Report to / Rapport au:
Planning and Environment Committee
Comité de l'urbanisme et de
l'environnement
and Council / et au Conseil
Submitted by / Soumis par: Nancy Schepers and Marian Simulik,
Infrastructure Services and
Community Sustainability
City-Wide / À l’échelle de la Ville |
|
Ref N°:
ACS2010-ICS-ESD-0004 |
SUBJECT: 2010 WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE-SUPPORTED
RECOMMENDED OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGETS
OBJET: ProjetS de budget de
fonctionnement et d’immobilisations 2010 SOUTENUS par les tarifs d’eau et
d’eaux usées RECOMMANDÉS
That the 2010 Rate
Operating and Capital Budget Estimates:
1. Be tabled at
Planning and Environment Committee on February 9, 2010;
2. Be
considered by the Planning and Environment Committee February 23, 2010; and
3. Be
forwarded to Council thereafter for final approval.
Que les budgets de fonctionnement et d’immobilisations préliminaires de
2010 soutenus par les tarifs :
1. Soient reçus et déposés à la réunion du
Comité de l’urbanisme et de l’environnement
devant avoir lieu le 9 février 2010;
2. Soient étudiés par le Comité de l’urbanisme
et de l’environnement au cours d’une
réunion devant avoir lieu le 23 février 2010;
3.
Soient soumis par la suite au Conseil pour approbation finale.
The total recommended
rate drinking water and wastewater net operating budget for 2010 is $244.7
million, which provides the necessary resources to support a total gross
capital budget of $189.4 million. The budget provides for implementation of
several Council approved strategic projects and service upgrades.
These increased capital investments will provide higher service levels to residents, increase flood protection measures, and better protect the health of the Ottawa River. These include:
· $4 million to reduce flood risks in the City’s west end;
· Almost $24 million to improve the health of the Ottawa River;
· An additional $5 million to improve the efficiency of water billing;
· $127.2 million for maintaining and expanding infrastructure renewal; and,
· $10.1 million to meet legislative requirements.
A major component of the 2010 Rate Budget is the implementation of capital projects that will target issues surrounding West End Flooding. The first phase of these proposed projects focuses on delivering performance improvements to existing drainage systems in 2010.
The 2010 budget continues to
support the City’s Ottawa
River Action Plan (ORAP), which is the subject of a separate report
(ACS2010-ICS-ESD-0007). The report describes a series
of short-term projects to be undertaken in the
2009-2013 period, with a value of $251.64 million. The bulk of this spending is
on the City’s Combined Sewer Overflow Strategy, which is designed to further
improve the water quality in the Ottawa River. ORAP
identifies 17 projects that contribute to the environmental sustainability of
the Ottawa River watershed. It also outlines further planning and initiatives
directed towards the development of a long-term Water Environment Strategy. A major component of the 2009 budget
was the creation of the Ottawa River Fund.
That $139 million dollar Fund enabled
the acceleration of the City’s improvement of the water quality in the Ottawa
River in partnership with the provincial and federal governments. The total
ORAP funding of $251.64 million is comprised of the $139-million Ottawa River Fund approved in 2009,
$34.38 million in Other Works in Progress, and a further $78.26 million in
costs not previously budgeted.
The costs for wastewater
services are recovered primarily from the water rate and corresponding sewer
surcharge paid only by those Ottawa residents receiving the service. In order
to provide these services in a financially sustainable manner, Council in 2009,
approved a high-level forecasted net 9% rate increase for 2010 as part of its multi-year
budget forecasts. With the adjustment of the transfer charges agreed to as part
of the 2010 tax-based budget, this increase becomes 10%. In anticipation of the
major capital spending involved in both the Ottawa River Action Plan and West
End Flooding prevention, both of which will draw primarily from the Wastewater
Fund and Reserve, the overall 10% rate increase will be achieved with a 2%
increase to Water Rates and an 18% increase in the Wastewater rate. Other
less significant sources of revenue, such as cost recovery services on hauled
liquid waste charges, will increase as per CPI or previously approved
increases. For an
average household receiving both water and wastewater services, this rate
increase represents a cost increase of approximately $1 per week.
The 2010 drinking water services gross operating resource requirements are comprised of $51.2 million in direct net operating expenditures and $70.0 million in non-departmental services of which $49.1 million is a contribution directed to a dedicated Water Capital Reserve Fund. In 2010, the total resource net operating requirement to provide drinking water services will be $121.2 million.
Similarly, in wastewater services, the 2010 gross operating resource requirement is comprised of $44.0 million in direct net operating costs and $79.5 million in non-departmental services. Of the latter, $42.2 million is a contribution directed to a dedicated Wastewater Capital Reserve Fund. In 2010, the total draft resource net operating requirement to provide wastewater and drainage services is proposed at $123.5 million.
With respect to addressing long-term funding needs, there is a requirement under the Safe Drinking Water Act for the Ottawa Drinking Water Operating Authority to prepare and submit formal Financial Plans covering the long-term financial requirements for Ottawa’s drinking water system by July 1, 2010. This is the final element of the Municipal Drinking Water Licensing scheme required by the Province. While drinking water is the subject of the new regulations, due to the synergism between water, wastewater and stormwater, staff has included all elements in its conduct of the Cost, Revenue and Rate Study. The results of the study will become the subject of two reports: a report related to the water and wastewater rate structure scheduled for consideration by the Planning and Environment Committee and the Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee in March; and a subsequent report, providing for the long-term financial requirements for consideration by Council in the late spring. Together, this one-year budget, and the long-term funding provisions, will place these services on a fiscally sustainable course.
The Ontario Municipal Benchmarking Initiative (OMBI)
exists to allow municipalities to improve service through comparison with other
municipal service providers. The most recent results from the OMBI Annual
Report confirm that the City of Ottawa compares very favourably with similar
sized and aged municipalities in terms of the cost to treat and distribute
drinking water as well as the cost of wastewater collection, treatment and
disposal of biosolids. The OMBI benchmarks indicate that Ottawa is
demonstrating service excellence through the continued provision of a water and
wastewater services in a cost effective manner.
In March 2009, Council approved the Planning and Environment Committee Strategic Priorities for 2009-2010 outlined in report ACS2009-ICS-DCM-0001. These key initiatives, which align with the strategic priorities of the Environmental Services Department, include “rebuilding the brand,” “rebuilding public trust” and “source water protection/supply.” As part of the service excellence imperative, the Draft 2010 Operating and Capital Budgets, continue to reflect those priorities.
Le budget préliminaire de fonctionnement net
soutenu par les redevances d'eau et d'eaux usées de 2010 s’élève à 244,7 M$, ce
qui donne les ressources nécessaires pour appuyer un budget d’immobilisations
brut total de 189,4 M$. Ce budget prévoit la mise en œuvre de plusieurs projets
stratégiques et des améliorations aux services approuvés par le Conseil
municipal.
Ces dépenses accrues en immobilisations
permettront de fournir de meilleurs niveaux de service aux résidents,
d’améliorer les mesures de protection contre les inondations et de mieux
protéger la santé de la rivière des Outaouais. Ces dépenses comprennent :
·
4 millions
de dollars pour réduire les risques d’inondation dans la partie ouest de la
ville;
·
presque
24 millions de dollars pour améliorer la santé de la rivière des
Outaouais;
·
un
supplément de 5 M$ afin d’assurer un relevé des compteurs d’eau plus exact;
·
127.2
millions de dollars pour le maintien et l’expansion du renouvellement des
infrastructures;
·
10.1
millions de dollars pour répondre aux exigences législatives.
