DESIGNATION OF THE BRADLEY/CRAIG FARMSTEAD, 590
HAZELDEAN ROAD UNDER PART IV OF THE ONTARIO
HERITAGE ACT DÉSIGNATION DE LA FERME BRADLEY/CRAIG, SITUÉE AU 590, CHEMIN
HAZELDEAN, AUX TERMES DE LA PARTIE IV DE LA LOI SUR LE PATRIMOINE DE L'ONTARIO |
That the Planning and Environment Committee recommend
that Council approve the designation of the Bradley/Craig Farmstead, 590
Hazeldean Road, under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with
the Statement of Cultural Heritage Value, attached as Document 4, as
amended.
recommandation modifiée du ccpbo
Que le Comité de l’urbanisme et de l’environnement
recommande au Conseil d’approuver la désignation de la ferme Bradley/Craig,
située au 590, chemin Hazeldean, aux termes de la partie IV de la Loi sur le
patrimoine de l’Ontario, conformément à l’énoncé de la valeur sur le plan du
patrimoine culturel faisant l’objet du document 4 ci-annexé, tel que
modifié.
Documentation
1. Deputy City Manager's report Planning, Transit and the Environment
dated 4 January 2010 (ACS2010-ICS-PGM-0021).
2. LACAC Extract of Draft Minutes of 21
January 2010.
Report to/Rapport au :
Ottawa Built Heritage Advisory Committee
Comité consultatif sur la
conservation de l'architecture locale
and /
et
Planning
and Environment Committee
Comité de l'urbanisme et de
l'environnement
and Council / et au Conseil
04 January 2010 / le 04 janvier
2010
Submitted by/Soumis par : Nancy Schepers, Deputy City
Manager/Directrice municipale adjointe,
Infrastructure
Services and Community Sustainability/Services
d’infrastructure et Viabilité des collectivités
Contact Person/Personne-ressource : John Smit,
Manager/Gestionnaire, Development Review-Urban Services/Examen des projets
d'aménagement-Services urbains, Planning and Growth Management/Urbanisme et
Gestion de la croissance
(613) 580-2424, 13866
John.Smit@ottawa.ca
REPORT RECOMMENDATION
That the Ottawa Built Heritage Advisory Committee recommend that Planning and Environment Committee recommend that Council approve the designation of the Bradley/Craig Farmstead, 590 Hazeldean Road, under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Cultural Heritage Value, attached as Document 4.
RECOMMANDATION
DU RAPPORT
Que le Comité consultatif sur le patrimoine bâti
d’Ottawa recommande
au Comité de l’urbanisme et de l’environnement de recommander à son tour au
Conseil d’approuver la désignation de la ferme Bradley/Craig, située au 590,
chemin Hazeldean, aux termes de la partie IV de la Loi sur le patrimoine de l’Ontario, conformément à l’énoncé de la
valeur sur le plan du patrimoine culturel faisant l’objet du document 4
ci-annexé.
BACKGROUND
The Bradley/Craig Farmstead, 590 Hazeldean Road (see Location Map, Document 1 and Bird’s Eye View, Document 2) includes the farmhouse and barn at 590 Hazeldean Road. The farmhouse is a two-and-a-half-storey, red brick structure, built during the 1870s. The barn, built in 1873, features timber frame construction and a monitor roof. Taken together, the farmhouse, large barn and farmyard are an excellent example of a late 19th century farmstead built when agriculture was the dominant economic activity of the province. The farmstead was farmed by the Bradley family for generations. The last member of the family to farm the land was married to a descendant Joshua Bradley, the original settler of the land, and he farmed there from the 1940s until his recent retirement.
The Bradley/Craig Farmstead was included on the former City of Kanata’s heritage reference list. Staff contacted the owners and undertook research to understand the history of the farmstead and to determine whether or not it was worthy of designation. Their analysis revealed that the farmstead was worthy of designation. In 2006, the property was sold to a developer, and in 2007 the Department wrote to the new owner, communicating its interest in designation. There was no response to this letter. Staff did not proceed with the designation out of consideration of the former owners, now tenants, who were elderly and interested in avoiding public attention. In addition, the building was not threatened. The proposed designation was noted in the Fernbank Community Design Plan in 2009, and at the time, the owners were again notified of the City’s interest in designating the property.
