Report
to/Rapport au :
Planning and Environment Committee
Comité de l'urbanisme
et de l'environnement
Agriculture
and Rural Affairs Committee
Comité d'agriculture
et des questions rurales
12 January 2010 / le 12 janvier 2010
Submitted by/Soumis
par : Nancy Schepers, Deputy City
Manager/Directrice municipale adjointe,
Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability/Services d'infrastructure et Viabilité des collectivités
Contact
Person/Personne-ressource : Richard Kilstrom, Manager/Gestionnaire, Policy
Development and Urban Design/Élaboration de la politique et conception urbaine,
Planning and Growth Management/Urbanisme et Gestion de la croissance
Élaboration de la politique et conception urbaine
(613) 580-2424 x 22653,
Richard.Kilstrom@ottawa.ca
REPORT
RECOMMENDATIONS
That Planning and Environment
Committee and the Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee recommend Council:
1.
Approve and adopt an amendment to
the Official Plan to provide policies regarding permissions for drive-through
facilities in the Central Area and Village designations, as detailed in
Document 1;
2.
Approve amendments to Zoning By-law
2008-250 regarding permissions for drive-through facilities and restaurant
uses, as detailed in Document 2, and forward a by-law incorporating the
required amendments to the Ontario Municipal Board.
RECOMMANDATIONS DU
RAPPORT
Que le Comité de l’urbanisme
et de l’environnement et le Comité de l’agriculture et des affaires rurales
recommandent au Conseil :
1.
D’approuver et d’adopter une
modification au Plan officiel afin d’établir des politiques relatives aux
autorisations de services au volant dans les désignations secteur Centre et
village, comme il est expliqué en détail dans le Document 1;
2.
D’approuver des modifications au
Règlement de zonage 2008-250 concernant les autorisations relatives aux utilisations
de service au volant et de restaurant, comme il est expliqué en détail dans le
Document 2, et de transmettre un règlement incorporant les modifications
requises à la Commission des affaires municipales de l’Ontario.
In Zoning By-law 2008-250, a “drive-through
facility” was introduced as a land use. An appeal was received regarding the
approach taken to this new land use in the Zoning By-law in terms of where the
permissions for the land use were applied.
As well, the appellant objected to restrictions on certain types of
restaurants (the Zoning By-law provides for three types of restaurants). This report proposes certain modifications to
the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to resolve this appeal. These modifications emanate from a settlement
hearing at the Ontario Municipal Board held in December 2009.
The purpose of this Official Plan amendment is to provide policies regarding drive-through facilities in the Central Area and Village designations of the Official Plan. The amendment will prohibit drive-through facilities in these designations unless certain criteria can be met. Proposals for new drive-through facilities in these areas will be required to go through concurrent Zoning By-law amendment and Site Plan Control approval processes.
The proposed Zoning By-law amendments are intended to harmonize the treatment of drive-through facilities and various types of restaurants, city-wide, in certain zones. Generally, it is proposed that these uses be permitted in a number of commercial, industrial and leisure zones where the y are not now permitted under By-law 2008-250.
DISCUSSION
Recommendation 1 - Official Plan Amendment
This amendment would introduce new policies in Section 3.6.6 – Central Area, and in Section 3.7.1 – Villages, regarding drive-through facilities. While Section 3.6.3 - Mainstreets contains policies that deal specifically with drive-through facilities, the remaining land use designations do not currently contain specific policies in this regard.
Central Area designation
The policies for the Central Area designation in Section 3.6.6 emphasize the vital role of this area of the city, its distinct identity and heritage character, as well as the primacy of the Parliament Buildings and other national symbols. These policies have as their objective the enhancement of the diversity and attractiveness of the Central Area by encouraging a broad range of land uses and day/night, year-round activities. There is an emphasis on policies to support walking, cycling and transit to and in the Central Area, particularly during peak traffic periods. Further policies recognize the importance of a safe and comfortable pedestrian/cycling environment on all downtown streets. Regarding architectural form, the policies highlight how new buildings and spaces will reflect a human scale of development, and will be guided by design criteria that will result in a significantly enhanced pedestrian environment. The policies also ensure that development applications and public works have regard for the Central Area Secondary Plan policies to enhance the physical character, identity and unique heritage resources of the Central Area’s distinctive streets, theme streets, character areas, and heritage conservation districts.