Un des grands volets du budget de 2010 soutenu
par les tarifs concerne la mise en œuvre de projets d’immobilisations ciblant
les problèmes d’inondations dans la partie ouest de la ville. La première étape
de ces projets consiste à améliorer le rendement des systèmes de drainage
existants en 2010.
Le
budget de 2010 continue d’appuyer le Plan d’action de la rivière des Outaouais,
qui fait l’objet d’un autre rapport (ACS2010-ISC-ESD-0007).
Ce rapport décrit une série de projets à court terme, d’une valeur de
251,64 millions de dollars, qui doivent être réalisés entre 2009 et 2013.
La plus grande partie de ces fonds sera attribuée à la Stratégie de contrôle
des débordements d’égout unitaire, visant l’amélioration continue de la qualité
de l’eau de la rivière des Outaouais. Le Plan d’action souligne 17 projets
qui contribuent à la durabilité écologique du bassin hydrographique de la
rivière des Outaouais. On y présente aussi un aperçu d’autres plans et
initiatives portant sur l’élaboration d’une Stratégie sur le milieu aquatique à
long terme. Un élément important du budget de 2009 était la création du fonds
pour la rivière des Outaouais. Ce fonds de 139 millions de dollars a
permis à la Ville d’accélérer l’amélioration de la qualité de l’eau de la
rivière des Outaouais, en partenariat avec les gouvernements provincial et
fédéral. Le financement
de 251,64 millions de dollars du Plan d’action de la rivière des
Outaouais comprend les 139 millions du fonds pour la rivière des Outaouais
approuvés en 2009, 34,38 millions pour d’autres travaux en cours et
78,26 millions en dépenses qui n’ont pas encore été inscrites au budget.
Le coût
des services de traitement des eaux usées est principalement recouvré par la
redevance d’eau et la surtaxe d’égouts correspondante, payées seulement par les
résidents d’Ottawa qui bénéficient de ces services. Afin d’offrir ces services
d’une façon viable financièrement, le Conseil a approuvé, dans le cadre de ses
prévisions budgétaires pluriannelles, une augmentation nette prévue des
redevances de 9 % en 2010. En tenant compte de l’ajustement des frais de
transfert approuvé pour le budget de 2010 soutenu par les recettes fiscales,
cette augmentation s’élève à 10 %. En prévision des
grosses dépenses en immobilisations qui s’annoncent relativement au Plan
d’action de la rivière des Outaouais et à la prévention des inondations dans
l’ouest de la ville, dont les fonds proviendront en grande partie du Fonds de
réserve pour les eaux usées, l’augmentation générale de 10 p. 100 des
tarifs sera réalisée en augmentant de 2 p. 100 la taxe d’eau et de 18
p. 100 la taxe d’eaux usées. D’autres sources de revenu moins importantes, comme les frais de
services contre remboursement des déchets liquides transportés, augmenteront au
même rythme que l’IPC ou selon les augmentations préalablement déterminées. Pour un
ménage de taille moyenne qui reçoit les services d’eau et d’eaux usées, cette
modification des tarifs représente une augmentation des coûts d’environ
1 $ par semaine.
Les exigences pour 2010 comprennent 51,2 M$ en
dépenses nettes de fonctionnement directes et 70,0 M$ en postes non rattachés
aux services dont 49,1 M$ constituent une contribution à un Fonds de réserve
pour immobilisations de l’eau.
En 2010, le besoin net total en ressources de fonctionnement pour
fournir les services d’eau potable sera de 121.2 millions de dollars.
La situation est la même pour le service de
traitement des eaux usées : le montant brut des besoins en ressources de
fonctionnement comprend 44,0 millions de dollars en coûts nets directs
d’exploitation et 79,5 millions de dollars en services non‑liés aux
Services. De ce dernier montant, 42.2 millions de dollars sont versés
au Fonds de réserve pour immobilisations de l’eau. En 2010, le besoin net total
provisoire en ressources de fonctionnement pour les services de traitement des
eaux usées et de drainage s’élèverait à 123.5 millions de dollars, ce qui
représente une augmentation de 9 % par rapport à 2009, essentiellement pour les
dépenses en immobilisations susmentionnées.
En ce qui concerne les besoins de financement à long
terme, une disposition de la Loi de 2002
sur la salubrité de l’eau potable oblige l’organisme responsable de
l’exploitation du réseau de distribution de l’eau potable d’Ottawa à préparer
et à présenter avant le 1er juillet 2010 des plans
financiers prévoyant les besoins financiers à long terme du réseau de
distribution de l’eau potable d’Ottawa. Ces plans reflètent la dernière
exigence du Programme de délivrance des permis de réseaux municipaux d’eau
potable de la Province. Bien que l’eau potable fasse l’objet de nouveaux
règlements, à cause de la synergie entre l’eau potable, les eaux usées et l’eau
pluviale, le personnel a considéré tous ces éléments dans son étude du coût, des
recettes et des redevances. Les conclusions de cette étude feront l’objet de
deux rapports. Le premier, qui portera sur le barème de redevances, doit
être présenté au mois de mars pour étude par le Comité de l’urbanisme et de
l’environnement et le Comité de l’agriculture et des affaires rurales. Le
deuxième, qui portera sur les besoins financiers à long terme, doit être
présenté vers la fin du printemps pour étude par le Conseil. Ce budget d’un an
et ces données sur le financement à long terme placeront ces services sur une
voie durable financièrement.
L’Initiative d’analyse comparative des services
municipaux de l’Ontario (IACSM) a été mise en œuvre pour permettre aux
municipalités d’améliorer leur service en les comparant à ceux d’autres fournisseurs
de services municipaux. Les conclusions du dernier rapport annuel de l’IACSM
confirment que la Ville d’Ottawa se compare très avantageusement avec d’autres
municipalités de taille et d’âge comparables au chapitre du coût du traitement
et de la distribution de l’eau potable et du coût de la collecte et du
traitement des eaux usées et de l’élimination des biosolides. Ces résultats
indiquent qu’Ottawa fait preuve d’excellence dans le domaine des services en
fournissant des services rentables d’alimentation en eau potable et de
traitement des eaux usées.
En mars 2009, le Conseil municipal a approuvé
les priorités stratégiques du Comité de l’urbanisme et de l’environnement pour
l’année 2009‑2010, présentées dans le rapport ACS2009-ICS-DCM-0001. Parmi
ces grandes initiatives, conformes aux priorités stratégiques des Services
environnementaux, on trouve « reconstruire notre image »,
« regagner la confiance du public » et « protéger les sources d’eau
et l’approvisionnement en eau ». Conformément à l’exigence d’excellence du
service, les budgets préliminaires de fonctionnement et d’immobilisations
continuent à témoigner de ces priorités.
BACKGROUND
The Environmental Services Department is comprised of five branches: Drinking Water Operations, Wastewater and Drainage Operations, Solid Waste Operations, Customer Services and Strategic and Environmental Services. Solid Waste Operations presented a separate tax-based budget to Committee in the fall of 2009 and was subsequently approved by Council on January 28, 2010. The Drinking Water and Wastewater and Drainage Operations Branches provide direct services, while the Customer Services and Strategic and Environmental Services Branches provide those services that are common across the Department.
Note: *Includes $ .258 M
for General Manager’s Office, 2 FTE for GMO, 3FTE Quality Management Branch and 3 FTE in the Business
Services Branch
**Not included in this budget
All references to Net Operating Expenditure
The Department is proceeding on a number of initiatives intended to
determine and confirm that the appropriate combination of services and
authorities exist. These include:
(1)
A
strategic alignment review with an external consultant to assess the
Department’s ability to meet its fundamental service delivery criteria.