In the spring of 2009 staff were informed that the tenants would be moving out soon. As a result of the change in status of the farmstead complex, staff has initiated the designation of the complex to ensure its protection for future generations. Coincident with the receipt of that information, the new owners of the property contacted the City regarding the farm, stating their objection to the designation of the barn, but not the house.
The owner of the property has expressed concern about the inclusion of the barn in the designated parcel because of concerns regarding the future use of the structure. Heritage staff made an inquiry through AGORA-L, an electronic network of heritage professionals and ordinary citizens, administered by the Heritage Canada Foundation, and an informal group of heritage planners in Ontario looking for successful examples of the adaptive re-use of barns. Many examples were found across Canada, including theatres, restaurants, wineries, private houses and retail stores. Since then, the owner of the property and heritage staff have met to discuss the proposed designation and staff has allayed some of the concerns regarding the protection of the barn under the Ontario Heritage Act. The developer hired a conservation architect to undertake an analysis of the barn’s condition.
DISCUSSION
Individual buildings, structures and cultural heritage landscapes will be designated as properties of cultural heritage value under Part IV of the Heritage Act,” and that
The City will give immediate consideration to the designation of any cultural heritage resources under the Heritage Act if that resource is threatened with demolition.
Section 2.6.1 of the Provincial Policy Statement (2005, PPS) contains policies regarding the conservation of cultural heritage resources: “Significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved.” Research conducted by staff confirmed that the Bradley Craig Farmstead has cultural heritage value and is worthy of protection under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. Designating the property will be consistent with the PPS.
Regulation 09/06 (Document 3)
The Bradley/Craig Farmstead demonstrates the development of farming methods and the parallel evolution of farm buildings, from simple log structures, to large, timber frame barns and elaborate farmhouses. Built on land originally settled by Joshua Bradley in 1821, whose family became leaders in the community, the farmstead was a model for dairy farms across the region. The Gothic Revival style farmhouse was constructed by his grandson in the 1870s, replacing an earlier log house. The Gothic Revival was at the height of its popularity at this time and the building has many features associated with the style, including white brick voussoirs, stringcourses and quoins, a steeply pitched gable roof, bargeboard trim in the gable ends, verandas, and roof The entrance displays a high level of craftsmanship including its original front door with sidelights and elliptical transom of blue and purple glass.
The barn is an excellent example of a monitor roofline dairy barn that was large enough to store the hay required by a large dairy operation. It illustrates improvements in farming techniques and the parallel evolution of farm buildings in the late 19th century; as the scale of farms increased, larger timber framed barns were built which incorporated labour saving innovations such as ramps for unloading hay, and rope and pulley systems for moving the hay into the “mow,” the area of the barn used for hay storage. The barn was constructed by a local builder, John Cummings, with the help of apprentices and neighbouring farmers. Cummings was a prominent craftsman in Goulbourn, having built a number of significant buildings and barns in the township. This is the last known example of a barn built by Cummings.
Regulation 09/06 sets out criteria for designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. It states that “A property may be designated under Section 29 of the Act if it meets one or more of the following criteria for determining whether it is of cultural heritage value or interest …” These criteria are organized into three groups; design or physical value, historical or associative value and contextual value.
The two buildings that comprise the Bradley/Craig Farmstead meet the design criteria in the regulation. The house is a good representative example of the Gothic Revival, demonstrating a high level of craftsmanship in its detailing. The Barn is an excellent example of a monitor roofed dairy barn built with many technologically advanced features specific to dairy barns. It is the last known work of barn builder, Cummings, to survive. In terms of historical value, it is associated with the Bradley family, a prominent pioneer family in Goulbourn Township and its development into a large dairy farm illustrates the agricultural history of the area from earliest settlement to a period of economic prosperity. Finally, the Bradley/Craig Farmstead has contextual value as a local landmark (see Document 4, Statement of Cultural Heritage Value and Document 5, Heritage Survey Form).
Conclusion
The recommended designation meets the criteria for designation under the Ontario Heritage Act. The designation would protect a valuable part of Ottawa’s rural heritage and would be consistent with policies set out in the Official Plan and the Provincial Policy Statement. The designation meets the criteria of Regulation 09/06 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
CONSULTATION
Heritage Ottawa is aware of the proposed designation.
Councillor Glenn Brooks is aware of the proposed designation.
The property owner is aware of the proposed designation.
