9 May 2012
10:00 a.m.
DISPOSITION 34
COMMITTEE REPORTS
ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE REPORT 15
1. FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR IN-HOUSE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION - 2011 EXTERNAL AUDIT RESULTS
ÉTATS FINANCIERS POUR LA
COLLECTE DES DÉCHETS SOLIDES PAR LA VILLE –
RÉSULTATS DE LA VÉRIFICATION
EXTERNE DE 2011
1. That Council receive this report for information; and,
2. That Council extend the reporting period for year 6 of the In-house Collection Operations to October 27, 2012.
CARRIED
2. Proposed
cost recovery Program for the use of the wastewater system
programme
de recouvrement des frais proposé pour l’utilisation du réseau des eaux usées
That Council:
1.
Approve the
proposed cost recovery program for the use of the wastewater system.
2.
Approve an
amendment to Schedule “B” to By-law No. 2003-514, regulating the control of
discharges to sewers and sewage works, to replace the existing fee for ‘Water
from a source other than the municipal distribution system” with a conveyance
fee of $1.01 per cubic metre and a treatment fee of $0.63 per cubic metre as
calculated in accordance with Document 1 and subject to review and revision on
an annual basis upon approval by Council of the water and wastewater rate
budget.
CARRIED
3. Orléans
Watermain Link
Raccordement
des conduites principales d’Orléans
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
That Council approve the results of the Class Environmental Assessment Study for the Orléans
Watermain Link as detailed in Documents 1 and 2 and direct staff to proceed with Notice of Study
Completion for a 30-day public review period in accordance with the Ontario
Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Schedule "B" process.
CARRIED
FINANCE AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT 18A
1.
QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE
REPORT TO COUNCIL, q4: October 1 – December 31, 2011 rapport TRIMESTRIEL SUR LE rendement présenté au conseil POUR LE 4E TRIMESTRE,
DU 1ER OCTOBRE AU 31 DÉCEMBRE 2011 |
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive the report for
information.
RECEIVED
FINANCE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT 20
1.
400th
Anniversary Celebrations of Samuel de champlain’s voyage to ottawa festivités du 400e anniversaire de
l’expédition de Samuel de champlain à Ottawa |
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
That Council approve the celebratory plan for the 400th
anniversary of Samuel de Champlain’s voyage to Ottawa as described in this
report, and refer associated funding to the 2013 budget process.
CARRIED
2.
COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL
SERVICES REPORT FOR THE PERIOD january 1st to march 31st,
2012 Rapport général sur les services juridiques pour la pÉriode du 1er
janvier AU 31 mars 2012 |
COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive this report
for information.
RECEIVED
3.
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY – CONTRACTS AWARDED FOR THE
PERIOD OCTOBER 1, 2011 TO DECEMBER 31, 2011 DÉLÉGATION DE POUVOIR –
CONTRATS ACCORDÉS POUR LA PÉRIODE DU 1er OCTOBRE AU 31 DÉCEMBRE
2011 |
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive this report
for information.
RECEIVED
4.
2011 – PURCHASING YEAR IN REVIEW 2011 – L’ANNÉE DE
L’APPROVISIONNEMENT EN RÉVISION |
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
That
Council receive this report for information.
RECEIVED
5.
2012 Operating and Capital
Budget q1 status report Budgets de fonctionnement et des immobilisations 2012 – T1 - Rapport
d’étape |
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
That Council approve the capital budget adjustments as outlined in Document 5.
CARRIED
6.
2012 Tax ratios and other
tax policies COEFFICIENTS FISCAUX ET AUTRES
POLITIQUES D’IMPOSITION DE 2012 |
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS
That Council
approve:
1. The adoption
of the following optional property classes in 2012:
·
Shopping centre commercial property class
·
Parking lots and vacant lands commercial
property class
·
Office building commercial property class
·
Large industrial property class
·
New multi-residential property class
·
Professional sports facility class
2. The adoption of the following tax ratios for
2012:
Tax Class
|
Ratios ** |
Residential |
1.000000 |
Multi-Residential |
1.700000 |
New Multi-Residential |
1.000000 |
Farm |
0.200000 |
Managed
Forest |
0.250000 |
Pipeline |
1.539271 |
Commercial Broad Class |
1.924496 |
- Commercial * |
1.826951 |
- Office Building * |
2.207164 |
- Parking Lots and Vacant Land – Commercial* |
1.197053 |
- Shopping Centre * |
1.519664 |
- Professional Sports Facility |
1.826951 |
Industrial Broad Class |
2.428169 |
- Industrial * |
2.574494 |
- Large Industrial * |
2.210831 |
* including new construction classes for
BET purposes
** Subject to final minor revisions upon OPTA
close-off
3. The adoption of the following tax ratios and by-laws for the
mandatory property subclasses and the tax rate percentage reduction for
farmland awaiting development:
·
Commercial excess land (i.e. commercial,
office and shopping centre tax classes) - 70% of the applicable commercial
property class tax ratio
·
Vacant industrial land, industrial and large
industrial excess land - 65% of the applicable industrial property class tax
ratio
·
Farm lands awaiting development subclass I -
75.0% of the residential property class tax ratio and the corresponding tax
rate percentage reduction for the awaiting residential, multi-residential,
commercial and industrial property classes; and Farm lands awaiting development
subclass II - no tax rate reduction
4. That the tax rates for 2012 be established based on the ratios
adopted herein.
5. That the
2012 capping and clawback provisions be as follows:
a) That capping parameters be approved at the higher of
10% of the previous year’s annualized tax or 5% of the 2011 Current Value
Assessment (CVA) taxes;
b)
That capped/clawback
properties whose recalculated annualized taxes fall within $250 of their CVA
taxation be moved to their CVA tax for the year;
c)
That properties
which have reached their CVA during 2011 or crossed over from the clawed back
category to the capped category remain at CVA taxes and be excluded from any
further and future capping adjustments;
d)
That
properties that cross over
from the capped category to the clawed back category remain subject to claw
back adjustments.
6. That the tax level for “new construction” properties
be set at a minimum level of 100% of their CVA taxes for 2012 and future
taxation years.
