1.             ZONING - 7725 FLEWELLYN ROAD AND 2021 MUNSTER ROAD

 

ZONAGE - 7725, CHEMIN FLEWELLYN ET 2021, CHEMIN MUNSTER

 

 

 

Committee RecommendationS

 

(This application is subject to Bill 51)

 

That Council approve an amendment to Zoning By-law 2008-250 to:

 

1.         Change the zoning of 2021 Munster Road from RU - Rural Countryside Zone to RU[131r] - Rural Countryside [rural exception 337] Zone as detailed in Document 1 and shown in Document 2; and

 

2.         Amend the RU[131r] - Rural Countryside [rural exception 131] Zone as it relates to 7725 Flewellyn Road as detailed in Document 1 and shown in Document 2.

 

 

RecommandationS du Comité

 

(Cette demande est assujettie au Règlement 51)

 

Que le Conseil approuve une modification au Règlement de zonage 2008-250 en vue de :

 

1.                  modifier le zonage du 2021, chemin Munster de RU – Zone d’espace rural à RU[337r] – Zone d’espace rural [dotée de l’exception rurale 337], comme l’explique en détail le document 1 et l’illustre le document 2; et

 

2.                  modifier le zonage RU[131 r] – Zone d’espace rural [dotée de l’exception rurale 131] tel qu’il s’applique au 7725, chemin Flewellyn, comme l’explique en détail le document 1 et l’illustre le document 2.

 

 

Documentation

 

1.      Deputy City Manager's report Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability dated 8 September 2009 (ACS2009-ICS-PGM-0140).

 

2.   Extract of Draft Minutes, 22 October 2009.

 


Report to/Rapport au :

 

Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee

Comité d'agriculture et des affaires rurales

 

and Council / et au Conseil

 

08 September 2009 / le 08 septembre 2009

 

Submitted by/Soumis par : Nancy Schepers, Deputy City Manager/Directrice municipale adjointe,

Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability/Services d’infrastructure et Viabilité des collectivités

 

Contact Person/Personne-ressource : Derrick Moodie, Manager/Gestionnaire, Development Review-Rural Services/Examen des projets d'aménagement-Services ruraux,

Planning and Growth Management/Urbanisme et Gestion de la croissance

(613) 580-2424, 15134  Derrick.Moodie@ottawa.ca

 

Rideau-Goulbourn (21)

Ref N°: ACS2009-ICS-PGM-0140

 

 

SUBJECT:

ZONING - 7725 Flewellyn Road and 2021 Munster Road (D02-02-09-0021)

 

 

OBJET :

ZONAGE - 7725, chemin Flewellyn et 2021, chemin munster

 

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS

 

That the Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee recommend Council approve an amendment to Zoning By-law 2008-250 to:

 

1.               Change the zoning of 2021 Munster Road from RU - Rural Countryside Zone to RU[337r] - Rural Countryside [rural exception 337] Zone as detailed in Document 1 and shown in Document 2; and

 

2.               Amend the RU[131r] - Rural Countryside [rural exception 131] Zone as it relates to 7725 Flewellyn Road as detailed in Document 1 and shown in Document 2.

 

RECOMMANDATIONS DU RAPPORT

 

Que le Comité de l’agriculture et des affaires rurales recommande au Conseil d’approuver une modification au Règlement de zonage 2008-250 en vue de :

 

1.         modifier le zonage du 2021, chemin Munster de RU – Zone d’espace rural à RU[337r] – Zone d’espace rural [dotée de l’exception rurale 337], comme l’explique en détail le document 1 et l’illustre le document 2; et

 

2.         modifier le zonage RU[131 r] – Zone d’espace rural [dotée de l’exception rurale 131] tel qu’il s’applique au 7725, chemin Flewellyn, comme l’explique en détail le document 1 et l’illustre le document 2.

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

The zoning application affects two parcels of land known as 2021 Munster Road (Areas A and B on Document 2) and 7725 Flewellyn Road (Areas C, D and E on Document 2). The parcels are located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Munster Road and Flewellyn Road.  Lands to the north have been developed as an estate lot development. Lands to the south of Flewellyn Road comprise an existing quarry operation.  Lands to the east and west are rural in nature.