Village designation
The policies for the Village designation in Section 3.7.1 permit a variety of land uses to provide for the daily needs of the rural community while ensuring that villages remain distinctly rural in character and scale. Permitted uses include: residential, retail and commercial service facilities, restaurants, offices and personal service establishments, light industrial uses, institutional uses such as schools, community meeting and recreational buildings and facilities, places of worship, and public open space. The policies support development that reinforces the historical character of Village core areas and mainstreets. Further policies encourage a pedestrian-friendly streetscapes and development that is compatible in scale with the rural character of Villages. There are more detailed policies in the Village Plans contained in Volume 2 of the Official Plan which identify Village mainstreets and cores.
Recommendation 2 - Zoning By-law Amendments
A “drive-through facility” use was not a defined
land use in the Zoning By-laws of the former municipalities. Under the former By-laws, a drive-through
facility was generally permitted as an accessory use and therefore was not
specifically regulated, except for certain lands where it was mentioned and
prohibited through the use of exceptions and subzones.
In Zoning By-law 2008-250, a “drive-through
facility” was introduced as a defined land use.
Because of the nature of this use, where it is permitted in a zone it
has to be developed in conjunction with another permitted use in that zone,
such as a bank or fast-food restaurant.
In order to translate the intent of the former Zoning By-laws with
respect to drive-through facilities, decisions had to be made regarding which
zoning designations this new land use would be permitted in the city. The protocol for determining where
drive-through facilities would be permitted was based on the permissions in the
former Zoning By-laws for fast-food restaurants, as this use was most closely
associated with accessory drive-through facilities. It is noted however that other uses, such as
banks, may have been able to develop accessory drive-through facilities under
the former municipal Zoning By-laws.
RATIONALE
Planning Policy Context and conformity
Provincial Policy Statement
The Provincial
Policy Statement has three general, high-level policies that would apply to the
issue of drive-through facility and restaurant permissions in the City’s Zoning
By-law.
Policy 1.1.1
b) states,
“Healthy, liveable and safe communities
are sustained by: accommodating an appropriate range and mix of residential,
employment (including industrial, commercial and institutional uses),
recreational and open space uses to meet long-term needs.”
Policy 1.1.3.4
states,
“Appropriate development
standards should be promoted which facilitate intensification, redevelopment
and compact form, while maintaining appropriate levels of public health and
safety.”
Policy 1.5.1
a) states,
“…planning public streets, spaces
and facilities to be safe, meet the needs of pedestrians, and facilitate
pedestrian and non-motorized movement, including but no limited to, walking and
cycling.”
Central Area designation
In
support of the policies for the Central Area, the amendment provides a new
policy stating that drive-through facilities will not generally be permitted in
the Central Area. However, on an
exceptional, site-specific basis, the proposed policy states that a
drive-through facility may be considered through concurrent applications for
Zoning By-law amendment and Site Plan Control approval. The policy contained in Document 1 provides
the criteria that must be met to ensure that the planned character and function
of the Central Area are maintained. Further, these applications would only be considered for
approval in circumstances where the location and design of the drive-through
facility will maintain the intent of the Official Plan and any applicable
Secondary Plan. As is the case for the
review of development applications related to this type of land use, impacts on
traffic-related issues would also be evaluated through these processes.
Village designation
To reflect the intent of the Village designation policies in the Official Plan, the amendment as shown in Document 1, adds a new policy that states that drive-through facilities shall not generally be permitted in the commercial core area of Villages or in Village mainstreets, except in extraordinary circumstances. On an exceptional basis, the policy states that a drive-through facility may be considered on a site-specific basis through concurrent applications for Zoning By-law amendment and Site Plan Control approval. Essentially, the policies in Section 3.6.3.6 for Traditional Mainstreets regarding drive-through facilities will apply with the necessary modifications in respect of the Village commercial cores and Village mainstreets. The policies in Section 3.6.3.6 include the consideration of appropriate means to minimize the interruption of the street frontage and to ameliorate the impact on the pedestrian environment. These means would include coordinated tree planting and landscaping, pedestrian amenities and consideration of the dimension, location and number of vehicular accesses.