7. That the property tax mitigation programs be continued
and endorsed for 2012, including the charitable and vacancy rebate programs,
the Farm Grant Program and the Low Income Seniors and Disabled Persons Complete
Tax Deferral Program as previously approved by Council; and
a) the associated policies be received and endorsed; and
b)
that any future
municipal capital facility agreements be presented to FEDCO for review and
recommendation to Council for approval.
8. a) Changes to the Urban Fire Special Service
area for tax levy purposes pursuant to section 326 of the Municipal Act 2001,
S.O. 2001, Chapter 25 as defined in the attached report to include properties within
Document 1 – Fire Zone 41 and within Document 2 – Fire Zone 47.
b) Changes to the Rural Fire Special Service
area for tax levy purposes pursuant to section 326 of the Municipal Act 2001,
S.O. 2001, Chapter 25 as defined in the attached report to exclude properties
within Document 1 – Fire Zone 41 and to exclude properties within Document 2 –
Fire Zone 47.
9. a) That
City Council give direction to City staff, interested stakeholders such as Eastern Ontario Landlord Organization
(EOLO) to work together and attempt to find, refine
or develop generally accepted methods of demonstrating the tax burden on
multi-residential properties as compared to residential properties so that City
Council can address the multi-residential tax ratio question.
b) That City Council request the
Province investigate the use of a more sophisticated valuation model of income
capitalization for the Multi-Residential properties by the Municipal Property
Assessment Corporation (MPAC) to facilitate the determination of the equivalent
tax burden between the residential and multi-residential property tax classes
and among the various property types within the multi-residential property tax
class.
CARRIED, as amended by the following Motions:
MOTION
Moved by Councillor P. Hume
Seconded by Councillor P. Clark
That recommendation 9 of Finance and Economic Development Committee
Report 20, Item 6, 2012 Tax Ratios and Other Tax Policies, be amended to read
as follows:
a)
Direct staff to work with interested
stakeholders such as the Eastern Ontario Landlords Organization to find,
refine and/or develop generally accepted methods of demonstrating the tax
burden on multi-residential properties as compared to residential properties so
that City Council can address the multi-residential tax ratio question.
b)
That City Council request the Province direct the Municipal
Property Assessment Corporation (MPAC) to investigate the use of a valuation
model of income capitalization that would result in a closer approximation of
actual value of the Multi-Residential properties to facilitate the
determination of the equivalent tax burden between the residential and
multi-residential property tax classes and among the various property types
within the multi-residential property tax class.
CARRIED
MOTION
Moved by Councillor T. Tierney
Seconded by Councillor K. Egli
WHEREAS the City of Ottawa’s Pre-Authorized Tax Payment Plan offers
taxpayers the ability to have their current years’ property taxes spread over a
10-month period with payments automatically deducted from their bank account on
either the first or fifteenth of each month; and
WHEREAS some taxpayers have indicated they would benefit from having
the choice of a date for payment other than the first or fifteenth of the
month; and
WHEREAS adding two more due dates within a month would provide more
options for those taxpayers who find the first or fifteenth inconvenient;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT Council direct staff to establish two
additional due dates within the month for the City of Ottawa’s Pre-Authorized
Tax Payment Plan for the 2013 tax year.
CARRIED
7.
Lansdowne Partnership Plan
– Construction of Capital works PLAN
DE PARTENARIAT DU PARC LANSDOWNE – TRAVAUX D'IMMOBILISATION |
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
That Council approve
that staff undertake the construction works for soil remediation and the
relocation of the Horticulture Building as described in this report, to be
funded through the advancement of $12.6 million of existing capital authority
to the 2012 spending plan.
CARRIED
Direction to Staff
That staff be directed to do
whatever is necessary to gain access to the second storey of the Coliseum Building
in order to document potential heritage aspects and identify any elements that
might be saved for display or re-use.
8.
disposal
STRATEGY - 9 Leeming Drive – former St. Thomas School STRATÉGIE D’ÉLIMINATION – 9, promenade LEEMING,
ancienne école ST. THOMAS |
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS
That Council:
1.
Approve the staff recommendation to retain a small
portion of the property at 9 Leeming Drive, shown as
Parcel A on Document 2 attached and having an area of approximately 0.124 ha
(0.306 acres) to increase the size of Maki Park to allow for future park development;
2.
Declare the remainder of the property at 9 Leeming Drive, being Parcels B and C on Document 2 attached as surplus to the City’s needs;
3.
Approve the staff recommendation to market the
remainder of the property at 9 Leeming Drive for sale
being Parcels B and C on Document 2
attached and having an area of approximately 1.00 ha (2.47 acres) and
legally described as part Block E, Registered Plan 442519 to recoup a portion
of the $2M expenditure; and
4.
Approve the transfer of the property
described in Recommendation 3 to the Ottawa Community Lands Development
Corporation (OCLDC) to initiate the sale and redevelopment of this property as
described in this report.
CARRIED
9.
Property Settlement – TRim Road Project (north
Service Road to Innes Road), Claridge Homes (Trim Road) Inc. répartition du droit de
propriété – projet du chemin trim (du chemin north service au chemin innes),
claridge homes (trim ROAD) Inc. |
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
That Council approve
the property settlement for the
acquisition of a strip of vacant lands containing 3.123 ha, shown as Parcel 1
and Parcel 3 on Document 1, as required for the Trim Road (North Service Road
to Innes Road) Project for the amount of $1,614,240 from Claridge Homes (Trim Road) Inc
CARRIED
PLANNING
COMMITTEE REPORT 28B
1. LOW-RISE
INFILL HOUSING IN MATURE NEIGHBOURHOODS AMÉNAGEMENTS INTERCALAIRES
DE FAIBLE HAUTEUR DANS LES QUARTIERS BIEN ÉTABLIS |
Committee
recommendationS as amended
That Council approve:
1.
An amendment to the Zoning By-law 2008-250 to
include a new section which provides regulations for infill development as
detailed in Document 2;
2.
The Urban Design Guidelines for Low-Rise Infill
Housing as detailed in Document 3;
3.