(2)
A
departmental commitment to work with all service providers to ensure a
compatible, complementary and effective combination of services.
(3)
The
development of a Departmental Service Excellence Plan that includes those corporate
initiatives related to service excellence, accessibility, French language
services planning, and equity and inclusion.
Strategic
Alignment / Operational Overview
The Auditor General recommended that the City review the organizational structure of Wastewater and Drainage Operations Branch to ensure that adequate communication and operational oversight is maintained. A full departmental review (Strategic Alignment Initiative) was initiated with SP3 Consulting Ltd. The consultant completed all of the on-site interview work in April and reporting was completed in September 2009. This report outlines current and recommended changes in roles and responsibilities of all branches and divisions, an organizational model, strategic alignment goals and principles as well as a transition strategy.
The Department continues to work on the second phase of this realignment initiative. This work will transition the Department towards a customer-centric environmental leadership role that engages staff directly in the process. Transition will take place over a number of months commencing this year and will include developing a service excellence culture through greater employee engagement and operational effectiveness.
While it is recognized that the Department is often the City’s ‘public face’ with respect to the delivery of many of these services, it is also acknowledged that the delivery of these services is largely dependent upon the combined knowledge and expertise of a number of other supporting departments and branches. Among the primary contributors are:
· Infrastructure Services – through Asset Management and Construction Services;
· Planning and Growth Management – through Development Approvals, Infrastructure Approvals, Policy Development and Urban Design;
· Community Sustainability through sustainability planning and risk management;
· Financial Services – through Revenue, Corporate Finance and Supply; and,
· City Operations – through Human Resources, Corporate Communications and Customer Service and Information Technology.
The contributions of the Environmental Services Department to the City of Ottawa and its residents rest within the fields of public health protection, environmental protection and economic development. The major service contributions in these fields are:
Public health
protection:
· Delivers safe, reliable and high quality drinking water to the community;
· Collects and transports sanitary and storm wastes from homes, businesses and properties across the City; and,
· Provides an adequate and reliable supply of drinking water and associated infrastructure for fire protection and suppression purposes.
Environmental
protection:
· Treats and discharges combined and separated sanitary and hauled liquid wastes at the R. O. Pickard Environmental Centre;
· Treats and oversees the beneficial reuse of biosolids;
· Treats and discharges collected stormwater at stormwater treatment facilities across the City; and,
· Monitors the general water quality in rivers and streams in Ottawa.
Economic
development:
· Provides adequate water, wastewater and storm services in order to meet the current and future requirements of the community;
· Provides a Municipal Drain program in support of Agri-business; and,
· Manages a stable and consistent rate structure.
These services are provided in a reliable, cost-effective and customer-focused manner.
DISCUSSION
Drinking
Water Operations
The City of Ottawa’s Drinking Water Operations Branch ranks among the top producers and distributors of safe, high quality drinking water in the world and over the past four years the City’s drinking water has been rated exceptional by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment’s Chief Drinking Water Inspector, having achieved perfect water quality scores at four of the City’s six municipal drinking water systems.
The Branch treats and distributes 292 million litres of high quality drinking water per day to approximately 810,000 customers through the operation and maintenance of two water purification plants, 14 pumping stations, 9 reservoirs and over 2,822 kilometres of watermains, 39,989 valves, 18,275 hydrants and 203,415 water meters. Over 300,000 water quality analyses are conducted every year through a combination of laboratory services, the bulk of which are performed at the R.O. Pickard Environmental Centre Laboratory.
The major strategic directions for the Department in regard to the provision of Drinking Water Operations in 2010 are to:
· Complete a Cost, Revenue and Rate Study and submit a Financial Plan by July 1, 2010 in accordance with the City’s Municipal Drinking Water Licence;
·
Participate in an external
third party accreditation of the City’s Drinking Water Services Operational
Plan as a regulatory requirement under the Province’s new Municipal Drinking
Water Services licensing scheme, and achieve full accreditation as an Operating
Authority in accordance with the City’s Municipal Drinking Water Licence;
·
Participate in a
Department-wide strategic alignment/organizational development initiative;
· Continue to contribute to the Rideau River/Mississippi River and South Nation/Raison Region Source Protection Authorities’ development of Source Water Protection planning initiative;
· Maintain participation in the development of a comprehensive asset management strategy;
· Renew and upgrade the existing Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system serving both water plants, the communal well systems, the pump stations and storage facilities;
· Update the Water Development Master Plan for the water purification plants;
· Initiate a long-term replacement strategy for the backbone transmission watermain (large diameter);
· Commence a multi-year review of disinfection processes through a microbial risk assessment;
·
Develop initiatives to increase
the public trust and confidence in the services provided by the Department
through a more aggressive public information and education program;
· Begin the implementation of an Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) system to reduce the cost of meter reading, improve customer service by eliminating water and wastewater bills based upon estimates, and monitor customer consumption patterns in order to improve system management;
· Continue to demonstrate the City’s commitment to water conservation through implementation of the three-year Water Efficiency Plan; and,
· Develop and implement a Council-approved Cross Connection Control program and Private Fire Hydrant Maintenance program in response to Council’s direction and the Auditor General’s recommendations.
Operating Budget Pressures – Drinking
Water
The total 2010 net operating requirement associated with the delivery of drinking water services (inclusive of the customer services and strategic and environmental services net expenditures) is
$121.2 million.
The associated operating pressures are captured in the following Table:
Table
1: 2010 Budget Pressures – Drinking
Water
|
2009 Adjustments To Base Budget $000 |
Maintain Existing $000 |
Provincial Legislated $000 |
Growth $000 |
New Operating Needs $000 |
User Fees & Charges |
|||
|
|
||||||||
OPERATING BUDGET PRESSURES |
|||||||||
General Manager’s /Manager’s Offices
|
5 |
37 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|||
Production
|
(234) |
1,428 |
96 |
- |
39 |
- |
|||
Distribution |
115 |
757 |
109 |
- |
- |
(8) |
|||
Water Quality Assurance |
30 |
144 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|||
Customer Services/ Strategic & Environmental Services |
80 |
704 |
- |
46 |
180 |
- |
|||
Productivity Improvements |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|||
OPERATING SUB-TOTAL (a) |
(4) |
3,070 |
205 |
46 |
219 |
(8) |
|||
SUB-TOTAL |
3,527 |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
NON-DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET
PRESSURES |
|||||||||
Water Billing Revenues |
7,700 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(304) |
|||
Capital Formation |
(7,700) |
(3,536) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|||
Cost Transfers |
- |
312 |
- |
- |
- |
(304) |
|||
NON-DEPARTMENTAL SUB-TOTAL
(b) |
- |
(3,224) |
- |
- |
- |
|
|||
SUB-TOTAL |
(3,528) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
TOTAL by CATEGORY (a + b) |
(4) |
(154) |
205 |
46 |
219 |
(312) |
|||
OVERALL WATER FUND BUDGET
PRESSURES TOTAL |
0 |
||||||||
A more detailed explanation of these budget
pressures is explained below. Details related to additional staffing
requirements are included in Document 3 of this report.
Adjustments to Base Budget:
($4,000)
·
Adjustment
for Collective Agreement provisions.
·
Reduction
to reflect lower than projected Water Treatment Waste Residuals.
Maintain Existing Services: ($154,000)
Provincial/Legislated:
$205,000
· Provide personal protective equipment materials and supplies.
· Provide continual improvement support to Drinking Water Quality Management System through the addition of 2 additional FTEs.
Growth: $46,000
·
Compensation for 1 additional
FTE in support of Maintenance Management.