A study of Village cores and
mainstreets will be undertaken in 2010 and 2011 to develop criteria for
evaluating applications to permit drive-through facilities in these areas. A
variety of criteria are to be considered in determining which areas may be
considered for the development of a drive-through facility, including the
historical character of the Villages, the pedestrian-friendly character that is
planned for these areas, the compatibility of the size and scale of the
development, the geographic extent of the area of each of the Villages that
will require special policies regarding drive-through facilities, and the
applicable policies in Sections 2.5.1 – Compatibility and Community Design,
and, 4.11 – Compatibility of the
Official Plan. At the time of the completion of this study the
findings may be adopted by a further Official Plan amendment, either to Volume
1 or to Volume 2 of the Plan.
The proposed new policy and the policies to be
used while the study is underway will support the primary policy objectives for
the Village designation regarding the planned pedestrian scale for Village
cores and mainstreets, compatible size and scale of development and appropriate
geographic location for this use.
Recommendation 2 - Zoning By-law Amendments
Drive-through Facility Permissions
While a drive-through facility is
proposed to be added as a permitted use in some zones, a fast-food restaurant
or any other use that might be associated with a drive-through facility, is not
necessarily also permitted in these same zones.
An application for a Zoning By-law amendment would be necessary to
permit a fast-food restaurant or any other use not permitted by the zone
designation, in these zones.
Currently, Zoning By-law 2008-250 generally permits
drive-through facilities in the following zones and certain subzones:
Arterial Mainstreet zone and subzones (AM, AM1 - AM3, AM6, AM7)
General Mixed-Use zone and subzones (GM, GM1, GM3, GM7, GM11 - GM17, GM19, GM20, GM23 - GM25)
Mixed-Use Centre zone and subzones (MC, MC1 – MC5, MC7 – MC14)
Local Commercial subzones (LC6, LC7)
General Industrial zone and subzones (IG, IG1, IG3, IG5, IG7)
Light Industrial zone and subzones (IL, IL2 - IL4, IL6 - IL8)
Heavy Industrial zone and subzone (IH, IH1)
Business Park Industrial zone and subzones (IP, IP1 - IP3, IP5)
Airport Transportation Facility subzone (T1A)
Rural Commercial zone and subzones (RC, RC1 - RC4, RC6 - RC11)
Rural General Industrial zone and subzones (RG, RG1 - RG5)
Rural Heavy Industrial zone and subzones (RH, RH1 - RH5)
Regarding drive-through facilities, the purpose of
this amendment is to permit this use in a number of additional zones and
subzones including:
Arterial Mainstreet subzones (AM4, AM5)
General Mixed-Use subzones (GM2, GM4, GM5, GM8, GM9, GM18, GM21),
Major Leisure subzone (L2)
Local Commercial zone and subzones (LC, LC1 - LC5)
Mixed-Use Centre subzone (MC6)
General Industrial subzone (IG6)
Light Industrial subzones (IL1, IL5, IL9)
Business Park Industrial subzones (IP4, IP7 - IP10)
Rural General Industrial zone (RG)
Rural Heavy Industrial zone (RH)
In the RG and RH zones, an amendment that is technical
in nature is proposed. Currently in
these two zones, drive-through facilities are permitted conditional on the use
being located on the same lot as another permitted use. The proposed amendment would result in the
use “drive-through facility” being added to the list of permitted uses, without
any conditions. This will have little
practical consequence as a drive-through facility is always located on the same
lot as the use it is associated with.
The drive-through facility use was originally included as a conditional
use because it was closely associated with the types of service uses that were
only to be permitted conditionally in these zones, on the same lot as one of
the permitted uses. This change will
make the format of these rural industrial zones consistent with the formatting
of the urban industrial zones.