There are no legal/risk management implications associated with this report.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
N/A
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
Document 1 Location
Map
Document 2 Bird’s Eye views
Document 3 Criteria for Designation
Document 4 Statement of Cultural Heritage Value
Document 5 Heritage Survey and Evaluation Form
DISPOSITION
City Clerk and Solicitor Department, Legislative Services Branch to notify the property owner and the Ontario Heritage Trust (10 Adelaide Street East, 3rd Floor, Toronto, Ontario, M5C 1J3) of Council’s decision to designate the Bradley Craig/ Farmstead, 590 Hazeldean Road.
Planning and Growth Management Department to
advertise the Notice of Intention to Designate according to the Act
and subsequent Notice of the passage of the designation by-law.
Surveys and Mapping to prepare an accurate survey of the lands to be designated.
Legal Services to prepare the designation by-law, submit it to City Council for enactment, serve the by-law and register it on title following passage by Council.
LOCATION MAP DOCUMENT
1
ONTARIO REGULATION 9/06
CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING CULTURAL HERITAGE
VALUE OR INTEREST
Consolidation
Period: From January 25, 2006
to the e-Laws currency date.
No amendments.
This
is the English version of a bilingual regulation.
Criteria
1. (1) The criteria set out in subsection (2) are
prescribed for the purposes of clause 29 (1) (a) of the Act. O. Reg. 9/06,
s. 1 (1).
(2) A property may be designated under section 29
of the Act if it meets one or more of the following criteria for determining
whether it is of cultural heritage value or interest:
1.
The property has design value or physical value because it,
i.
is a rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type,
expression, material or construction method,
ii.
displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit, or
iii.
demonstrates a high degree of technical or scientific achievement.
2.
The property has historical value or associative value because it,
i.
has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity,
organization or institution that is significant to a community,
ii.
yields, or has the potential to yield, information that contributes to an
understanding of a community or culture, or
iii.
demonstrates or reflects the work or ideas of an architect, artist, builder,
designer or theorist who is significant to a community.
3.
The property has contextual value because it,
i.
is important in defining, maintaining or supporting the character of an area,
ii.
is physically, functionally, visually or historically linked to its
surroundings, or
iii.
is a landmark. O. Reg. 9/06, s. 1 (2).
Description of Property – The Bradley/Craig Farmstead, 590 Hazeldean Road
The Bradley/Craig Farmstead,
a complex including a two-and-a-half storey Gothic Revival style farmhouse and
a large dairy barn, is located on the south side of Hazeldean Road.
Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest
The Bradley/Craig Farmstead’s
cultural heritage value lies in its being an excellent example of a farmhouse
and barn constructed in the latter part of the 19th century when
agriculture was the dominant economic activity of the province. It illustrates
the second phase of the agricultural history of the former township of
Goulbourn when farmers became more prosperous and constructed elaborate high
style houses and technically advanced barns to replace earlier log
structures.
Built on land originally settled by Joshua Bradley in 1821, the Gothic
Revival farmhouse was constructed by his grandson in the 1870s. The barn, built in 1873, illustrates improvements in farming
techniques and the parallel evolution of farm buildings in the late 19th
century; as the scale of farms increased, larger timber framed barns were built
which incorporated labour saving innovations such as ramps for unloading hay,
and rope and pulley systems for moving the hay into the mow. The barn was specifically designed for a
dairy farm and its large size and monitor roofline meant that the hay required
by a large dairy operation could be safely stored within it. The barn was constructed by a local builder,
John Cummings, with the help of apprentices and neighbouring farmers. Cummings was a prominent craftsman in
Goulbourn, having built a number of significant buildings and barns in the township.