New Operating Needs Services Requirements: $219,000
· Provide additional support to implementation of Advanced Metering Infrastructure (2 term positions) and expanded Public Outreach and Promotion Program (1 Officer and 6 Summer Students) in support of Council Strategic Direction through 5.98 additional FTEs.
User Fees and Charges:
(312,000)
· An increase in the Water Rate of 2%, as proposed, generates this additional revenue.
2009 Drinking Water Operating Budget
Year-end Variances
In 2009, the Drinking Water Operations approved net budget was under spent by a total of $1.620 million. This under-expenditure, by service area, was principally in the following categories:
Drinking
Water Services: $465,000
· Lower than anticipated waste discharges to sewage collection system.
· Higher than anticipated repairs and maintenance.
Customer Services/Strategic and Environmental Services: $1.2 million
· Increased recoveries.
· Lower than anticipated use of materials and supplies.
· Compensation surplus due to vacancies.
· Internal charges from other departments.
In 2009, the Drinking Water Non-Department Cost and Revenues were under spent by a total of $5.6 million. This deficit was principally in the following categories:
Non-Department Costs and Revenues: $5.6 million
· Lower than anticipated Water Billing Revenues.
· Surplus in reduced debt servicing costs.
2009 Productivity/Efficiency Savings
The 2009 target in Productivity/Efficiency for the Drinking Water Fund is $2.342 million. The Branch has met the target in efficiency savings.
In those areas that these assumptions are expected to affect future year budgeting, reductions have been made in the baseline budget and listed in Table #1 as 2009 Adjustments To Base Budget.
As per Council policy, year-end surpluses or deficits in the water rate-supported service areas are settled to the Capital Reserve Fund. However, due to the significant shortfall in water revenues, the 2009 year end deficit will be funded by a combination of reduced Works in Progress funding of existing capital projects and the refinancing of others. A separate report regarding the disposition of the 2009 rate supported deficits will come forward to the Planning and Environment Committee at a later date.
2010
Capital Budget
The infrastructure required to provide a highly reliable level of service and a high quality product delivered to each home and business is extensive. For the City of Ottawa, the asset replacement value for all drinking water facilities and infrastructure is currently estimated to be approximately $6.8 billion.
A key component of being able to continue to provide this service in a
reliable manner is to continually re-invest in this critical infrastructure.
The Capital Budget is the City’s means of accomplishing that task. The
following table represents the breakdown of water facility and infrastructure
valuations and the value of this year’s capital works programs by category. The
total 2010 gross Capital Budget associated with drinking water (inclusive of
customer services and strategic and environmental services requirements) is
$94.7 million.
Table
2 – Asset Values and 2010 Capital Program
|
Estimated Asset Replacement Value (2009$) ($1,000s) |
Renewal Projects ($1,000s) |
Regulatory ($1,000s) |
Growth ($1,000s) |
Strategic Initiative ($1,000s) |
Total ($1,000s) |
Water Systems -General |
N/A |
2,048 |
1,330 |
2,165 |
882 |
6,425 |
Water Treatment Facilities |
$ 530,000 |
7,270 |
- |
1,000 |
- |
8,270 |
Water Pumping Stations |
$90,000 |
2,480 |
- |
3,300 |
- |
5,780 |
Water Distribution |
$6,100,000 |
24,255 + 22,207* |
- |
27,344 |
- |
51,599 + 22,207* |
Water Reservoirs |
$70,000 |
88 |
- |
- |
- |
88 |
Communal Well Systems |
$20,000 |
339 |
- |
- |
- |
339 |
Sub-Total by Category |
$6,810,000 |
58,687 |
1,330 |
33,809 |
882 |
94,708 |
* Water Fund contribution towards
City-wide Integrated Renewal program
Wastewater and Drainage Operations
The Branch maintains 2,621 kilometres of sanitary sewers, 145 kilometres
of combined sewers, 2,350 kilometres of storm sewers, 198,532 service
connections and 69,260 catch basins. In addition, it operates and maintains 77
wastewater and stormwater pumping stations and 194 stormwater management
facilities.
The Branch operates and maintains the Robert O. Pickard Environmental
Centre (ROPEC) in the treatment of an average of 455,000 m3/day, and
in 2009, oversaw the beneficial re-use of over 52,000 tonnes of biosolids.
Largely in support of the rural community, the Branch also manages a
Municipal Drain program that includes the maintenance of 1,200 kilometres of
drains.
The major strategic directions for the Department in regard to wastewater, stormwater and drainage services in 2010, which are largely associated with ORAP, include:
· Leading in the development of a comprehensive, integrated hydraulic model of the Ottawa River;
· Preparing and submitting the first Annual Wastewater Compliance report;
· Participating in a Department-wide strategic alignment/organizational development initiative;
· Developing an Environmental Quality Management System (ISO 14001) for Wastewater Operations;
· Completing a Cost, Revenue and Rate Study;
· Continuing to develop a comprehensive asset management strategy;
· Implementing new flow monitoring at critical wastewater collection system manholes and outflow structures;
· Continuing reinvestment in treatment plant, pumping station and stormwater management facilities;
· Continuing to work closely with local Conservation Authorities and other regulatory bodies to improve the delivery of municipal drain maintenance and construction;
· Developing and implementing a new sewer cleaning notification process;
· Updating and improving the Sewer Collection program business processes in order to strengthen the planning, delivery and monitoring of maintenance activities;
· Updating the Collection System operating philosophy from an event-based response to a continuous (24/7) monitoring;
· Developing a comprehensive Operation Manual for the Collection System;
· Creating and leading an Urban Drainage Management Office with all corporate partners;
· Developing research partnerships with universities and research foundations;
·
Building upon initiatives to
increase the public trust and confidence in the services provided by the Branch
through a more aggressive public information and education program; and,
·
Working with the Office of
Emergency Management to implement the emergency response to significant rain
event recommendations.
Operating Budget Pressures –
Wastewater
The total 2010 net Operating Budget requirement associated with the delivery of wastewater services (inclusive of the customer services and strategic and environmental services expenditures) is $123.5 million.
A more detailed explanation of these budget pressures is explained
below. Details related to additional staffing requirements
are included in Document 4 of this report.
Adjustments to Base Budget: $1.6 million
· The reduction in the volume of water billed and subsequent impact on water revenues also has an impact on the sewer surcharge revenues. As a result, the 2009 budget has been adjusted by $7.5 million to reflect this deficit.
· Transfer of the Sewer Lateral program funding to capital of $1.38 million.
· Decrease in hauled liquid waste disposal volumes and revenues as received at ROPEC.
· Decrease in Sewer Surcharge revenues due to decreased water treatment facility waste residuals.
· Adjustment for 2009 budget shortfall in Collective Agreement provision.
Maintain Existing Services:
$7.63 million
· Various inflationary increases - $1.5 million:
· Biosolids disposal;
· Wastewater treatment chemicals, hydro, natural gas etc; and,
· Miscellaneous other services and contracts.
· Increase in Administrative allocation.
· Adjustment to base PAYG contribution.
· Increases to sewer inspection and maintenance, wastewater treatment and branch management programs and services with the addition of 7 FTEs.
Provincial/Legislated: $540,000
· addition to sewer maintenance, wastewater treatment and stormwater management programs and services with the addition of 11 FTEs.
Growth: $330,000 million
· Increased sewer cleaning costs due to system growth.
· Increased stormwater facility monitoring costs due to system growth – 18 new facilities.
· Increased Stormwater Facility monitoring as a result of system growth, 1 additional FTE.
New Services/Needs: $1.495 million
· Increase to the Industrial Waste, Environmental Monitoring, Laboratory Sewer Maintenance, Stormwater Management, Wastewater Treatment and Facility Maintenance programs and services with the addition of 10 FTEs.
