purposes to any land use located within the MC16 Subzone and the TM zone and the TM11 subzone,

(ii) uses of less than 150 square metres gross floor area that are located on the ground floor are not required to provide parking.

Note: MC16 is proposed zoning encompassing the areas presently zoned MC12, MC and IL8 Zones.

iv. That the Proposed MC16 Subzone – Parkdale Park Subzone in Document 4 of Report ACS2011-ICS-PGM-0086 be deleted and replaced with the following: