Report to/Rapport au :
Planning and
Environment Committee
Comité de l'urbanisme
et de l'environnement
and Council / et au Conseil
16 September 2010 / le 16 septembre 2010
Submitted by/Soumis par :
Nancy Schepers, Deputy City Manager/Directrice
municipale adjointe, Infrastructure Services
and Community Sustainability/Services d’infrastructure et Viabilité des
collectivités
Contact Person/Personne-ressource : Richard Kilstrom,
Acting Manager/Gestionnaire intérimaire, Development Review-Urban Services,
Inner Core/Examen des projets d'aménagement-Services urbains, Unité du Centre
intérieur, Planning
and Growth Management/Urbanisme et Gestion de la croissance
(613) 580-2424, 22379 Richard.Kilstrom@ottawa.ca
SUBJECT: |
|
|
|
OBJET : |
REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS
That the recommend Council approve an amendment to
Zoning By-law 2008-250 to change the zoning of 800 Montreal Road from AM5
(Arterial Mainstreet Subzone 5) to R4T [xxxx] (Residential Fourth Density
Subzone T, Exception xxxx), AM5 [yyyy] (Arterial Mainstreet Subzone 5,
Exception yyyy), AM5 [yyyy] Sxxx (Arterial Mainstreet Subzone 5, Exception
yyyy, Schedule xxx), O1 (Parks and Open Space Zone); and adding a Heritage
Overlay, as detailed in Document 2, and as shown in Documents 3 and 4.
RECOMMANDATIONS
DU RAPPORT
Que le Comité de l’urbanisme et de
l’environnement recommande au Conseil d’approuver une modification au Règlement
de zonage général no 2008-250 en vue de changer le zonage du 800,
chemin Montréal, de AM5 (Zone d’artère principale, sous-zone 5) à R4T [xxxx] (Zone
résidentielle de densité 4, sous-zone T), à AM5 [yyyy] (Zone d’artère
principale, sous-zone 5, avec exception yyyy), à AM5 [yyyy] Sxxx (Zone d’artère
principale, sous-zone 5, avec exception yyyy, annexe xxx) et à O1 (Zone de parc
et d’espace vert); et d’y ajouter une désignation patrimoniale, comme
l’explique le document 2 et le montre les documents 3 et 4.
The site, 800 Montreal Road, is located on the south side of Montreal Road and the east side of Den Haag Drive, just west of Carson's Road. The 4.2‑hectare site is currently occupied by an existing two storey building, while another building was recently demolished. A surface parking lot also exists to the west of the existing building. The site is characterized by clusters of vegetation, which are primarily located along the southern and eastern edges of the site and adjacent to the existing building, with grading that falls when moving away from Montreal Road toward the south. The site is surrounded by a range of uses, including the CMHC head office complex to the west, the Montfort Hospital complex to the northwest, mixed low-rise commercial and residential across Montreal Road to the north, an 11‑storey apartment building to the east, and townhouses along Carwood Circle to the southeast and south.
Development Proposal
The proposed development of the site includes five development blocks,
which include a range of dwelling types and densities, as well as a public park
and a new public street. The blocks consist of: multiple-attached (townhouse)
dwellings (22 units), four-storey stacked dwellings (76 to 80 units), a
6/8 storey retirement home (140 units), and six apartment buildings
ranging from four to 12 storeys (355 to 410 units), all totalling between 600
to 637 units. Each of the development blocks will be developed through separate
Site Plan Control applications in the future, thus the number of units and mix
is conceptual. The existing heritage building, formerly the head office and
main laboratory of Forintek, Canada’s wood products research agency, is
intended to be retained and incorporated into the retirement home.
The site is currently zoned as AM5 (Arterial
Mainstreet - Subzone 5), which permits a range of commercial and residential
uses. This zone permits a maximum building height of 25 metres on those
portions of the site not directly abutting low- to medium-rise residential,
where it reduces to a maximum height of 15 metres.
