Report to/Rapport au :

 

Planning and Environment Committee

Comité de l'urbanisme et de l'environnement

 

and Council / et au Conseil

 

25 May 2007/25 mai 2007

 

Submitted by/Soumis par : Nancy Schepers, Deputy City Manager /

Directrice municipale adjointe,

Planning, Transit and the Environment / Urbanisme, Transport en commun

et Environnement

 

Contact Person/Personne Ressource : Grant Lindsay, Manager / Gestionnaire, Development Approvals / Approbation des demandes d'aménagement

(613) 580-2424, 13242  Grant.Lindsay@ottawa.ca

 

Bay (7)

Ref N°: ACS2007-PTE-APR-0135

 

 

SUBJECT:

ZONING - 348 Woodroffe Avenue,  FILE NO. D02-02-07-0036

 

 

OBJET :

ZONAGE - 348, avenue woodroffe

 

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATION

 

That the  recommend Council approve an amendment to the former City of Ottawa Zoning By-law to change the zoning of 348 Woodroffe Avenue from R4B, a multiple unit subzone, to an R4B exception zone to permit a ground floor medical facility as a temporary use for three years, as shown in Document 1 and as detailed in Document 2.

 

RECOMMANDATION DU RAPPORT

 

Que le Comité de l'urbanisme et de l'environnement recommande au Conseil d’approuver une modification au Règlement de zonage de l’ancienne Ville d’Ottawa visant à faire passer la désignation de zonage de la propriété située au 348, avenue Woodroffe de R4B, sous-zone de logements collectifs, à zone d’exception R4B, afin de permettre un établissement médical au rez-de-chaussée à titre d’utilisation temporaire pour une période de trois ans, comme l’illustre le document 1 et le décrit en détail le document 2.

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

The site is located on the west side of Woodroffe Avenue north of Carling Avenue, south of Flower Avenue and directly across the street from the Carlingwood Shopping Centre.

 

The property is half of a semi-detached dwelling unit with a medical facility (that was converted from residential without the benefit of the necessary approvals) on the ground floor and a dwelling unit on the second floor.   The applicant has indicated that the dwelling unit is rented on a term basis on occasion, but he also uses it for his own use when it is not rented.  The other half of the semi-detached unit is owner occupied.  The surrounding uses include residential to the north and west and a commercial strip and the Carlingwood Shopping Centre to the south and east respectively.

 

On July 25, 2002, the former Planning and Development Committee recommended Council reject an application to add an exception to the R4B zone to permit a medical facility at 348 Woodroffe Avenue.  On August 28, 2002, City Council upheld the Committee's recommendation.  The staff report was recommending approval of the application.  The City Council decision was appealed by the applicant to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB).  On March 28, 2003, the Board dismissed the appeal on evidence presented by the local community group and Councillor.  An amending OMB order, issued April 22, 2003, allowed the applicant (Dr. Lokhat), up to one year following the issuance of the decision to relocate his present office. 

 

On February 23, 2004, before the termination date set by the OMB, the local Councillor held a public meeting to determine the community’s position on a medical facility use at this location.  The participants generally showed support for a temporary use at this location for a three-year period that would allow the owner sufficient time to phase out his operation or relocate.  Based on the outcome of this meeting the applicant submitted his second Zoning By-law amendment to permit his use for three more years.

 

On April 14, 2004, City Council approved a temporary three-year zoning to permit the medical facility on the ground floor.  This zoning was appealed to the OMB by an adjacent property owner.  The OMB dismissed the appeal indicating that the appellant did not provide any evidence of adverse impacts on him or his family if the clinic was to remain an additional three years.  The OMB was satisfied that it was appropriate to extend the period during which the medical facility could operate on the site in order to allow the Doctor time to find a suitable premise in the area. 

 

Existing Zoning

 

The existing zoning is R4B.  The R4B is a Multiple Unit Subzone.  The B subzone indicates minium lot width and lot area requirements.  The existing R4B zone permits no commercial uses.