Restaurant Permissions
Currently, Zoning By-law 2008-250 generally permits the full range of restaurant uses (“restaurant, full-service”, “restaurant, fast-food” and “restaurant, take-out”) in the following zones and subzones:
Arterial Mainstreet zone and subzones (AM, AM1 - AM3,
AM6, AM7)
General Mixed-Use zone and subzones (GM, GM1, GM3, GM5 - GM7, GM11 -
GM17, GM19, GM20, GM22 - GM25)
Mixed-Use Centre
zone and subzones (MC – MC15)
Local Commercial
subzone (LC6)
General
Industrial zone and subzones (IG, IG1 - IG4, IG6)
Light Industrial zone and subzones (IL, IL2, IL3. IL7, IL8)
Heavy Industrial zone (IH)
Business Park Industrial zone and subzones (IP, IP3, IP5)
Airport Transportation Facility subzone (T1A)
Major Leisure subzone (L2B)
Mixed-Use Downtown zone and subzones (MD, MD2, MD3)
Rural Commercial zone and subzones (RC, RC1 – RC7, RC10, RC11)
Village Mixed-Use zone and subzones (VM, VM3-VM7).
Regarding restaurants, the proposed amendments would result in the full range of restaurant uses (“restaurant, full-service”, “restaurant, fast-food” and “restaurant, take-out”) being permitted in a number of additional zones and subzones including:
Arterial Mainstreet subzones (AM4, AM5)
General Industrial subzones (IG5, IG7)
Heavy Industrial subzone (IH1)
Light Industrial subzones (IL4, IL5, IL6, IL9),
Business Park Industrial subzones (IP1, IP2, IP8, IP9)
Rural General Industrial zone (RG)
Rural Heavy Industrial zone (RH)
Village Mixed-Use subzone (VM1)
For some of the above zones and subzones, only “restaurant, take-out” would be added as a permitted use, while in others the full complement of restaurant uses would be added.
Zoning By-law 2008-250 generally carried over the restaurant permissions from the former Zoning By-laws. This amendment would introduce new restaurant types in specific zones and subzones. The Official Plan permits a broad range of uses, including service and restaurant uses, in the General Urban, Traditional Mainstreet, Arterial Mainstreet, Mixed-Use Centre, Employment Area, Enterprise Area, Village and General Rural designations. While the Official Plan refers to service and restaurant uses, a distinction is not made between the three types of restaurant that are regulated in the Zoning By-law. For this reason, the proposed amendment, contained in Document 2, to introduce new restaurant types in specific zones and subzones will be not be inconsistent with policies in the Official Plan.
RURAL IMPLICATIONS
Amendments to the zones RG (Rural
General Industrial) and RH (Rural Heavy Industrial) will permit fast-food
restaurants where previously they had not generally been permitted under the
former rural Zoning By-laws. Further,
amendments to these same zones will permit drive-through facilities as a
permitted use rather than as a conditional use.
CONSULTATION
Notice for the Official Plan amendment was carried out in accordance with the City's Public Notification and Consultation Policy.
No comments regarding the Official Plan amendment were received from the public. Inquiries regarding interpretation of technical aspects of the proposed Zoning By-law amendment were received.
Detailed responses to the notification/circulation are provided in Document 3.
The Ward Councillors are aware of these amendments and the staff recommendations. No comments regarding the proposed Official Plan amendment were received. Inquiries regarding interpretation of technical aspects of the proposed Zoning By-law amendment were received.
LEGAL/RISK MANAGEMENT
IMPLICATIONS
The attached proposed official plan amendment implements a recommended settlement. If this report is adopted by Council, implementation will occur in accordance with the disposition below.
If the report is not adopted by Council, then the matters addressed in this report will proceed to a hearing. It will be necessary for the City to retain outside witnesses at a cost estimated to be in the range of $50,000 to $75,000.
The staff recommendations support the following objectives for the Planning and Growth Management priority area:
E6: Require walking, transit and cycling-oriented communities and employment centres.
F2: Respect the existing urban fabric, neighbourhood form and the limits of existing hard services so that new growth is integrated seamlessly with established communities.
F5: Preserve Ottawa’s rural villages.