 

DISCUSSION

 

Purpose of Zoning Amendment

 

The zoning application fulfills a condition of consent. The affected land was the subject of an application for lot line adjustment granted by the Committee of Adjustment (D08-01-09/B-00099). The consent application adjusted the lot lines between 2021 Munster Road and 7725 Flewellyn Road. The application resulted in a five-hectare parcel comprising Areas A and B and known as 2021 Munster Road and a 1.3-hectare parcel comprising of Areas C, D and E known as 7725 Flewellyn Road. 

 

Existing Zoning

 

Areas A, B, C and D on Document 2 - Rural Countryside (RU).

Area E on Document 2 – Rural Countryside [rural exception 131] (RU[131r]). The zone limits commercial uses to a storage yard for a contractor along with all other uses permitted under the RU Zone.

 

Details of Proposed Zoning 

 

2021 Munster Road:

It is proposed to rezone 2021 Munster Road (Areas A and B) from RU - Rural Countryside to RU[337r] - Rural Countryside [rural exception 337].  Following the lot line adjustments this parcel will be vacant.  The proposal is to construct a new dwelling on this property just south of the existing subdivision located north of the subject lands. The parcel is within the 500-metre influence area of an existing quarry located on the south side of Flewellyn Road and zoned ME - Mineral Extraction.  The Zoning By-law requires a minimum setback of 210 metres from an ME zone when locating new dwellings.  In order to locate the new dwelling along the Munster Road frontage, the applicant requests a reduction in the setback from the ME zone from 500 metres to 150 metres.  The reduction in setback from the quarry is rationalized on the basis that the new dwelling will replace the existing dwelling, moving the residential use further away from the quarry operation.

 

7725 Flewellyn Road (Area C, D and E):

Area E on Document 2 is currently zoned Rural Countryside [rural exception 131] Zone.  The applicant currently operates two businesses from Area E.  It is proposed to expand the existing area zoned Rural Countryside [rural exception 131] Zone to include Areas C and D. The reconfigured lot encompasses the existing buildings related to the businesses (Area E) and the existing dwelling (Area D) which is proposed to be converted to accessory office use. Through the lot line adjustment, vacant lands are also being added (Area C) on which a new building for additional storage associated with the business is proposed to be constructed.

 

The proposed zoning will permit an office; a warehouse; and a storage yard, all limited to a contractor’s business.  Further, the proposed zoning will establish a seven-metre minimum rear yard. By definition the rear lot line is the lot line opposite to the front lot line. The front lot line is the shortest lot line abutting the street. This makes the Munster Road lot line a front lot line and the rear yard the most easterly lot line. This rear yard recognizes the location of the existing structures to the rear lot line.

 

Also, maximum lot coverage of 10 per cent of the lot area will be set for outdoor storage and outdoor storage will be prohibited within the required front yard. These provisions are carried forward from the existing Rural Countryside [rural exception 131] Zone.

 

Lastly, the proposed rezoning will require that outdoor storage must be screened from view from abutting residential uses and public streets by an opaque screen at least two metres in height from finished grade. The existing Rural Countryside exception 131 Zone requires a screen at least 1.8 metres in height from finished grade. This change would represent a 0.2-metre increase in screening height for outdoor storage.

 

In order to address the community concerns related to screening of any of the new structures from residential uses to the north, the by-law introduces a provision to require a three-metre high landscaped screen.

 

Official Plan 

 

Conformity to General Rural Policies

 

The subject sites are designated as “General Rural Area”, within the Official Plan.

 

7725 Flewellyn Road

 

Prior to the lot line adjustments, an RU[131r] Rural Countryside [exception 131] Zone applied to Area E on which the current contractor’s business operates.

 

The rezoning associated with Areas C, D and E will extend the area to which the commercial zone applies and will limit the uses to an office; a warehouse; and a storage yard, accessory to a contractor’s business.

 

When considering an application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a new use, the Official Plan notes the following matters are to be considered:

 

a.      The use would not be better located in a Village or the urban area;

 

The General Rural Area is intended to provide a location for those non-agricultural uses that, due to their land requirements or the nature of their operation, would not be more appropriately located within urban or Village locations.  The rezoning proposed expands an existing business requiring large areas for indoor and outdoor storage considered appropriate in the rural area.

 

b.      If the use is to be located on a local road, it must be demonstrated that the volume and pattern of traffic flow anticipated from the development will not interfere with the proper functioning of the local road network;

 

7725 Flewellyn Road is located across from an active quarry operation which generates on average 100 trucks per day exiting onto the south side of Flewellyn Road just east of the subject site, and approximately 50 trucks per day returning via Flewellyn Road, with the other 50 trucks returning through the Fallowfield Road entrance to the quarry.