Description of Heritage Attributes
Key attributes that express the heritage value of the farmhouse as a good example of the Gothic Revival include the:
· steeply pitched gable roof
· decorative bargeboard in the gable ends
· front veranda with its decorative woodwork
· red brick cladding and contrasting white brick quoins, voussoirs and stringcourses
· front door with original sidelights and elliptical transom window of blue and purple glass;
· metal grills on the exterior of the front door
Key attributes that express the heritage value of the large dairy barn include the:
· monitor roofline
· stone foundations
· timber frame construction
· purlin frame with kneewall
· solid wood timbers connected by mortise and tenon joinery
· wood cladding
· diamond-shaped clerestory windows
· raised, two-bay barn plan
·
Pair
of large double doors
Key attributes that express the heritage of the Bradley/ Craig Farmstead
complex
· spatial relationship between the house and the barn
· view from the east approaching Hazeldean Road
· the farmyard
HERITAGE SURVEY AND
EVALUATION FORM
|
|||
Address |
590 Hazeldean Road |
Building
name |
Bradley/Craig Farmstead |
Construction date |
1873 barn, 1870s house |
Original
owner |
Joshua Bradley |
northeast elevation 2003 Carol Ruddy northeast
elevation circa 1900
PHASE ONE EVALUATION |
||||
Potential significance |
Considerable |
Some |
Limited |
None |
Design |
3 |
|
|
|
History |
3 |
|
|
|
Context |
|
2 |
|
|
Phase One Score |
8
/ 9 |
Design or Physical Value |
prepared
by Carol Ruddy/ Sally Coutts |
August
2007/ August 2009 |
|
Architecture
(style, building type, expression, material, construction method) |
|
Gothic
Revival brick farmhouse. The Gothic
Revival style was in widespread use for the design of residences during the
1870s in Ontario. The steeply gabled
roof, bargeboard decoration and verandas with decorative trim are characteristic
of the Gothic Revival farmhouse. The
brick accents in label moulds and stringcourses, and the decorated chimneys
were also typical of the style. Farmhouse The
farmhouse is a two-and-one-half-storey, red brick structure with white brick
trim, constructed in the 1870s. There
is a bargeboard on the front and side gables.
There are white brick quoins on the corners of the building. The northwest projecting bay is the
location of the only window in the attic storey. White brick stringcourses continue into
label moulds around the top edge of the first and second-storey windows. The two over two sash windows have stone
sills. The front door is flanked by
round-headed sidelights. Two
round-headed, exterior metal grills protect the glass in the door. The
transom window extends the width of the sidelights. All of the windows in the door, sidelights
and transom have the original purple and blue glass. There is a front veranda with decorative
trim and chamfered posts. The original
veranda on the southeast elevation has been replaced by an enclosed porch,
clad in wood siding. The chimney on
the south gable is the only chimney remaining of the three original
chimneys. The foundation is stone
masonry. There is a new attached
double garage on the south (rear) elevation.
The metal roof is black. Barn This timber
frame barn is a particularly large example of the type of barn built to
accommodate the needs of a large dairy herd.
It has a high foundation wall and earth ramps for driving a hay wagon (and
later a tractor) into the upper level of the barn. The lower level of the barn contains
stables and a milking parlour while the upper level has a threshing floor
with storage areas to the side. A
system of pulleys and ropes with hayfork was used to move the hay. The cows were fed and milked on the ground
level of the barn. The barn
has a U-shaped floor plan and a monitor roof.
(Later additions resulted in the U-shaped plan.) The shutters in the window openings of the
monitor roof are opened or closed as required for ventilation. There are a pair of large double doors on
the north elevation which are wide enough to accommodate a team of horses or
a tractor. There is an earth ramp for
each pair of double doors. A smaller
door is centred between the double doors.
There are several window and door openings on the south, east and west
facades of the barn, irregularly arranged.
The barn is clad in vertical wood siding, with white trim. The metal roof is grey. The windows on the knee wall are diamond-shaped
and have white trim. There are various types of windows at the ground
level. The foundation is stone
masonry and has been repaired in a few areas with poured concrete. Outbuildings There are three smaller farm buildings to
the north of the main barn. There are
two gambrel roofed, wood frame structures, clad in wood with metal roofs,
built around 1930. The third building
is a contemporary metal storage shed. |
|
Craftsmanship/Artistic merit |
|
The front
door of the house, with its round-headed windows, original sidelights and
elliptical transom of blue and purple glass, is also finely crafted. The door has ornate exterior metal grills
that are the same dimensions as the round-headed windows. Other examples of
fine craftsmanship in the house include the newel post and balustrade of the
main staircase and the white brick decoration on the exterior of the house. The farmhouse and
barn are refined examples of their type.
The barn is of timber frame
construction. Timber frame
construction uses no metal fasteners to hold the supporting structure of the
barn together. A timber frame building
is built of solid wood timbers connected by mortise and tenon joinery secured
with hardwood pegs. |
|
Technical/Scientific
merit |
|
The
barn is an unusually large example of timber frame construction. There is considerable technical expertise
required to raise timbers of this size.