Purpose of Application
Amendments to the AM5
(Arterial Mainstreet – Subzone 5) zone are required in order for the
development concept to proceed as currently proposed, including an additional permitted use, additional
height on a portion of the site, as well as other changes required for consistency
with the proposed development.
Proposed Zoning
The proposed zoning will create an exception to the AM5 zone to add a retirement
home as an additional permitted use, restrict automobile-oriented uses,
increase the maximum building height from 25 metres to 40 metres on the portion
of the site adjacent Montreal Road, and establish design-oriented zoning
provisions. A heritage overlay is
proposed to be added for the existing heritage building on the site. The
southern portion of the site is intended to be rezoned to R4T [xxxx] (Residential
Fourth Density Subzone T, Exception xxxx) with exceptions to restrict certain
building types, and to establish design-oriented zoning provisions. An O1 (Parks
and Open Space) zone will be created to reflect the location of the new public
park. Details of the recommended zoning are included in Document 2.
Companion Applications
A concurrent Street Opening application (File No.
D07-15-09-0002) is being considered to establish the new public street, which
is proposed to connect from Den Haag Drive to Montreal Road and will provide
access to the development blocks as well as the public park. In addition,
Consent for Severance applications are currently being considered by the
Committee of Adjustment to establish the development blocks (File Nos. D08-01-10/B-00070
to B-00075 and B-00294).
Planning Act and Provincial Policy Statement
Section 2 of the Planning Act outlines those land use matters that are of provincial interest, to which all City planning decisions shall have regard. The provincial interests that apply to this site include the appropriate location of growth and development and the promotion of development that is designed to be sustainable, to support public transit and to be oriented to pedestrians. In addition, the Planning Act requires that all City planning decisions be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), a document that provides further policies on matters of provincial interest related to land use development. PPS policies indicate that there should be an appropriate mix of uses and range of housing types and densities which efficiently use land, resources, infrastructure and public service facilities, and support the use of alternative transportation modes and public transit.
The
proposed zoning allows for a mix of residential and commercial uses, which will
efficiently use land and contribute to a balanced community. The proposal
includes a mix of housing types and densities. The site is located on an
arterial road and transit priority corridor (Montreal Road), which
provides excellent access to the site and is a focus for mixed-use development.
The site is conveniently located to nearby residential and commercial areas to
allow for access by pedestrians. Staff conclude that the proposal is consistent
with the matters of provincial interest as outlined in the Planning Act
and PPS.
Official Plan
Strategic Directions
Section 2 of the Official Plan sets broad strategic directions to meet the challenge of managing growth, providing infrastructure, maintaining environmental integrity and creating liveable communities within Ottawa. To meet these challenges, polices are set out to pursue a mix of land uses, housing types and compact forms of development which in turn will enable the City to support a high-quality transit system and make better use of existing infrastructure and roads. The proposed development provides a mix of uses and housing types at densities that will support this overall goal.
Land Use Designation
The site is designated as Arterial Mainstreet on Schedule B of the Official Plan. Arterial Mainstreets intend to function as mixed-use corridors in order to sustain the surrounding community, transit system, and to provide a focus for the community. They intend to establish strong street edge with buildings that are human-scaled. The Arterial Mainstreet designation recognizes the importance of these sites in achieving a positive pedestrian environment and providing a lively mix of uses, and represents sites with significant opportunities for intensification. The Montreal Road Arterial Mainstreet has a minimum density target of 170 people plus jobs per net hectare.
Compatibility and Urban Design
Section 2.5.1 establishes design objectives which describes the vision for the form of the City’s built environment. These objectives are broadly stated and are applicable to all land use designations either at the city-wide level or on a site-specific basis. Design principles are further set out to describe how the City hopes to achieve the design objectives, with acknowledgment that all the design objectives may not be achieved or be achievable in all cases.
The proposed development is consistent with and implements the design objectives which speak to enhancing the sense of community, defining public and private spaces through development, and having new development respect the character of existing areas. An enhanced sense of community is being achieved by infilling a large underdeveloped site and strengthening the urban fabric of the street both physically and functionally. Public and private spaces are being defined through the creation of a new public park, whose location was specifically selected so that it combines open space in front of the heritage Forintek building (recommended by Federal Heritage Buildings Review Office (FHBRO) guidelines) with a publicly accessible recreational space that will bring people into the space that provides the building’s heritage setting.