N/A
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
N/A
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
Document 1 Proposed Official Plan Amendment
Document 2 Details of Recommended Zoning – Recommendation 2
Document 3 Details of Recommended Zoning – Recommendation 3
Document 4 Consultation Details
DISPOSITION
Legal Services to forward the by-law regarding Recommendation 1 to implement the Official Plan amendment to City Council.
Planning and Growth Management to prepare the implementing by-law for Recommendation 2, forward to Legal Services.
Legal Services to bring forward by-law regarding
Recommendation 2 to the Ontario Municipal Board for implementation by Ontario
Municipal Board order on February 25, 2010.
PROPOSED OFFICIAL
PLAN AMENDMENT DOCUMENT
1
Utilisation du sol
The Statement of
Components … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …
Purpose … … … … … …
… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … .
Location … … … … …
… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …
Basis … … … … … … …
… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … .
Introductory Statement … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … .
Details of the Amendment … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … ….
THE STATEMENT OF
COMPONENTS
PART A – THE PREAMBLE, introduces the actual Amendment but does not constitute part of Amendment No. X to the City of Ottawa Official Plan.
PART B – THE AMENDMENT, consisting of the following text and maps constitutes both the actual Amendment No. X to the City of Ottawa Official Plan.
PART A - THE PREAMBLE
1.0 Purpose
The purpose of Amendment No. X to the City of Ottawa
Official Plan is to add new policies to Section 3.6.6 Central Area and 3.7.1
Villages to prohibit drive-though facilities in these designations. Drive-through
facilities are not considered to be appropriate in the Central Area and Village
Mainstreets and Cores where such uses would interfere with the intended
function and form of these designations as described in the policies of the
aforementioned sections, which encourage a pedestrian–friendly streetscape and
a more compact form of development.
2.0 Location
The areas affected by the amendment are the Central Area as shown on Schedule B – Urban Policy Plan and all Villages as shown on Schedule A – Rural Policy Plan, both schedules to the Official Plan.
3.0 Basis
3.1 Background
The City of Ottawa enacted the Zoning By-law 2008-250 on June 25, 2008. An appeal was received with regard to where drive-through facilities and various types of restaurants (fast food, take-out and full service) are permitted in several zone codes in the By-law. Further to the settlement of this appeal, an Official Plan Amendment was to be presented to Planning and Environment Committee and Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee for approval by City Council.
PART B – THE AMENDMENT
1.0 The Introductory Statement
All of this part of this document entitled Part B – The Amendment, consisting of the following text, constitutes Amendment No. X to the City of Ottawa Official Plan.
2.0 Details
of the Amendment
2.1 The City of Ottawa Official Plan, Volume 1, is hereby amended as follows:
13. Drive-through facilities will not be permitted on Village mainstreets or in Village commercial cores, as identified either through a Secondary Plan, Community Design Plan or Zoning By-law, in order to protect and enhance the pedestrian environment. However, there may be exceptional circumstances where a drive-through facility may be located in these areas where the intent of this Official Plan regarding Villages, in a Secondary Plan or in a Community Design Plan, can otherwise be preserved. In these cases, appropriate means such as coordinated tree planting and landscaping, pedestrian amenities and the dimension, location and number of vehicular accesses will be used to minimize the interruption of the Village commercial core or Village mainstreet street frontage and ameliorate the impact on the pedestrian environment."
3.0 Interpretation
Implementation
and interpretation of these chapters shall be made having regard to information
of all of the chapters of the Official Plan.
DETAILS OF
RECOMMENDED ZONING – RECOMMENDATION 2 DOCUMENT 2
BY-LAW FOR CONSIDERATION BY
THE ONTARIO
MUNICIPAL BOARD
A by-law of the City of
Ottawa to
amend By-law No. 2008-250 to resolve an appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board.
The Council of the City of Ottawa, pursuant to
Section 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O.1990, enacts as follows:
1.