The joinery secured with wooden pegs displays a high level of
craftsmanship, given the precision that is required to secure the weight of
timbers that span such large distances. The
use of a hay fork attached to a track along the ridge beam of the roof was a
labour saving device that represented an innovation in farm technology. The track replaced earlier pulley systems
that were capable of moving loads vertically, but not horizontally through
the barn. |
|
Summary |
|
The Bradley Craig Farmstead illustrates the development of farming methods and the parallel
evolution of farm buildings, from simple log structures, to large, timber
frame barns and substantial farmhouses.
It is an example of the work of a prominent carpenter, John Cummings,
who built a number of significant buildings in the Goulbourn area. The farmhouse and barn are refined examples of their
type. |
|
Sources |
|
Ennals, Peter M. Nineteenth-century barns in southern
Ontario. Canadian Geographer,
XVI, 3, 1972. Canadian Wood Council. Post and Beam. www.cwc.ca/applications/post_and_beam Biographical files held by the Goulbourn
Museum History Centre on John Cummings (F-1043). McIlwraith, Thomas F. Looking for Old Ontario – Two Centuries
of Landscape Change. University of Toronto Press. Toronto, 1997. |
Historical and Associative Value |
prepared
by Carol Ruddy |
August 2007 |
|
Date
of construction |
Farmhouse
1870s Barn
1873 |
Themes/Events/Persons/Institutions |
|
The property
at 590 Hazeldean Road was settled by Joshua Bradley (1800-1881). Bradley was born in County Wexford, Ireland
and arrived in Upper Canada in 1821.
He received a Crown land grant in Goulbourn Township in 1824 for
Concession XI, Lot 29, the current location of the Craig farmhouse and
barn. The land was prime agricultural
land. The earliest buildings were a
log farmhouse and several log barns.
In the 1870s the log farmhouse was replaced by the existing Gothic
Revival brick house. In 1873, John
Cummings, a local carpenter, built the existing large, well-ventilated barn
for the Bradley family. Cummings built
four similar barns in the Goulbourn area, none of which remain standing. The farm remained in the ownership of the
Bradley family since the date of the Crown grant in 1824 until it was sold in
January 2007. |
|
Community
History |
|
Settlement of
Goulbourn Township. Goulbourn Township
was settled beginning in 1818 by veterans of the War of 1812. Soon after, Irish, Scottish and English
immigrants arrived, escaping the troubled economic conditions resulting from
the Napoleonic Wars. During the Irish
Potato Famine, 1845-1850, many settlers arrived in Goulbourn from
Ireland. |
|
Designer/Architect |
|
The builder
of the farmhouse is not known. The barn
was built by John Cummings (1832-1887) in 1873, with the help of apprentices
and neighbouring farmers. Cummings was
born in Ireland and came to Goulbourn sometime during the 1850s. He apprenticed to a carpenter named John
Shore in Ashton. Cummings lived in
Stittsville with his family and traveled throughout the area building barns
and houses, in addition to doing other carpentry work. The Craig barn is the only known remaining
example of a Cummings barn. Cummings
built the Butler House, The Richardson House, St. Paul’s Anglican Church
(burned in 1935), all located in Goulbourn.
|
|
Summary |
|
The Craig farmhouse and barn
illustrate the settlement of former Goulbourn Township, from the arrival of
settlers to the development of the land into prosperous farms. |
|
Sources |
|
Interviews with Norma and Eldon Craig,
2003. Graupner, John Graham. The
Gallant Grahams of Canada. Harlo Printing Company. Detroit, Michigan.
1990. pages 190 – 197 and 661 – 663.