The proposed changes to the City’s submission
requirements and procedures – including procedures and fees for new planting,
the Urban Tree Conservation By-law and the Drainage By-law as detailed in
Document 4 and direct the appropriate branches to implement these changes
within eight months of Council approval of this report;
4.
The addition of one Full-Time Employee for the
Forestry Services Branch as a
pressure to the draft 2013 budget, in order to ensure that the amendments to
the Urban Tree Conservation By-law can be implemented;
5.
That
section 139(x) of the proposed by-law amendment be
modified to exempt the development permitted at 570, 572, 574, 576, 578 and 580
Athlone by the Committee of Adjustment’s decision of
2010 from the provisions of the proposed infill modifications.
6.
a. That all building conversions to 3
units and above in Sandy Hill as defined by the Sandy Hill secondary plan be
subject to Site Plan Approval as a pilot project to assess if this would assist
in addressing current compatibility challenges and to ensure that the
guidelines are being met, and
b. that
staff report back to Planning Committee on this pilot project within 3 years
with recommendations.
7.
a. That the City Clerk and Solicitor be
directed to seek to retain a professional planning opinion with respect to the
means by which front-yard parking would only be permitted in lots with a
minimum width of 5.6 metres in the mature neighbourhoods of Capital Ward
(namely Old Ottawa South, Old Ottawa East and the Glebe); and
b. That this work, which has an estimated cost of $30,000,
proceed only upon the written confirmation of the Ward Councillor for Ward 17
that his office budget will provide $15,000 of the funding for the assignment,
with the balance to come from the budget of the Planning and Growth Management
Department.
CARRIED, as amended by the following Motions:
MOTION
Moved by Councillor P. Hume
Seconded by Councillor K. Hobbs
WHEREAS on
April 10, 2012 Planning Committee carried Report ACS2012-PAI-PGM-0097, as
amended, and directed staff to review the suggested amendments put forward by
the Industry Working Group, Community Associations and other delegations to
determine which can be incorporated into the proposed report and that this
review be done before the matter is considered by City Council so that motions
can be brought forward at Council to make changes where appropriate; and
WHEREAS staff
has undertaken a review of the suggested amendments related to Document 2 - Zoning By-law Changes for R1,
R2, R3 and R4 Zones in the Study Area (“Document 2”) and agrees with the
suggested amendments set out below; and
WHEREAS staff
has identified further amendments related to Document 2 necessary to clarify
the intent of the proposed zoning regulations;
THEREFORE BE
IT RESOLVED that Council approve the following change to Document 2 of Report ACS2012-PAI-PGM-0097, as amended:
Under
General Provisions: Parking
Remove: “The door of an attached garage, that is at or below grade, may not face the front
lot line unless otherwise permitted below” and “A carport may not face the
front lot line unless otherwise permitted below”
Replace: “where the required lot width is less than 12m in width, the minimum combined parking/driveway/walkway width is 2.2 meters and the maximum width is 3.0 meters” with “Where the required minimum lot width is less than 7.6m and the driveway, parking space and walkway are located in the same yard, the total minimum combined parking/driveway/walkway width is 2.2 metres and the maximum width is 3.0 metres”
Add: “Where the required minimum lot width is between 7.6 and 12m, and the driveway, parking space and walkway are located in the same yard, the total minimum combined parking/driveway/walkway width is 2.2 metres and the maximum width is 3.6 metres”.
Replace:
“Where the required lot width is 12m or greater, the maximum combined parking
space/ driveway/ walkway width is 6m” with “Where the required minimum lot
width is greater than 12m and the driveway, parking space and walkway are
located in the same yard, the total the maximum combined
parking/driveway/walkway width is 6m”.
Replace: “A walkway within a front yard may be a maximum of 1.25m in width, where no driveway or front yard parking space is provided in the front yard” with “When a walkway is in either a front or corner side yard, and no parking space or driveway is located in that same yard, the walkway may be a maximum of 1.25 m wide, and the minimum and maximum permitted combined widths of a parking space, driveway and walkway apply only to the parking space and driveway”.
Add “Where the lot is a corner lot, the minimum and maximum permitted widths of all parking spaces and driveways on the lot must not exceed that set out in the above provisions.”
Remove: “All areas not covered with soft landscaping, such as driveways, parking spaces and walkways must be contiguous”
Under
General Provisions: Front Yard Parking
Replace: “The front yard parking space must be between 4.5 and 6m in length” with “The front yard parking space must be between 5.2 and 6m in length”.
Replace: “The maximum recess of the first floor from the front yard lot line is 6m” with “The maximum front yard setback of the first floor of the front wall is 6m”.
Add: “Where a parking space is located within the front yard, the centerline of the parking space must, if projected to the centerline of the public street, intersect the centerline of the public street as nearly as practicable at a right angle, but in no case may the acute angle between the projection of the centerline of the parking space and the centerline of the public street be less than 70 degrees”.
Remove: “Where the lot is a corner lot the parking space may only be:
§ located in the rear yard or corner side yard; and
§ accessed only by a driveway from the public street abutting the corner or rear lot line or from the public lane”.
Under General
Provisions: Permitted Rooftop
Projection Above Maximum Height Limit
Replace: “Despite the
provisions in Section 64 – Permitted Projections above the Height Limit, all
permitted projections above the permitted height limit:
§ must not exceed 3.0 metres in height; and,
§ the combined area may not be greater than a total of 11 square metres” with
“Despite the provisions
in Section 64 – Permitted Projections above the Height Limit, all permitted
projections above the permitted height limit, other than a chimney or a parapet
of 20 inches or less in height:
§ must not exceed 3.0 metres in height; and,
§ the combined area may not be greater than a total of 11 square metres”.
Under General Provisions: Permitted Projections Into Required Yard Setbacks
Replace: “The maximum permitted projection into the front yard is to be the average of the existing setback of the projections of the adjacent existing homes (one on either side) fronting on the same street.” with “The maximum permitted projection into the front yard is to be the average of the existing projection into the front yard of the same type of projection from the adjacent existing buildings (one on either side) fronting on the same street”
Replace: “On a corner lot, the maximum permitted projection into the front yard is to be the average of the existing abutting property and the amount permitted by the zoning by-law under Table 65.” With “On a corner lot, or where one of the two abutting lots is vacant, the maximum permitted projection into the front yard is to be the average of the existing projection into the front yard of the same type of projection from the adjacent existing building fronting on the same street, and the amount permitted by the zoning by-law under Table 65.”