Staff is also proposing specific zoning provisions that require buildings to address the public streets and restrict the location of parking, thus establishing a strong street edge and pedestrian environment. For the lands that will remain within the AM zone, automobile-oriented uses like parking lots and drive-throughs will be prohibited. For lands to be rezoned R4T, staff is retaining the Arterial Mainstreet provision for minimum density (170 people and jobs per net hectare) as a mechanism to drive development to achieve a denser urban form without surface parking.
The proposed development concept respects the character of the existing area by complementing the massing pattern, height, and character of the surrounding context. The proposed 12-storey building at the north-east of the site is located close to Montreal Road and adjacent to an existing high-rise building. Building heights transition lower moving away from Montreal Road to the existing low-rise neighbourhood to the south.
Section 4.11 and the Urban Design Guidelines
provide further direction on design and compatible development. The Urban Design
Guidelines for Arterial Mainstreets, Transit-oriented Development, and
High-Rise Housing are applicable to this site. Amongst the considerations are
built form, open space, transportation and parking, sunlight, and supporting
neighbourhood services.
Transportation and Parking: The Community
Transportation Study submitted with the application indicates that the proposed
development will generate 234 vehicular trips in the afternoon peak hour, and
this will have a minimal impact on the existing street network and Level of
Service of surrounding intersections. The new public street will provide access
to the individual development blocks. The proposed zoning will restrict the
location of parking from being adjacent public streets, in order to create more
pedestrian-oriented streetscapes. In
addition, the proposed zoning will reduce parking requirements such that
parking will be provided at a rate consistent with parking rates in the
surrounding area to the north and west.
Built Form: Although the existing AM5 zone
permits building heights up to eight storeys, other aspects of the built form
of development are not specifically defined in the existing zoning. The
proposed zoning requires buildings to be located close to the public street, and
requires additional setbacks for upper stories of buildings, in order to create
a more human-scaled environment and to reduce the visual impact of the
12-storey building.
Open Space: A new public park will be
established along Montreal Road which will contribute to the active environment
along this Arterial Mainstreet. The location of the park was determined to ensure
access, preserve views to the heritage building, and to create a space that is
well-defined by surrounding existing and proposed buildings. Details of park
design will be furthered through the conditions of the Consent for Severance
and Street Opening applications.
Sunlight: The 12-storey high-rise building will be
located adjacent to Montreal Road at the north end of the site. The proposed six-metre
setback for the upper storeys, combined with Montreal Road’s wide road
allowance, ensure there is substantial distance between the high-rise portion
of the building and existing development to the north such that shadowing
impacts are reduced. There is a 40-metre setback between the existing 11-storey
building to the east and the proposed 12‑storey building, which will
allow natural light through and reduce shadow impacts. The sun/shadow study
that was submitted with the application indicates that on the winter solstice
(December 21) when the sun-angle is at its lowest, some properties on the north
side of Montreal Road will experience short-term shadows for portions of the
day. However, the overall impact is minor.
Supporting Neighbourhood Services: The proposed
development concept includes a daycare, retirement home, and public park, which
will provide services to the surrounding community. The addition of approximately 600 dwelling
units in the area will increase transit usage, thereby providing an incentive
for increased transit service in this area over time. The site is within
walking distance to existing services and public parks.
Other design aspects, such as streetscape,
building design, amenity area, and pedestrian and cycling amenities will be
addressed through the Site Plan Control process.
Infrastructure
The Official Plan policies of Subsection 4.4 Water and Wastewater Servicing require adequate services for new development. The property is adequately served by water, storm and sanitary sewer lines to facilitate the proposed development permitted by the re-zoning.