By-law
No. 2008-250 entitled “City of Ottawa Zoning By‑law” is amended as
follows:
(a) Section 175 (1) L2 (Major Leisure Facility)
Add the following immediately after subsection (a)
(b) the following uses are also permitted subject to:
(i) being in association with “amusement park”, “library”, “sports arena” and “theatre”:
“drive-through facility”,
Arterial Mainstreet Zones:
(b) Section 186 (4) AM 4
“drive-through facility” to be removed from list of prohibited uses,
(c) Section 186 (5) (a) AM 5
“drive-through facility” to be added to list of permitted uses,
General Mixed Use Zones:
(d) Section 188 (2) GM 2
“drive-through facility” to be added to list of permitted uses,
(e) Section 188 (4) GM 4
“drive-through facility” to be added to list of permitted uses,
(f) Section 188 (5) GM 5
“drive-through facility” to be added to list of permitted uses,
(g) Section 188 (8) GM 8
“drive-through facility” to be added to list of permitted uses,
(h) Section 188 (9) GM 9
“drive-through facility” to be added to list of permitted uses,
(i) Section 188 (18) (a) GM 18
“drive-through facility” to be added to list of permitted uses,
(j) Section 188 (21) (c) GM 21
“drive-through facility” to be added to list of permitted uses,
Local
Commercial Zones:
(k) Section 189 (1) LC
“drive-through facility” to be added to list of permitted uses,
(l) Section 190 (1) LC 1
“drive-through facility” to be added to list of permitted uses,
(m) Section 190 (2) LC 2
“drive-through facility” to be added to list of permitted uses,
(n) Section 190 (3) LC 3
“drive-through facility” to be added to list of permitted uses,
(o) Section 190 (4) LC 4
“drive-through facility” to be added to list of permitted uses,
(p) Section 190 (5) LC 5
“drive-through facility” to be added to list of permitted uses,
(q) Section 192 (6) MC 6 (Mixed Use Centre)
“drive-through facility” to be added to list of permitted uses,
(r) Section 200 (6) (b) IG 6 (General Industrial)
“drive-through facility” to be removed from list of prohibited uses.
Light Industrial Subzones:
(s) Section 204 (1) (a) IL 1
“drive-through facility” to be added to list of permitted uses,
(t) Section 204 (5) (a) IL 5
“drive-through facility” to be removed from list of prohibited uses.
(u) Section 204 (9) (b) IL 9
(i) “drive-through facility” to be added to list of permitted uses in clause (b),
(ii) and by adding the following clause:
(e) drive-through facility is only permitted in association with the uses in 204(9)(b)(iii) and only when these uses are located within a building containing one or more of the uses listed in 203(9)(a).
Business Park Industrial Subzones:
(v) Section 206 (4) (a) IP 4 is amended by:
(i) “drive-through facility” to be removed from list of prohibited uses in clause 4(a),
(ii) adding the following clause:
(d) drive-through facility is only permitted in association with a permitted use when the permitted use is located within a building containing other permitted uses.
(w) Section 206 (7) (b) IP 7
(i) “drive-through facility” to be added to list of permitted uses in clause (a),
(ii) add the following clasue:
(c) drive-through facility is only permitted in association with the uses in 206 (7) (b) and only when these uses are located in the same building as a use permitted under clause 206 (7) (a) above.
(x) Section 206 (8) (b) IP 8
“drive-through facility” to be removed from list of prohibited uses,
(y) Section 206 (9) (a) IP 9
“drive-through facility” to be removed from list of prohibited uses
(z) Section 206 (10) (b) IP 10
“drive-through facility” to be added to list of permitted uses,
(aa) Section 219 (1) RG (Rural General Industrial)
“drive-through facility” to be added to list of permitted uses,
(bb) Section 219 (2) RG
“drive-through facility” to be removed from list of conditional permitted uses,
(cc) Section 221 (1) RH (Rural Heavy Industrial)
“drive-through facility” to be added to list of permitted uses,
(dd) Section 221 (2) RH (Rural Heavy Industrial)
“drive-through facility” to be removed from list of conditional permitted uses.
(ee) Section 239 – Urban Exceptions
Exception [338] to be modified by adding
"drive-through facility" to Column IV- Land Uses Prohibited,
Exception [51] to be modified by replacing the
word, "commercial", with the word, "non-residential", in
Column IV - Land Uses Prohibited.