Under Where the required minimum lot width is less
than 7.6 metres: Parking
Replace: “A carport may not face a front lot line” with “A carport may not face a front lot line and may not project into the front yard”.
Add: “Notwithstanding that a carport may not face the front lot line, a parking space located partially within the front yard may be located under the second storey of the building to a maximum depth of three metres. Where such a parking space exists, no other parking space may be provided on the lot”.
Add: “All areas not covered with soft landscaping, such as driveways, parking spaces and walkways must be contiguous when located in the same yard”.
Under Where the required
minimum lot width is 7.6 metres or greater: Parking
Replace: “Garages and carports must be recessed a minimum of 1m from the front wall of the dwelling” with “Garages and carports must be setback further from the front lot line than the front wall of the associated dwelling”.
Under Transition
Provisions (a)
Replace: “If a completed application for any one or more of:
(i) Committee of Adjustment approval;
(ii) site plan control approval, including an extension of site plan control approval;
(iii) payment in lieu of parking agreement; or
(iv) part lot control approval
was received on or after February 1, 2011 and prior to April 25, 2012 the complete application, as well as any subsequent application listed in (i) to (iv) above submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit, are exempt from the provisions of Section 139 and will be processed in accordance with the zoning regulations and provisions in place prior to April 25, 2012”
with “If a completed application for any one or more of:
(i) Committee of Adjustment approval;
(ii) site plan control approval, including an extension of site plan control approval;
(iii) payment in lieu of parking agreement;
(iv) part lot control approval; or,
(v) building permit”
was received on or after February 1, 2011 and prior to May 9, 2012 the complete application, as well as any subsequent application listed in (i) to (v) above submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit, are exempt from the provisions of Section 139 and will be processed in accordance with the zoning regulations and provisions in place prior to May 9, 2012”.
Under Transition
Provisions (b)
Replace: “For the purposes of clause 139 (X) (a), “completed application” means an application which would have been approved or granted on April 24, 2012 had it been processed or disposed of on that day” with
“For the purposes of clause 139 (X) (a), “completed application” means an application which would have been approved or granted on May 8, 2012 had it been processed or disposed of on that day”.
Under Transition
Provisions (d)
Replace: “Once the permit or approval resulting from the processing of the application noted in clause (a) has been granted, the provisions of this by-law in place on or after April 25, 2012 apply to the land in question” with
“Once the permit or approval resulting from the processing of the application noted in clause (a) has been granted, the provisions of this by-law in place on or after May 9, 2012 apply to the land in question”
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that pursuant to the
Planning Act, subsection 34(17) no further notice be given.
CARRIED
MOTION
Moved by Councillor P. Hume
Seconded by Councillor K. Hobbs
WHEREAS on
April 10, 2012 Planning Committee carried Report ACS2012-PAI-PGM-0097, as
amended, and directed staff to review the suggested amendments put forward by
the Industry Working Group, Community Associations and other delegations to
determine which can be incorporated into the proposed report and that this
review be done before the matter is considered by City Council so that motions
can be brought forward at Council to make changes where appropriate; and
WHEREAS staff has undertaken a
review of the suggested amendments related to Document 3 – Urban Design Guidelines for Low-Rise Infill Housing (“Document
3”); and
WHEREAS staff is of the
opinion that some wording changes will clarify the intent of the guidelines;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that
Council approve the following change to Document
3 of Report ACS2012-PAI-PGM-0097, as amended:
Under Guideline 2.6
Replace: “Design universally accessible walkways, from private entrances to public sidewalks” with
“Design accessible walkways, from private entrances to public sidewalks”.
Under Guideline 4.1.3
Replace: “In determining infill lot sizes, recognize local lot sizes
including lot width, as well as the existing relationship between lot size,
yard setbacks and the scale of homes; recognize also the provisions of the
Zoning By-law and the Official Plan’s intensification policies” with
“In determining infill lot sizes, recognize the provisions of the Zoning
By-law, the Official Plan’s intensification policies, and local lot sizes
including lot width, the existing relationship between lot size, yard setbacks
and the scale of homes”.
Under Guideline 4.1.8
Replace: “Determine appropriate side and rear separation distances between existing homes and new infill homes/ infill housing blocks to ensure appropriate light, view, and privacy. Consider how building height, site orientation and the location of windows affect views, access to direct sunlight and privacy” with
“Determine appropriate side and rear separation distances between existing homes and new infill homes/ infill housing blocks to ensure appropriate light, view, and privacy. Consider how building height, site orientation and the location of windows affect views, sunlight and privacy”.
Under Guideline 4.1.9
Replace: “Maintain rear yard amenity space that is generally consistent with the pattern of the neighbouring homes. Do not break an existing neighbourhood pattern of green rear yards by reducing rear yard setbacks” with
“Maintain rear
yard amenity space that is generally consistent with the pattern of the
neighbouring homes. Do not break an
existing neighbourhood pattern of green rear yards by reducing required rear yard setbacks”.
Under
Guideline 4.3.2
Replace: “Design infill to be rich in detail and to enhance public streets and spaces, while also responding to the established patterns of the street and neighbourhood. To appropriately transition into an established neighbourhood, incorporate elements from the neighbourhood such as…” with
“Design infill to be rich in detail and to enhance public streets and spaces, while also responding to the established patterns of the street and neighbourhood. To appropriately transition into an established neighbourhood, consider elements from the neighbourhood such as….”