 

The increased lot area, proposal to construct an accessory warehouse and proposal to retrofit the existing dwelling for office use accessory to the existing business, will result in two to three new employees on the site, anticipating a maximum one per cent traffic increase in visits to the site. 

 

A one per cent maximum increase in traffic is not expected to impact the proper functioning of Flewellyn Road.

 

c.       The privacy of adjacent landowners or the amelioration of potential adverse impacts from lighting, noise, odour, dust or traffic can be achieved by separating the land uses, buffering or other measures as part of the development;

d.      The potential for reducing possible impacts on neighbouring agricultural uses or nearby rural residential or Village communities, where relevant;

e.       The development is in keeping with the surrounding rural character and landscape;

f.        All those requirements of Section 2 and 4 related to transportation, servicing, design and compatibility and environmental protection;

 

An active quarry operation exists on the south side of Flewellyn Road. The quarry has buffers already established to the existing abutting uses. No complaints from abutting uses, related to the quarry operation have been filed with Ministry of Natural Resources attesting to the effectiveness of the buffers established by the quarry operation.

 

An existing country estate rural residential development on large treed lots is located approximately 115 metres north of the reconfigured 7725 Flewellyn Road.

 

The applicant in pre-consultation with the community has agreed to limit the height of the proposed accessory warehouse building to one storey; and to alter the original proposed location for the accessory warehouse structure on 7725 Flewellyn Road to accommodate concerns from abutting landowners. The applicant has also discussed building design, exterior building colour and materials with the community.

 

A site inspection on September 8th noted that the site is very open and visible. There are currently no trees on the subject parcel between the existing buildings and the proposed interior side lot line.

 

The proposed zone provisions will require outdoor storage areas to be screened from the street and from residential uses by a two metre high screen.  The applicant has no concerns related to the buffering required related to the outdoor storage.

 

In response to comments received by the City, the draft zone details (Document 1) and the conceptual site plan (Document 4) have been forwarded to the local Community Association and to three households who registered requests with the City. 

 

Also in response to comments received from the public, staff requested the applicant to provide details related to a landscape buffer along the interior side lot line (north property line).  The applicant prefers to defer discussions related to a landscape buffer to the site plan approval stage.  Staff propose establishing a requirement for the landscaped buffer through the Zoning By-law so as to ensure that this matter is addressed at the site plan approval stage.  Planning staff recommends a three-metre height as it represents a balance of the community and applicants concerns.  In time, the trees will grow to achieve and exceed the 3.5-metre height.  The reduction in installed height and ability to provide a mix of trees will provide the developer with options in achieving the height.

 

The public suggested that 3.5 metres was the minimum height of buffering required to mitigate visual impacts of the proposed building on the abutting residential uses. The public suggests that coniferous tree plantings be provided.

 

Staff explored the prospect of providing a 3.5-metre landscaped buffer through a combination of berms, fences and/or coniferous tree plantings. The applicant has indicated that construction of a berm is not feasible from a drainage perspective on this site.  Without specific grading information being made available to staff, it cannot confirm whether construction of a berm is achievable on this site, while maintaining proper grading and drainage of the site.

 

The applicant has indicated that the establishment of a treed buffer would be the preferred method of providing the landscape buffer but that to provide coniferous trees at an installed height of 3.5 metres would be a financial hardship.  The applicant feels that if a landscape buffer is required that an installed height of two metres would be preferred. Staff acknowledges that it is quite costly for coniferous trees in excess of two metres in height to be transplanted.

 

As a compromise staff has drafted the by-law requiring a three metre high landscaped buffer to be established along the north property line to screen any new buildings from abutting residential uses. Such height may be established through the use of berms, fencing or a mix of deciduous and coniferous trees/plantings.

 

The warehouse structure being proposed by the developer is approximately 1394 square metres.  The final details for landscaping and design of the building and development of the site for a building of this size will be subject of an application for site plan control requiring notification to area landowners. 

 

Staff are of the opinion that mitigation of any impacts can be achieved and that the site can be developed in keeping with the rural character of the area through the establishment of appropriate buffering through the site plan approval process, provided the requirements for same are established through the inclusion of zone provisions as set out in Document 1.