Heritage
Considerations
The existing building, formerly used by Forintek, is identified by the Federal Heritage Buildings Review Office (FHBRO) as a Recognized Federal Heritage Building. The proposed development retains the existing building in accordance with the requirements of the federal agreement of purchase and sale and incorporates it into the design of the site. Views from Montreal Road have been ensured through the establishment of a public park in front of the building. In addition, staff recommend that a heritage overlay be included in the proposed zoning in order that its reuse be guided by the heritage provisions in the Zoning By-law.
Residential Zoning
The two development blocks at the south portion of the site that are intended for multiple-attached and stacked dwellings will not have any frontage onto Montreal Road after the creation of the new public street. To better reflect the form and type of development proposed, and to account for the lack of frontage on the Arterial Mainstreet, these two development blocks are intended to be rezoned to a R4T [xxxx] (Residential Fourth Density Subzone T, Exception xxxx). This exception zone will also retain the minimum density provisions of the Arterial Mainstreet to encourage a development form without surface parking. Given that the minimum density requirement for this part of Montreal Road is 170 people plus jobs per net hectare, and the dwelling occupancy rate for stacked townhouses is 2.06 people per dwelling unit, the minimum density translates to 83 dwelling units per hectare for the purposes of the implementing Zoning By-law. Because the development concept is considered to be an early iteration of what will eventually become a more defined site plan, and because the applicant will not be the party developing the property but is actually selling blocks of land to other parties to develop, staff will pursue the final design and layout of the residential blocks of land with the ultimate developers, and will actively pursue a form of development without surface parking. For the stacked townhouse block planned on the southernmost block of land, staff will pursue a form of development that provides courtyard green space between building blocks.
It is anticipated that each block will be individually developed and each will necessitate a Site Plan Control process. Site issues such as location of parking, noise attenuation, servicing, landscaping, microclimate impacts, and stormwater management will be addressed through the Site Plan Control process. Since the lands front onto an Arterial Mainstreet, they are within a Design Priority Area. Each of the blocks will be required to go through the Design Review process, which will further enhance staff’s ability to achieve the most desirable built form and building design.
Summary
The proposed development supports the direction of the Planning Act and Provincial Policy Statement by creating new development at densities and locations that efficiently uses land, existing infrastructure, and supports alternative transportation. It represents an appropriate form of intensification, and is in conformity with the policies for the Arterial Mainstreet designation. Staff are satisfied that the compatibility, design, and transportation aspects of the site have been adequately considered in light of the relevant Official Plan policies and Urban Design Guidelines. The proposed Zoning By-law amendment conforms with the general intent of the Official Plan and existing zoning on the site, and as such, staff recommend approval of the proposed zoning.
Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments (ESA) were submitted with the application, and a Record of Site Condition has been filed with the Ministry of the Environment. Certain standard conditions will be included in the Site Plan Control approval based on the recommendations of the ESAs.
The Rideau Valley Conservation Authority and City staff have indicated that there are no issues from an environmental point of view regarding the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment.
N/A
Notice of this application was carried out in accordance with the City's Public Notification and Consultation Policy. Details of the public consultation can be found in Document 5.
This 4.2 hectare site is
prominently located on
In this respect, the rezoning of
the corner (Den Haag/
I am also supportive of the proposed zoning of the front of the existing building which is identified by the Federal Heritage Buildings Review Office (FHBRO). My understanding is that the primary heritage feature of the building is principally its front portion (including staircase in the front lobby) and the exterior frontage played a role. The use of that frontage as a public park meets that intention as well as fulfilling aspects of the City’s Official Plan with respect to pedestrian-friendly elements on major arteries.
The high-rise elements facing
Part of the thinking that has gone into this site has to do with restricting automobile-oriented uses. To that end parking will either be underground or organized in such a way that it does not dominate the site. This care will mean that parking will not affect the activities that would naturally occur in a residential community to the same extent.
I am pleased that staff responses regarding the following community concerns have been addressed:
I was surprised to read staff’s reply concerning the community concern regarding level of service (LOS) at several major intersections in the vicinity. The reply indicated that “historically there has been negative growth rate within the study area”. This statement did appear to fly in the face of all of the new developments that have occurred in recent years in the surrounding area. I requested that our staff review the facts to ascertain whether this was not an error. I am assured that such a review has now occurred and that, astonishing as it may seem, traffic in the surrounding area does not appear to have increased significantly in recent years.