CARRIED
MOTION
Moved by Councillor P. Hume
Seconded by Councillor K. Hobbs
WHEREAS on
April 10, 2012 Planning Committee carried Report ACS2012-PAI-PGM-0097, as
amended, and directed staff to review the suggested amendments put forward by
the Industry Working Group, Community Associations and other delegations to
determine which can be incorporated into the proposed report and that this
review be done before the matter is considered by City Council so that motions
can be brought forward at Council to make changes where appropriate; and
WHEREAS staff has undertaken this review and has received
new information from the Committee of Adjustment with regards to Document 4 – Changes to City Submission
Requirements and Procedures, The Urban Tree Conservation By-law and the
Drainage By-law (“Document 4”); and
WHEREAS the Committee of Adjustment does not receive grading
plans and would therefore not receive information on surface materials and Tree
Disclosure Information; and
WHEREAS it is important for this information to form part of
the package to the Committee of Adjustment, staff recommends changes to Document 4 so that the Committee of
Adjustment receives information on surface materials and Tree Disclosure
Information;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Council approve the following
changes to Document 4 of Report
ACS2012-PAI-PGM-0097, as amended:
Under Changes to
submission requirements and City procedures: Existing Trees
Replace: “Grading plans submitted for Site Plan Control, Committee of Adjustment and Building Permit applications, will require the inclusion of Tree Disclosure information on the grading plan” with
“Grading plans submitted for Site Plan Control and Building Permit applications, will require the inclusion of Tree Disclosure information on the grading plan. For applications to the Committee of Adjustment, Tree Disclosure information will be required on an alternate drawing”.
Under
Changes to submission requirements and
City procedures: Changes to drawing requirements
Replace: Grading plans submitted for Site Plan Control, Committee of Adjustment and Building Permit applications will be required to clearly identify, dimension and label all hard and soft surface areas and materials (e.g. asphalt, pavers, wood deck, grass, planting bed etc.) in the front yard, corner side yard, rear yard and Right-of-Way (ROW)” with
“Grading plans submitted for Site Plan Control and Building Permit applications will be required to clearly identify, dimension and label all hard and soft surface areas and materials (e.g. asphalt, pavers, wood deck, grass, planting bed etc.) in the front yard, corner side yard, rear yard and Right-of-Way (ROW). For applications to the Committee of Adjustment, an alternate drawing will be required to clearly identify, dimension and label all hard and soft surface areas and materials (e.g. asphalt, pavers, wood deck, grass, planting bed etc.) in the front yard, corner side yard, rear yard and Right-of-Way (ROW)”.
CARRIED
MOTION
Moved by Councillor P. Hume
Seconded by Councillor K. Hobbs
WHEREAS on April 10, 2012
Planning Committee carried Report ACS2012-PAI-PGM-0097, as amended, and
directed staff to review the suggested amendments put forward by the Industry
Working Group, Community Associations and other delegations to determine which
can be incorporated into the proposed report and that this review be done
before the matter is considered by City Council so that motions can be brought
forward at Council to make changes where appropriate; and
WHEREAS staff has undertaken a
review of the amendments related to Document
4 – Changes to City Submission Requirements and Procedures, The Urban Tree
Conservation By-law and the Drainage By-law (“Document 4”); and
WHEREAS staff
is of the opinion that text changes will clarify requirements related to
existing trees and ensure consistency with the wording of the Urban Tree
Conservation By-law;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that
Council approve the following change to Document
4 of Report ACS2012-PAI-PGM-0097, as amended:
Under Changes to submission
requirements and City procedures: Existing Tree: The Tree
Disclosure information must include the following:
Bullet Four - Replace: “Protection measures for trees to be retained (including on subject site, in the ROW, and/or to protect trees on adjacent private lands)” with
“Protection measures for trees, listed in the table, to be
retained (including on the subject site, in the ROW, and/or to protect trees on
adjacent private lands)”.
Under Changes to submission
requirements and City procedures: Existing Tree:
Replace: “The Tree Disclosure information must identify where site works will harm or destroy trees on adjacent private lands.” with
“The Tree Disclosure information must identify where site works will injure or destroy trees on adjacent private lands”.
Replace: “If Distinctive Tree(s) will be lost, the applicant, with the support of the property owner, is required to apply for a Distinctive Tree Permit from the City.” with
“If Distinctive Tree(s) will be injured or destroyed, the applicant, with the support of the property owner, is required to apply for a Distinctive Tree Permit from the City”.
CARRIED
MOTION
Moved by Councillor P. Hume
Seconded by Councillor K. Hobbs
WHEREAS
on April 10, 2012 Planning Committee carried Report ACS2012-PAI-PGM-0097, as
amended, and directed staff to review the suggested amendments put forward by
the Industry Working Group, Community Associations and other delegations to
determine which can be incorporated into the proposed report and that this
review be done before the matter is considered by City Council so that motions
can be brought forward at Council to make changes where appropriate; and
WHEREAS
staff has undertaken a review of the amendments related to Document 4 – Changes to City Submission Requirements and Procedures,
The Urban Tree Conservation By-law and the Drainage By-law (“Document 4”) and recommends changes with regards to
procedures for new trees; and
WHEREAS
staff is of the opinion that the changes will maintain the intent of ensuring
that new trees are planted when infill projects are built;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that
Council approve the following change to Document
4 of Report ACS2012-PAI-PGM-0097, as amended:
Under Changes to submission requirements and City procedures: New Trees
Replace: “A tree planting fee will be charged to all Building Permit Applications for each new single, semi, duplex and triplex (units that are not subject to Site Plan Control or Plan of Subdivision).
o A per lot fee will be collected at the time of Building Permit application and transferred to Forestry’s Tree Planting Fund.
o The amount will cover Forestry Services’ costs to plant and maintain one new tree per lot for a two-year period; the estimated amount is $700 plus HST.
o The tree will be planted in the right-of-way (ROW).
o If there is insufficient room in the ROW, the funds will be used for tree planting programs in the neighbourhood.
o
If there is already a tree in the ROW of the
lot, a refundable security will be collected and kept for two years to ensure
that the tree survives. If the tree does
not survive, the funds will be used to plant and maintain a replacement tree.