 

g.      Noxious uses will only be considered where suitable screening and buffering can be provided and generally these uses will not be considered in location within groundwater recharge areas or immediately adjacent to residential areas, Scenic-Entry Routes, or waterfront areas;

 

The uses are not considered to be noxious uses.

 

h.      The impact that the development will have on the protection of tree cover and local wildlife movement, as a result of proposed site clearing and grading, fencing, security lighting, and other similar site plan matters.

 

The development does not impact on the issues noted in policy (h). The site has very minimal tree cover at this time. Area C on Document 2 is currently a farm field. No fencing is proposed on the conceptual site plan.

 

Areas A and B are an intervening property between the existing residential country estate lot subdivision and the commercial lot at 7725 Flewellyn Road.  The applicant intends to construct a new dwelling on 2021 Munster Road.  This parcel and the proposed development thereon will assist in an indirect way to provide a buffer of the commercial use from the abutting residential uses to the north as well.

 

Conformity to Mineral Resource Policies

 

7725 Flewellyn Road and 2021 Munster Road are adjacent a Limestone Resource Area designation located in Lot 11, Concession 8, on the south side of Flewellyn Road.  An existing quarry operates from this 200-acre site.

 

The Official Plan provides that the City protect the continued operation and expansion of existing licensed extraction sites, by preventing any new development in their vicinity that would preclude or hinder aggregate extraction.

 

The Official Plan policies provide that where there is an existing licensed pit or quarry, development may be approved within the area of potential impact, where an impact assessment study is completed demonstrating that the mineral aggregate operation will not be affected by the development. The Ministry of Natural Resources was circulated the impact assessment study for review.

 

An impact assessment was prepared by Paquette Planning Associates Ltd. March 2009 (revised May 22, 2009) and submitted in support of the Zoning By-law amendment application.  The impact assessment study was circulated to Ministry of Natural Resources for comment on June 5, 2009. No comments from the Ministry of Natural Resources were received as of the authoring of this report.

 

The impact assessment concludes that the net effect of the proposed rezoning will be to cease the existing residential use currently sited across the street from the quarry and re-establish the residential use further north along the Munster Road frontage. No new residential use is being established.  Such a change effectively places the more sensitive residential use further away from the quarry improving on the current situation.  The existing dwelling will be utilized as a contractor’s office. The impact assessment indicates that the construction office and storage facility will serve as a good transitional land use between the quarry and the existing residences and new dwelling to the north. The existing and proposed business comprising a construction office and storage facility is viewed as a compatible use with the quarry use south of Flewellyn Road.

 

The Official Plan policies provide that where the municipality approves of development within 500 metres of a quarry that the City may impose conditions to ensure the development provides adequate buffering and/or separation between the new use and the mineral aggregate area/operation.

 

The Zoning By-law amendment proposed for 2021 Munster Road requires a 150-metre setback from any new dwelling to the Mineral Extraction (ME) zone establishes a greater setback than the existing dwelling provided.

 

The quarry operator has provided written support for the rezoning.

 

In summary, the rezoning proposal in accordance with the recommendations contained within the report conforms to the policies of the Official Plan.

 

Servicing Issues 

 

The site is serviced by private wells and septic systems.

 

The Ottawa Septic Office raised concerns as to the exact location of all septic systems and wells in relation to the new lot lines through the consent process.  The Committee of Adjustment imposed a condition requiring that the owner satisfy the Rideau Valley Conservation Authority requirements with respect to the existing well and sewage system being located wholly within the boundaries of the lot.

 

Comments from the Conservation Authority in response to the rezoning circulation are that the rezoning application is premature until such time as the applicant provides information to the satisfaction of the Conservation Authority to clear the condition related to the lot line adjustments. 

 

The applicant believes that the servicing is located in accordance with the setbacks required and will undertake to relocate if required, in whole or in part, any systems found not to meet the required setbacks within the lot lines as adjusted. 

 

The owner will continue to be required to clear the condition to the satisfaction of Rideau Valley Conservation prior to finalizing the consent.

 

Staff has concurred to proceed with the application on that basis.

 

Concurrent Application 

 

The land is subject to severance application D08-01-09/B-00099.

7725 Flewellyn Road will be subject to site plan approval prior to the conversion of the dwelling to accessory office use and construction of the new storage building.

 

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS

 

The property is approximately 187 metres east of the Flewellyn Special Policy Area.  Accordingly there are no significant natural features identified for the subject land.