User Fees and
Charges: $11.6 million
· Increase in revenues due to increase in Sewer Surcharge to 116% of Water Rate.
2010 Productivity/Efficiency Savings: ($2.7) million –
Not achieved
The original 2009 efficiency target for Wastewater was $3.3 million. Throughout the year, only $637,000 of the efficiencies were identified. However, the remaining efficiencies target of $2.7 million has been carried forward to 2010.
The associated operating
pressures are captured in the following Table:
Table 3:
2010 Budget Pressures – Wastewater
|
2009 Adjustments To Base Budget $000 |
Maintain Existing $000 |
Provincial Legislated $000 |
Growth $000 |
New Services $000 |
User Fees and Charges |
|
||||
OPERATING BUDGET PRESSURES |
|||||||||||
Manager’s Office
|
5 |
6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
||||
Wastewater Treatment
|
213 |
1,447 |
213 |
- |
572 |
- |
|
||||
Wastewater Collection |
58 |
549 |
266 |
95 |
758 |
- |
|
||||
Stormwater Management |
6 |
37 |
61 |
235 |
65 |
- |
|
||||
Drainage |
11 |
13 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
||||
Customer
Services/ Strategic & Environmental Services |
134 |
328 |
- |
- |
100 |
(10) |
|
||||
Productivity
Improvements |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
||||
OPERATING SUB-TOTAL (a) |
427 |
2,380 |
540 |
330 |
1,495 |
(10) |
|
||||
SUB-TOTAL |
5,162 |
|
|||||||||
NON-DEPARTMENTAL
BUDGET PRESSURES |
|||||||||||
Sewer Surcharge
Revenues |
7,500 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(11,607)- |
|
||||
Capital
Formation |
(7,500) |
4,696 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
||||
Cost Transfers |
- |
559 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
||||
NON-DEPARTMENTAL
SUB-TOTAL (b) |
1,200 |
5,245 |
- |
- |
- |
(5,162) |
|
||||
|
SUB-TOTAL |
|
|
||||||||
TOTAL by CATEGORY
(a + b) |
1,627 |
7,625 |
540 |
330 |
1,495 |
(11,617) |
|
||||
OVERALL
WASTEWATER FUND BUDGET PRESSURES TOTAL |
0 |
|
|||||||||
2009 Wastewater Operating
Budget Year-end Variances
The 2009 wastewater services approved net budget was over spent by a total of $999,000. The most significant areas of variance were in the following categories:
Wastewater and Drainage Services: Surplus of approximately $2.0 million
· Lower than anticipated spending on materials and services.
· Lower than anticipated internal charges from other departments
· Vacancies within the Branch.
Customer Services and Environmental Programs: Surplus of $0.3 million
· Lower than anticipated volume of Water Treatment Plant Waste Residuals.
· Lower than anticipated liquid hauled waste revenues.
· Vacancies within the two Branches.
Non-Department Costs and Recoveries: ($10.2) million
· Lower than anticipated Water Billing Revenues.
· Deficit due to increased recoveries by Surface Operations.
· Lower than anticipated investment revenues.
2009 Productivity/Efficiency Savings
The remaining 2009 target in Productivity/Efficiency savings for the Sewer Fund is $2.694M. As per Council policy, year-end surpluses or deficits in the wastewater rate-supported service areas are settled to the Sewer Capital Reserve Fund. However, due to the significant revenue shortfall, the 2009 year end deficit will be funded by a combination of reduced Works in Progress funding of existing capital projects and the refinancing of others. A separate report regarding the disposition of the 2009 rate supported deficits will come forward to the Planning and Environment Committee at a later date.
2010 Capital Budget
Maintaining existing infrastructure is key to continuing to deliver wastewater, stormwater and municipal drain services. Overall, the asset value for all City-owned wastewater facilities and infrastructure is estimated at approximately $10.4 billion. Continued re-investment into this infrastructure ensures that these services can be delivered in an appropriate manner.
For asset
management purposes, the 2010 Capital Budget has been developed into five (5)
different service areas, each representing a separate class of facility or
infrastructure, each with its own renewal and reinvestment strategy. The total 2010 gross Capital Budget associated
with wastewater (inclusive of customer services and strategic and environmental
services requirements) is $94.7 million. The following table represents the
breakdown of wastewater facility and infrastructure valuations and the value of
this year’s capital works programs by category:
Table
4 – Asset Values and 2010 Capital Program
|
Estimated Asset Replacement Value (2009$) ($1,000s) |
Renewal Projects ($1,000s) |
Regulatory ($1,000s) |
Growth ($1,000s) |
Strategic Initiative ($1,000s) |
Total ($1,000s) |
Wastewater General |
N/A |
2,040 |
1,470 |
360 |
825 |
4,695 |
Wastewater Treatment and Pumping Facilities |
$1,175,,000 |
5,025 |
5,500 |
- |
- |
10,525 |
Wastewater and Stormwater Collection |
8,875,000 |
35,527 + 38,152* |
- |
3,438 |
500- |
39,475 + 38,152* |
Stormwater Treatment Facilities |
234,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal
Drains |
N/A |
- |
1,830 |
- |
- |
1,830 |
Sub-total by Category |
$10,284,000 |
$80,754 |
$8,800 |
$3,798 |
1,325 |
$94,677 |
*Wastewater Fund contribution towards
City-wide Integrated Program
Ottawa
River Action Plan and Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Control
The Ottawa River Action Plan (ORAP) is the
subject of a separate Report (ACS2010-ICS-ESD-0007) which describes in detail the
City’s proposed Plan to protect and improve water quality within the Ottawa
River. A major component of the Plan is the consideration of three options, A,
B or C, which will allow the City to achieve regulatory compliance with
combined sewer overflow criteria.
Later this year, staff will initiate the
development of a longer term strategy associated with protection the Ottawa
River, the results of which are the subject of a separate report for
consideration by Committee.
Staff, the community, the Ontario Environmental
Commissioner and the Ottawa Riverkeeper endorse moving to a higher level of CSO
control through Option B. Option B provides for greater storage and the capture
and conveyance towards treatment of combined sewage from within the Ultimate
Combined Sewer Area in an average year, at an estimated cost of $251.64M over
the next 5 years, as well as the implementation of a public education program.
Ottawa
River Fund (ORF)
In 2009, Council approved the creation of the Ottawa River Fund (ORF) with projected spending of $139 million over five years, including $19.75 million in 2009.
The Ottawa River Fund attracted equal $33 million commitments from both federal and provincial governments to support this important initiative. Several ORAP projects are enhancements of previous projects and thus have higher capital costs from what was previously projected; or have accelerated timelines from those anticipated in Long Range Financial Plan (LRFP) III and in the 2009-2018 Capital Budgets.
In 2009, $19.75M in capital projects was identified, through the Ottawa River Fund. Major projects included the west end regulators, the final phase of the City’s Real Time Control program, Critical Manhole Monitoring program and the installation of Inlet Control Devices within the Combined Sewer Area.
Table 5 describes the financial requirements
and overall program costs of $251.64 million over the next five years.
Table 5 - ORAP Financial
Requirements
|
5-year ORAP ($ Million) |
2014 and beyond1 |
|||
2009 |
2010 |
2011-13 |
TOTAL |
||
Total ORAP per Document 2 |
54.13 |
23.86 |
173.65 |
251.64 |
11M/yr |
Less |
|||||
Ottawa River Fund Approved in 2009 |
19.75 |
31.25 |
88.0 |
139.0 |
|
Other Works in Progress (WIPs) |
34.38 |
|
|
34.38 |
|
Costs not previously budgeted |
|
(7.39) |
85.65 |
78.26 |
11M/yr |
1This does not include the cost of the sewer separation program, which sees
significant annual variations in expenditures.