(Note that if an existing tree is not properly protected and is damaged during
construction, additional fines and/or compensation under the Municipal Trees
and Natural Areas By-law may be collected)”
With: “A tree planting deposit will be charged to all Building Permit Applications for each new single, semi, duplex and triplex (units that are not subject to Site Plan Control or Plan of Subdivision).
o A per lot deposit will be collected at the time of Building Permit application and transferred to Forestry’s Tree Planting Fund.
o The amount will be equivalent to the cost to plant and maintain one new tree per lot for a two-year period (the 2012 estimated amount is $700 plus HST).
o An applicant may plant a tree on the subject lot or in the right-of-way (ROW) in front of the lot. Planting must be to the specifications provided by Forestry Services; specifications will indicate permitted caliper sizes, permitted tree species and planting requirements.
o An applicant may apply for a refund of the tree deposit based on certification that shows that a tree was planted as per Forestry Services’ specifications.
o If the tree does not meet the specifications, the deposit will not be returned and the funds will be used to replace the tree or for tree planting programs in the neighbourhood.
o If the applicant does not plant a tree, Forestry Services will use the deposit to plant a tree in the ROW in front of the subject lot. If there is insufficient room in the ROW, Forestry Services will work with the homeowner to plant a tree on the lot. When a tree cannot be planted in the ROW or on the lot, the deposit will be used for tree planting programs in the neighbourhood.
o A tree planted in the ROW or in the neighbourhood by Forestry Services will be maintained for a period of two years by Forestry Services.
o In cases where there is already a tree in the ROW of the lot, a refundable security will be collected and kept for two years to ensure that the tree survives. If the tree does not survive, the funds will be used to plant and maintain a replacement tree. (Note that if an existing tree is not properly protected and is damaged during construction, additional fines and/or compensation under the Municipal Trees and Natural Areas By-law may be collected)”.
Under Changes to submission requirements and City
procedures: Final Grading Inspection
Add: “In order to release the tree deposit,
the certifier must also confirm that a tree was planted on site to Forestry
Services’ specifications, and that all hard and soft
landscape areas in the front yard have been installed as per the approved
plans”.
Under Changes to submission requirements and City
procedures: Landscape Implementation
Remove: “Once the final landscape has been installed, the developer/builder or their agent will be required to submit a letter, and accompanying summertime photo, certifying that all hard and soft landscape areas have been installed as per the approved plan and that all protected trees remain. The information will be reviewed by Planning and Growth Management and forwarded to By-law Services should there be compliance issues”.
CARRIED
PLANNING
COMMITTEE REPORT 29
1. APPLICATION TO ALTER 150 ELGIN STREET, A
PROPERTY DESIGNATED UNDER PART IV OF THE ONTARIO
HERITAGE ACT DEMANDE
EN VUE DE MODIFIER LE 150, RUE ELGIN, PROPRIÉTÉ DÉSIGNÉE EN VERTU DE LA
PARTIE IV DE LA LOI SUR LE PATRIMOINE
DE L’ONTARIO |
Committee
recommendationS
That Council:
1.
Approve the
application to alter 150 Elgin Street, in accordance with designs by DCYSA
Architecture and Design submitted on March 1, 2012 included as Documents 3-10;
2.
Delegate
authority for minor design changes to the General Manager, Planning and Growth
Management Department; and
3.
Issue the
heritage permit with a two-year expiry date from the date of issuance.
(Note: The statutory 90-day timeline for
consideration of this application under the Ontario
Heritage Act will expire on May 29, 2012.)
(Note: Approval to Alter this property
under the Ontario Heritage Act must
not be construed to meet the requirements for the issuance of a building
permit.)
CARRIED
2. APPLICATION TO ALTER 535 FAIRVIEW AVENUE, A
PROPERTY DESIGNATED UNDER PART V OF THE ONTARIO
HERITAGE ACT AND LOCATED IN THE ROCKCLIFFE PARK HERITAGE CONSERVATION
DISTRICT DEMANDE
DE MODIFICATION DU 535, AVENUE FAIRVIEW, PROPRIÉTÉ DÉSIGNÉE AUX TERMES DE LA
PARTIE V DE LA LOI SUR LE PATRIMOINE DE
L'ONTARIO ET SITUÉE DANS DISTRICT DE CONSERVATION DU PATRIMOINE DE
ROCKCLIFFE PARK |
Committee
recommendationS
1.
Approve the
application to alter 535 Fairview Avenue, as per drawings submitted by Nicholas
Caragianis Architect Inc. on March 6, 2012 included
as Documents 3 and 4;
2.
Delegate
authority for minor design changes to the General Manager, Planning and Growth
Management Department; and
3.
Issue the
heritage permit with a two-year expiry date from the date of issuance.
(Note: The
statutory 90-day timeline for consideration of this application under the Ontario Heritage Act will expire on June
4, 2012)
(Note: Approval to Alter this property under the Ontario Heritage Act must not be construed to meet the requirements for the issuance of a building permit.)
CARRIED
3. APPLICATION TO ALTER 428 BUENA VISTA ROAD, A
PROPERTY DESIGNATED UNDER PART V OF THE ONTARIO
HERITAGE ACT AND LOCATED IN THE ROCKCLIFFE PARK HERITAGE CONSERVATION
DISTRICT DEMANDE
DE MODIFICATION DU 428, CHEMIN BUENA VISTA, PROPRIÉTÉ DÉSIGNÉE EN VERTU DE LA
PARTIE V DE LA LOI SUR LE PATRIMOINE DE
L’ONTARIO ET SITUÉE DANS LE DISTRICT DE CONSERVATION DU PATRIMOINE DE
ROCKCLIFFE PARK |
Committee
recommendationS
That Council:
1.
Approve the
application to alter 428 Buena Vista Road, as per drawings submitted by Bryan
Jackson on March 5, 2012;
2.
Delegate
authority for minor design changes to the General Manager, Planning and Growth
Management Department; and
3.
Issue the
heritage permit with a two-year expiry date from date of issuance.
(Note: The statutory 90-day timeline for
consideration of this application under the Ontario Heritage Act will expire on
June 4, 2012)
(Note: Approval to Alter this property
under the Ontario Heritage Act must not be construed to meet the requirements
for the issuance of a building permit.)
CARRIED
4. APPLICATION TO ALTER 470 WILBROD STREET, A
PROPERTY DESIGNATED UNDER PART V OF THE ONTARIO
HERITAGE ACT AND LOCATED IN THE WILBROD/LAURIER HERITAGE CONSERVATION
DISTRICT DEMANDE
DE MODIFICATION DU 470, RUE WILBROD, PROPRIÉTÉ DÉSIGNÉE AUX TERMES DE LA
PARTIE V DE LA LOI SUR LE PATRIMOINE DE
L'ONTARIO ET SITUÉE DANS DISTRICT DE CONSERVATION DU PATRIMOINE
WILBROD/LAURIER |
Committee
recommendationS
That Council:
1.
