Report to/Rapport au :

 

Planning Committee /

Comité de l’urbanisme

 

And Council / et au conseil

 

16 May 2011 / le 16 mai 2011

 

Submitted by/Soumis par :Mathieu Fleury, Councillor/Conseiller

Rideau-Vanier (Ward/Quartier) 12

 

Contact Person/Personne resource:Mathieu Fleury, Councillor/ Conseiller

613-580-2482, Mathieu.Fleury@ottawa.ca

 

Rideau-Vanier (12)

Ref N°:ACS2011-CMR-PLC-0009

 

SUBJECT:    REDUCTION IN CASH-IN-LIEU OF PARKING FEE FOR 90 GUIGUES AVENUE  

 

OBJET:          RÉDUCTION DU MONTANT DU RÈGLEMENT FINANCIER DES EXIGENCES RELATIVES AU STATIONNEMENT POUR LE 90, AVENUE GUIGUES

 

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATION

 

That the Planning Committee approve the reduction of the Cash-in-Lieu of parking fee for 90 Guigues Avenue to 500$ per parking space, for three parking spaces, for a total of 1,500$. 

 

RECOMMANDATION DU RAPPORT

 

Que le Comité de l’urbanisme approuve que le règlement financier des exigences relatives au stationnement pour le 90, avenue Guigues, soit ramené à 500 $ par place de stationnement, soit 1,500$ au total.

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

At the 10 May 2011 meeting of the Planning Committee, Councillor Hobbs introduced the following notice of motion on behalf of Councillor Fleury:

 

WHEREAS the Official Plan encourages the use of alternatives means of transportation; and,

 

WHEREAS the property at 90 Guigues is conveniently located in the downtown, making it convenient to both public transportation, cyclists and pedestrians; and,

 

WHEREAS the current Cash-in-Lieu parking fees are prohibitively expensive for small developers; 

 

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Cash-in-Lieu of parking fee for 90 Guigues Avenue be reduced to 500$ per parking space, for three parking spaces, for a total of 1,500$. 

 

 

DISCUSSION

 

The property is currently occupied with a three-storey four unit rental apartment building on the west side and surface parking area on the east side.  The property has a lot area of 640 square metres, and 20.22 metres of frontage on Guigues Avenue.  The subject site is zoned R4S, a Residential Fourth Density zone that allows a wide mix of residential building forms ranging from detached to low rise apartment dwellings and planned unit developments.  The site is also subject to a Heritage Overlay, which places restrictions on properties where existing buildings are demolished and replaced or where additions are proposed.  However, as the proposed plan includes retaining the existing building and constructing an additional detached building, the R4S zone requirements are applied.  The existing apartment located on the west side of the subject site is exempt from parking requirements because it is a Category 2 building in the City of Ottawa Heritage Reference List, in an area to which a heritage overlay applies.

 

There is an additional three-storey six unit apartment building proposed on the east side of the subject site, resulting in a Planned Unit Development.  The parking requirement for the newly proposed building is 0.5 spaces per unit, for a total of 3 spaces.  The applicant had originally proposed underground parking accessed from Guigues Avenue.  However, following discussions with stakeholders, the applicant has revised plans to remove proposed parking and has chosen to proceed by way of cash-in-lieu of parking.

 

Parking in the area has historically been accommodated in rear yards, through common or individual driveways.  On-street parking is limited to 2 hours from 7am to 7pm on the north side of Guigues Avenue.

 

The application is  for the reasons outlined below:

 

Conformity with Official Plan Policies and criteria contained in .

1.      Cash-in-Lieu of Parking may be appropriate where the existing parking supply in the surrounding area can accommodate the on-site deficiency.

 

There is 2 hour metered parking for approximately 25 vehicles on both sides of Parent Street, from St Patrick to St Andrew Streets and for 12 vehicles on the south side of St. Andrew Street from 7:00 am to 7:00 pm.  There is 2 hour metered parking for approximately 30 vehicles from 8.30 am to 5.30 pm on both sides of Dalhousie Street from St Patrick to St Andrew Streets.  The area north of and including St. Andrew Street between Sussex and King Edward Avenues allows for permit parking.

 

There are three public parking locations on Parent Street, two on Dalhousie Street, one on St. Patrick Street east of Dalhousie and a City of Ottawa Public parking lot is located at 70 Clarence Street, approximately 2 blocks from the site location.

 

Guigues Street which is the location of the Cash in Lieu, consist of 2 storey residential units that provide on-site private parking at the side or rear of the dwellings. On-Street parking for 2 hours from 7.00 am to 7.00 pm is permitted on the North side, and no parking is permitted on the South side.