I believe that the re-zoning proposed for this site represents an appropriate (and significant) intensification in conformity with our Official Plan as well as a necessary re-purposing of the subject lands. I feel confident that the result will be an exemplary redevelopment that will serve as a model. I extend my thanks to our staff and to CLC for the manner in which the extensive discussions were conducted.
Should this matter be appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board, it is anticipated that a three day hearing would result. The City would be represented by staff witnesses if the above recommendation is adopted. Should the application be refused, reasons must be provided. On appeal, an outside planner would need to be retained at an estimated cost of $25,000.
The proposed development and planning applications align with the City Strategic Plan in that it respects the existing urban fabric, neighbourhood form, and the limits of existing hard services so that new growth is integrated seamlessly with established communities; creates a walking, transit, and cycling-oriented community; and contributes toward achieving a 30-per cent modal split by 2021.
There are no direct financial implications associated with this report.
The application was not processed by the "On Time Decision Date" established for the processing of Zoning By-law amendments due to the need to resolve issues with park location and community design.
Document 1 Location Map
Document 2 Details of Recommended Zoning
Document 3 Proposed Zoning Map
Document 4 Schedule xxx
Document 5 Consultation Details
City Clerk and Solicitor Department, Legislative Services to notify the owner, applicant, OttawaScene.com, 174 Colonnade Road, Unit #33, Ottawa, ON K2E 7J5, Ghislain Lamarche, Program Manager, Assessment, Financial Services Branch (Mail Code: 26-76) of City Council’s decision.
Planning and Growth Management to prepare the implementing by-law, forward to Legal Services and undertake the statutory notification.
Legal Services to forward the implementing by-law to City Council.
DETAILS OF RECOMMENDED ZONING DOCUMENT 2
Proposed
Changes to the Comprehensive Zoning By-law
1.
The Zoning Map of City of Ottawa Zoning By-law
2008-250 is amended by changing the zoning of the lands known municipally as 800 Montreal Road from AM5 (Arterial Mainstreet Subzone 5) to R4T
[xxxx] (Residential Fourth Density Subzone T), AM5 [yyyy] (Arterial Mainstreet
Subzone 5, Exception yyyy), AM5 [yyyy] Sxxx (Arterial Mainstreet Subzone 5, Exception
yyyy, Schedule xxx), O1 (Public Open Space Subzone 1); and adding a Heritage Overlay, as shown on
Document 3.
2.
Add a new exception [yyyy] and provisions to
Section 239 as follows:
Column III: Additional land uses permitted:
retirement home
Column IV:
Land used prohibited
car
wash
drive-through
facility
stacked
dwelling
parking
lot as a principle use
service
and repair shop
Column V: Provisions
a.
Minimum front and corner side yard setback for
any part of a building above 11m: 6m
b.
Maximum required front and corner side yard
setback for any part of a building wall 11m or less in height:
i.
Montreal Road: 25m from centreline of Montreal Road
ii.
Other streets: 3.0m from street lot line
c.
The wall at grade facing a public street shall have 50% of its
facade comprised of windows and entrances and, in the case of a corner lot, the
entrance may be in an angle at corner walls facing a street intersection;
d.
Despite Schedule 1, for the purpose of calculating all
required parking the lands zoned AM5[yyyy] shall be subject to the rates set
out under Area B on Schedule 1.
3.
Add new exception [xxxx] and provisions to
Section 239 as follows:
Column IV: Land Uses Prohibited
detached, linked-detached, semi-detached, and duplex dwellings
Column V: Provisions
a.
Minimum
density for any lot which does not abut a lot that is subject to a Heritage
Overlay: 83 dwelling units per hectare.
b.
Any yard abutting a public pedestrian pathway shall be
considered a corner side yard
c.
Minimum front and corner side yard setback: 2.5m
d.
Minimum interior side yard setback:
i.