 

An R4B[900]-tp zone existed on the site from April 14, 2004 to April 13, 2007.  The tp symbol represented a temporary zoning for three years.  The [900] exception permitted a medical facility on the ground floor and a second-floor dwelling unit.  By-law 2004-180, that enacted the temporary zoning, stated this By-law is repealed on April 13, 2007, whereupon the exception permitting the medical facility is also repealed and the exception number [900] and the -tp symbol are stricken from the R4B[900]-tp zone designation.  


 

Proposed Zoning

 

The proposed zoning is R4B with an exception to permit a medical facility on the ground floor and a dwelling unit on the second floor for a temporary three-year period commencing from the enactment of the implementing By-law.  For the details of the recommended zoning see Document 2.

 

 

DISCUSSION

 

The Department is recommending approval of this temporary use application for the reasons set out below.

 

This is the third time a Zoning By-law amendment application for the subject medical facility has come forward to Planning and Environment Committee.  On the previous two occasions the Department supported the medical facility both as a permitted use in 2002 and as a temporary use in 2004.  The Department continues to support a medical facility at this location for three more years.

 

Official Plan

 

The Official Plan has designated this site as General Urban Area that permits the development of the full range and choice of housing types to meet the needs of all ages, incomes and life circumstances, in combination with conveniently located employment, retail, service, cultural, leisure, entertainment and institutional uses.  A broad scale of uses are found within this designation that are intended to facilitate the development of complete and sustainable communities.  While the City is supportive of the establishment of a broad mix of uses in Ottawa's neighbourhoods, this is not meant to imply that all uses will be permitted everywhere within this designation as location, scale and type of land uses will continue to be regulated by the Zoning By-law, in accordance with the provisions of the approved Plan.  The Plan provides direction that new development be compatible and complement the surrounding land uses and that non-residential uses be conveniently located with respect to concentrations of residential development.  The locational and compatibility policies of the Plan direct uses that have the potential to generate negative impacts to appropriate locations.  The compatibility criteria of the Plan, including noise, spillover of light, accommodation of parking and access, are prominent considerations when assessing the relationship between new proposals and existing development.

 

The extension of the temporary zoning for the existing medical facility can be supported, as the use is located within a residential-looking building on a lot at the edge or periphery of an existing residential neighbourhood with a district linear commercial zoning abutting to the south along Carling Avenue.  The subject site is also located on an arterial road across the street from the Carlingwood Shopping Centre and its associated parking facilities.  The Department believes that the temporary use would not represent an intrusion into the residential neighbourhood in the long term and would not have the effect of extending the district linear commercial zoning.  Furthermore, the site retains a residential dwelling unit on the second floor and functions similarly to other businesses operating from former private homes along Woodroffe Avenue.

 

The compatibility issues have not been raised by the community in the past for it has always been the land use concern that they have addressed.  There is a driveway on the south side of the building abutting the commercial zone that serves as the access to the rear yard where client parking is permitted.  The on-site parking location and layout were not approved by the City, however, the parking currently exists and serves a purpose.   The parking spaces lie adjacent to the rear yards of two homeowners of which the owner, who shares the other half of the semi-detached house, has spoken in favour of the medical facility both at the last OMB hearing and the recent public meeting in May 2007.

 

Public Support

 

The proposal has received considerable public support over the years and the Doctor is seen or viewed as contributing positively to the community.  At a recent public meeting the Doctor indicated that there was a shortage of family physicians in Ottawa and he wanted to continue to serve the community. 

 

It is the Department's understanding that the applicant now wishes to remain at this location until he retires.  The two OMB decisions for a one year extension followed by a temporary three-year zoning were based on the Doctor's intentions to relocate his practice to another suitable premise in the area where the use is permitted.  Given the Doctor's current position to remain, the past decisions of the Board, and the potential for appeals to the enacting By-law and another OMB decision, the Department cannot guarantee it will continue to support a medical facility at this location should the Doctor decide to continue his practice at this location beyond the next three years.

 

 

CONSULTATION

 

Notice of this application was carried out in accordance with the City's Public Notification and Consultation Policy.  The Ward Councillor is aware of this application and the staff recommendation.  The City received four public comments, as well as comments from the local community association to this application.

 

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

N/A

 

 

APPLICATION PROCESS TIMELINE STATUS

 

This application was processed by the "On Time Decision Date" established for the processing of Zoning By-law amendment applications.

