Report to/Rapport au :

 

Joint Transit Committee and Transportation Committee

Réunion conjointe du Comité du transport en commun et du Comité des transports

 

3 February 2010/le 3 février 2010

 

Submitted by/Soumis par : Kent Kirkpatrick, City Manager / Directeur municipal

 

Contact Person/Personne-ressource : John Smit, Manager/Gestionnaire, Development Review‑Urban Services/Examen des projets d'aménagement-Services urbains, Planning and Growth Management/Urbanisme et Gestion de la croissance

(613) 580-2424, 13866  John.Smit@ottawa.ca

 

Capital (17)

Ref N°: ACS2010-CMR-OCM-0001

 

SUBJECT:

Lansdowne transportation Impact and assessment study and transportaton demand management plan

 

 

OBJET:

ÉTUDE D’ÉVALUATION ET D’IMPACT SUR LES TRANSPORTS ET PLAN DE GESTION DE LA DEMANDE EN TRANSPORT

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS

 

That the joint Transportation and Transit Committee:

 

1.                  Approve the Lansdowne Transportation Study Terms of Reference, as outlined in Document 1; and

 

2.                  Direct staff to retain Delcan Corporation and McCormick Rankin Corporation to undertake the Lansdowne Transportation Study and develop a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan in accordance with the Terms of Reference outlined in Document 1.

 

 

RECOMMANDATIONS DU RAPPORT

 

Que le Comité mixte des transports et du transport en commun :

 

1.             Approuve le cadre de référence de l'étude sur les transports du parc Lansdowne, tel que l'indique le document 1 ; et

 

2.             Demande au personnel de retenir les services de Delcan Corporation et de McCormick Rankin Corporation pour entreprendre l'étude sur les transports du parc Lansdowne et d'élaborer un plan de gestion de la demande en transport (PDDT), conformément au cadre de référence présenté dans le document 1.

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

At a special meeting of City Council held on November 12, 13, and 16, 2009 Council considered a report from the City Manager, dated November 12, 2009 (Report Ref. # ACS2009-CMR-OCM-0009), regarding Implementation of the Lansdowne Partnership Plan (LPP) that had been tabled at the Council meeting of September 2, 2009. 

 

Recommendation 2 a) ii) of the LPP Implementation Report was put forward as follows:

 

“That transportation studies and supporting transportation demand management plans be completed to determine whether or not impacts on traffic circulation and on-street parking resulting from the implementation of the LPP can be reasonably accommodated and that the transportation strategy outlined in the LPP will work as anticipated.”

 

On November 16, 2009, prior to approving the report recommendation, Council approved Motion 77/14 as follows:

 

“THERFORE BE IT RESOLVED that City Council delegate the authority to a joint Transit and Transportation Committee to approve the Terms of Reference for the transportation studies including an associated demand management plan for the LPP and for the additional Terms of Reference for the Traffic Impact Study for the relocation of the trade show space to the airport as referenced in Recommendation 2 a) ii);”

 

The Transportation Strategy included in the September 2, 2009 report (Report Ref. # ACS2009-CMR-OCM-0006), was developed to provide a high-level assessment of transportation requirements to support the LPP and to provide for a strategy that would be consistent with Official Plan (OP) and Transportation Master Plan (TMP) transportation objectives and directions.  Council further directed that a Terms of Reference for this study be consistent with the Council approved Transportation Impact Assessment guidelines.

 

The provision of Motion 77/14, which relates to the Traffic Impact Study for the airport tradeshow, is responded to in report # ACS2010-CMR-REP-0009 that was tabled at Corporate Services and Economic Development Committee on February 2, 2010 and will be considered by Council on February 10, 2010.

 

 

DISCUSSION

 

Recommendation 1:

 

The Terms of Reference, as outlined in Document 1 of this report, has been developed for the completion of a detailed Transportation Impact and Assessment Study and associated Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan for Lansdowne as directed by Council in November 2009.  The Terms of Reference build on the 2009 LPP Transportation Strategy and set out the necessary minimum requirements for the study and TDM Plan. To ensure a full assessment is undertaken of all relevant transportation issues the scope of the study may expand as the study progresses.