Staff will pursue opportunities for cost sharing with other government bodies.
West end Flooding
On July 24, 2009, the City of Ottawa experienced a significant rainfall
event, resulting in the backup of sanitary and storm sewers. At the August 25, 2009
meeting of Committee, it was recognized that some of the required immediate
solutions to the problems identified as a result of the flooding could be
addressed through existing reserve funds, while others should be included in
the 2010 Rate-supported Capital Budget.
Committee directed staff:
1. To develop the 2010 sewer
capital budget with a specific financial allocation to address basement
flooding in the west end of Ottawa, specifically, but not limited to, Kanata
and Stittsville; and to focus on including specific project based
solutions.
2. Should it not be possible to
identify specific projects, staff was directed to include a generic financial
allocation in the 2010 budget.
3. To implement any measures deemed appropriate and reasonable to prevent
basement flooding in affected areas.
The following table represents a list of
proposed improvement projects to be undertaken in phases. Projects and funding
requirements for 2011 and 2012 will be refined in Phase 4. Depending on the scope of work, funding
requirements could extend beyond 2012.
Table 6
– West End Flooding – Proposed Improvement Projects
Projects (to be
refined as part of Phase 3) |
2010 ($ Million) |
2011 ($ Million) |
2012 ($ Million) |
Installation of Inlet Control Devices, sealing of Maintenance Hole
covers and other flow removal measures |
2.0 |
1.0 |
|
Improvements to major system/overland drainage (design in 2010) |
0.5 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Improvements to Hazeldean Pumping Station* |
0.5 |
2.0 |
|
Modifications to Monahan Drain |
0.2 |
|
|
Sewer capacity and hydraulic improvements** (design initiated in
2010) |
0.8 |
7.5 |
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
4.0 |
11.5 |
4.5 |
* Improvements to be undertaken in 2
phases. First phase focused on
performance improvements that can be carried within the existing station and
the second on those that require more extensive modifications. Does not include funding related to
Front-ending Agreement.
** Specific projects will be defined as part of
Phase 3. These may extend beyond 2012.
Revenues
The City’s water, sanitary and storm
sewer systems are primarily funded through a combination of Development Charges
and Water Rate and corresponding Sewer Surcharge. On occasion, more senior
levels of government direct funds toward municipalities for certain programs.
The Ottawa River Fund is one of those initiatives.
In accordance with the requirements
of the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Department is in the process of
conducting a Cost, Revenue and Rate Study. This Study includes the review of
the City’s long-term funding strategies, including the Water Rate, the Sewer
Surcharge, the structure and current and forecast trends in consumer
consumption. The results of this study will be brought forward in two separate
reports, one addressing rate structure and a second addressing long term
funding requirements.
A preliminary Rate Structure Report has been taken to the community for
public consultation with four separate rate structures. The results of those
consultations are being compiled and final recommendations will become the
subject of a Water and Wastewater Rate Structure Report scheduled for
consideration by the Planning and Environment Committee and the Agriculture and
Rural Affairs Committee in March.
With respect to the long-term financial requirements for the City’s $17
billion investment in drinking water, wastewater and stormwater assets, a second
report will be prepared for consideration by Council in late spring. This
Financial Plan Report will provide a six-year funding strategy, in accordance with the regulatory
requirements, taking into consideration the asset investment requirements of
the next fifty years. Following the receipt of Council’s approval, the drinking
water services aspect of the Financial Plan will be provided to the Ministries
of the Environment and Municipal Affairs and Housing as the final required element
of the Municipal Drinking Water Licensing program. This submission is due prior
to July 1, 2010 in order to comply with the Financial Plan Regulation.
An important part of ensuring
sustainable water service delivery is protecting water sources. The important
Source Protection Planning work being lead by the Rideau River/Mississippi and
South Nation/Raison Region Source Protection Authorities is not likely to be
incorporated into this first Financial Plan. The development of these Plans
will not be completed by July 2010, which is the regulated date of the first
submission of the City’s Financial Plan. However, staff will develop the City’s
Financial Plan with this in mind, and with the intent of being able to
incorporate any eventually identified source protection plan implementation
costs within the Plan, when they become known (likely in 2012).
Revenue Projection for 2010
Similar
to the experience of many Ontario municipalities, due to increased
efficiencies, weather fluctuations and increased environmental awareness, there
has been a steady decline in drinking water consumption over the past six
years. In Ottawa, this 6.3% decline in
billed water demand over the period 2008 - 2009 has resulted in a $16.0M shortfall
in water and wastewater revenues in 2009.
Reduced
water consumption has a direct impact on revenues for both water and
wastewater. Average water production
and average billing has declined steadily over the 2003 to 2009 period. The
average daily water production has dropped by 20% since 2003, and average daily
water consumption has dropped by almost 12%.
It is
understood that the water production rate has declined mainly due to:
·
Reduced
water consumption by customers;
·
Successful
implementation of the Water Loss Control Strategy (reduced leakage); and,
·
On-going
Capital programs that target infrastructure renewal and rehabilitation.
As the
significance in the decline in demand became known, the Department initiated a
trend analysis of the water billing information in order to better understand
the drop in our customers’ water consumption. It was found that all customer
categories saw a reduction in water consumption from 2001 to 2008:
Table 7 – Drinking Water Consumption Reduction 2001- 2008
Customer Category |
% Reduction 2001 to 2008 |
Consumption Reduction (m3) 2001 - 2008 |
Single Family Residential |
7% |
2,800,000 |
Multi Family Residential |
8% |
2,300,000 |
Industrial,
Commercial, Institutional (ICI) |
6% |
1,700,000 |
Total Consumption Reduction
2001-2008 |
6,800,000 |
The trend analysis also revealed that weather patterns
have an effect on outdoor water usage, and that from 2001 to 2008 there have
been higher precipitation and lower mean temperatures during the summer months.
In summary, the trend analysis identified the
following factors that may have contributed to the reduction in water
consumption by our customers:
·
An increasing awareness and adoption of
environmentally-friendly habits that result in lower water consumption (shorter
showers, washing full loads of laundry or dishes, etc.)
·
Installation of more efficient plumbing fixtures and
appliances, such as low flow toilets, front-loading clothes washing machines,
water efficient dishwashers, etc
·
Weather patterns that have discouraged outdoor water
usage (higher rainfall, lower temperatures, fewer consecutive dry day periods),
and,
·
City of Ottawa Water Efficiency Strategy (public
education, retrofit program, toilet rebate program, etc.)
While in the short-term, these water demand reductions
create revenue shortfalls and difficulties in projecting future year
projections, in the longer term those reductions that can be relied upon as
being permanent effectively expand the servicing capacity of the City’s
existing infrastructure. This increase in servicing capacity will in turn aid
with the City’s goal of both increased intensification and reduced capital
spending for further infrastructure expansion.
Based
on a review of past consumption, the 2010 revenue projections have been
developed through the projected billed drinking water amount of 86 million
cubic metres (235 ml/day). This is equal
to the 2009 billed total.
The
implications of this trend in declining water demand is being taken into consideration
by the work of the Cost, Revenue and Rate Study mentioned previously. This
trend is expected to affect the recommendations of both subsequent reports,
namely the Rate Structure report and the long term Financial Plan report.
Operating
Cost Comparison
The Ontario Municipal Benchmarking Initiative (OMBI) exists to allow municipalities to improve service through comparison with other municipal service providers. Annually, the organization publishes a report made available to all participants, of which the City is one.
