Why are we revisiting Ottawa’s ward structure?
In June 2019, City Council directed City staff to retain an independent consultant to conduct a comprehensive review of the City of Ottawa’s ward boundaries. The review is meant to establish boundaries that can be used in at least three municipal elections (2022, 2026 and 2030) and, perhaps, a fourth municipal election in 2034. The last major review of Ottawa’s ward boundaries occurred in 2004-2005.
The City of Ottawa has seen a considerable spike in population since the last ward boundary review – particularly in Barrhaven (Ward 3), where there has been expanded development of residential communities. The population in other wards has also increased, notably in Gloucester-South Nepean (Ward 22) and Cumberland (Ward 19). Population projections indicate these areas will continue to grow.
A review of ward boundaries is intended to achieve “effective representation” as established by the Supreme Court of Canada. Effective representation is the “goal” of all ward boundary reviews.
What is Effective Representation?
Generally speaking, “effective representation” means that one person’s vote should be of similar weight to another person’s vote. When applied to wards, the term suggests that wards should be of similar population size. In practice, achieving effective representation for ward boundary reviews involves balancing several components:
- Voter Parity: Ward populations should be similar but not identical and should be in the range of +/-10 per cent to +/-15 per cent of the average ward population. Larger percentage variations are possible, but only in exceptional circumstances such as in Ottawa’s functioning rural community.
- Natural/Physical Boundaries: Ward boundaries have to be recognizable. Natural boundaries such as rivers and the Greenbelt, and physical boundaries such as highways, railways and arterial roads make good boundaries.
- Geographic Communities of Interest: Ottawa’s neighbourhoods such as the Glebe or Westboro Village and commercial areas such as the ByWard Market or the Carp Business Improvement Area are considered to be “communities of interest.” When re-aligning ward boundaries, geographically contiguous communities of interest should not be divided, unless they are so large that they must be split to achieve voter parity.
- Minority Interests: Minority interests should be considered if they are geographically based.
- Ward History: Ward design should, where possible, consider the history of the ward. However, ward history by itself cannot override other major criteria such as voter parity, strong natural/physical boundaries and communities of interest.
- Capacity to Represent: Capacity to represent is often equated with Councillors’ workload. It includes matters such as ward size, types and complexity of issues, ongoing growth and development, etc. and has to be taken into consideration when designing wards.
- Geographic Size and Shape of a Ward: All wards cannot be the same geographic size. Some areas of the city are more densely populated than others and some wards have more open space. Ottawa is especially unique with respect to this component of effective representation because of its large rural area.
- Population Growth: The results of the Ottawa Ward Boundary Review 2020 are meant to last for at least three municipal elections (2022, 2026 and 2030) and, perhaps, a fourth municipal election in 2034. The target election for an evaluation of effective representation will be 2026. This allows for Ottawa’s expected growth to be factored into ward boundary calculations.
- Balancing the Components of Effective Representation: While all components of effective representation must be taken into consideration, they are not all equal. Voter parity, respecting communities of interest, and well-defined, coherent ward boundaries are the most important components.
How is the City reviewing its ward structure?
In accordance with Council direction, an independent third-party consultant team has been retained to lead the comprehensive ward boundary review in order to ensure that the process of determining ward boundaries is impartial and approached without preconceived ideas or predetermined outcomes.
The consultant team has:
- Completedbackground research
- Developed population projections
- Led the public consultation process (Round 1)
- Developed options for re-aligning Ottawa’s wards
- Preparedand presented an Information Report to the Finance and Economic Development Committee and City Council setting out options for re-aligning Ottawa’s wards
- Developed a sixth option at City Council's request
The consultant team will:
- Lead the public consultation process (Round 2)
- Prepare and present a Final Report and recommendations to the Finance and Economic Development Committee and City Council
What does the consultation process look like?
Consultation is conducted in two rounds. Round 1 collected input on what the public and stakeholders would like to see changed in Ottawa’s current ward boundary alignment, while Round 2 will elicit feedback on the six options for ward re-alignments.