Approve the
application to alter 470 Wilbrod Street in accordance
with the designs by Barry Padolsky Associates Inc.
Architects received on March 7, 2012 and included as Documents 3-6;
2.
Delegate
authority for minor design change, to the General Manager, Planning and Growth
Management Department; and
3.
Issue the
heritage permit with a two-year expiry from the date of issuance.
(Note: The statutory 90-day timeline for consideration of this
application under the Ontario Heritage
Act will expire on June 5, 2012.)
(Note: Approval to Alter this property under the Ontario Heritage Act must not be construed to meet the requirements
for the issuance of a building permit.)
CARRIED
5. ZONING
- 468 WILBROD STREET ZONAGE – 468, RUE WILBROD |
Committee
recommendation
That Council
approve an amendment to Zoning By law 2008-250 to change the zoning of 468 Wilbrod Street from Residential Fourth Density, Subzone M,
Exception 481 (R4M[481]) to Residential Fourth Density, Subzone M, Exception xxxx (R4M[xxxx]), as shown in
Document 1 and detailed in Document 2.
CARRIED
6. ZONING
– 975 RICHMOND ROAD ZONAGE – 975, CHEMIN RICHMOND |
Committee
recommendation
That Council
approve an amendment to Zoning By-law 2008-250 to change the zoning of 975
Richmond Road from TM H(15) to TM [1373] H(15), as
shown in Document 1 and detailed in Document 2.
CARRIED
7. ZONING
- 5649 HAZELDEAN ROAD (FORMERLY 1774 MAPLE GROVE ROAD) ZONAGE – 5649, CHEMIN
HAZELDEAN (AUPARAVANT 1774, CHEMIN MAPLE GROVE) |
Committee
recommendation
That Council
approve an amendment to Zoning By
law 2008-250 to change the zoning of 5649 Hazeldean Road (formerly 1774 Maple
Grove Road) from Development Reserve (DR) to Residential Third Density Subzone
YY Exception 1297 (R3YY[1297]) and Parks and Open
Space Subzone R (O1R), and from R3YY[1297] to O1R, from O1R to R3YY[1297] and
from DR to R3YY[1297]-h, as shown in Document 1 and as detailed in Document 2.
CARRIED
8. OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT –
DELETION OF CENTRUM BOULEVARD EXTENSION MODIFICATION AU PLAN
OFFICIEL – SUPPRESSION DU PROLONGEMENT DU BOULEVARD CENTRUM |
Committee
recommendation AS AMENDED
That Council direct staff to complete the Environmental Assessment process to identify the right-of-way for the future Centrum Boulevard Extension and bring forward the construction of a pedestrian and emergency vehicle access for future budget considerations and take no further steps to amend the Official Plan in respect of Centrum Boulevard nor to construct the Centrum Boulevard Extension such as to permit motorized vehicular traffic.
CARRIED
9. DEMOLITION
CONTROL - 588 AND 592 RIDEAU STREET AND 165 CHARLOTTE STREET RÉGLEMENTATION DE
DÉMOLITION – 588 ET 592, RUE RIDEAU ET 165, RUE CHARLOTTE |
Committee
recommendation
That Council
approve demolition of 588 and 592
Rideau Street and 165 Charlotte Street subject to the conditions contained in
Document 4.
CARRIED
10. 2011
CENSUS RESULTS AND RELATION TO POPULATION PROJECTIONS RÉSULTATS DU RECENSEMENT
DE 2011 ET RAPPORT AVEC LES PROJECTIONS DÉMOGRAPHIQUES |
Committee
recommendation
That Council receive this report
for information purposes.
RECEIVED
11. TREASURER'S
STATEMENT ON DEVELOPMENT CHARGES RESERVE FUNDS FOR 2011 COMMUNICATION DE LA
TRÉSORIÈRE DE LA VILLE SUR LES REDEVANCES D’AMÉNAGEMENT DE 2011 |
Committee
recommendation
That Council receive
this report for information.
RECEIVED
PLANNING
COMMITTEE REPORT 30
1. MONAHAN
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY CONSTRUCTED WETLAND UPGRADE INSTALLATION DE GESTION
DES EAUX PLUVIALES MONAHAN RÉHABILITATION DU MARAIS ARTIFICIEL |
Committee
recommendationS
That Council approve:
1. That the City permit the
South Kanata Development Corporation to front-end the design and construction
of the Monahan Stormwater Management Facility Upgrade
subject to entering into a front-ending agreement with the City in accordance
with the Council-approved Front Ending Policy;
2. That
the City reimburse the South Kanata Development Corporation for the
rehabilitation component of the works from the funds previously budgeted under
the Monahan Constructed Wetland Rehabilitation capital project 905757, once these works have been
accepted by the City; and,
3. That
staff be directed to bring forward amendments to the Development Charge By-law
to increase the area specific storm water development charge to include the
balance of the development charge eligible costs associated with this upgrade.
CARRIED, as amended by the following Motion:
MOTION
Moved by Councillor A. Hubley
Seconded by Councillor P. Hume
WHEREAS Planning Committee at its meeting of 8 May 2012 considered a
report with respect to Monahan Stormwater Management Facility Constructed Wetland Upgrade;
and
WHEREAS the Ministry of the
Environment expressed concern about the manner in which the Ministry’s position
has been stated; and
WHEREAS a letter has been issued by
the City to the Ministry to clarify this matter;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the
letter attached as Document 1 to this motion be appended to the report from
Planning Committee so that it will form part of the official record of the
consideration of this item.
CARRIED
2. ZONING REVIEWS / COMMUNITY DESIGN PLAN AND SECONDARY
PLAN REVIEWS rÉvisions
de zonage / EXAMENS DU PLAN DE CONCEPTION COMMUNAUTAIRE ET DU
PLAN SECONDAIRE |
Committee
recommendation
That Council approve
that funds in the amount of $500,000 be allocated from the One-time and
Unforeseen account to fund the program to undertake small-scale reviews of
existing zoning and to revisit a number of Community Design Plans to resolve
ambiguities
CARRIED
TRANSIT
COMMISSION REPORT 11A
1.