Described
below are the results taken from the most recent version of OMBI’s Annual
Report.
In the drinking water service area, the OMBI performance measures included:
· Ottawa 2008 Result - $195
· Ontario Median - $228
Discussion: Ottawa compares very favourably with similar sized and aged municipalities.
2. The cost to distribute drinking water per kilometre of distribution pipe:
· Ottawa 2008 Result - $8,477
· Ontario Median - $8,477
Discussion: Ottawa meets the Ontario Median, and compares closely with similar sized and aged municipalities, such as Hamilton and London.
In the wastewater service area, similar OMBI performance measures included:
· Ottawa 2008 Result - $130
· Ontario Median - $278
Discussion:
Ottawa sits well below the Ontario Median, and compares very favourably with
municipalities of similar size and age of infrastructure. This is in large part due to the efficiency
of the R.O. Pickard Environmental Centre.
This Centre has a sophisticated SCADA system, optimized unit processes,
highly skilled and trained staff and a best-in-class energy management system.
· Ottawa 2008 Result - $5,920
· Ontario Median - $5,920
Discussion: Ottawa meets the Ontario Median, and compares fairly closely with similar sized and aged municipalities, such as Halton and London.
Generally, the OMBI benchmarks indicate that services are provided to Ottawa residents in a cost effective manner when compared with similar sized service providers in Ontario.
Rate Increase Comparison
Municipalities across Ontario, Canada and North America are struggling
to continue to provide a high-level of service in the face of increased
customer expectation, enhanced government regulation and oversight and the difficulty
of maintaining an extensive and aging infrastructure. All municipalities have
to increase revenue in order to meet these demands.
Unfortunately, a diverse system of rates, fees and charges across the
province make it difficult to compare actual charges across municipalities.
Therefore, the best alternative is to compare based upon charge or rate
increases.
Listed below is a review of the 2010 water and/or combined sewer rate
increases proposed or accepted in similar sized municipalities across Ontario.
Table
8 - Comparative Water Sewer Rates for 2010
|
Drinking Water |
Wastewater |
Overall |
Ottawa |
2% |
18% |
10% |
Toronto |
9% |
9% |
|
Durham |
8.2% |
6.6% |
|
London |
8% |
9% |
|
York |
10% |
10% |
10% |
Approval of the 2010 Water and Wastewater Rate-supported draft Operating and Capital Budget will provide the funding necessary for the City to make significant capital investments to reduce the impact of City operations on the environment. Contained with the funding provisions of this budget are many operational and capital projects that will contribute towards this objective, the key program that will be funded through this budget in the Ottawa River Action Plan.
The 2010 Water and Wastewater Rate Budget is of significance for all those residents who receive drinking water and wastewater services. As all city residents are charged the same, this report has no separate rural implications. The issue of the sewer charge for the Richmond/Carp areas will be contained in the tax policy report.
The purpose of this report is to seek the approval of Committee and Council of the Rate-supported Draft 2010 Operating and Capital Budget Estimates for Water and Wastewater Services.
Public notifications of this report will occur through normal notification processes. Consultation will occur through tabling of the report and any delegations received at the Planning and Environment Committee meeting on February 23, 2010.
N/A
There are no legal/risk management impediments to implementing any of the recommendations in this report.
N/A
Financial implications are identified within the report.
It is
important to understand how the proposed rate increases affect service delivery
costs of customers. To develop this forecast, staff reviewed the records for
individual residential customers receiving both water and wastewater services.
The City’s billing records indicate that, on average, residential customers use
0.60 m3/day or 220 m3
of drinking water per year. Based on the rates as recommended in this
report, the annual costs to an average residential homeowner will be:
Table
9 – Annual Costs to an Average Residential Homeowner
|
2009 |
2010 |
Volume (m3/yr) |
220 |
220 |
% Increase |
9% |
10% |
Cost |
$556.61 |
$612.27 |
$ Increase |
$45.96 |
$55.66 |
Document 1 – 2010 Draft
Operating and Capital Budgets – Rate Supported Programs
Document 2 – Short-term ORAP Project
Descriptions, Status, Budgets and Timelines
Document 3 – 2010 Additional Staffing
Requirements by Pressure Type – Water Fund
Document 4 – 2010 Additional Staffing
Requirements by Pressure Type – Wastewater Fund
Budgets will be
amended as per Council deliberation and adoption.
DOCUMENT 2 - ORAP Cost Estimates &
Project Schedule/Status
|
||||
ID No. |
Project |
5-year Budget* ($Million) |
|
Schedule/Status |
1 |
Implementation of Real Time Control (RTC) |
$30.0 |
|
Over 90% complete. To be completed 2010. |
2 |
Critical CSO and Storm Outfall Monitoring |
$5.0 |
|
Feasibility assessment has commenced. New monitoring stations to be installed by
2012-13. |
3 |
CSO Storage for Ultimate Combined Sewer Area
(UCSA) |
$140.0 |
|
EA has commenced. To be commissioned 2013-15 depending upon
design solution. |
4 |
Review & Implement Sewer Interconnection
Program |
$4.0 |
|
Commenced.
To be completed 2013. |
5 |
Sewer Separation Outside the UCSA |
$47.0 |
|
On-going initiative that will continue until
program is complete (estm. 20-25 yrs.) |
6 |
Development of a Wet Weather Infrastructure Management Plan |
$0.14 |
|
Commenced.
To be completed 2010. |
7 |
Implementation of a Wet Weather
Infrastructure Management Plan |
$7.325 |
|
To commence 2011 and take several years to
complete at an estm. cost of $2M/year. |
8 |
Installation of Floatable Traps in Combined
Sewer Area Catch Basins |
$3.55 |
|
Over 30% complete. To be completed 2011. |
9 |
Pinecrest Creek / Westboro Stormwater
Management Retrofit Plan |
$0.25 |
|
Commenced.
To be completed 2010. |
10 |
Eastern Subwatersheds Stormwater Management
Retrofit Plan |
$0.75 |
|
To be carried out 2011-2012. |
11 |
Implementation of Stormwater Retrofit Plans |
$4.0 |
|
To commence 2012 and take several years to
complete. Long-term costs commencing 2014
are estm. at $9M/year. |
12 |
R.O. Pickard
Environnmental Centre Effluent Dechlorination |
$7.44 |
|
To be carried out in 2010. |
13 |
Develop & Implement a Water
Environment Strategy |
$1.0 |
|
Strategy to be developed 2010-2011. |
14 |
Monitoring and Source Control Programs |
$0.26 |
|
On-going initiative that will continue over
the life of ORAP. |
15 |
Wastewater & Drainage Environmental
Quality Management System |
$0.15 |
|
To be developed in 2010. |
16 |
Updates to the Ottawa R. Bacterial Water
Quality Computer Model |
$0.40 |
|
To be carried out in 2010. |
17 |
Public Outreach and Education (NEW) |
$0.375 |
|
To be carried out over the period 2010-2013. |
|
TOTAL |
$251.64 |
|
*2009-2013.