Biographical files held by the Goulbourn Museum History Centre on John
Cummings (F-1043) and Joshua Bradley (F-1042). Stanzel, Jim. Land Patent Holders Goulbourn Township
and Village of Richmond. Ottawa
Branch – Ontario Genealogical Society. Publication Number: 01-03, ISBN:
0-7779-1516-2. |
Contextual Value |
prepared
by Carol Ruddy |
|||
August
2004 |
||||
northeast
elevation 2003 Carol Ruddy
interior of barn 2003
Carol Ruddy |
||||
Community
Character |
||||
The farmhouse and barn represent the last vestiges of rural heritage
character on Hazeldean Road in the context of adjacent suburban subdivisions
and commercial developments. |
||||
Context/Links
to Surroundings |
||||
The agricultural complex consisting of the
timber frame barn, Gothic Revival farmhouse, outbuildings and surrounding
fields is a cultural heritage landscape that is typical of the late 19th
century dairy farm and is a character-defining element on Hazeldean Road. |
||||
Landmark |
||||
The farmhouse and barn are set close to the road with open fields to
the rear. The distinctive roofline of
the large barn and the architectural character of the house combine to make
this farm complex a landmark on Hazeldean Road. The house and barn are the last remaining
examples of their type between Stittsville and Kanata. |
||||
Summary |
||||
The Craig farmhouse and barn are prominent,
character-defining heritage elements on Hazeldean Road in the context of
adjacent new residential and commercial development. |
2. Designation of THE bradley/craig farmstead, 590 hazeldean road under
part iv of the ontario heritage act
DÉSIGNATION DE LA FERME BRADLEY/CRAIG, SITUÉE AU 590, CHEMIN
HAZELDEAN, AUX TERMES DE LA PARTIE IV DE LA LOI
SUR LE PATRIMOINE DE L'ONTARIO
ACS2010-ICS-PGM-0021 Rideau Goulburn (21)
Sally Coutts, Heritage Planner, spoke to the
report, outlining in particular details pertaining to the application process
for heritage designation. Ms. Coutts
provided a PowerPoint presentation outlining the heritage attributes of the two
buildings, the farmhouse and barn at 590 Hazeldean Road, as well as the parcel
of land that staff are recommending for designation. Ms. Coutts elaborated on the craftsmanship
and strong cultural heritage value of the gothic revival style farmhouse, as
well as the sophisticated construction of the dairy barn, with a monitor roof
and diamond-shaped windows. Ms. Coutts
reminded members that the outbuildings, as well as the more recent addition to
the barn are not part of the proposed designation.
Miguel Tremblay, FoTenn Consultants Inc., spoke to in opposition to the
designation. Mr. Tremblay stated that
the City of Ottawa’s Official Plan policy regarding intensification may be in
conflict with the City staff’s recommendation to designate this property. Mr. Tremblay warned members that zoning
allows for significant mixed use development directly adjoining the proposed
parcel, and that Hazeldean Road would be converted to an arterial road. Mr. Tremblay suggested that under such
circumstances, the context on which the designation is based would be lost.
Alan Cohen, Soloway Wright, spoke in opposition to the
designation. Mr. Cohen stated that the
Craig barn may be inappropriate for designation because it is no longer used as
a dairy barn, and would therefore most likely remain unused amidst new
development. Mr. Cohen stated that if
OBHAC recommended against designation of the building, it would be more easily
moved to an area where an adaptive reuse might be more feasible. This, Mr. Cohen felt, would ensure its
conservation, rather than simply its preservation.
David Jeanes, Heritage Ottawa, spoke to the comments submitted by Ken
Elder, Heritage Ottawa. Mr. Jeanes noted
the front door of the farmhouse and the diamond shape of the windows in the
Craig barn as significant attributes to the buildings.
The following correspondence was received and
is held on file in the City Clerk’s office pursuant to the City of Ottawa’s
Records Retention and Disposition Bylaw:
·
Email
dated 18 January 2010 from Ken L. Elder, Advocacy Director, Heritage Ottawa, in
support of the designation.
Members noted that the parcel
recommended for designation is a small portion of the overall lot owned by the
developer, and that this property was listed on the former City of Kanata
heritage reference list. Members
applauded the City of Ottawa for seeking designation of a complex including a
barn, which have heritage significance.
Members felt that the developer would have opportunity to find an
adaptive reuse for the Craig barn, and felt that the attributes described by
staff exceeded the requirements to warrant designation. Finally, members determined that the
development proposed for the adjacent site should not impede heritage
designations, and felt that this designation was not in conflict with the mixed
use development zoning.
Members suggested to staff to
amend Document 4 to include the two doors of the Craig barn.
Moved by È. Wertheimer,
That the Ottawa Built Heritage Advisory
Committee recommend that Planning and Environment Committee recommend that
Council approve the designation of the Bradley/Craig Farmstead, 590 Hazeldean
Road, under Part IV of the Ontario
Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Cultural Heritage Value,
attached as Document 4, as amended.
CARRIED