Some of the public meetings and sessions with stakeholders for Round 1 were cancelled as part of the City’s response to COVID-19. Due to the necessary cancellation of the in-person public meetings, residents and stakeholders were strongly encouraged to complete the online survey, submit input through the Guest Book, or provide written input.
Because of the continuing COVID-19 pandemic, six public consultation sessions during Round 2 will be held via Zoom. Three of the sessions will invite comments from participants from all over the city, while another three sessions will focus more on each of Ottawa’s geographic communities – urban, suburban and rural. There will also be separate sessions for stakeholders (e.g. Business Improvement Areas, school boards, city-wide associations, community groups, etc.). Sessions will occur on varying days of the week – including Saturday – and times will range from mid-morning to late afternoon to the evening hours. Round 2 also includes interviews with Members of Council.
The public consultation also includes an online public engagement component through Engage.Ottawa.ca.
Who is leading the review?
The consultant team consists of:
- Beate Bowron, Beate Bowron Etcetera (Project Manager and responsible for the public consultation process)
- Dr. Gary Davidson, The Davidson Group (Responsible for ward boundary re- alignment options and final recommendations)
- Russell Mathew, Hemson Consulting Ltd. (Responsible for population projections)
Members of the consultant team are familiar with Ottawa and have extensive experience in conducting ward boundary reviews.
When would any new ward boundaries come into effect?
City Council will make the final decision on whether to approve any recommendations regarding ward boundaries. Any changes that are adopted would be implemented for the 2022 Municipal Elections.
Is this going to affect the school board elections?
School board electoral areas (zones) are composed of one or more municipal wards. Therefore, changes to the ward boundaries could affect the school boards’ electoral boundaries. Any new boundaries would be established by the school boards.
How can I get involved in the Ottawa Ward Boundary Review 2020?
Round 1 of the public process is complete.
Round 2 will run from August 19, 2020 to September 25, 2020 and will collect feedback on the six options for re-aligning Ottawa’s wards. There are a number of ways to participate:
For more information, visit the Ottawa Ward Boundary Review 2020 website and our Engage Ottawa project page.
Where can I find a map of the current Ottawa wards and their populations?
Ward Look-up Tool
Current Ward Maps and Population
Ward maps and population
| Ward Number |
Ward Name |
Ward Councillor |
Population 2019 year end |
| 1 |
Orléans |
Matthew Luloff |
48,304 |
| 2 |
Innes |
Laura Dudas |
42,796 |
| 3 |
Barrhaven |
Jan Harder |
62,848 |
| 4 |
Kanata North |
Jenna Sudds |
38,497 |
| 5 |
West Carleton-March |
Eli El-Chantiry |
26,003 |
| 6 |
Stittsville |
Glen Gower |
41,350 |
| 7 |
Bay |
Theresa Kavanagh |
45,696 |
| 8 |
College |
Rick Chiarelli |
51,914 |
| 9 |
Knoxdale-Merivale |
Keith Egli |
39,676 |
| 10 |
Gloucester-Southgate |
Diane Deans |
47,505 |
| 11 |
Beacon Hill-Cyrville |
Tim Tierney |
33,982 |
| 12 |
Rideau-Vanier |
Mathieu Fleury |
50,075 |
| 13 |
Rideau-Rockcliffe |
Rawlson King |
40,285 |
| 14 |
Somerset |
Catherine McKenney |
42,277 |
| 15 |
Kitchissippi |
Jeff Leiper |
45,631 |
| 16 |
River |
Riley Brockington |
48,612 |
| 17 |
Capital |
Shawn Menard |
38,690 |
| 18 |
Alta Vista |
Jean Cloutier |
44,648 |
| 19 |
Cumberland |
Vacant |
51,743 |
| 20 |
Osgoode |
George Darouze |
28,557 |
| 21 |
Rideau-Goulbourn |
Scott Moffatt |
31,548 |
| 22 |
Gloucester-South Nepean |
Carol Anne Meehan |
55,656 |
| 23 |
Kanata South |
Allan Hubley |
49,915 |