ACCESSIBLE SHUTTLE SERVICES
FOR LANSDOWNE PARK SERVICE
DE NAVETTES ACCESSIBLES POUR LE PARC LANSDOWNE |
COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1.
direct staff to enter into negotiations with the Ottawa
Sports and Entertainment Group (“OSEG”) for an agreement between it and the
City for shuttle services within the existing approved Transportation Demand
Management measures for the Lansdowne Partnership Plan that would ensure a sufficient
number of shuttle service vehicles would be accessible and accommodate the
needs of the disabled community for events at Lansdowne and for staff to report
back on the results of the negotiations at the first Transit Commission meeting
in September, 2012; and
2. request that OSEG consult with the City’s
Accessibility Advisory Committee on this matter as part of the negotiation
process for such an agreement.
CARRIED
Motions Requiring Suspension
of the Rules of Procedure
MOTION
Moved by Councillor P. Hume
Seconded by Councillor J. Harder
WHEREAS there is a pending application
for site plan approval that cannot be finalized as the Ward Councillor has
declared interest pursuant to the Municipal
Conflict of Interest Act;
THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED that the Rules of Procedure be suspended to permit the introduction of
the following motion.
WHEREAS the
Delegation of Authority By-law provides for a requirement of concurrence by the
Ward Councillor prior to various planning approvals being given; and
WHEREAS from time to
time a Councillor declares interest in a matter, pursuant to the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, and
therefore cannot provide concurrence; and
WHEREAS it is
appropriate that an alternative means be provided for
concurrence to be given;
THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED THAT:
1.
Where a
Councillor has declared interest pursuant to the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, concurrence under the
Delegation of Authority By-law may be given jointly by the Chair and Vice-Chair
of Planning Committee or Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee as applicable;
2.
Where it is
the Chair or Vice-Chair that has declared interest, the Mayor may substitute
for such Chair or Vice-Chair in providing concurrence;
3.
The
Delegation of Authority By-law No. 2012-109 be amended accordingly
CARRIED
MOTION
Moved by Councillor S. Blais
Seconded by Councillor P. Hume
That the Rules of Procedure be waived to consider the following motion to
allow the Cumberland Panthers to immediately finalize the building permit for
the installation of the storage container at Millennium Park in time for the
upcoming football season:
WHEREAS the
Cumberland Panthers Football Club has applied for a building permit to install
a 20 by 8 ft storage container as a fixed asset at the City’s Millennium Park
located at 500 Millennium Boulevard, in support of recreation activities on
those City-owned lands and that municipal development charges are applicable to
the project; and
WHEREAS the
structure will be used for storage at the City-owned sport fields;
THEREFORE BE
IT RESOLVED that Council approve that the City enter into a 20 year deferral
agreement without interest for the municipal development charges related to the
installation of the storage facility at 500 Millennium Boulevard by the Cumberland
Panthers Football Club and that the development charges be waived if the
storage facility is removed prior to the termination of the agreement.
CARRIED
Notices of Motion (For
Consideration at Subsequent Meeting)
MOTION
Moved by Councillor S. Blais
Seconded by Councillor M. Wilkinson
WHEREAS an extension to Brian Coburn Boulevard, including an
intersection with Mer Bleue Road is nearing
completion of construction; and
WHEREAS to open a road a by-law is required; and
WHEREAS the reference plan to permit a legal description for the by-law
is anticipated to be available prior to the next meeting of Council; and
WHEREAS the Municipal Act
permits the delegation of the authority to enact certain by-laws;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the authority to enact a by-law opening
that portion of Brian Coburn Boulevard between Mer Bleue
Road and Tenth Line Road be delegated to a Committee composed of the Chair,
Transportation Committee and Councillor Blais and the Deputy City Manager,
Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Committee will meet at the call of the
Chair, Transportation Committee and notice of the meeting to approve the by-law
be placed upon the City’s website a minimum of six hours before the meeting is
to take place.
By-laws Three Readings
2012-138
A by-law of the City of Ottawa to establish certain lands
as common and public highway and assume it for public use (Pullman Avenue).
2012-139
A by-law of the City of Ottawa to impose special annual
drainage rates upon lands in respect of which money is borrowed under the Tile
Drainage Act.
2012-140
A by-law of the City
of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2004-60 to appoint Municipal Law Enforcement
Officers in accordance with private property parking enforcement.
2012-141
A by-law of the City of Ottawa to establish certain lands
as common and public highway and assume it for public use (Prestige Circle).
2012-142
A by-law of the City of Ottawa to establish certain lands
as common and public highway and assume them for public use.
2012-143
A
by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to
change the zoning of lands known municipally as part of 4120 8th
Line Road.
2012-144
A
by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa and to amend By-law No. 266 of 1981 of the former
Township of West Carleton to change the zoning for the properties known
municipally as 3711, 3715, 3719 and 3725 Carp Road.
2012-145
A
by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to
change the zoning of lands known municipally as 5649 Hazeldean Road.
2012-146
A
by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to
change the zoning of lands known municipally as 468 Wilbrod
Street.
2012-147
A
by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to
provide regulations for the control of low-rise residential infill development
in mature neighbourhoods.
2012-148
A by-law of the City of Ottawa to designate certain lands
at 109, 111, 113 and 115 Claridge
Drive, 12, 14, 16 and 18 Gentian Heights, 100, 102, 122, 124, 134 and 136 Watershield Ridge and 208 and 210 Springbeauty
Avenue as being exempt from Part Lot Control.
2012-149
A by-law of the City of Ottawa to designate certain lands
at 199, 201, 203 and 205 Brambling Way, 2441 to 2500 Regatta Avenue and 515,
517, 519, 521, 523, 525, 527 and 529 Egret Way as being exempt from Part Lot
Control.
2012-150
A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2001-17
to appoint certain Inspectors, Property Standards Officers and Municipal Law
Enforcement Officers in the Building Code Services Branch of the Planning and
Growth Management Department.
CARRIED