 

RURAL IMPLICATIONS

 

The rezoning supports the rural economy through support for an existing rural business and establishes zone provisions to mitigate impacts on existing rural residential uses.

 

CONSULTATION

 

Notice of this application was carried out in accordance with the City's Public Notification and Consultation Policy.  The Ward Councillor is aware of this application and the staff recommendation. Details of the public submissions are provided in Document 3.

 

LEGAL/RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS

 

There are no legal/risk management implications associated with this report.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

N/A

 

APPLICATION PROCESS TIMELINE STATUS

 

The application was not processed by the "On Time Decision Date" established for the processing of Zoning By-law amendments due to the complexity of the issues associated with addressing issues related to compatible development of the site.

 

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

 

Document 1      Details of Recommended Zoning

Document 2      Location Map

Document 3      Consultation Details

Document 4      Conceptual Site Plan

 

DISPOSITION

 

City Clerk and Solicitors Department, Legislative Services to notify the owner, applicant, , OttawaScene.com, 174 Colonnade Road, Unit #33, Ottawa, ON  K2E 7J5, Ghislain Lamarche, Program Manager, Assessment, Financial Services Branch (Mail Code:  26-76) of City Council’s decision.

 

Planning and Growth Management to prepare the implementing by-law, forward to Legal Services and undertake the statutory notification.

 

Legal Services to forward the implementing by-law to City Council.


DETAILS OF RECOMMENDED ZONING                                                       DOCUMENT 1

 

Proposed Changes to the Comprehensive Zoning By-law

 

1.                              The Zoning Map of By-law No. 2008-250, entitled the “City of Ottawa Zoning By‑law” is amended by rezoning the lands shown on Attachment 1 to this by-law as follows:

(a)    Area A is rezoned from RU to RU[337r];

(b)   Area B is rezoned from RU to RU[337r];

(c)    Area C is rezoned from RU to RU[131r]; and,

(d)   Area D is rezoned from RU to RU[131r].

 

2.                     Section 240 – Rural Exceptions of By-law No. 2008-250 is amended by adding the following exceptions:

 

I

Exception Number

II

Applicable Zone

Exception Provisions

III

Additional Land Uses Permitted

IV

Land Uses Prohibited

V

Provisions

337r

RU[337r]

 

 

-   notwithstanding Section 67, no new building consisting of a dwelling may be constructed closer than 150 metres to land zoned ME

 

3.                     Exception [131r] of Section 240 – Rural Exceptions of By-law No. 2008‑250 is amended as follows:

(a)      delete the use listed in Column III;

(b)      insert in Column IV the following:

 

            - all uses except:

office, limited to a contractor’s business

warehouse, limited to a contractor’s business

storage yard, limited to a contractor’s business

(c)      delete the existing provisions from Column V and replace them with the following:

-         minimum rear yard setback: 7 m

-         maximum lot coverage of all outdoor storage: 10%

-         outdoor storage is prohibited within the required front yard

-         outdoor storage must be screened from view from abutting residential uses and public streets by an opaque screen at least 2 m in height from finished grade.

-         all new buildings must be screened from view from abutting residential uses by an opaque screen along the interior side yard (north property line) at least 3 metres in height from finished grade. Such screening shall be achieved through berming, fencing or a mix of deciduous and coniferous tree plantings or any combination of the above.


LOCATION MAP                                                                                                  DOCUMENT 2


CONSULTATION DETAILS                                                                                DOCUMENT 3

 

NOTIFICATION AND CONSULTATION PROCESS

 

Notification and public consultation was undertaken in accordance with the Public Notification and Public Consultation Policy approved by City Council for Zoning By-law amendments. 

 

The applicant held public meetings in the community.  The first meeting was held on May 13, 2009 and a second meeting was held on June 22, 2009.

 

PUBLIC COMMENTS

 

Two letters of support from the public were received.

 

Three letters of concern from the public were received.

 

SUMMARY OF PUBLIC INPUT

 

Letters of support cited the following points related to the current operation:

The following concerns were raised in the letters:

 

STAFF RESPONSE TO ISSUES RAISED

COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION COMMENTS

One letter was received from the North West Goulbourn Community Association Inc. raising the same issues as summarized above.


CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN                                                                                   DOCUMENT 4

 



ZONING - 7725 FLEWELLYN ROAD AND 2021 MUNSTER ROAD

ZONAGE - 7725, CHEMIN FLEWELLYN ET 2021, CHEMIN MUNSTER

ACS2009-ICS-PGM-0140                                                    RIDEAU-GOULBOURN (21)

 

(This application is subject to Bill 51)

 

At the outset, the Chair read a statement required under the Planning Act, which advised that anyone intending to appeal this zoning by-law item must either voice their objections at the public meeting or submit their comments in writing prior to the amendment being adopted by Council on 16 November 09.  Failure to do so could result in the Ontario Municipal Board dismissing all or part of such an appeal.

 

Ms. Terry MacHardy, Planner, Development Review, Rural Services Branch, Planning and Growth Management (PGM), Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability (ISCS), spoke to a PowerPoint slide presentation (held on file with the City Clerk) which served to provide the Committee with an overview of the staff report. 

 

Following her presentation, in response to questions from Councillor El-Chantiry, Ms. MacHardy confirmed that with the inclusion of the recommended buffer, the subject property would be in conformity with the General Rural policies of the Official Plan (OP), and that the community would have opportunity for input, as the size of the building would trigger a public process for site plan approval.

 

PUBLIC DELEGATIONS

 

Mr. Terry Hale explained that he owns property immediately adjacent to the east of the subject lands.  He noted the adjoining properties to the west and to the south were owned by the Henderson and Cavanagh families, respectively, both of whom had issued letters authorizing him to speak on their behalf (held on file with the City Clerk).  Mr. Hale detailed that in 1980, the original Crawford farm, comprising the subject property and the estate lot property immediately adjacent to the north had been subdivided to form the current two parcels.  The southern portion was purchased by the Barkhouse family, who began their construction business, and in 1983, the estate lot development was approved for the parcel to the north, with construction beginning shortly thereafter.  Mr. Hale praised the neighbouring business as a clean, quiet, and well run operation, renovated to maintain and preserve its original rustic rural atmosphere, and lauded it as an award-winning commercial establishment the City should be proud of, and one that the City should help to prosper and grow, serving as a model for similar commercial enterprises. 


 

Mr. Doug DuFeu, a resident of Lucas Lane whose property adjoins the rear of the subject property, outlined his opposition because of the buffer zone.  Noting he had purchased in the area because of its rural setting, he expressed his wish to see a 3.5m buffer of coniferous trees, as the use of deciduous trees would only provides a barrier for half of the year.  Acknowledging the staff report spoke to a review at the time of a site plan or building application, Mr. DuFeu raised the spectre of expanding a smaller building without the need to trigger a site plan process.  Disputing the applicant’s claim that a 3.5m screening of coniferous trees would prove a financial hardship, Mr. DuFeu noted that residential owners wishing to sell their properties might suffer similar hardship if a barrier were not in place, giving prospective buyers a view of a 15,000 sq. ft. building.  Mr. DuFeu further disputed the applicant’s assertion of the building as a one-storey structure, claiming the peak, at 25 feet, represented a height of three storeys.  However, Mr. DuFeu had no opposition to the dwelling proposed for 2021 Munster Road. 

 

Responding to questions from Councillor El-Chantiry as to allowable heights in rural villages as part of the OP without requiring changes or modifications, Mr. Danny Page, Program Manager, Development Review,  Rural Services (West), PGM, ISCS, explained that design guidelines for rural villages speak to buildings generally being at a maximum height of three storeys.  In this case, the subject property is outside of the village, where zone provisions would be the governing factor.  Mr. Page believed that what is intended for the subject property is a warehouse building of one storey in height.  As to the issue of trees, Mr. Page reaffirmed that the size of the building will invoke the need for public consultation and a site plan that is subject to public consultation.  He said Staff will liaise with the community to discuss options for how such a buffer can best be provided.

 

Mr. Colin Heard, President, Northwest Goulbourn Community Association, spoke on behalf of members of Heritage Corners, the subdivision adjacent to the subject properties.  Mr. Heard said residents were satisfied that the proposed zoning, retaining the “RU” zoning, along with Exceptions 131R and 337R, had served to meet the requirements of the applicants, the neighbouring landowners and the community, and to ensure that the rural nature of this part of the former Goulbourn Township had been retained.  However, Mr. Heard said residents were concerned about the lack of a definitive site plan.  While acknowledging that the process called for a zoning by-law and rezoning to be in place prior to the development of a site plan, the speaker indicated that community concerns could have been allayed had the applicant provided such details earlier. 