Abutting an R1, R2, R3, or R4 zone: 7.5m
ii.
All other cases: 4.5m
e.
Minimum rear yard setback: 5.5m
f.
The front doors of all dwelling units must be
located in a wall directly facing either a public street or public pedestrian
pathway.
g.
Exterior parking spaces and aisles leading to a
parking space must not be located
i.
closer than 15.0 metres to a dwelling
ii.
in any required yard, or in a provided front or
corner side yard.
h.
Despite Schedule 1, for the purpose of calculating all
required parking the lands zoned R4T[xxxx] shall be subject to the rates set
out under Area B on Schedule 1
4.
Add to Part 17 the schedule as shown in Document
4 as Schedule xxx.
PROPOSED ZONING MAP DOCUMENT
3
SCHEDULE xxx
DOCUMENT
4
CONSULTATION DETAILS DOCUMENT
5
NOTIFICATION AND CONSULTATION PROCESS
Notification and public consultation was undertaken in accordance with the Public Notification and Public Consultation Policy approved by City Council for Zoning By-law amendments. Prior to submission of the applications, a meeting was held in the community. There were 12 members of the public who provided comments on this application. A summary of the public comments and staff responses are provided below.
SUMMARY OF PUBLIC INPUT
Comment:
Increased parking demand on surrounding streets
will be an issue. Parking regulations on
Den Haag should be revised due to increased traffic (e.g. no parking from
Montreal Road to Carson’s Road). Where will visitor parking be accommodated?
Staff Response:
Parking requirements are proposed to be reduced to a rate consistent with the rate required in the surrounding areas to the north and west. Each development block will need to provide parking in accordance with the Zoning By-law requirements. On-street parking will be permitted on the new public street, and staff proposes a two-hour limit, to handle short-term visitor parking.
Comment:
Will the new street be a right-in, right-out only at Montreal Road or will it have full access? There is the potential for a traffic signal to be located across from existing dwellings, which would have negative impacts such as light shining into windows.
Staff Response:
The intersection of the new public street and Montreal Road is proposed to be a full movement intersection, though no traffic signals are proposed at this time.
Comment:
The traffic study was conducted during the summer
months when traffic patterns are traditionally lower, was conducted before the
new Montfort elementary school opened on Den Haag Drive, and does not account
for the new expansion to La Cite Collégiale, which may increase
volume on Den Haag and Bathgate. The traffic study makes no significant mention
of the possibility of the new interprovincial bridge being constructed at the
north end of Aviation Parkway or the eventual redevelopment of the Rockcliffe
airbase.
Staff Response:
Traffic volumes are not
appreciably lower during summer, and often traffic volumes are at peak during
summer. The City’s database of traffic volumes is primarily from summer months,
and this data is provided to consultants for their use in preparing
transportation studies. The two new institutions cited are anticipated to have
a minor impact on traffic volumes. As per the City's TIA guidelines, traffic
study should include analysis for build-out and five years after build-out. It
is not expected that Rockcliffe airbase or the interprovincial bridge will be
developed within this timeframe; therefore the traffic study does not include
this development in the analysis. However,
staff is fully aware that a major redevelopment could occur at the Rockcliffe
airbase. At the time that such a proposal comes forward, it will be up to the
proponent of that redevelopment to address the transportation issues that may
arise, and Rockcliffe airbase is a much larger potential redevelopment site
than 800 Montreal Road so the impacts on the transportation system will be
different than those analyzed under this proposal. With respect to a possible
interprovincial bridge, a location has not been chosen with certainty although
staff understands that the Aviation Parkway corridor remains a candidate.
Again, the impacts of such a bridge, if and when it comes forward, would have
to be evaluated based on the specific aspects that flow from whatever proposal
would be brought forward and it would be up to that process to address the
impacts from that project.