Additional costs may be incurred in subsequent years. |
DOCUMENT
3
Water Fund |
||||||
2010 Additional Staffing Requirements by Pressure Type |
||||||
Maintain Existing
Services |
Section |
|||||
1 |
Customer Services Person |
The additional customer
service person is needed to meet increasing requests for utility locates,
meter servicing and to maintain the service delivery standard response times. |
Customer Services |
|||
1 |
Communications Officer |
A communication officer
is required to meet the additional demands from all branches of the
Environmental Services Department in order to increase public confidence in
the products and services offered to residents. |
||||
1 |
Technical Assistant |
Provide technical support
to building facilities management in the areas of Life Safety, Building Code,
Fire Code, Hoisting/Lifting , Elevating devices, Boilers and Pressure Vessels
Codes & associated Regulatory compliance.
|
Facilities Management |
|||
New Services |
|
|||||
1 |
Project Coordinator |
AMR project. This is a
term position, and the funds are recovered from the Capital Program |
Revenue |
|||
1 |
Inspector |
A field inspector is necessary
to provide the field inspection for quality control of the installation
contracted. This is a term position,
and the funds are recovered from the Capital Account. |
Customer Services |
|||
1 |
Public Outreach Officer |
Promoting City Water program.
Program will involve one Public Outreach Officer and six (6) summer students |
Customer Services |
|||
1.98 |
Office Assistants |
|
||||
1 |
Network Analyst |
Provide support to the Production
Program's new network communication systems and security network of the
upgraded SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition) system. The analyst will perform the lead role in
the maintenance of network standards and documentation, and assist in the
administration of databases and regulatory reporting requirements. |
Production |
Growth |
|
|||||
1 |
Maintenance Planner |
Electrical Maintenance
Area - There is currently a high level of work order backlog. The position will support Maintenance
Optimization - Phase 2 work that was stalled due to lack of resources. |
Maintenance Management |
|||
Regulatory |
||||||
2 |
Operational Engineers |
Provide direct support for
the Drinking Water Quality Management System.
Continual improvement has become a core activity in the Production
Program. The DWQMS and Municipal
Drinking Water Licenses require regular review of operations manuals,
procedures and drawings. |
Production |
|||
Total FTEs 11.98 |
||||||
DOCUMENT 4
|
2010 Additional Staffing Requirements by Pressure Type |
|
|||||||
|
Maintain Existing
Services |
Section |
|||||||
|
1 |
Coordinator |
Utilize CCTV inspection
for condition assessment in a timely manner. Quickly identify and tag defects
for immediate repair. |
Inspection |
|||||
|
1 |
Sewer Coordinator |
Work planning and scheduling
for the Collection supervisors. Free up clerical staff for data entry (AG
report, Wastewater Audit, art. 3.2, find. 26) |
Sewer Maintenance |
|||||
|
1 |
Project Manager |
Non-technical project managers
to work on business cases, business processes improvements, new service
levels, benchmarking, performance management, corporate initiatives,
strategic planning support, etc. |
Branch Mgt |
|||||
|
1 |
Utility Clerks I |
To address backlog in data entry and field dispatching. (AG
report, Wastewater Audit, art. 3.2, find. 32) |
Branch Mgt |
|||||
|
1 |
Process Operator Mechanic |
Proactive maintenance
plan has not been achieved in many years. Excessive backlog of corrective work.
Aging plant. |
Treatment |
|||||
|
1 |
Operational Data Analyst |
Analysis of data points
and trends generated by hundreds of monitoring equipment in the plant,
pumping stations, regulators and flow monitoring equipment, on behalf of OROs
and OICs. (O.Reg 129/04, art. 18) |
Treatment |
|||||
|
This position is required
to address the backlog of electrical work orders. |
Maintenance Management |
|||||||
|
1 |
Coordinator |
Process Technologists scope
doubling to include Collection system oversight. Additional liaison and
coordination required between process staff and O&M staff. |
Treatment |
|||||
|
New Services |
|
|||||||
|
1 |
Notification Clerk |
In anticipation of new sewer
cleaning notification process. Coordinate and communicate the sewer cleaning
schedule to residents. (Directed to Report to PEC in 2010-Q1). |
Inspection |
|||||
|
1 |
Foreperson |
Maintenance requirements for
new infrastructure installed as part of the Ottawa River Action Plan.
Critical manholes, new instrumentation,
(ACS2010-ICS-ESD-0007, projects 1 and 2) |
Sewer Maintenance |
|||||
|
1 |
Maintenance Worker |
|||||||
|
1 |
Operators - Inspectors |
Pre-commissioning
inspections of new infrastructure. Reduce transfer of defective
infrastructure from developers and contractors. (AG report, 2006
Wastewater audit, rec. #12) |
Sewer Maintenance |
|||||
|
1 |
Program Manager |
Increased leadership and
coordination in stormwater management. Integration between departments.
Current connections between municipal drains, ponds, overland drainage, etc.
are weak. |
Stormwater |
|||||
|
1 |
Coordinator |
ORAP calls for continued monitoring
and source control programs and activities; acceleration of SWM Strategy in
subwatershed affecting beaches. The Eastern sub-watersheds have
significant industrial impacts to the storm systems and will require
monitoring, inspections & enforcement not currently in our scope of work, |
Industrial Waste Program |
|||||
|
1 |
Field Technician |
ORAP calls for continued
monitoring and source control programs and activities; acceleration of SWM
Strategy in subwatershed affecting beaches. This will result in an
increased requirement for Priority
Outfall Monitoring, flow monitoring and stream assessments. Expansion of the Baseline Program (part of
ORAP) will require additional oversight off group activities on a city-wide
basis. |
Environmental Program |
|||||
|
1 |
MMS Coordinator |
Pumping stations
currently do not have a complete MMS inventory and associated maintenance
plan. A new coordinator is required to
review and keep current maintenance & operation manuals, flow diagrams and
electrical single line diagrams. The
quantity of equipment, potential efficiency gains, equipment replacement
costs and consequences of failure call for a higher level of maintenance. The level of maintenance management support
should be in proportion to or similar to the plant. |
Maintenance Management |
|||||
|
1 |
Maintenance Planner |
This position is to
address the backlog of electrical work orders. |
||||||
|
1 |
Laboratory Technician |
The Lab will be taking on
400,000 of analysis from Realty Services Branch that is currently
subcontracted to a commercial laboratory. The laboratory will be doing about
200,000 of the work in house, 160,000 of which is volatile analysis. The FTE
will help to perform some of this analysis in-house using a Gas
Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer equipped with a purge & trap.
|
Laboratory Services |
|||||
|
GrowtGrowthwth |
|
||||||
|
1 |
Field Technician |
Supporting 12 new stormwater
treatment facilities in 2010. |
Stormwater |
||||
|
Regulatory |
|
||||||
|
2 |
Operators - Inspectors |
O.Reg 129/04. Construction on live sewer system must be under
the supervision of a Licensed Operator. ( AG 2006 Sewage Spill Audit (ref.
in 5.2.1) and the Price Audit report, recs #14 and 15) |
Sewer Maintenance |
||||
|
1 |
Supervisor |
||||||
|
1 |
Foreperson |
Implementation of Ottawa River
Action Plan project #4 and 14. Management of cross-connection and
inter-connections. (ACS2010-ICS-ESD-0007) |
Sewer Maintenance |
||||
|
1 |
Maintenance Worker |
||||||
|
1 |
Coordinator - Facility
Ops |
Four new stormwater facilities
with extensive monitoring requirements in 2010. (Monitoring conditions,
certificate of approval of facilities) |
Stormwater |
||||
|
4 |
Process Technologists |
These four FTEs will provide
for 1 continuous full time 24/7 FTE to monitor, oversee and control the
entire wastewater collection system (RTC, Pumping Stations, critical
manholes, flow monitoring sites, etc.).
The oversight of regulators is required under the CofA. (See Rec. #3 of AG 2006 Sewage Spill
Audit) |
Treatment |
||||
|
1 |
Technologist |
Biosolids Management
System requires site supervision of biosolids land application. Program
expanded from 30% to 100% land application. This function was previously performed
by a consultant. |
Treatment |
||||
|
TOTAL FTEs 29 |
|||||||