 

In brief, the Terms of Reference:

·          Sets out Study Objectives

·          Identifies Key Transportation Issues to be addressed

·          Defines the Study Area

·          Details the Assessment required

·          Sets out Work Plan Requirements and Deliverables

·          Highlights all the Community Concerns that have been expressed related to transportation matters to be considered in the conduct of the study

 

The objectives of the Transportation Impact and Assessment Study include:

·          Conducting a Community Transportation Study (CTS) in accordance with the City’s Transportation Impact Assessment (TIA) Guidelines to address Transportation Impacts and requirements

·          Undertaking a more traditional Transportation Impact Assessment for “day-to-day” activity related to the new mixed use

·          Building on the August 2009 LPP Transportation Strategy to address transportation needs for events

·          Undertaking overlap analysis to assess cumulative impacts – “day-to-day” and events

 

The key transportation issues that will be reviewed include but are not limited to the following:

·        Pedestrian and Cycling needs

-     facility connectivity, event storage capacity and safety, on-site bicycle parking facilities

·        Transit Planning and Operations

-     maximize ridership, create incentives

-     additional Bank Street service for “day-to-day” activities

-     “event” transit and shuttle bus requirements and impacts on Bank Street and the Queen Elizabeth Driveway

·        Traffic flow

-     impacts of “day-to-day” site traffic on area streets and intersections, and any off-site parking impacts

-     impact of “event” traffic on the community as a whole with regard to on-street parking, cut-through traffic and general congestion

 

·        Site access

-     intersection operation and minimizing pedestrian/bike/vehicle conflicts

·        Parking

-     on-site parking sufficient for “day-to-day” requirements   

-     impacts of off-site “event” parking minimized through aggressive transit service and TDM plan

·        Transportation Demand Management

-     specific to each on-site land use and event, with objective to maximize alternative travel modes and minimize vehicular travel

·         Queen Elizabeth Driveway

-     recognize the National Capital Commission’s (NCC’s) requirements and need to protect/enhance this facility’s integrity and safety for all users and travel modes

·        Other (taxis, water taxis, service vehicles, etc.)

 

The work program provided in the Terms of Reference includes:

 

1.  Confirmation of Base Conditions

·      Uses and activities (being determined through master plan development)

·      Demand scenarios

·      Data collection

·      Update of 2009 LPP Transportation Strategy existing conditions analysis regarding traffic

·      Re-examine assumptions and estimates regarding transit

·      Confirm feasible modal split targets

 

2.  A detailed assessment of four (4) activity scenarios that are focused on the following:

 

Scenario 1 – daytime including office, hotel, residential and retail (AM Peak hour, PM peak hour and SAT/SUN peak hour)

 

Scenario 2 – weekday evening including significant retail (restaurant; cinema) and with/without OHL Hockey (up to 10,000) [Friday evening]

 

Scenario 3 – full retail and CFL Football/soccer (up to 25,000) [Saturday and Sunday afternoons and Friday evenings]

 

Scenario 4 – some retail (restaurant; cinema) and large event (up to 40,000) [weekend evening]

 

3.  The detailed assessments under each scenario include:

·      Pedestrian and cycling activity and needs (circulation, connections, bike parking, etc.)

·      Transit service requirements

·      Traffic operations including at satellite parking lots

·      Shuttle requirements and operations

·      Parking Requirements (on-site and off-site, on-street, etc.)

·      Site access and queuing requirements

·      On-site circulation requirements (vehicles, pedestrians, loading, etc.)

·      Transit service impacts on Bank Street (simulation model)

·      Emergency response requirements

·      Sensitivity analysis (relative to different assumptions)

·      Public comments and concerns raised through consultations

 

4. The Transportation Impact and Assessment Study is to provide determinations and make recommendations related to the following:

·      Network modifications and measures to maximize pedestrian and cycling modes

·      Transit operations plan to support day to day and events for each scenario

·      Traffic operations plan to support day to day and events and to support the transit operations plan

·      On and off-site parking operations and management

·      On-site needs (access, circulation, loading etc)

·      TDM plan for each land use

·      Implementation and performance monitoring plan

 

Recommendation 2:

 

Staff is recommending that Delcan Corporation and McCormick Rankin Corporation be retained jointly to undertake the Lansdowne Transportation Impact and Assessment Study and to develop the TDM plan for the Lansdowne Revitalization, in accordance with the attached Terms of Reference, Document 1 and under the direction of City staff. 

 

Delcan in partnership with and under the direction of City staff prepared the August 2009 LPP Transportation Strategy. The Transportation Impact and Assessment Study will be grounded in the work done to date and in close connection with City staff. Delcan is an internationally respected firm that has the required background to undertake this work in a cost efficient and timely manner. Delcan has a long history of working with the City of Ottawa on important transportation initiatives. For example, Delcan and the City worked together on some of the most significant projects undertaken by the City over the last thirty years, including: Traffic Studies and Traffic Calming Plans for Sandy Hill, Parkdale Area and Main Street; Parking Studies for Elgin Street, the Central Area, Bank Street, Somerset Street, and Wellington Street; the transportation Planning work for various Community Design Plans (CDP) including the Escarpment District Plan, the East Orleans, CDP, the Leitrim CDP, and the development of the Regional Road Corridor Design Guidelines. Delcan Corporation has also undertaken the Transportation Impact and Assessment Study and planning work for private and public sector clients for many of the City’s major employment and institutional nodes including Confederation Heights, Tunney’s Pasture, the Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa University and Algonquin College.  Delcan has been on the standing offer list at the City of Ottawa for over ten years.