 

While parking demand in the area is significant, the applicant has confirmed that monthly parking spaces are available in all nearby parking lots, and Vrtucar or car sharing services are located nearby.  Two Vrtucar vehicles are located at the corner of Guigues Avenue and Dalhousie Street and St. Andrew and Dalhousie Streets, half a block and two blocks away respectively.  Approximately three blocks away at the corner of Dalhousie and Clarence Streets a third Vrtucar is located.

 

2.      Cash-in-Lieu of Parking may be appropriate where legitimate site constraints or other hardships exist that limit the ability to provide the required number of parking spaces.

 

The applicant had originally proposed underground parking in the newly constructed building on-site.  Access to underground parking was proposed through a garage door fronting on Guigues Avenue.  The City’s Urban Design Guidelines for Low-Medium Density Infill Housing speaks to emphasizing front doors rather than garages, including increased soft landscaping and less asphalt in front yards, which is accomplished through removing parking and the associated garage door entrance.

 

3.      A factor to consider is where the City currently has, or has identified the need for a parking strategy in the area.

 


 

The City has not identified the need for a parking strategy on Guigues Avenue although a Local Parking Study has been initiated for the area south of St. Patrick Street.  There are no known plans to change the parking complement in the immediate area or known construction projects that might impact current parking supply in the area.

 

4.      The use of the property is not considered over development of the site.

 

The use is compatible with the existing character of the area and is a permitted land use in the Zoning By-law.  Performance standards that are not met by the proposal will require minor variances.

 

The property exists within the Lowertown West Heritage Conservation District.  The District Study anticipates that there will be change in the District as it evolves.  This evolutionary growth pattern has resulted in streets that are densely packed, either with no driveways, or with access to rear yards, or access provided by narrow driveways or carriageways and with minimal side yard setbacks.  This street pattern, that also features houses of different styles, eras and forms, side by side, is a distinguishing feature of the heritage conservation district.

 

The proposed development conforms to the “Guidelines” contained within the heritage district study. The building is proposed at the same height, has roughly the same setback from the street, and is similar in width as its neighbours.

Its design expression echoes and is inspired by the “Appartements Guigues” next door. The building’s understated contemporary design does not overwhelm the neighbouring buildings and its materials are consistent with its neighbour to the west.

 

5.      There will be no negative impact on the liveability of adjacent residential areas.

 

The close proximity of retail, services, employment and entertainment uses means a probability that new residents of the proposed development may not own vehicles or require parking on-site.  If parking is required off-site, public street parking and parking lots are available.  Public transit, car-sharing service membership, cycling and walking are viable options for future residents of the area.  As such, the liveability of adjacent residential areas will not be affected.  In addition the streetscape of the subject site will improve through increased landscaping, no curb cuts and less hard surface.

 

Other Planning Objectives:

 

Traditionally, the property would not have had parking and the department feels that the application is consistent with the goals of the Lowertown West Heritage Conservation District.

The City of Ottawa Official Plan Section 4.11 states that opportunities to reduce parking requirements and promote increased usage of walking, cycling and transit should be considered, where appropriate.

 

The property is located within walking distance to retail, services, entertainment and public transit.  The site is served by OC Transpo on Dalhousie Street to the South and by STO Transit on King Edward Street and Murray Street and so a reduction in parking requirements is consistent with Section 4.11. 

 

RURAL IMPLICATIONS

 

Not applicable.

 

 

CONSULTATION

 

The following City department was circulated on this motion:

 

Planning and Growth Management Department

 

This represents good planning from a number of standpoints, including the successful architectural integration of a small-scale infill project in a sensitive heritage streetscape and within a mature urban neighbourhood where people can function on foot. In this case, it is more important to the Department to achieve good urban design and compatibility with the existing built fabric than to compromise this with motor vehicle parking, especially since there are other transportation and parking options available to residents.

 

 

COMMENTS BY THE WARD COUNCILLOR

 

Councillor Fleury is supportive of the reduction of Cash-in-lieu of parking, and has moved this motion to that end.

 

 

LEGAL IMPLICATIONS

 

There are no legal implications associated with this report.

 

 

RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS

 

No risk management implications have been identified.

 

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

Cash-in-lieu of parking fees for the three spaces are $12,840. Reducing the fees to $1,500 would reduce Cash-in-lieu of parking revenues by $11,340.

 

 

TECHNOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS

 

Not applicable.

 

 

CITY STRATEGIC PLAN

 

The proposed development and planning applications align with the City Strategic Plan in that it is an example of leading edge urban design, has integrated new growth with the established community, and contributes toward achieving a 30 per cent modal split by 2021. 

 

 

DISPOSITION

 

The Planning and Growth Management Department will implement Committee’s decision and notify the property owner.