Comment:
The level of service (LOS) at the
intersection of Den Haag Drive and Montreal Road is very close to approaching a
level of E since the additional traffic lights were installed at the entrance
to the Montfort Hospital this past summer. The traffic study should show the
potential effects on the LOS that the additional traffic lights, which would be
required at the Montreal entrance to the proposed street at 800 Montreal Road,
would have on all of the adjacent intersections of Montreal Road. The study
should show how a potential vehicular increase of 630 to 1000 on Den Haag and
Montreal Road will have on the LOS at the intersection of Den Haag and Montreal
Road, the intersection at the Montfort Hospital and Montreal Road, and at the
intersection of Aviation Parkway and Montreal Road. Traffic volumes cited are from the City of
Ottawa and are dated from 2004. Current and up-to-date records should have been
provided.
Staff Response:
The transportation study indicates that
the proposed development upon build-out will generate 234 vehicle trips in the
afternoon peak hour. The current and projected LOS for all intersections in the
immediate area, including Montreal Road/Den Haag Drive, Montreal Road/Aviation
Parkway, and the Montreal Road/Montfort Access, are within acceptable limits to
the City. Traffic signals are not currently proposed at the intersection of the
new public street and Montreal Road. As
per the City's Traffic Impact Assessment Guidelines, consultants use annual
traffic growth rate data in their analysis to account for future development
within the study area. In this case,
historically there has been negative growth rate within the study area,
therefore the consultant chose 0 per cent growth rate to apply to the existing
traffic counts, which has been accepted by the City. Traffic counts at the
various nearby intersections were compiled between 2002 and 2009.
Comment:
The proposed density will cause issues with traffic and infrastructure. There should be efforts to decrease the density and save present vegetation in order not to destroy precious oxygen source, hurt the ecosystem, and make surrounding area less pleasant to live in. Increased density will be too noisy, polluted, and create no privacy. Density will mean more buses, which is detrimental to air quality, traffic, and structure of nearby houses.
Staff Response:
The site is currently zoned to permit development at the densities proposed. The proposed density meets the density targets specified in the Official Plan for Montreal Road, which is identified as an intensification area. Vegetation retention and noise control will be addressed through subsequent Site Plan Control applications for the individual development blocks.
Comment:
Densely spaced buildings with up to 12 storeys in height with 600 units would not fit into a neighbourhood with 1 to 2 storey dwellings and only 3 apartment buildings. The high-rise building will take away from scenic feel, will block light in winter, create wind impacts, and add light pollution at night. The 12-storey building is higher than the existing building east of the project. Sun will be blocked to certain properties on north side of Montreal Road at 10am and 3pm during equinox and solstice
Staff Response:
The current zoning permits heights up to eight storeys. The 12-storey
building and its location on the site was considered with respect to its
proximity to arterial roads and transit, and the context of existing high-rise
development in the area. A sun/shadow study was submitted with the application
which shows the potential impact on the existing development to the north,
indicating that the extent of shadow impact is limited. Microclimate impacts
will be addressed through the subsequent Site Plan Control process. Additional
rationale for building height is included in the Discussion section above.
Comment:
The plan should ensure that as many trees and greenspace as possible
are retained. There should be a focus on evergreen planting.
Staff Response:
A new
public park will be developed as part of this development proposal. Tree
preservation and planting will be addressed through subsequent Site Plan
Control applications.
Comment:
There is concern about the detrimental effect of drilling, blasting,
digging and noise from construction. Where will construction phasing start? Have studies been performed to show
the effects of and mitigation measure to be put in place for the elevation of
urban noise pollution in the application for the street location and the
building height amendment?
Staff
Response:
Construction
methods are not considered through the Zoning By-law amendment process; however
the site is already zoned to permit development. Construction phasing has not
yet been determined, however, Site Plan Control applications will be required
prior to individual site development. The City’s Noise Control Study guidelines
establish when such a study is required, and this will be addressed through the
future Site Plan Control process. Local roads and high-rise housing do not
generate a noise level that would necessitate a Noise Control Study; however,
any noise-sensitive development adjacent to an arterial road would require a
Noise Control Study to investigate the impacts of the arterial road on the
use.
Comment:
Will Canada Lands Company (CLC) be involved in development once
property sold?
Staff Response:
Canada Lands Company intends to include specific development
requirements for each development block when sold to future land developers.