 

The speaker noted that despite having been shown by the applicant where berms and barriers might be located, staff had subsequently reported, “The applicant has indicated that construction of a berm is not feasible from a drainage perspective on this site. 

Without specific grading information being made available to staff, it cannot confirm whether construction of a berm is achievable on this site, while maintaining proper grading and drainage of the site.  Mr. Heard took this to mean the issue of drainage had not yet been addressed, which meant the location of the building could not be finally determined, while asking neighbours to approve of the rezoning. 

 

As to the construction of a barrier to minimize the view by neighbouring properties, Mr. Heard quoted from a letter sent by City staff providing details of the draft zoning by-law stating that, “Buildings must be screened from view from abutting residential uses by opaque screens along the north property boundary at least 3.5m in height from finished grade.  Such screening shall be achieved through berming, fencing or coniferous tree plantings or any combination of the above.”  Mr. Heard then asserted that in subsequent correspondence received after a meeting between staff and the applicant, this section was changed such that only new buildings were to be screened, and which reduced the screen from 3.5m to 3.0m in height, achievable through berming, fencing or a mix of tree plantings.  Mr. Heard asserted that no consultation with the community had taken place to discuss these changes, nor had any explanation been offered.  Noting the community was opposed to the changes, Mr. Heard said that in order to keep with the rural environment, coniferous trees of at least 3.5m in height must be a mandatory component of the screening mechanism if the screening was to be opaque for all seasons, as required by the by-law.  Mr. Heard felt the argument that providing such cover would prove a financial hardship to the applicant was weak.  In conclusion, he asked to have the essential components incorporated into the wording of the zoning by-law, and that the process allow for some degree of flexibility to permit a detailed site plan to be provided earlier.

 

Mr. Dan Paquette, Paquette Planning Associates, representing the applicant, explained he believed that due process had been undertaken, with formal meetings at the applicant’s on-site office with area residents, to allow for a discussion of all matters pertaining to the proposed zoning amendment.  He felt the applicant had addressed many of the residents’ concerns regarding building heights and setbacks, with the overarching issue remaining related to the berm/buffer to screen the view from the north side.  Referring to the recommended zoning by-law details which refer to a 3.0m barrier of combined berm/ barrier of coniferous and/or deciduous trees, or a combination thereof, Mr. Paquette felt the best time to finalize such details would be when going through the site plan application.  Mr. Paquette said his client was prepared to undertake this, but had delayed initiation of same until the issue of zoning had been settled, in advance of spending money on an expensive process.  He acknowledged the scale of the project would necessitate public involvement, at which time staff could help mediate a solution that might be mutually acceptable to all parties. 

 

Councillor Jellett felt Mr. Paquette had accurately encapsulated the concerns involved, the primary one being the matter of the buffer, which was a site plan issue.  To reassure neighbouring residents, the Councillor asked whether the house to be built upon Area A, abutting the properties to the north, would provide any screening to the building to be located at Area C, facing Flewellyn Road.  Mr. Paquette noted the location of the new house in Area A would mitigate any view that existing residents would have of the new storage building.  As to the positioning of the berm, Mr. Paquette clarified that this barrier would not run the length of the back of Area A, but was required, by by-law, for new buildings, as a large portion of the property would likely remain an open field.  Mr. Paquette reaffirmed that the applicant was committed to providing screening and architectural treatments that would screen the view of the back of his new storage facility, and that would be acceptable to the community, as it was the applicant’s intent to continue living within this community.  Regarding the difference between the 3.0m and 3.5m tree buffer, Mr. Paquette noted that eventual tree growth would take care of any such difference in height, but reiterated that such details, along with plans to outline adequate drainage, would best be achieved at the site plan stage.

 

There being no further discussion, the Committee considered the staff recommendations.

 

That the Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee recommend Council approve an amendment to Zoning By-law 2008-250 to:

 

1.         Change the zoning of 2021 Munster Road from RU - Rural Countryside Zone to RU[131r] - Rural Countryside [rural exception 337] Zone as detailed in Document 1 and shown in Document 2; and

 

2.         Amend the RU[131r] - Rural Countryside [rural exception 131] Zone as it relates to 7725 Flewellyn Road as detailed in Document 1 and shown in Document 2.

 

                                                                                                            CARRIED