APPROVED by the Ontario Municipal Board on _____________________, 2010
BY-LAW FOR CONSIDERATION BY
THE ONTARIO
MUNICIPAL BOARD
A by-law of the City of
Ottawa to
amend By-law No. 2008-250 to resolve an appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board.
The Council of the City of Ottawa, pursuant to
Section 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O.1990, enacts as follows:
By-law No. 2008-250 entitled “City of Ottawa Zoning By‑law” is amended as follows:
Arterial Mainstreet Zones:
(a) Section 186 (4) (c) AM 4
“restaurant” to be removed from list of prohibited uses,
(b) Section 186 (5) (a) AM 5
“restaurant” to be added to list of permitted uses,
(c) Section 186 (5) (b) AM 5
“restaurant-full service” and “restaurant-take out” to be removed from list of permitted uses,
General Industrial:
(d) Section 200 (5) (a) IG 5
“restaurant-fast food” to be removed from list of prohibited uses.
(e) Section 200 (7) (b) IG 7
“restaurant” to be added to list of permitted uses,
(f) Section 202 (1) (b) IH1 (Heavy Industrial)
“restaurant-fast food” to be added to list of permitted uses,
Light Industrial Subzones:
(g) Section 204 (4) (a) IL 4
“restaurant-full service” to be removed from list of permitted uses,
“restaurant” to be added to list of permitted uses,
(h) Section 204 (5) (a) IL 5
“restaurant-fast food” and “restaurant-take out” to be removed from list of prohibited uses.
(i) Section 204 (6) (b) IL 6
“restaurant-fast food” and “restaurant-take out” to be removed from list of prohibited uses.
(j) Section 204 (9) (a) IL 9
“restaurant” to be added to list of permitted uses,
(k) Section 204 (9) (b) IL9
“restaurant-full service” and “restaurant-take out” to be removed from list of conditionally permitted uses
Business Park Industrial Subzones:
(l) Section 206 (1) (a) IP 1
“restaurant” to be added to list of permitted uses,
“restaurant-full service” and “restaurant-take out” to be removed from list of permitted uses,
(m) Section 206 (2) (a) IP 2
“restaurant” to be added to list of permitted uses,
“restaurant-full service” and “restaurant-take out” to be removed from list of permitted uses,
(n) Section 206 (8) (b) IP 8
“restaurant-fast food” and “restaurant-full service” to be removed from list of prohibited uses,
(o) Section 206 (9) (a) IP 9
“restaurant-fast food” and “restaurant-full service” to be removed from list of prohibited uses,
(p) Section 219 (2) (c) RG (Rural General Industrial)
Delete section (2) (c)
(q) Section 221 (2) (c) RH (Rural Heavy Industrial)
Delete section (2) (c)
Village Mixed Use:
(cc) Section 230 (1) VM1
“restaurant” to be added to list of permitted uses, effective February 24, 2011.
(dd) Add exception [xxxx] to section 239, applicable to 911 Watters Road, inserting in Column III, “Additional Land Uses Permitted”, “Restaurant, Fast Food”.
APPROVED by the Ontario Municipal Board on _____________________, 2010
CONSULTATION DETAILS DOCUMENT 3
COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION COMMENTS
Comment: The Fallowfield Community Association requested information regarding how the proposed Official Plan amendment with regard to drive-through facilities would affect Fallowfield Village.
Response: Fallowfield Village does not have a designated Village Core or Mainstreet, nor does it have a Village Mainstreet zone. None of the existing zones in Fallowfield will be affected by the proposed Zoning By-law amendments.
Comment: The Dalhousie Community Association submitted a comment indicating that they support the proposed Official Plan amendment.
Comment: The Rockcliffe Park Community Association submitted a comment indicating that they support the proposed Official Plan amendment. The Association requested confirmation that the Traditional Mainstreet zone along Beechwood Avenue would not be affected by the proposed Zoning By-law amendments.
Response: Staff confirmed that the Traditional Mainstreet zone will not be among the zones affected by the proposed Zoning By-law amendments.