 


 

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

 

Document 1      Location Map

Document 2      Details of Recommended zoning

Document 3      Consultation Details

 

 

DISPOSITION

 

City Clerk’s Branch, Secretariat Services to notify the owner, Dr. Hossen Lokhat, 348 Woodroffe Avenue, Ottawa, ON  K2A 3V5., OttawaScene.com, 174 Colonnade Road, Unit #33, Ottawa, ON  K2E 7J5, Ghislain Lamarche, Program Manager, Assessment, Financial Services Branch (Mail Code:  26-76) of City Council’s decision.

 

Planning, Transit and the Environment Department to prepare the implementing by-law, forward to Legal Services Branch and undertake the statutory notification.

 

Legal Services Branch to forward the implementing by-law to City Council.


LOCATION MAP                                                                                                  DOCUMENT 1

 

 


DETAILS OF RECOMMENDED ZONING                                                       DOCUMENT 2

 

 

The property at 348 Woodroffe Avenue will be rezoned from R4B to R4B[xxx] and will be subject to the following:

 

  1. Additional permitted uses: dwelling unit and medical facility
  2. Additional zoning provisions:

(a)        the additional permitted uses are permitted for a temporary three-year period commencing the date of enactment of the implementing by-law,

(b)        the medical facility is only permitted on the ground floor,

(c)                a dwelling unit is only permitted on the second floor, and

(d)               the lot width and lot area requirements for a semi-detached house in an R4B zone apply.

 

 

 


CONSULTATION DETAILS                                                                                DOCUMENT 3

 

 

NOTIFICATION AND CONSULTATION PROCESS

 

Notification and public consultation was undertaken in accordance with the Public Notification and Public Consultation Policy approved by City Council for Zoning By-law amendments.  One public meeting was held in the community on May 08, 2007, that was hosted by the Ward Councillor. 

 

 

PUBLIC COMMENTS

 

Four written comments were received from the public. Three were in support and one was in opposition.  The Woodpark Community Association submitted a comment objecting to the amendment application.

 

 

SUMMARY OF PUBLIC INPUT

 

May 08, 2007 - PUBLIC MEETING COMMENTS

 

One public meeting was held in the community on May 08, 2007, that was hosted by the Councillor.  There were 30 people in attendance.  Staff did not attend the meeting.  A report on the meeting was prepared by the Councillor and provided to staff.  The applicant/Doctor Lokhat attended the meeting.  The Councillor’s report indicated that the Doctor mentioned that even at the age of 70 he was not ready to retire, that his patients wanted him to continue with his practice and that as there is a shortage of family physicians in Ottawa he wanted to continue to serve the community for another three years.

 

Councillor Cullen in his report summarized the questions/comments as follows:

COUNCILLOR’S COMMENTS

Councillor Alex Cullen provided the following comments:

 

"While I recognize that a medical office use at 348 Woodroffe Ave. is not compatible in a residential area, I must acknowledge that many in the community value Dr. Lokhat's services as a family physician in the area.  Therefore I am willing to support a temporary 3-year extension of the zoning to permit the continued operation of a medical office on this site.  My expectation, and the community's, is that when Dr. Lokhat retires, this site will revert to residential uses that it is zoned for."

 

COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION COMMENTS

The Woodpark Community Association objects to the zoning amendment.  The reasons are the establishment of the use represents the encroachment of a commercial use into a residential area; the area is becoming more and not less residential with a dentist’s office closing and reverting back to residential and the redevelopment of a single family site on Woodroffe to a planned unit development of six units with the possibility of a second site redeveloping in a similar fashion; the illegal conversion resulted in the loss of affordable housing; there is ample commercial space available for lease within five minutes of the site; the amendment is unwarranted and inappropriate; the use is incompatible in terms of hours of operation and parking requirements with the existing residential uses in the area and; the continuation of a non-residential use in a residential area represents a concentration of commercial activity that should more appropriately be located elsewhere. 

 

The Association indicated that if Council approves the amendment it will, in all likelihood, have no choice but to appeal the Council decision to the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

Response:

 

The Department is supporting the amendment for a temporary use at this location for three additional years.  The reasons are documented in the Discussion section of this report.