Comment:
Has there
been any consideration on the potential impact that this new development will
have on the migratory pattern of birds.
Staff Response:
The Urban Design Guidelines for High-Rise Housing provide direction on
addressing impacts on birds through building design. This will be considered
through the subsequent Site Plan Control applications.
Comment
What is
the impact on the water supply and demand for firefighting purposes?
Staff
Response:
A
conceptual servicing study was provided and indicates there is adequate water
supply to support the proposed development. Further analysis will be conducted
at the time of the individual Site Plan Control applications.
Comment:
Is there
the possibility that a First Nations land claim is currently underway on this property?
The Rockcliffe Air Base development was halted indefinitely due this reason.
Staff Response:
It is staff’s understanding that any federal
obligations regarding First Nations matters would have to have been met prior
to the sale of the site from the Department of Public Works and Government
Services Canada to CLC.
Comment:
The site is not truly well-serviced by transit when
compared to other high-density nodes, such as Lees Avenue, which is located adjacent
to a transitway station.
Staff Response:
The site is serviced by a high-frequency transit route and local transit routes, and is identified as a “Transit Priority Corridor”. The Lees Mixed Use Centre has a density target of 285 people plus jobs per net hectare while the Montreal Road Arterial Mainstreet has a density target of 170 people plus jobs per net hectare. These density targets take into account, among other aspects, the potential to support the transit network.
Comment:
How does this development address the need and
requirement for additional jobs in the area? Why is there not a stronger
commercial component to this project? How can this be called a mixed-used
project when it is only housing? Does the Zoning and OP not permit and encourage
commercial uses, namely offices, in this area? Why were these uses not
contemplated? A true mixed-use
development has a combination of residential, commercial, industrial, office, institutional,
or other land uses. This development only has a mix of difference types of
residential uses (according to the 2008-250 By-law a “Retirement Home” is a residential
use building). Unless significant commercial or office uses are added I
recommend that the “mixed-use” moniker be dropped from this project as it is
misleading to the general public.
Staff Response:
The current Zoning By-law does not include specific requirements for jobs or mix of uses. The Arterial Mainstreet zone, and the proposed exceptions, will continue to permit a broad range of commercial, institutional, and office uses. Although the concept plan for this development proposal consists of primarily residential development, the actual land uses will not be determined until each individual Site Plan is processed for each development block. Staff intends to actively pursue the provision of retail uses along Montreal Road when addressing site plan applications on a phase-by-phase basis.
Comment:
The proposal should meet all of the Urban Design
Guidelines for Development along Arterial Mainstreets, rather than just six of
them. Are any of these buildings going
to be LEED certified, as per the Guideline 38: “Use green building technologies
such as green roofs, drip irrigation, and other Leadership in Energy and
Environmental Design (LEED) approaches?”
Staff Response:
Not all design guidelines are applicable to each development, or application type. For example, several of the design guidelines will be evaluated at the time of the Site Plan application, and are not possible to evaluate at the time of Zoning By-law amendment. Site-specific aspects, such as green building technologies, will be addressed through the Site Plan Control process. A summary of how the proposed development fits with the design guidelines is included in the discussion section above.
Comment:
The density for the site should be compared against established standards for comparable developments in similar neighbourhoods.
Staff Response:
The concept indicates that there are between 600 and 637 units proposed, however, the actual dwelling numbers will be confirmed through the individual Site Plan applications in the future. The density targets that are included in Section 2 of the Official Plan represent the direction for new development along Arterial Mainstreets, which is one of the areas where intensification is to be focussed. Further details are described in the Discussion section above.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTS
Ottawa Forests and Greenspace Advisory Committee
OFGAC does not object to the change in zoning. OFGAC strongly recommends that the ravine
area be protected and that as many trees as possible be protected during and
after construction. Both a development
plan and Landscape plan should reflect this.
Staff Response:
A Significant Tree Assessment was provided with the application which
documents the trees on site and recommendations for protection. Further analysis will occur during the Site
Plan Control process for the individual development blocks.