 

Delcan has local expertise and international experience that makes it uniquely qualified to deal with transportation matters on a project of this scale and complexity.  Their Ottawa office has extensive local experience in public and private sector projects of this magnitude.

The inclusion of McCormick Rankin Corporation as part of the consultant team will provide the specialized expertise required to work with OC Transpo in developing the transit operational plans that is critical to the development of the final TDM plan.  As provided for in the Terms of Reference, Delcan and McCormick Rankin Corporation will work under the direction of City staff in Planning, Public Works and OC Transpo.  Staff will provide overall direction and be involved in the ongoing review of the assessments and directions throughout the course of the study to ensure that all relevant requirements and issues are addressed as directed by Committee and Council.

The number of firms with the skills required to do this type of work, under the prescribed timelines, is extremely limited. Many firms in Ottawa that provide this type of service also specialize in design and architectural services.  It is likely that a number of these firms that potentially could qualify for this work could choose not to undertake the transportation work for Lansdowne, as they may prefer to compete in the larger park design competition. 

In order to ensure that Members of Council are provided all the information necessary to make an informed decision on this issue staff is recommending that Delcan and McCormick Rankin Corporation be retained in order to ensure that the aggressive timelines for this project can be met.

Extensive due diligence was brought to the development of the Terms of Reference, including concerns raised by stakeholders throughout the fall and subsequent to a review of the draft Terms of Reference.

Engaging Delcan and McCormick Rankin Corporation will ensure that the work is completed within the June 2010 timelines as directed by Council. Seeking an alternate consultant to complete this work presents a significant challenge, as other consultants would be subject to a significant learning curve to understand the specifics of the work done to date. Consequently, it is expected that another consultant would not be able to undertake the work in either a cost effective or timely manner to meet Council’s timelines.

 

CONSULTATION

 

As directed by Council a comprehensive public consultation process on the LPP was undertaken. The public consultation process included public meetings, an on-line consultation platform and a public opinion research survey. Additional opportunities for public input, to build on comments received from the public during the first phase, are being integrated into the process moving forward.

 

City of Ottawa staff, including the City Manager, have met on a number of occasions with the following groups and stakeholders:

 

·          The Central Canada Exhibition Association (CCEA);

·          The Ottawa Association of Exposition Managers (OAEM);

·          Coliseum Incorporated;

·          The Glebe Community Association;

·          The Ottawa South Community Association;

·          The Old Ottawa East Community Association;

·          The Centretown Citizens Community Association;

·          The Glebe Business Improvement Area (BIA);

·          The Ottawa Farmer’s Market (OFM); and

·          The Algonquins of Pikwàkanagàn.

 

The City Manager and, in most cases, OSEG representatives met with these stakeholder groups to ensure that each group was provided with an opportunity to obtain any information they wanted to assist them in preparing their feedback and input for Council consideration and to raise any issues and concerns they wished to have considered regarding the Lansdowne Transportation Impact and Assessment Study and Traffic Demand Management Plan.

 

The public was also provided an opportunity to speak to standing committees on the Transportation Strategy. Each stakeholder group was advised of the opportunities to attend the October 8, 2009 Joint Transportation Committee and Transit Committee meeting, and the Committee of the Whole meeting of Council on November 12, 2009.

 

On January 26, 2010, in preparation for this joint committee meeting, staff met with stakeholder groups to provide an opportunity to review the preliminary draft Terms of Reference for the Transportation Impact and Assessment Study (now finalized and included in Document 1) and to ensure that the issues and concerns to date were reflected and adequately addressed in these Terms of Reference. Community organizations attending this meeting included:

 

·          The Glebe Community Association;

·          Ottawa Farmers Market;

·          Old Ottawa East Community Association;

·          Old Ottawa South Community Association;

·          The Centretown Citizens Community Association;

·          The Glebe Business Improvement Area;

·          Citizens for Safe Cycling; and

·          Roads & Cycling Advisory Committee.

 

The comments received and issues raised at this meeting have been incorporated into the final Terms of Reference (Document 1) either through modifications to the document or where comments are more general, listed in an appendix with a requirement in the Terms of Reference that these be considered in the conduct of the study.

 

Staff is currently working to further develop the public engagement strategy on the Lansdowne Transportation Impact and Assessment Study moving forward.

 

LEGAL/RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS

 

There are no legal/risk management impediments to implementing the recommendations in this report.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

There are no additional financial implications associated with the recommendations in this report. Costs were included in the budget established in November for Stage 1 of the implementation.

 

 

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

 

Document 1 - Lansdowne Transportation Impact and Assessment Study and Demand Management Strategy Terms of Reference

 

DISPOSITION

 

Subject to Committee approval, staff will implement the recommendations as outlined in the report.